Literature DB >> 34624480

Polyphenol effects on CuO-nanoparticle-mediated DNA damage, reactive oxygen species generation, and fibroblast cell death.

Carlos Angelé-Martínez1, Fathima S Ameer2, Yash S Raval3, Guohui Huang4, Tzuen-Rong J Tzeng5, Jeffrey N Anker6, Julia L Brumaghim7.   

Abstract

The ability of ten polyphenolic antioxidants to prevent CuO nanoparticle (NPCuO) and H2O2-mediated DNA damage and cytotoxicity was investigated. Five of the polyphenols (MEPCA, PREGA, MEGA, ECG, and EGCG) prevent NPCuO/H2O2-mediated DNA damage (IC50 values of 7.5-800 μM), three have no effect (PCA, VA, and EC), and two (GA and EGC) result in increased DNA damage. Most polyphenols had similar antioxidant/prooxidant activity in the presence of NPCuO or free copper ions. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by NPCuO/H2O2 in the presence of representative polyphenols correlate with results of DNA damage studies: in the presence of NPCuO/H2O2, MEPCA prevents ROS formation, VA has no effect on ROS levels, and EGC increases ROS levels. EPR results with CuO nanoparticles washed to remove dissolved copper in solution (wCuO) in the presence of H2O2/ascorbate suggest that MEPCA prevents ROS formation on the nanoparticle surface in addition to preventing ROS formation from dissolved copper. In mouse fibroblast (L929) cells, combining NPCuO with H2O2 results in significantly greater cytotoxicity than observed for either component alone. After 3 h incubation with MEPCA or MEGA, the viability loss in L929 cells induced by NPCuO/H2O2 challenge was significantly rescued at physiologically relevant polyphenol levels (1 μM). These studies show that polyphenols can protect DNA and inhibit cytotoxicity generated by NPCuO under oxidative stress conditions.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell death prevention; CuO nanoparticles; DNA damage; Polyphenol; Prooxidant; Reactive oxygen species

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34624480      PMCID: PMC8671380          DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2021.105252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  100 in total

1.  Separation and purification of sulforaphane from broccoli seeds by solid phase extraction and preparative high-performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  Hao Liang; Chunfang Li; Qipeng Yuan; Frank Vriesekoop
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 5.279

2.  Copper oxide nanoparticles stimulate glycolytic flux and increase the cellular contents of glutathione and metallothioneins in cultured astrocytes.

Authors:  Felix Bulcke; Ralf Dringen
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 3.996

3.  Nanoparticle cytotoxicity depends on intracellular solubility: comparison of stabilized copper metal and degradable copper oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Andreas M Studer; Ludwig K Limbach; Luu Van Duc; Frank Krumeich; Evagelos K Athanassiou; Lukas C Gerber; Holger Moch; Wendelin J Stark
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.372

4.  Effects of surface chemistry on the generation of reactive oxygen species by copper nanoparticles.

Authors:  Miao Shi; Hyun Soo Kwon; Zhenmeng Peng; Alison Elder; Hong Yang
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Reactive oxygen species generation by copper(II) oxide nanoparticles determined by DNA damage assays and EPR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Carlos Angelé-Martínez; Khanh Van T Nguyen; Fathima S Ameer; Jeffrey N Anker; Julia L Brumaghim
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.913

6.  (-)-Epigallocatechin gallate causes oxidative damage to isolated and cellular DNA.

Authors:  Ayako Furukawa; Shinji Oikawa; Mariko Murata; Yusuke Hiraku; Shosuke Kawanishi
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 5.858

7.  Protection of DNA from gamma-radiation induced strand breaks by Epicatechin.

Authors:  Cherupally Krishnan Krishnan Nair; Veena Prakash Salvi
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Copper oxide nanoparticles are highly toxic: a comparison between metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Hanna L Karlsson; Pontus Cronholm; Johanna Gustafsson; Lennart Möller
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  Predicting how polyphenol antioxidants prevent DNA damage by binding to iron.

Authors:  Nathan R Perron; James N Hodges; Michael Jenkins; Julia L Brumaghim
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 5.165

Review 10.  Oxidative DNA damage from nanoparticle exposure and its application to workers' health: a literature review.

Authors:  Kyung-Taek Rim; Se-Wook Song; Hyeon-Yeong Kim
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2013-08-20
View more
  1 in total

1.  Non-doped and transition metal-doped CuO nano-powders: structure-physical properties and anti-adhesion activity relationship.

Authors:  N Khlifi; S Mnif; F Ben Nasr; N Fourati; C Zerrouki; M M Chehimi; H Guermazi; S Aifa; S Guermazi
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.036

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.