Literature DB >> 18710264

Copper oxide nanoparticles are highly toxic: a comparison between metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes.

Hanna L Karlsson1, Pontus Cronholm, Johanna Gustafsson, Lennart Möller.   

Abstract

Since the manufacture and use of nanoparticles are increasing, humans are more likely to be exposed occupationally or via consumer products and the environment. However, so far toxicity data for most manufactured nanoparticles are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare different nanoparticles and nanotubes regarding cytotoxicity and ability to cause DNA damage and oxidative stress. The study was focused on different metal oxide particles (CuO, TiO2, ZnO, CuZnFe2O4, Fe3O4, Fe2O3), and the toxicity was compared to that of carbon nanoparticles and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT). The human lung epithelial cell line A549 was exposed to the particles, and cytotoxicity was analyzed using trypan blue staining. DNA damage and oxidative lesions were determined using the comet assay, and intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was measured using the oxidation-sensitive fluoroprobe 2',7'-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA). The results showed that there was a high variation among different nanoparticles concerning their ability to cause toxic effects. CuO nanoparticles were most potent regarding cytotoxicity and DNA damage. The toxicity was likely not explained by Cu ions released to the cell medium. These particles also caused oxidative lesions and were the only particles that induced an almost significant increase (p = 0.058) in intracellular ROS. ZnO showed effects on cell viability as well as DNA damage, whereas the TiO2 particles (a mix of rutile and anatase) only caused DNA damage. For iron oxide particles (Fe3O4, Fe2O3), no or low toxicity was observed, but CuZnFe2O4 particles were rather potent in inducing DNA lesions. Finally, the carbon nanotubes showed cytotoxic effects and caused DNA damage in the lowest dose tested. The effects were not explained by soluble metal impurities. In conclusion, this study highlights the in vitro toxicity of CuO nanoparticles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18710264     DOI: 10.1021/tx800064j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  231 in total

1.  Serum proteins prevent aggregation of Fe2O3 and ZnO nanoparticles.

Authors:  Mark A Wells; Aamir Abid; Ian M Kennedy; Abdul I Barakat
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 5.913

Review 2.  Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: promises for diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Morteza Mahmoudi; Mohammad A Sahraian; Mohammad A Shokrgozar; Sophie Laurent
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.418

3.  Generation of Scalable, Metallic High-Aspect Ratio Nanocomposites in a Biological Liquid Medium.

Authors:  Kinsey Cotton Kelly; Jessica R Wasserman; Sneha Deodhar; Justin Huckaby; Mark A DeCoster
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  Immunotoxicological impact of occupational and environmental nanoparticles exposure: The influence of physical, chemical, and combined characteristics of the particles.

Authors:  Paola Pedata; Claudia Petrarca; Elpidio Maria Garzillo; Mario Di Gioacchino
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.219

5.  In vitro intestinal toxicity of copper oxide nanoparticles in rat and human cell models.

Authors:  Taylor E Henson; Jana Navratilova; Alan H Tennant; Karen D Bradham; Kim R Rogers; Michael F Hughes
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.913

Review 6.  Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface.

Authors:  Andre E Nel; Lutz Mädler; Darrell Velegol; Tian Xia; Eric M V Hoek; Ponisseril Somasundaran; Fred Klaessig; Vince Castranova; Mike Thompson
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 43.841

7.  Exposure vs toxicity levels of airborne quartz, metal and carbon particles in cast iron foundries.

Authors:  Beatrice Moroni; Cecilia Viti; David Cappelletti
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  Intracellular accumulation dynamics and fate of zinc ions in alveolar epithelial cells exposed to airborne ZnO nanoparticles at the air-liquid interface.

Authors:  Cosmin Mihai; William B Chrisler; Yumei Xie; Dehong Hu; Craig J Szymanski; Ana Tolic; Jessica A Klein; Jordan N Smith; Barbara J Tarasevich; Galya Orr
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 5.913

9.  Toxicological Profiling of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in Liver Context Reveals Pyroptosis in Kupffer Cells and Macrophages versus Apoptosis in Hepatocytes.

Authors:  Vahid Mirshafiee; Bingbing Sun; Chong Hyun Chang; Yu-Pei Liao; Wen Jiang; Jinhong Jiang; Xiangsheng Liu; Xiang Wang; Tian Xia; André E Nel
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 15.881

10.  Magnetite nanoparticles coated with oleic acid: accumulation in hepatopancreatic cells of the mangrove crab Ucides cordatus.

Authors:  Hector Aguilar Vitorino; Priscila Ortega; Roxana Y Pastrana Alta; Flavia Pinheiro Zanotto; Breno Pannia Espósito
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.