Literature DB >> 34615986

Machine learning identifies the independent role of dysplasia in the prediction of response to chemotherapy in AML.

Raphael Itzykson1,2, Thomas Cluzeau3, Matthieu Duchmann4,5, Orianne Wagner-Ballon6,7, Thomas Boyer8,9, Meyling Cheok10, Elise Fournier8, Estelle Guerin11,12, Laurène Fenwarth13, Bouchra Badaoui6, Nicolas Freynet6, Emmanuel Benayoun6, Daniel Lusina14, Isabel Garcia15, Claude Gardin16, Pierre Fenaux17, Cécile Pautas18, Bruno Quesnel19, Pascal Turlure20, Christine Terré21, Xavier Thomas22, Juliette Lambert23, Aline Renneville8, Claude Preudhomme13, Hervé Dombret24.   

Abstract

The independent prognostic impact of specific dysplastic features in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial and may vary between genomic subtypes. We apply a machine learning framework to dissect the relative contribution of centrally reviewed dysplastic features and oncogenetics in 190 patients with de novo AML treated in ALFA clinical trials. One hundred and thirty-five (71%) patients achieved complete response after the first induction course (CR). Dysgranulopoiesis, dyserythropoiesis and dysmegakaryopoiesis were assessable in 84%, 83% and 63% patients, respectively. Multi-lineage dysplasia was present in 27% of assessable patients. Micromegakaryocytes (q = 0.01), hypolobulated megakaryocytes (q = 0.08) and hyposegmented granulocytes (q = 0.08) were associated with higher ELN-2017 risk. Using a supervised learning algorithm, the relative importance of morphological variables (34%) for the prediction of CR was higher than demographic (5%), clinical (2%), cytogenetic (25%), molecular (29%), and treatment (5%) variables. Though dysplasias had limited predictive impact on survival, a multivariate logistic regression identified the presence of hypolobulated megakaryocytes (p = 0.014) and micromegakaryocytes (p = 0.035) as predicting lower CR rates, independently of monosomy 7 (p = 0.013), TP53 (p = 0.004), and NPM1 mutations (p = 0.025). Assessment of these specific dysmegakarypoiesis traits, for which we identify a transcriptomic signature, may thus guide treatment allocation in AML.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34615986     DOI: 10.1038/s41375-021-01435-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  41 in total

1.  Precision oncology for acute myeloid leukemia using a knowledge bank approach.

Authors:  Moritz Gerstung; Elli Papaemmanuil; Inigo Martincorena; Lars Bullinger; Verena I Gaidzik; Peter Paschka; Michael Heuser; Felicitas Thol; Niccolo Bolli; Peter Ganly; Arnold Ganser; Ultan McDermott; Konstanze Döhner; Richard F Schlenk; Hartmut Döhner; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Multilineage dysplasia (MLD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) correlates with MDS-related cytogenetic abnormalities and a prior history of MDS or MDS/MPN but has no independent prognostic relevance: a comparison of 408 cases classified as "AML not otherwise specified" (AML-NOS) or "AML with myelodysplasia-related changes" (AML-MRC).

Authors:  Miriam Miesner; Claudia Haferlach; Ulrike Bacher; Tamara Weiss; Katja Macijewski; Alexander Kohlmann; Hans-Ulrich Klein; Martin Dugas; Wolfgang Kern; Susanne Schnittger; Torsten Haferlach
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms.

Authors:  James W Vardiman; Nancy Lee Harris; Richard D Brunning
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes.

Authors:  James W Vardiman; Jüergen Thiele; Daniel A Arber; Richard D Brunning; Michael J Borowitz; Anna Porwit; Nancy Lee Harris; Michelle M Le Beau; Eva Hellström-Lindberg; Ayalew Tefferi; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia.

Authors:  Daniel A Arber; Attilio Orazi; Robert Hasserjian; Jürgen Thiele; Michael J Borowitz; Michelle M Le Beau; Clara D Bloomfield; Mario Cazzola; James W Vardiman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Multilineage dysplasia is associated with a poorer prognosis in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia with intermediate-risk cytogenetics and wild-type NPM1.

Authors:  María Rozman; José-Tomás Navarro; Leonor Arenillas; Anna Aventín; Teresa Giménez; Esther Alonso; Granada Perea; Mireia Camós; Mayda Navarrete; Esperanza Tuset; Lourdes Florensa; Fuensanta Millá; Josep Nomdedéu; Esmeralda de la Banda; Marina Díaz-Beyá; Marta Pratcorona; Ana Garrido; Blanca Navarro; Salut Brunet; Jorge Sierra; Jordi Esteve
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.673

7.  Morphologic dysplasia in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is related to unfavorable cytogenetics but has no independent prognostic relevance under the conditions of intensive induction therapy: results of a multiparameter analysis from the German AML Cooperative Group studies.

Authors:  Torsten Haferlach; Claudia Schoch; Helmut Löffler; Winfried Gassmann; Wolfgang Kern; Susanne Schnittger; Christa Fonatsch; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Christian Wuchter; Brigitte Schlegelberger; Peter Staib; Albrecht Reichle; Uschi Kubica; Hartmut Eimermacher; Leopold Balleisen; Andreas Grüneisen; Detlef Haase; Carlo Aul; Jochen Karow; Eva Lengfelder; Bernhard Wörmann; Achim Heinecke; Maria Cristina Sauerland; Thomas Büchner; Wolfgang Hiddemann
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  MLD according to the WHO classification in AML has no correlation with age and no independent prognostic relevance as analyzed in 1766 patients.

Authors:  Hannes Wandt; Ulrike Schäkel; Frank Kroschinsky; Gabriele Prange-Krex; Brigitte Mohr; Christian Thiede; Ulrich Pascheberg; Silke Soucek; Markus Schaich; Gerhard Ehninger
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Machine learning demonstrates that somatic mutations imprint invariant morphologic features in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Yasunobu Nagata; Ran Zhao; Hassan Awada; Cassandra M Kerr; Inom Mirzaev; Sunisa Kongkiatkamon; Aziz Nazha; Hideki Makishima; Tomas Radivoyevitch; Jacob G Scott; Mikkael A Sekeres; Brian P Hobbs; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 25.476

10.  The new provisional WHO entity 'RUNX1 mutated AML' shows specific genetics but no prognostic influence of dysplasia.

Authors:  T Haferlach; A Stengel; S Eckstein; K Perglerová; T Alpermann; W Kern; C Haferlach; M Meggendorfer
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  1 in total

1.  The new diagnostic criteria for myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia is useful for predicting clinical outcome: comparison of the 4th and 5th World Health Organization classifications.

Authors:  Hee Sue Park; Hee Kyung Kim; Hong-Sik Kim; Yaewon Yang; Hye Sook Han; Ki Hyeong Lee; Bo Ra Son; Jihyun Kwon
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 4.030

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.