Literature DB >> 15707928

Attentional effects on contrast discrimination in humans: evidence for both contrast gain and response gain.

Liqiang Huang1, Karen R Dobkins.   

Abstract

In order to understand how attention affects visual processing, we investigated the degree to which attention effects can be accounted for by increases in the contrast gain of the contrast response function, CRF (represented by an increase in effective contrast) vs. increases in the response gain (represented by an overall amplification of response). To this end, we used a dual-task paradigm to compare psychophysical "threshold vs. pedestal contrast" (TvC) curves obtained under conditions of full- vs. poor-attention. The attention effect, defined as the ratio of thresholds for poor- vs. full-attention conditions, was roughly four-fold at a pedestal contrast of 0% (i.e., at detection threshold) and there was a significant decrease in attention effect with increasing pedestal contrast, from approximately ten-fold at the lowest non-zero pedestal contrast tested (0.25%) to three-fold at the highest pedestal contrast tested (64%). These findings are consistent with the existence of both contrast gain effects of attention (needed to account for the substantial attention effect at detection threshold and the decrease in attention effect with increasing pedestal contrast) as well as response gain effects of attention (needed to account for the fact that attention was beneficial across all pedestal contrasts-rather than harmful at some contrasts, as a pure contrast gain model would predict). The results of a model fitting Naka-Rushton CRF equations to the TvC data also support this conclusion. Here we found a two-fold increase in contrast gain and a five-fold increase in response gain in the CRF for the full-attention, as compared to the poor-attention, condition. Because pure contrast gain effects, on the order of two-fold, have been observed at early stages of visual processing (for example in areas V4 and MT), our psychophysical results suggest a hybrid model of attention; contrast gain control at an early stage of visual processing, followed by response gain control at a later stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15707928     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  48 in total

1.  The effect of attention on neuronal responses to high and low contrast stimuli.

Authors:  Joonyeol Lee; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Wohlgemuth was right: distracting attention from the adapting stimulus does not decrease the motion after-effect.

Authors:  Michael J Morgan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Sustained and transient covert attention enhance the signal via different contrast response functions.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Exogenous and endogenous attention during perceptual learning differentially affect post-training target thresholds.

Authors:  Ikuko Mukai; Kandy Bahadur; Kartik Kesavabhotla; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  How do attention and adaptation affect contrast sensitivity?

Authors:  Franco Pestilli; Gerardo Viera; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Using a filtering task to measure the spatial extent of selective attention.

Authors:  John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The role of judgment frames and task precision in object attention: Reduced template sharpness limits dual-object performance.

Authors:  Shiau-Hua Liu; Barbara Anne Dosher; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  The significance of microsaccades for vision and oculomotor control.

Authors:  Han Collewijn; Eileen Kowler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Chromatic and luminance contrast sensitivity in fullterm and preterm infants.

Authors:  Rain G Bosworth; Karen R Dobkins
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.