Literature DB >> 34617027

Feasibility of Simulated Postcontrast MRI of Glioblastomas and Lower-Grade Gliomas by Using Three-dimensional Fully Convolutional Neural Networks.

Evan Calabrese1, Jeffrey D Rudie1, Andreas M Rauschecker1, Javier E Villanueva-Meyer1, Soonmee Cha1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of simulated postcontrast T1-weighted brain MR images generated by using precontrast MR images in patients with brain glioma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, a three-dimensional deep convolutional neural network was developed to simulate T1-weighted postcontrast images from eight precontrast sequences in 400 patients (mean age, 57 years; 239 men; from 2015 to 2020), including 332 with glioblastoma and 68 with lower-grade gliomas. Performance was evaluated by using quantitative image similarity and error metrics and enhancing tumor overlap analysis. Performance was also assessed on a multicenter external dataset (n = 286 from the 2019 Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge; mean age, 60 years; ratio of men to women unknown) by using transfer learning. A subset of cases was reviewed by neuroradiologist readers to assess whether simulated images affected the ability to determine the tumor grade.
RESULTS: Simulated whole-brain postcontrast images were both qualitatively and quantitatively similar to the real postcontrast images in terms of quantitative image similarity (structural similarity index of 0.84 ± 0.05), pixelwise error (symmetric mean absolute percent error of 3.65%), and enhancing tumor compartment overlap (Dice coefficient, 0.65 ± 0.25). Similar results were achieved with the external dataset (Dice coefficient, 0.62 ± 0.27). There was no difference in the ability of the neuroradiologist readers to determine the tumor grade in real versus simulated images (accuracy, 87.7% vs 90.6%; P = .87).
CONCLUSION: The developed model was capable of producing simulated postcontrast T1-weighted MR images that were similar to real acquired images as determined by both quantitative analysis and radiologist assessment.Keywords: MR-Contrast Agent, MR-Imaging, CNS, Brain/Brain Stem, Contrast Agents-Intravenous, Neoplasms-Primary, Experimental Investigations, Technology Assessment, Supervised Learning, Transfer Learning, Convolutional Neural Network, Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning Algorithms Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain/Brain Stem; CNS; Contrast Agents-Intravenous; Convolutional Neural Network; Deep Learning Algorithms; Experimental Investigations; MR-Contrast Agent; MR-Imaging; Machine Learning Algorithms; Neoplasms-Primary; Supervised Learning; Technology Assessment; Transfer Learning

Year:  2021        PMID: 34617027      PMCID: PMC8489450          DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021200276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell        ISSN: 2638-6100


  24 in total

1.  Cerebral astrocytomas: histopathologic correlation of MR and CT contrast enhancement with stereotactic biopsy.

Authors:  F Earnest; P J Kelly; B W Scheithauer; B A Kall; T L Cascino; R L Ehman; G S Forbes; P L Axley
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Gliomas: correlation of magnetic susceptibility artifact with histologic grade.

Authors:  L J Bagley; R I Grossman; K D Judy; M Curtis; L A Loevner; M Polansky; J Detre
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Deep Learning for Predicting Enhancing Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis from Noncontrast MRI.

Authors:  Ponnada A Narayana; Ivan Coronado; Sheeba J Sujit; Jerry S Wolinsky; Fred D Lublin; Refaat E Gabr
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Predicting 15O-Water PET cerebral blood flow maps from multi-contrast MRI using a deep convolutional neural network with evaluation of training cohort bias.

Authors:  Jia Guo; Enhao Gong; Audrey P Fan; Maged Goubran; Mohammad M Khalighi; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Incidence of immediate gadolinium contrast media reactions.

Authors:  Martin R Prince; Honglei Zhang; Zhitong Zou; Ronald B Staron; Paula W Brill
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Perfusion imaging of brain tumors using arterial spin-labeling: correlation with histopathologic vascular density.

Authors:  T Noguchi; T Yoshiura; A Hiwatashi; O Togao; K Yamashita; E Nagao; T Shono; M Mizoguchi; S Nagata; T Sasaki; S O Suzuki; T Iwaki; K Kobayashi; F Mihara; H Honda
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS).

Authors:  Bjoern H Menze; Andras Jakab; Stefan Bauer; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Keyvan Farahani; Justin Kirby; Yuliya Burren; Nicole Porz; Johannes Slotboom; Roland Wiest; Levente Lanczi; Elizabeth Gerstner; Marc-André Weber; Tal Arbel; Brian B Avants; Nicholas Ayache; Patricia Buendia; D Louis Collins; Nicolas Cordier; Jason J Corso; Antonio Criminisi; Tilak Das; Hervé Delingette; Çağatay Demiralp; Christopher R Durst; Michel Dojat; Senan Doyle; Joana Festa; Florence Forbes; Ezequiel Geremia; Ben Glocker; Polina Golland; Xiaotao Guo; Andac Hamamci; Khan M Iftekharuddin; Raj Jena; Nigel M John; Ender Konukoglu; Danial Lashkari; José Antonió Mariz; Raphael Meier; Sérgio Pereira; Doina Precup; Stephen J Price; Tammy Riklin Raviv; Syed M S Reza; Michael Ryan; Duygu Sarikaya; Lawrence Schwartz; Hoo-Chang Shin; Jamie Shotton; Carlos A Silva; Nuno Sousa; Nagesh K Subbanna; Gabor Szekely; Thomas J Taylor; Owen M Thomas; Nicholas J Tustison; Gozde Unal; Flor Vasseur; Max Wintermark; Dong Hye Ye; Liang Zhao; Binsheng Zhao; Darko Zikic; Marcel Prastawa; Mauricio Reyes; Koen Van Leemput
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  A fully automated artificial intelligence method for non-invasive, imaging-based identification of genetic alterations in glioblastomas.

Authors:  Evan Calabrese; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Soonmee Cha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Combining radiomics and deep convolutional neural network features from preoperative MRI for predicting clinically relevant genetic biomarkers in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Evan Calabrese; Jeffrey D Rudie; Andreas M Rauschecker; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Jennifer L Clarke; David A Solomon; Soonmee Cha
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-04-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.