| Literature DB >> 25116756 |
Shunji Tomatsu1, Tsutomu Shimada2, Robert W Mason3, Adriana M Montaño4, Joan Kelly5, William A LaMarr6, Francyne Kubaski7, Roberto Giugliani8, Aratrik Guha9, Eriko Yasuda10, William Mackenzie11, Seiji Yamaguchi12, Yasuyuki Suzuki13, Tadao Orii14.
Abstract
Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are a group of lysosomal storage disorders caused by deficiency of the lysosomal enzymes essential for catabolism of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Accumulation of undegraded GAGs results in dysfunction of multiple organs, resulting in distinct clinical manifestations. A range of methods have been developed to measure specific GAGs in various human samples to investigate diagnosis, prognosis, pathogenesis, GAG interaction with other molecules, and monitoring therapeutic efficacy. We established ELISA, liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and an automated high-throughput mass spectrometry (HT-MS/MS) system (RapidFire) to identify epitopes (ELISA) or disaccharides (MS/MS) derived from different GAGs (dermatan sulfate, heparan sulfate, keratan sulfate, and/or chondroitin sulfate). These methods have a high sensitivity and specificity in GAG analysis, applicable to the analysis of blood, urine, tissues, and cells. ELISA is feasible, sensitive, and reproducible with the standard equipment. HT-MS/MS yields higher throughput than conventional LC-MS/MS-based methods while the HT-MS/MS system does not have a chromatographic step and cannot distinguish GAGs with identical molecular weights, leading to a limitation of measurements for some specific GAGs. Here we review the advantages and disadvantages of these methods for measuring GAG levels in biological specimens. We also describe an unexpected secondary elevation of keratan sulfate in patients with MPS that is an indirect consequence of disruption of catabolism of other GAGs.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25116756 PMCID: PMC4192686 DOI: 10.3390/metabo4030655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Correlation between mucopolysaccharidoses and GAG (s).
| Disorder | Deficient Enzyme | Trait | Chromosome | Primary storage GAG(s) | KS elevation in blood |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPS I (Hurler) | α-L-Iduronidase (IDUA) | AR | 4p16.3 | DS, HS | ↑↑↑ |
| MPS II (Hunter) | Iduronate-2-sulfatase (IDS) | XR | Xq28 | DS, HS | ↑↑↑ |
| MPS IIIA | Heparan-N-sulfatase (SGSH) | AR | 17q25.3 | HS | ↑ |
| MPS IIIB | α-N-Acetylglucoaminidase (NAGLU) | AR | 17q21 | HS | ↑ |
| MPS IIIC | α-Glucosaminidase acetyltransferase (HGSNAT) | AR | 8p11-q13 | HS | ↑ |
| MPS IIID | N-Acetylglucosamine 6-sulfatase (GNS) | AR | 12q14 | HS | NA |
| MPS IVA | Galactose 6-sulfatase, | AR | 16q24.3 | C6S, KS | ↑↑↑ |
| MPS IVB | β-Galactosidase (GLB1) | AR | 3p21.33 | KS | ↑ |
| MPS VI (Maroteaux-Lamy) | N-Acetylgalactosamine-4-sulfatase (G4S) | AR | 5q13.3 | C4S, DS | ↑↑ |
| MPS VII (Sly) | β-D-Glucuronidase (GUSB) | AR | 7q21-q22 | C4, 6S, DS, HS | ↑↑ |
AR: autosomal recessive, XR: X-linked recessive, C4S: chondroitin 4-sulfate, C6S: chondroitin 6-sulfate, DS: dermatan sulfate, HS: heparan sulfate, KS: keratan sulfate.
Figure 1Plasma KS and HS levels determined by Sandwich ELISA assay. Left panel (plasma KS): The KS standards for ELISA calibration and the anti-KS monoclonal antibody (5-D-4) were obtained from Seikagaku (Tokyo, Japan). The ELISA procedure was described previously [28]. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate spectrophotometer reference to 650 nm. The KS concentration was determined by applying the absorbance of each sample to the calibration curve [28]. Right panel (Plasma HS): All reagents described for HS-ELISA were provided from Seikagaku Co (Tokyo, Japan). Monoclonal antibodies against HS were used. The ELISA method was essentially the same as described for KS assay. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm (reference absorbance 630 nm) using a microplate spectrophotometer [29].
Figure 5Hypotheses (H) of secondary elevation of blood KS in other MPS. H1; Accumulation of GAGs and pro-inflammatory factors induces KS synthesis. H2; GAG storage in chondrocyte leads to cell death and release of KS. H3; Accumulated HS leads to inhibition of GALNS activity. H4; Other GAGs co-deposited with KS masks the access of degradative enzymes for KS and undegraded KS is too large for filtration in kidney. H5; Fucosylation, sialyation, or sulfation modification of KS leads to resisting degradation.
Figure 2MRM of LC-MS/MS for plasma or serum samples in patients with MPS I-VII. ΔDiHS-0S (left) and mono-sulfated KS (right) are described.
Figure 3Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) of HT-MS/MS. (a) Multiple injections of mono-sulfated KS with a series of dilutions in duplicate shows seven gradient peaks per a set of dilutions (as well as other surrounding samples). (b) Multiple injections of chondosine (Q1; 353.7, Q3; 192.5) with the same concentration shows 8 peaks per min.
Figure 4Plasma KS, DS, and HS (ΔDiHS-0S and ΔDiHS-NS) levels by LC-MS/MS.