| Literature DB >> 34615541 |
Charlène A Mauger1,2, Sachin Govil3, Radomir Chabiniok4,5,6,7, Kathleen Gilbert2, Sanjeet Hegde3,8, Tarique Hussain4, Andrew D McCulloch3, Christopher J Occleshaw9, Jeffrey Omens3, James C Perry3,8, Kuberan Pushparajah10, Avan Suinesiaputra11, Liang Zhong12,13, Alistair A Young14,15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Relationships between right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) shape and function may be useful in determining optimal timing for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF). However, these are multivariate and difficult to quantify. We aimed to quantify variations in biventricular shape associated with pulmonary regurgitant volume (PRV) in rTOF using a biventricular atlas.Entities:
Keywords: Atlases; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Myocardial deformation; Tetralogy of Fallot; Ventricular function
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34615541 PMCID: PMC8496085 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-021-00780-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Characteristics of the 88 rTOF participants
| Variables | N = 88 |
|---|---|
| Age at CMR scan (y) | 16 (11.8, 24.3) |
| Sex (F/M) | 35/53 |
| Height (cm) | 160 (149.8, 168) |
| Weight (kg) | 58.3 ± 25.4 |
| PRF (%) | 36.9 ± 14.4 |
| PRVi (ml/m2) | 23.7 (14.2, 33.3) |
| Age at primary repair (y) | 0.8 (0.25, 1.6) |
| Time after primary repair (y) | 15.7 (10.9, 21) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.0 (17.8, 26.5) |
| Tricuspid regurgitation*: | |
| None-trace | 57 (64.8%) |
| Mild | 18 (20.4%) |
| Mild-to-moderate | 6 (6.8%) |
| Moderate | 7 (8.0%) |
| Severe | 0 |
| Numbers with reintervention | 33 (37.5%) |
| Pulmonary valve replacement | 0 |
| Types of repair: | |
| Transannular patch | 69 (78.4%) |
| Valve-Sparing | 5 (5.7%) |
| Conduit | 14 (15.9%) |
Normally distributed data are presented as mean ± std. dev and median (interquartile ranges) otherwise. PRF pulmonary regurgitant fraction, PRVIi pulmonary regurgitant volume index, BMI body mass index. *Tricuspid regurgitation from the MRI report
Fig. 1Overview of the biventricular atlas construction. A Contours and landmarks on short and long axis cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) images at end-diastole; B model fit at end-diastole (ED) (left) and end-systole (ES) (right). The left ventricle (LV) is shown in green, the right ventricle (RV) is shown in blue and the epicardium is shown in maroon; C endocardial surface colors showing differences in shape at ED (left) and ES (right) from the mean (25.5 ml/m2) to high (40 ml/m2) pulmonary regurgitant volume index (PRVI). Scale bar is in mm. Red denotes displacement outward from the LV, and blue denotes displacement inward to the LV
Fig. 2Model-based LV and RV dimension calculations. Green: LV; Purple: RV; Maroon: Epicardium. A Biventricular model and intersecting planes. B Long axis plane showing how apical angle (β), tricuspid tilt (α), and basal bulge (d) were calculated. C Mid-ventricular short axis view showing LV and RV lateral to septal dimensions (D1 and D3 respectively) and RV and LV anterior–posterior dimensions (D2 and D4 respectively)
Error between biventricular model estimates and slice summation of manual contours
| Differences | PPMCC | Values from 3D models | Values from manual contours | Interobserver error (n = 35) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RV EDVI (ml/m2) | 9 ± 15 | 0.89 | 147 ± 14 | 137 ± 15 | − 7 ± 12 |
| RV ESVI (ml/m2) | 6 ± 10 | 0.90 | 90 ± 27 | 84 ± 33 | − 11 ± 15 |
| RVEF (%) | 0 ± 7 | 0.70 | 39 ± 7 | 39 ± 9 | 5 ± 5 |
| RVMI (g/m2) | 2 ± 6 | 0.74 | 42 ± 11 | 39 ± 9 | − 2 ± 5 |
| LV EDVI (ml/m2) | 0 ± 7 | 0.90 | 78 ± 14 | 79 ± 16 | − 1 ± 5 |
| LV ESVI (ml/m2) | 3 ± 6 | 0.88 | 42 ± 24 | 39 ± 20 | − 1 ± 3 |
| LVEF (%) | 4 ± 8 | 0.74 | 50 ± 6 | 46 ± 9 | 1 ± 3 |
| LVMI (g/m2) | 10 ± 6 | 0.75 | 76 ± 14 | 66 ± 11 | − 4 ± 3 |
Data are presented as mean difference ± std. dev. of the differences. RV right ventricle, LV left ventricle, EF ejection fraction, EDVI end-diastolic volume index, ESVI end-systolic volume index, LVMI left ventricular mass index, PPMCC Pearson product moment correlation coefficient, RVMI right ventricular mass index
Fig. 3Principal component shape modes. Wireframe shows model at ED and shaded surfaces show the model at ES. Green: LV; Purple: RV; Maroon: Epicardium; Yellow: Aorta; Cyan: Mitral; Light green: Pulmonary; Pink: Tricuspid. Top rows show mean plus two standard deviations. Bottom row shows mean minus two standard deviations. PV pulmonary valve, AV aortic valve, TV tricuspid valve, MV mitral valve. See Additional file 1 for animations of these modes. To better visualize the change in function, motion was linearly interpolated between ED and ES shapes
Fig. 4a Shape differences associated with increasing pulmonary regurgitant volume index. Green: LV; Purple: RV; Maroon: Epicardium; Yellow: Aorta; Cyan: Mitral; Light green: Pulmonary; Pink: Tricuspid. Top: anterior view; Bottom: posterior view. Left: mean shapes at 5 ml/m2; middle: mean shape at 25.5 ml/m2; right: mean shape at 40 ml/m2. PV: pulmonary valve, AV: aortic valve, MV: mitral valve and TV: tricuspid valve. For an animation of this variation see Additional file 2. To better visualize the change in function, motion was linearly interpolated between ED and ES shapes. b Endocardial surface colors show differences in shape from the mean for low (left) and high (right) PRVI. Scale bar is in mm. Red denotes displacement outward from the LV, and blue denotes displacement inward to the LV. Top: end-diastolic shape; bottom: end-systolic shape. PV pulmonary valve, AV aortic valve, MV mitral valve, TV tricuspid valve
Remodeling features derived from biventricular models
| Mean value | PRVI PE | |
|---|---|---|
| Basal bulge at ED (mm) | 16.5 ± 4.5 | 0.25 |
| Basal bulge at ES (mm) | 11.9 ± 3.4 | |
| Tricuspid tilt at ED (°) | 41.6 ± 12.39 | |
| Tricuspid tilt at ES (°) | 31.6 ± 10.9 | 0.25 |
| Apical angle at ED (°) | 85.7 ± 6.8 | 0.29 |
| Apical angle at ES (°) | 83.8 ± 7.5 | 0.21 |
| LV lateral to septal dimension at ED (mm) | 41.1 ± 6.4 | − 0.25 |
| LV lateral to septal dimension at ES (mm) | 31.0 ± 6.0 | − 0.27 |
| RV lateral to septal dimension at ED (mm) | 41.0 ± 6.7 | 0.24 |
| RV lateral to septal dimension at ES (mm) | 34.0 ± 6.0 | |
| LV anterior–posterior dimension at ED (mm) | 54.0 ± 7.7 | |
| LV anterior–posterior dimension at ES (mm) | 42.1 ± 6.9 | − 0.18 |
| RV anterior–posterior dimension at ED (mm) | 71.1 ± 9.6 | 0.32 |
| RV anterior–posterior dimension at ES (mm) | 59.8 ± 8.7 | 0.26 |
LV left ventricle, RV right ventricle. Values are shown as mean ± SD. PRVI PE: pulmonary regurgitant volume index parameter effect for significant univariate correlations with parameters (p < 0.05). As normalized values were used in the regression, PRVI PE represents changes in standard deviations
Fig. 5Changes in contraction patterns associated with increasing pulmonary regurgitation. Paradoxical septal motion is observed as regurgitation increases, as shown by an outward displacement of the septum toward the RV. AV aortic valve, PV pulmonary valve, TV tricuspid valve, MV mitral valve, RVFW right ventricular free wall, LVFW left ventricular free wall, RVS right ventricular septum, LVS left ventricular septum
Strain values derived from biventricular models
| LV LS (%) | LV CS (%) | LV RS (%) | RV LS (%) | RV CS (%) | RV RS (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value | 19.0 ± 5.7 | 20.6 ± 5.3 | 21.5 ± 7.4 | 20.7 ± 5.4 | 14.0 ± 3.8 | 20.8 ± 12.8 |
| PRVI PE | 0.32 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.37 |
LV left ventricle, RV right ventricle, LS longitudinal strain, CS circumferential strain, RS radial strain. Absolute values are shown for CS and LS for simpler interpretation of the association with PRVI
Values are shown as mean ± SD. PRVI PE: pulmonary regurgitant volume index parameter effect for significant correlations with strains (p < 0.05). As normalized values were used in the regression, PRVI PE represents changes in standard deviations