| Literature DB >> 34612664 |
Cristobal A Onetto1, Peter J Costello1, Radka Kolouchova1, Charlotte Jordans1, Jane McCarthy1, Simon A Schmidt1.
Abstract
To successfully complete malolactic fermentation (MLF), Oenococcus oeni must overcome wine stress conditions of low pH, high ethanol, and the presence of SO2. Failure to complete MLF may result in detrimental effects to the quality and stability of the resulting wines. Research efforts to date have focused on elucidating the mechanisms and genetic features that confer the ability to withstand low pH and high ethanol concentrations on O. oeni; however, the responses to SO2 stress are less well defined. This study focused on characterizing the transcriptional response of O. oeni to SO2 challenge during cultivation in a continuous system at wine-like pH (3.5). This experimental design allowed the precise discrimination of transcriptional changes linked to SO2 stress from responses associated with growth stage and cultivation parameters. Differential gene expression analysis revealed major transcriptional changes following SO2 exposure and suggested that this compound primarily interacts with intracellular proteins, DNA, and the cell envelope of O. oeni. The molecular chaperone hsp20, which has a demonstrated function in the heat, ethanol, and acid stress response, was highly upregulated, confirming its additional role in the response of this species to SO2 stress. This work also reports the first nanopore-based complete genome assemblies for O. oeni. IMPORTANCE Malolactic fermentation is an indispensable step in the elaboration of most wines and is generally performed by Oenococcus oeni, a Gram-positive heterofermentative lactic acid bacterium species. While O. oeni is tolerant to many of the wine stresses, including low pH and high ethanol concentrations, it has high sensitivity to SO2, an antiseptic and antioxidant compound regularly used in winemaking. Understanding the physiological changes induced in O. oeni by SO2 stress is essential for the development of more robust starter cultures and methods for their use. This study describes the main transcriptional changes induced by SO2 stress in the wine bacterium O. oeni and provides foundational understanding on how this compound interacts with the cellular components and the induced protective mechanisms of this species.Entities:
Keywords: Oenococcus oeni; malolactic fermentation; stress response; sulfur dioxide; transcriptomics; wine microbiology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34612664 PMCID: PMC8510247 DOI: 10.1128/Spectrum.01154-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiol Spectr ISSN: 2165-0497
FIG 1Schematic outline for investigation of O. oeni AWRIB429 response to SO2 stress during chemostat culture in semidefined medium (pH 3.5, 22°C, anaerobic). Cultures were dosed with 5 mg/liter and 10 mg/liter SO2 at 0 h, and samples were taken at indicated time points for RNA-seq analysis, determination of bacterial viability, and other chemical analyses. Chemostat cultures were performed in quadruplicate for each SO2 treatment. I, media inlet; O, effluent outlet; S, sample port; N2, nitrogen gas inlet; addn, addition.
FIG 2Complete circular representation of the chromosome and plasmid of Oenococcus oeni strain AWRIB429. From largest to smallest track: dark purple highlights within the outer purple track represent 99 wine stress-related genes reported by Margalef-Català et al. 2016 (11) and found in strain AWRIB429, with labeled genes observed as differentially expressed (1 < log2 FC < −1; adjusted P value of <0.005) in at least one of the SO2 treatments. Plus- and minus-strand ORFs are colored by KEGG functional categories as indicated in the outer legend. (a to d) Differentially expressed genes (up- and downregulated genes are represented as red and blue dots, respectively) observed under different SO2 treatments: 4 h (a) and 30 min (b) after addition of 10 mg/liter of SO2 and 4 h (c) and 30 min (d) after addition of 5 mg/liter of SO2. Top, middle, and bottom axes represent 7, 0, and −4 log2 FC in all tracks. The inner two tracks show the location of all ribosomal- and tRNA-coding ORFs.
Differentially expressed genes between treatments grouped by functional category
| 5 mg/liter SO2 | 10 mg/liter SO2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene ID | Functional annotation | 30 min | 4 h | 30 min | 4 h |
| Protein and DNA damage | |||||
| J3U91_00272 | Hsp20/alpha crystallin family protein: small heat shock protein | 0.57 | 6.55 | ND | 0.68 |
| J3U91_00467 | nrdH; glutaredoxin | 1.02 | 1.30 | ND | 1.17 |
| J3U91_01815 | trxA3; thioredoxin | ND | 1.44 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_01735 | trxA2; thioredoxin | −1.44 | −1.16 | −1.02 | −1.88 |
| J3U91_00500 | msrA; peptide-methionine ( | −0.31 | −1.08 | ND | −0.43 |
| J3U91_00562 | clpL; ATP-dependent Clp protease ATP-binding subunit ClpL | ND | 2.44 | ND | 0.62 |
| J3U91_00560 | clpP; ATP-dependent Clp protease, protease subunit | ND | 1.86 | ND | 0.70 |
| J3U91_00629 | clpE; ATP-dependent Clp protease ATP-binding subunit | ND | 1.68 | ND | 0.51 |
| J3U91_00478 | clpP; ATP-dependent Clp protease, protease subunit | 0.65 | 1.24 | ND | 0.99 |
| J3U91_00327 | uvrB; excinuclease ABC subunit B | ND | 1.19 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_01004 | recU; recombination protein U | −0.51 | −1.30 | ND | −1.31 |
| J3U91_00004 | recF; DNA replication and repair protein | −0.81 | −0.93 | −0.76 | −1.42 |
| Carbohydrate metabolism, nutrient uptake, and energy | |||||
| J3U91_00050 | Diacetyl reductase | ND | 1.23 | ND | 0.37 |
| J3U91_00122 | rbsK; ribokinase | −0.45 | −1.08 | ND | −0.41 |
| J3U91_00136 | rpiA; ribose 5-phosphate isomerase A | −0.70 | 0.78 | −0.60 | −1.18 |
| J3U91_00145 | acyP; acylphosphatase | ND | 1.23 | −1.22 | −1.90 |
| J3U91_00197 | ND | 1.03 | ND | 0.56 | |
| J3U91_00206 | 6-Phospho-beta-glucosidase | ND | 1.26 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_00218 | gatB; galactitol PTS system EIIB component | 0.69 | 1.29 | ND | 0.59 |
| J3U91_00228 | mntH; manganese transport protein | ND | −1.08 | ND | −0.55 |
| J3U91_00250 | HIBADH; 3-hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase | ND | 1.12 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_00265 | celB; cellobiose PTS system EIIC component | −0.56 | −1.51 | −0.66 | −1.71 |
| J3U91_00331 | uraA; uracil permease | ND | −1.73 | ND | −0.60 |
| J3U91_00348 | SORD; | ND | 1.18 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_00375 | citD; citrate lyase subunit gamma (acyl carrier protein) | ND | 1.02 | ND | 0.72 |
| J3U91_00376 | citE; citrate (pro-3 | ND | 0.99 | ND | 0.63 |
| J3U91_00377 | citF; citrate lyase subunit alpha/citrate CoA-transferase | ND | 1.09 | ND | 0.71 |
| J3U91_00415 | kch; voltage-gated potassium channel | −0.57 | −1.12 | ND | −1.21 |
| J3U91_00739 | adhP; alcohol dehydrogenase, propanol-preferring | ND | 1.42 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_00916 | APA; basic amino acid/polyamine antiporter, APA family | −0.60 | −1.52 | −0.36 | −0.88 |
| J3U91_00927 | pgl; 6-phosphogluconolactonase | ND | 1.26 | ND | 0.61 |
| J3U91_00980 | arcA; arginine deiminase | −0.38 | −1.61 | ND | −0.71 |
| J3U91_01368 | lysY; putative lysine transport system ATP-binding protein | 0.60 | 1.10 | ND | 0.71 |
| J3U91_01401 | speG; diamine | ND | −1.11 | ND | −0.68 |
| J3U91_00728 | PTS glucose transporter subunit IIA | ND | ND | ND | −1.12 |
| J3U91_01460 | ATPF0A; F-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit a | ND | −0.94 | ND | −1.13 |
| J3U91_01562 | Glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase | 0.72 | 1.16 | 0.66 | 0.81 |
| J3U91_01579 | GntP; gluconate:H+ symporter | ND | 1.07 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_01581 | ulaA; ascorbate PTS system EIIC component | 0.64 | 1.12 | 0.66 | 0.67 |
| J3U91_01583 | ulaC; ascorbate PTS system EIIA or EIIAB component | ND | 1.10 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_01672 | mleP; malate permease | 0.52 | 1.14 | 0.37 | 0.91 |
| J3U91_01673 | mleA; malolactic enzyme | 0.45 | 1.15 | 0.31 | 0.84 |
| J3U91_01682 | abfA; alpha- | ND | 1.05 | ND | 0.61 |
| J3U91_01734 | APA; basic amino acid/polyamine antiporter, APA family | ND | −1.34 | ND | −0.90 |
| J3U91_01750 | alr; alanine racemase | −0.29 | −1.25 | −0.29 | −0.75 |
| J3U91_01778 | kdgR; LacI family transcriptional regulator, kdg operon repressor | ND | 1.29 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_01817 | alsD; acetolactate decarboxylase | ND | 0.57 | ND | 0.40 |
| J3U91_01828 | glcU; glucose uptake protein | ND | −1.45 | ND | −0.65 |
| J3U91_01978 | celC; cellobiose PTS system EIIA component | ND | −1.24 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_01979 | celA; cellobiose PTS system EIIB component | ND | −1.78 | ND | −1.63 |
| Cell envelope and division | |||||
| J3U91_00162 | divIC; cell division protein | −0.69 | −0.98 | −0.48 | −1.26 |
| J3U91_00301 | pgmB; beta-phosphoglucomutase | ND | 2.02 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_00444 | polysaccharide biosynthesis protein | −0.64 | −1.10 | −0.62 | ND |
| J3U91_00577 | amiABC; | −0.46 | −1.06 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_00641 | ltaS; lipoteichoic acid synthase | −0.51 | −1.21 | −0.53 | −1.10 |
| J3U91_00932 | division/cell wall cluster transcriptional repressor MraZ | ND | −1.74 | ND | −1.63 |
| J3U91_00940 | ftsA; cell division protein | ND | −1.02 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_00944 | Cell division protein | −0.60 | −2.04 | −0.39 | −1.10 |
| J3U91_01123 | dgkA; undecaprenol kinase | −0.72 | −0.53 | −0.65 | −1.12 |
| J3U91_01229 | FemA; peptidoglycan bridge formation glycyltransferase | ND | 1.35 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_01307 | cwlO; peptidoglycan | ND | −1.12 | ND | −0.72 |
| J3U91_01479 | clsA_B; cardiolipin synthase A/B | −0.39 | −1.38 | ND | −1.00 |
| J3U91_01480 | mreD rod shape-determining protein | −0.82 | −2.32 | −0.83 | −2.49 |
| J3U91_01481 | mreC; rod shape-determining protein | −0.52 | −1.21 | −0.44 | −0.75 |
| J3U91_01533 | LysM peptidoglycan-binding domain-containing protein | ND | −1.41 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_01550 | rfbB; dTDP-glucose 4,6-dehydratase | ND | 1.24 | ND | 0.71 |
| J3U91_01551 | rfbC; dTDP-4-dehydrorhamnose 3,5-epimerase | ND | 1.55 | ND | 0.72 |
| J3U91_01552 | rfbA; glucose-1-phosphate thymidylyltransferase | ND | 1.92 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_01614 | Glycosyltransferase eps cluster 2 | ND | −1.31 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_01615 | Putative glycosyltransferase eps cluster 2 | ND | −1.14 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_01619 | Putative glycosyltransferase eps cluster 2 | −0.42 | −1.13 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_01625 | Capsular polysaccharide biosynthesis protein | ND | −1.68 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_01854 | Glycosyltransferase eps cluster 1 | ND | −1.07 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_01858 | Putative glycosyltransferase eps cluster 1 | −0.31 | −1.01 | ND | ND |
| J3U91_01902 | murA; UDP- | −0.90 | −1.45 | −0.63 | −1.02 |
| J3U91_01940 | bacA; undecaprenyl-diphosphatase | ND | −1.73 | ND | −0.86 |
| J3U91_01941 | tagU; peptidoglycan teichoic acid transferase | −1.56 | −3.37 | −0.98 | −2.71 |
Changes in gene expression are represented as log2 fold change (log2 FC) between time point and control condition before SO2 addition.
Shading shows genes with a log2 FC of 1 < log2 FC < −1, and treatments in which gene expression changes show an adjusted P value of >0.005 are represented as not detected (ND).
FIG 3Effect of SO2 exposure on viable cells and metabolism of fructose and lactic and acetic acids by Oenococcus oeni AWRIB429 during continuous culture. Arrows represent the time points of SO2 addition. Data points represent the average of three replicate cultures and standard deviations. Dotted lines outline initial measurements before SO2 in the low-SO2 treatment (5 mg/liter SO2).