Literature DB >> 18056840

MLD according to the WHO classification in AML has no correlation with age and no independent prognostic relevance as analyzed in 1766 patients.

Hannes Wandt1, Ulrike Schäkel, Frank Kroschinsky, Gabriele Prange-Krex, Brigitte Mohr, Christian Thiede, Ulrich Pascheberg, Silke Soucek, Markus Schaich, Gerhard Ehninger.   

Abstract

Between February 1996 and December 2004, the German Leukemia Study Initiative registered 1766 consecutive patients for the acute myeloid leukemia (AML) 96 study, all of whom were diagnosed by central cytomorphology according to the French-American-British (FAB) and the new World Health Organization (WHO) classification. We focused our analysis on the prognostic impact of multilineage dysplasia (MLD) as a new parameter of the WHO classification for AML. We could not confirm the WHO statement that MLD occurs most frequently in older individuals, but we confirmed that MLD is often associated with an unfavorable cytogenetic profile (P < .001). In 1332 individuals receiving intensive AML therapy presence of MLD was negatively correlated with complete remission (P = .001) in univariate, but not in multivariate, analysis. Multivariate analysis of either event-free or overall survival again failed to show an independent prognostic significance of MLD besides age, cytogenetics, and, in part, NPM1/FLT3-ITD mutations. Our data support a reassessment of the WHO classification in the light of a more biologic understanding of AML. This study is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT00180115.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18056840     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-101162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  13 in total

1.  Reproducibility and prognostic significance of morphologic dysplasia in de novo acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Olga K Weinberg; Olga Pozdnyakova; Federico Campigotto; Daniel J DeAngelo; Richard M Stone; Donna Neuberg; Robert P Hasserjian
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 2.  Recent advances in the diagnosis and classification of myeloid neoplasms--comments on the 2008 WHO classification.

Authors:  C C Yin; L J Medeiros; C E Bueso-Ramos
Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 3.  Biological and clinical consequences of NPM1 mutations in AML.

Authors:  E M Heath; S M Chan; M D Minden; T Murphy; L I Shlush; A D Schimmer
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Machine learning identifies the independent role of dysplasia in the prediction of response to chemotherapy in AML.

Authors:  Raphael Itzykson; Thomas Cluzeau; Matthieu Duchmann; Orianne Wagner-Ballon; Thomas Boyer; Meyling Cheok; Elise Fournier; Estelle Guerin; Laurène Fenwarth; Bouchra Badaoui; Nicolas Freynet; Emmanuel Benayoun; Daniel Lusina; Isabel Garcia; Claude Gardin; Pierre Fenaux; Cécile Pautas; Bruno Quesnel; Pascal Turlure; Christine Terré; Xavier Thomas; Juliette Lambert; Aline Renneville; Claude Preudhomme; Hervé Dombret
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Prognostic implications of CD14 positivity in acute myeloid leukemia arising from myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Yunsuk Choi; Je-Hwan Lee; Sung-Doo Kim; Dae-Young Kim; Jung-Hee Lee; Miee Seol; Young-Ah Kang; Mijin Jeon; Ah Rang Jung; Kyoo-Hyung Lee
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.490

6.  Prior cytopenia predicts worse clinical outcome in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Amelia Huck; Olga Pozdnyakova; Andrew Brunner; John M Higgins; Amir T Fathi; Robert P Hasserjian
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2015-06-28       Impact factor: 3.156

7.  Cytoplasmic localization of nucleophosmin in bone marrow blasts of acute myeloid leukemia patients is not completely concordant with NPM1 mutation and is not predictive of prognosis.

Authors:  Sergej Konoplev; Xuelin Huang; Harry A Drabkin; Hartmut Koeppen; Dan Jones; Hagop M Kantarjian; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Weina Chen; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Carlos E Bueso-Ramos
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Acute erythroid leukemia: a reassessment using criteria refined in the 2008 WHO classification.

Authors:  Robert P Hasserjian; Zhuang Zuo; Christine Garcia; Guilin Tang; Armen Kasyan; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Lynne V Abruzzo; Hagop M Kantarjian; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Sa A Wang
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia with 20-30% bone marrow blasts.

Authors:  Luca Maurillo; Francesco Buccisano; Maria Ilaria Del Principe; Chiara Sarlo; Luigi Di Caprio; Concetta Ditto; Federica Giannotti; Daniela Nasso; Eleonora Ceresoli; Massimiliano Postorino; Marco Refrigeri; Sergio Amadori; Adriano Venditti
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.576

10.  Role of ASXL1 and TP53 mutations in the molecular classification and prognosis of acute myeloid leukemias with myelodysplasia-related changes.

Authors:  Raynier Devillier; Véronique Mansat-De Mas; Veronique Gelsi-Boyer; Cecile Demur; Anne Murati; Jill Corre; Thomas Prebet; Sarah Bertoli; Mandy Brecqueville; Christine Arnoulet; Christian Recher; Norbert Vey; Marie-Joelle Mozziconacci; Eric Delabesse; Daniel Birnbaum
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.