Literature DB >> 15302062

Comparison of biomechanical and structural properties between human aortic and pulmonary valve.

Peteris Stradins1, Romans Lacis, Iveta Ozolanta, Biruta Purina, Velta Ose, Laila Feldmane, Vladimir Kasyanov.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary valve autografts have been reported as clinically effective for replacement of diseased aortic valve (Ross procedure). Published data about pulmonary valve mechanical and structural suitability as a long-term substitute for aortic valve are limited. The aim of this study was to compare aortic and pulmonary valve properties.
METHODS: Experimental studies of biomechanical properties and structure of aortic and pulmonary valves were carried out on pathologically unchanged human heart valves, collected from 11 cadaveric hearts. Biomechanical properties of 84 specimens (all valve elements: cusps, fibrous ring, commissures, sinotubular junction, sinuses) were investigated using uniaxial tensile tests. Ultrastructure was studied using transmission and scanning electron microscopy.
RESULTS: Ultimate stress in circumferential direction for pulmonary valve cusps is higher than for aortic valve (2.78+/-1.05 and 1.74+/-0.29 MPa, respectively). Ultimate stress in radial direction for pulmonary and aortic cusps is practically the same (0.29+/-0.06 and 0.32+/-0.04 MPa, respectively). In ultrastructural study, different layout and density in each construction element are determined. The aortic and pulmonary valves have common ultrastructural properties.
CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical differences between aortic and pulmonary valve are minimal. Ultrastructural studies show that the aortic and pulmonary valves have similar structural elements and architecture. This investigation suggests that the pulmonary valve can be considered mechanically and structurally suitable for use as an aortic valve replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15302062     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.05.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  24 in total

Review 1.  Heart valve macro- and microstructure.

Authors:  Martin Misfeld; Hans-Hinrich Sievers
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Heart valve function: a biomechanical perspective.

Authors:  Michael S Sacks; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Integrating valve-inspired design features into poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel scaffolds for heart valve tissue engineering.

Authors:  Xing Zhang; Bin Xu; Daniel S Puperi; Aline L Yonezawa; Yan Wu; Hubert Tseng; Maude L Cuchiara; Jennifer L West; K Jane Grande-Allen
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 4.  The time has come to extend the expiration limit of cryopreserved allograft heart valves.

Authors:  Jan Burkert; Petra Kochová; Zbyněk Tonar; Robert Cimrman; Tereza Blassová; Ramadan Jashari; Radovan Fiala; Jaroslav Špatenka
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 5.  Heart Valve Biomechanics and Underlying Mechanobiology.

Authors:  Salma Ayoub; Giovanni Ferrari; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Frederick J Schoen; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.090

6.  Laser microfabricated poly(glycerol sebacate) scaffolds for heart valve tissue engineering.

Authors:  Nafiseh Masoumi; Aurélie Jean; Jeffrey T Zugates; Katherine L Johnson; George C Engelmayr
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.396

7.  Directing valvular interstitial cell myofibroblast-like differentiation in a hybrid hydrogel platform.

Authors:  Jesper Hjortnaes; Gulden Camci-Unal; Joshua D Hutcheson; Sung Mi Jung; Frederick J Schoen; Jolanda Kluin; Elena Aikawa; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 9.933

8.  Prediction of matrix-to-cell stress transfer in heart valve tissues.

Authors:  Siyao Huang; Hsiao-Ying Shadow Huang
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 1.365

Review 9.  Mechanical considerations for polymeric heart valve development: Biomechanics, materials, design and manufacturing.

Authors:  Richard L Li; Jonathan Russ; Costas Paschalides; Giovanni Ferrari; Haim Waisman; Jeffrey W Kysar; David Kalfa
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Biomechanical Behavior of Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Heterograft Tissues: Characterization, Simulation, and Performance.

Authors:  Joao S Soares; Kristen R Feaver; Will Zhang; David Kamensky; Ankush Aggarwal; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.495

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.