Literature DB >> 34611027

Awareness-Dependent Normalization Framework of Visual Bottom-up Attention.

Shiyu Wang1,2, Ling Huang1,2, Qinglin Chen1,2, Jingyi Wang1,2, Siting Xu1,2, Xilin Zhang3,2,4,5.   

Abstract

Although bottom-up attention can improve visual performance with and without awareness to the exogenous cue, whether they are governed by a common neural computation remains unclear. Using a modified Posner paradigm with backward masking, we found that the cueing effect displayed a monotonic gradient profile (Gaussian-like), both with and without awareness, whose scope, however, was significantly wider with than without awareness. This awareness-dependent scope offered us a unique opportunity to change the relative size of the attention field to the stimulus, differentially modulating the gain of attentional selection, as proposed by the normalization model of attention. Therefore, for each human subject (male and female), the stimulus size was manipulated as their respective mean attention fields with and without awareness while stimulus contrast was varied in a spatial cueing task. By measuring the gain pattern of contrast-response functions on the spatial cueing effect derived by visible or invisible cues, we observed changes in the cueing effect consonant with changes in contrast gain for visible cues and response gain for invisible cues. Importantly, a complementary analysis confirmed that subjects' awareness-dependent attention fields can be simulated by using the normalization model of attention. Together, our findings indicate an awareness-dependent normalization framework of visual bottom-up attention, placing a necessary constraint, namely, awareness, on our understanding of the neural computations underlying visual attention.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Bottom-up attention is known to improve visual performance with and without awareness. We discovered that manipulating subjects' awareness can modulate their attention fields of visual bottom-up attention, which offers a unique opportunity to regulate its normalization processes. On the one hand, by measuring the gain pattern of contrast-response functions on the spatial cueing effect derived by visible or invisible cues, we observed changes in the cueing effect consonant with changes in contrast gain for visible cues and response gain for invisible cues. On the other hand, by using the normalization model of attention, subjects' awareness-dependent attention fields can be simulated successfully. Our study supports important predictions of the normalization model of visual bottom-up attention and further reveals its dependence on awareness.
Copyright © 2021 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention field; awareness; gradient profile; normalization model; visual bottom-up attention

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34611027      PMCID: PMC8612474          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1110-21.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  57 in total

1.  Goal-related activity in V4 during free viewing visual search. Evidence for a ventral stream visual salience map.

Authors:  James A Mazer; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Distilling the neural correlates of consciousness.

Authors:  Jaan Aru; Talis Bachmann; Wolf Singer; Lucia Melloni
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Attentional effects on contrast discrimination in humans: evidence for both contrast gain and response gain.

Authors:  Liqiang Huang; Karen R Dobkins
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Subliminal attentional modulation in crowding condition.

Authors:  Leila Montaser-Kouhsari; Reza Rajimehr
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-12-19       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The effects of spatial attention in early human visual cortex are stimulus independent.

Authors:  Scott O Murray
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Jean-Pierre Changeux
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Functional MRI and EEG Index Complementary Attentional Modulations.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate.

Authors:  Giulio Tononi; Melanie Boly; Marcello Massimini; Christof Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Attentional enhancement via selection and pooling of early sensory responses in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Franco Pestilli; Marisa Carrasco; David J Heeger; Justin L Gardner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  A normalization model of attentional modulation of single unit responses.

Authors:  Joonyeol Lee; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.