| Literature DB >> 34623762 |
Hui Chen1,2, Shaukat Khan2, Betul Celik1,2, Yasuyuki Suzuki3, Yasuhiko Ago4, Shunji Tomatsu1,2,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (MPS IVA, also called Morquio A syndrome) is caused by a deficiency of N-acetylglucosamine-6-sulfate sulfatase (GALNS) and results in skeletal dysplasia symptoms such as short stature and abnormal gait. Treatments include enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but the effects are limited depending on the age of initiation and clinical phenotype. Thus, this study aims to assess the effects of treatments on MPS IVA patients compared to untreated MPS IVA patients and an age-matched control group.Entities:
Keywords: MPS IVA; Morquio A; activity of daily living; enzyme replacement therapy; hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34623762 PMCID: PMC8606213 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1806
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med ISSN: 2324-9269 Impact factor: 2.183
Demographics in MPS IVA patients
| Control | All MPS IVA | Severe MPS IVA | Attenuated MPS IVA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 145 | 161 | 134 | 25 | |
| Males: females, n | 72:73 | 87:74 | 73:61 | 13:12 | |
| Average final age (years) ± SD | 9.19 ± 8.00 | 18.84 ± 14.12 | 18.24 ± 13.78 | 22.38 ± 16.06 | |
| Final age range (years) | 0.33–43.55 | 0.33 to 70.41 | 0.33 to 70.41 | 3.89 to 58.33 | |
| Average final BMI (kg/m2) ± SD | N/A | 22.87 ± 6.72 | 23.19 ± 7.00 | 21.20 ± 4.74 | |
| Patients received surgeries, n (%) | 0 (0) | 83 (51.6) | 69 (51.5) | 13 (52.0) | |
| Hip, n (%) | 24 (14.9) | 17 (12.7) | 7 (28.0) | ||
| Spine, n (%) | 34 (21.1) | 31 (23.1) | 2 (8.0) | ||
| Leg, n (%) | 45 (28) | 40 (29.9) | 4 (16.0) | ||
| Adenoids and tonsils, n (%) | 14 (8.7) | 11 (8.2) | 3 (12.0) | ||
| Ears, n (%) | 13 (8.1) | 11 (8.2) | 1 (4.0) | ||
| Trachea, n (%) | 10 (6.2) | 10 (7.46) | 0 (0) | ||
| Inguinal and umbilical hernias, n (%) | 4 (2.5) | 4 (3.0) | 0 (0) | ||
| Other, n (%) | 8 (5.0) | 5 (3.7) | 3 (12.0) |
ADL scores in controls and patients with severe phenotypes or attenuated phenotypes
| Age range (years) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 5 | 5 to 10 | 10 to 15 | >15 | ||
| Control | N | 46 | 54 | 25 | 20 |
| Movement | 14.96 ± 6.10 | 19.43 ± 0.57 | 19.96 ± 0.20 | 20.00 ± 0 | |
| Movement with Cognition | 9.46 ± 6.71 | 19.39 ± 1.47 | 19.88 ± 0.44 | 20.00 ± 0 | |
| Cognition | 8.87 ± 5.52 | 16.07 ± 2.50 | 18.76 ± 1.85 | 20.00 ± 0 | |
| Severe | N | 37 | 33 | 40 | 115 |
| Movement | 14.49 ± 4.84 | 14.94 ± 3.30 | 9.95 ± 3.30 | 9.12 ± 4.56 | |
| Movement with Cognition | 10.95 ± 5.64 | 14.64 ± 3.44 | 12.98 ± 3.06 | 13.77 ± 4.63 | |
| Cognition | 13.00 ± 6.08 | 18.06 ± 2.54 | 19.03 ± 1.64 | 18.68 ± 2.35 | |
| Other MPS Symptoms | 52.32 ± 4.97 | 53.03 ± 4.05 | 49.40 ± 4.19 | 44.87 ± 6.73 | |
| Attenuated | N | 5 | 7 | 6 | 25 |
| Movement | 19.00 ± 0 | 17.43 ± 1.40 | 15.67 ± 4.41 | 14.40 ± 3.11 | |
| Movement with Cognition | 14.20 ± 3.21 | 19.29 ± 1.50 | 18.67 ± 1.21 | 17.88 ± 2.15 | |
| Cognition | 16.60 ± 2.08 | 19.71 ± 0.76 | 20.00 ± 0 | 19.80 ± 0.58 | |
| Other MPS Symptoms | 59.40 ± 1.73 | 56.29 ± 3.09 | 52.83 ± 2.79 | 49.88 ± 4.94 | |
| t‐tests between phenotypes | Movement |
|
|
|
|
| Movement with Cognition |
|
|
|
| |
| Cognition |
|
|
|
| |
| Other MPS Symptoms |
|
|
|
| |
ANOVA p‐values: Severe groups 0 to 5, 5 to 10, 10 to 15, >15: “movement,” “cognition,” and “other MPS symptoms” p‐value < 0.001; “movement with cognition” p‐value = 0.002. Attenuated groups 0 to 5, 5 to 10, 10 to 15, >15: “movement” p‐value 0.0086, “movement with cognition” p‐value 0.0079, “cognition” and “other MPS symptoms” p‐value < 0.001.
t‐test p‐values:
p < 0.05 of severe or attenuated phenotype scores compared to control.
p < 0.01 of severe or attenuated phenotype scores compared to control.
p < 0.001 of severe or attenuated phenotype scores compared to control.
FIGURE 1Age‐dependent ADL scores for each MPS IVA patient according to phenotype and age‐matched controls. (a) “Movement” scores. Attenuated trend line: y = −0.0873x + 17.54, R 2 = 0.180. Severe trendline: y = −0.1592x + 13.798, R 2 = 0.160. (b) “Movement with cognition” scores. Attenuated trend line: y = 0.0047x + 17.69, R 2 = 0.0007. Severe trendline: y = 0.0388x + 12.608, R 2 = 0.0116. (c) “Cognition” scores. Attenuated trend line: y = 0.0259x + 18.867, R 2 = 0.0973. Severe trendline: y = 0.0943x + 16.063, R 2 = 0.0969 (d) “Other MPS symptoms” score. Attenuated trend line: y = −0.2234x + 57.393, R 2 = 0.449. Severe trendline: y = −0.2952x + 53.274, R 2 = 0.311
FIGURE 3(a) “Movement” score changes over years from baseline for untreated severe patients. All surveys included. Linear regression line y = 0.0707x–1.0958. R 2 = 0.0005. (b) “Movement” score changes over years from baseline for untreated severe patients. Patient number 18 outlier (purple) excluded. Linear regression line y = −2.3896x + 2.8302. R 2 = 0.3104. (c) Movement with cognition” (M+C) score changes over years from baseline for untreated severe patients. All surveys included. Linear regression line y = −0.9162x + 0.281. R 2 = 0.0629. (d) Movement with cognition” (M+C) score changes over years from baseline for untreated severe patients. Patient number 18 outlier (purple) excluded. Linear regression line y = −3.6556x + 4.6524. R2 = 0.4682. (e) “Cognition” score changes over years from baseline for untreated severe patients. All surveys included. Linear regression line y = −0.844x + 1.849. R 2 = 0.1969. (f) “Cognition” score changes over years from baseline for untreated severe patients. Patient number 18 outlier (purple) excluded. Linear regression line y = −1.8655x + 3.4791. R 2 = 0.422. (g) “Other MPS symptoms” score changes over years from baseline for untreated severe patients. All surveys included. Linear regression line y = 0.1947x + 0.2534. R 2 = 0.0019. (h) Patient number 18 outlier (purple) excluded. Linear regression line y = −2.9374x + 4.7445. R 2 = 0.2421
FIGURE 2ADL scores compared with treatment groups. (a) Scores in “Movement.” (b) Scores in “Movement with cognition.” (c) Scores in “Cognition.” (d) Scores in “Other MPS symptoms scores.” ERT trendline: y = −0.2227x + 53.202. R 2 = 0.1856. Untreated trendline: y = −0.2735x + 53.153. R 2 = 0.2967. HSCT trendline: y = −0.2116x + 55.961. R 2 = 0.4511. Overall trendline: y = −0.2568x + 53.433. R 2 = 0.2567.
FIGURE 4ADL score changes for treated patients. (a) “Movement” change in scores. Linear regression: y = −0.1352x + 0.3847. R 2 = 0.006. (b) “Movement with cognition” (M+C) change in scores. Linear regression: y = −0.0395x + 1.021. R 2 = 0.001. (c) “Cognition” change in scores. Linear regression: y = −0.1274x + 1.296. R 2 = 0.0085. (d) “Other MPS symptoms” change in scores. Linear regression: y = 0.486x–1.7768. R 2 = 0.062
FIGURE 5ADL score changes from baseline by age group. Untreated patients have the first survey as a baseline. Treated patients have the date of ERT initiation as a baseline. (a) “Movement” change in scores. (b) “Movement with cognition” (M+C) change in scores. (c) “Cognition” change in scores. (d) “Other MPS symptoms” change in scores