T Blake Monroe1, Ethan J Anderson1,2. 1. Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States. 2. Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States.
Abstract
Monoamine oxidase (MAO) is rapidly gaining appreciation for its pathophysiologic role in cardiac injury and failure. Oxidative deamination of norepinephrine by MAO generates H2O2 and the catecholaldehyde 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde (DOPEGAL), the latter of which is a highly potent and reactive electrophile that has been linked to cardiotoxicity. However, many questions remain as to whether catecholaldehydes regulate basic physiological processes in the myocardium and the pathways involved. Here, we examined the role of MAO-derived oxidative metabolites in mediating the activation of cardiac fibroblasts in response to norepinephrine. In neonatal murine cardiac fibroblasts, norepinephrine increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), accumulation of catechol-modified protein adducts, expression and secretion of collagens I/III, and other markers of profibrotic activation including STAT3 phosphorylation. These effects were attenuated with MAO inhibitors, the aldehyde-scavenging dipeptide l-carnosine, and FPS-ZM1, an antagonist for the receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE). Interestingly, treatment of cardiac fibroblasts with a low dose (1 μM) of DOPEGAL-modified albumin phenocopied many of the effects of norepinephrine and also induced an increase in RAGE expression. Higher doses (>10 μM) of DOPEGAL-modified albumin were determined to be toxic to cardiac fibroblasts in a RAGE-dependent manner, which was mitigated by l-carnosine. Collectively, these findings suggest that norepinephrine may influence extracellular matrix remodeling via an adrenergic-independent redox pathway in cardiac fibroblasts involving the MAO-mediated generation of ROS, catecholaldehydes, and RAGE. Furthermore, since elevations in the catecholaminergic tone and oxidative stress in heart disease are linked with cardiac fibrosis, this study illustrates novel drug targets that could potentially mitigate this serious disorder.
Monoamine oxidase (MAO) is rapidly gaining appreciation for its pathophysiologic role in cardiac injury and failure. Oxidative deamination of norepinephrine by MAO generates H2O2 and the catecholaldehyde 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde (DOPEGAL), the latter of which is a highly potent and reactive electrophile that has been linked to cardiotoxicity. However, many questions remain as to whether catecholaldehydes regulate basic physiological processes in the myocardium and the pathways involved. Here, we examined the role of MAO-derived oxidative metabolites in mediating the activation of cardiac fibroblasts in response to norepinephrine. In neonatal murine cardiac fibroblasts, norepinephrine increased reactive oxygen species (ROS), accumulation of catechol-modified protein adducts, expression and secretion of collagens I/III, and other markers of profibrotic activation including STAT3 phosphorylation. These effects were attenuated with MAO inhibitors, the aldehyde-scavenging dipeptide l-carnosine, and FPS-ZM1, an antagonist for the receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE). Interestingly, treatment of cardiac fibroblasts with a low dose (1 μM) of DOPEGAL-modified albumin phenocopied many of the effects of norepinephrine and also induced an increase in RAGE expression. Higher doses (>10 μM) of DOPEGAL-modified albumin were determined to be toxic to cardiac fibroblasts in a RAGE-dependent manner, which was mitigated by l-carnosine. Collectively, these findings suggest that norepinephrine may influence extracellular matrix remodeling via an adrenergic-independent redox pathway in cardiac fibroblasts involving the MAO-mediated generation of ROS, catecholaldehydes, and RAGE. Furthermore, since elevations in the catecholaminergic tone and oxidative stress in heart disease are linked with cardiac fibrosis, this study illustrates novel drug targets that could potentially mitigate this serious disorder.
Myocardial fibrosis,
the pathological accumulation of collagen
in the myocardium, is the result of an excessive wound-healing response
facilitated by fibroblasts becoming activated (i.e., myofibroblasts)
in response to neurohumoral stimuli. In the myocardium, the transition
of resident cardiac fibroblasts to a myofibroblast phenotype is marked
by accelerated proliferation and increases in collagen deposition,
expression of α smooth muscle actin (αSMA), and expression
of proinflammatory chemo/cytokines.[1] While
it can be important in maintaining the integrity of an injured myocardium,
extracellular matrix expansion also contributes to the pathogenesis
of heart failure and arrhythmia by interfering with normal elasticity
and electrical conductivity in myocardial tissue.[2] Myocardial fibrosis is known to be associated with common
metabolic conditions such as diabetes and obesity[3,4] and
is a prominent feature in the etiology of most cardiomyopathies.[1] The molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying
cardiac fibrosis are only partially understood, reflected in the current
paucity of therapies specifically targeting this disorder.While
incomplete, the current understanding of cardiac fibrosis
etiology involves a confluence of factors including oxidative stress
and catecholaminergic and inflammatory signaling pathways.[5−8] Monoamine oxidase (MAO) represents the major metabolic pathway for
the breakdown of norepinephrine (NE) in the heart. MAO deaminates
NE to produce ammonia, hydrogen peroxide, and the reactive aldehyde
3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycolaldehyde (DOPEGAL). This biogenic “catecholaldehyde”
is substantially more cytotoxic and reactive than its parent catecholamines
or any of its other known downstream metabolites.[9] Although their role in neurotoxicity has been studied since
the mid-1990s,[10] catecholaldehydes have
never been examined in the context of cardiovascular disease despite
the rapidly emerging evidence supporting a pathogenic role for MAO
in cardiomyopathy. For example, pathogenic roles for MAO in the adverse
cardiac remodeling seen with diabetes[11] and ischemia/reperfusion injury[12−14] have recently been observed.
Due to the reactivity of the electrophilic aldehyde and catechol moieties,
DOPEGAL will readily react with nucleophilic species on biomolecules
to form adducts.[15] Adducts of biogenic
aldehydes derived from oxidized sugars and lipids constitute advanced
glycation products (AGEs) and advanced lipoxidation endproducts (ALEs),
endogenous agonists of the receptor for advanced glycation endproducts
(RAGE). RAGE has been shown to induce hallmarks of myofibroblast differentiation,[16] including rapid fibroblast proliferation[17] and collagen overproduction.[18] Since RAGE is a pattern recognition receptor that binds
a diverse array of ligands including glycated proteins[19,20] and lipid-modified proteins,[21] it seems
plausible that RAGE is also activated by catechol-modified proteins.While MAO activity in the myocardium has been examined as a source
of oxidative stress in the myocardium, its capacity to promote phenotypic
changes in resident cardiac fibroblasts has never been studied. Furthermore,
most of MAO’s pro-oxidant activity is generally attributed
to hydrogen peroxide generation and the pharmacological/toxicological
effects of catecholaldehydes and their adducts are unknown. To address
these knowledge gaps, we assessed MAO-mediated catecholaldehyde formation
in cardiac fibroblasts and the potential for these reactive metabolites
to mediate myofibroblast differentiation and collagen secretion. Our
hypothesis was that MAO-generated oxidative metabolites stimulate
fibroblast activation through a redox signaling pathway mediated by
RAGE, representing a mechanistic link between increased sympathetic
tone, oxidative stress, and the development of cardiac fibrosis in
heart disease.
Materials and Methods
Primary
Cardiac Fibroblast Preparation and Culture
Cardiac fibroblasts
(CFs) were isolated from D1–D3 neonatal
mouse hearts after digestion with enzymes from a commercially available
kit (Pierce Primary Cardiomyocyte Isolation Kit) and differential
plating technique. CFs were then cultured in Dulbecco’s DMEM/F12
media supplemented with 10% FBS and penicillin–streptomycin,
and cultures were confirmed to be ≥99% CFs. All experiments
were performed between passages 3–6. Since the FPS-ZM1 vehicle
was DMSO and DOPEGAL adducts were synthesized with excess bovine serum
albumin (BSA), the cells in all experimental groups received a vehicle
treatment with equal amounts of BSA (3%) and DMSO (0.001%).
Synthesis
of DOPEGAL and DOPEGAL–BSA Adducts
Preparation of
DOPEGAL was performed using a previously described
method[22,23] with some modifications. A 25 mM solution
of NE (Sigma-Aldrich) in 10 mM potassium phosphate, sodium bisulfite
buffer (pH 7.5) was combined with 100 μL (500 μg) of recombinant
MAO (Corning Life Sciences, Tewksbury, MA) and incubated at 30 °C
for 10 h with gentle shaking and exposure to oxygen. The reaction
was terminated by ultracentrifugation at 100,000g for 30 min, and the supernatant was collected. Adducts of DOPEGAL–bovine
serum albumin were synthesized by incubating aliquots of the supernatant
in 3% BSA solution (Sigma-Aldrich) in 50 mM sodium pyrophosphate buffer
(pH 8.8) overnight at 4 °C. Unreacted small molecules and salts
were removed with a protein concentrator (Pierce, 88,513).
Catechol-Modified
Protein Extraction Using m-Aminophenylboronic Acid
(m-APBA) Resin
Catechol-modified protein
adducts from the CF lysate were isolated
using a modified version of a previously described method.[22,24,25] As depicted in Figure A, the CF lysate (875 μg)
was loaded onto m-APBA resin in 50 mM sodium pyrophosphate
buffer (pH 8.8) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The APBA agarose
was then washed three times with a 1:1 ACN:50 mM sodium pyrophosphate
buffer solution, once with a 5 mM sodium pyrophosphate buffer and
once with ddH2O, centrifuging at 9000g and discarding the supernatant after each wash. Catechol-modified
proteins were eluted from the resin by a 1:1 ACN:1% TFA solution for
1 h at room temperature. After the catechol-modified protein adducts
from the lysate of the treated CFs were subjected to m-APBA pulldown, they were quantified using a BCA protein assay (Pierce).
Figure 1
Catechol-modified
adducts and oxidative stress in CFs following
NE treatment. Reaction schematic showing norepinephrine (NE) is metabolized
by MAO-A to produce DOPEGAL and H2O2, and then
the catechol-modified protein adducts in cell lysates are captured
using aminophenylboronic acid (APBA)-coated resin and quantified by
a BCA assay (A). Cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) were treated for 96 h with
NE (20 μM) alone or concurrently with MAOI (clorgiline + selegiline,
1 μM) or l-carnosine (10 μM), and the catechol-modified
proteins from the lysate were isolated with APBA resin and quantified
by a BCA assay (n = 3) (B). CFs were treated with
NE (5 μM) for 48 h alone or concurrently with RAGE-antagonist
FPS-ZM1 (223 nM), MAOIs, or l-carnosine as above, and the
cytosolic ROS was visualized with a CellROX Deep Red reagent and then
quantified using ImageJ and normalized to the nuclear Hoechst stain
(n = 3) (C). *P < 0.05 versus
vehicle control and †P < 0.05 versus the
NE-treated group.
Catechol-modified
adducts and oxidative stress in CFs following
NE treatment. Reaction schematic showing norepinephrine (NE) is metabolized
by MAO-A to produce DOPEGAL and H2O2, and then
the catechol-modified protein adducts in cell lysates are captured
using aminophenylboronic acid (APBA)-coated resin and quantified by
a BCA assay (A). Cardiac fibroblasts (CFs) were treated for 96 h with
NE (20 μM) alone or concurrently with MAOI (clorgiline + selegiline,
1 μM) or l-carnosine (10 μM), and the catechol-modified
proteins from the lysate were isolated with APBA resin and quantified
by a BCA assay (n = 3) (B). CFs were treated with
NE (5 μM) for 48 h alone or concurrently with RAGE-antagonist
FPS-ZM1 (223 nM), MAOIs, or l-carnosine as above, and the
cytosolic ROS was visualized with a CellROX Deep Red reagent and then
quantified using ImageJ and normalized to the nuclear Hoechst stain
(n = 3) (C). *P < 0.05 versus
vehicle control and †P < 0.05 versus the
NE-treated group.
CF Proliferation
Fibroblasts on a 96-well plate were
treated as described (Figure ). After treatment, the medium was removed and discarded,
and the cells were assayed for proliferation using the CyQUANT Cell
Proliferation Assay (Invitrogen). Per manufacturer’s instructions,
following treatment, the cells were subjected to freeze/thaw and then
assayed with a buffer containing a fluorogenic dye. The cells were
lysed and incubated with a CyQUANT GR dye, and then the fluorescence
was recorded at excitation/emission wavelengths of 485/528 nm using
a plate reader (Synergy HTX, BioTek, Inc.). A standard curve was generated
with serial dilutions of cell suspensions with known concentrations
as determined by an automated cell counter (Countess II FL, Applied
Biosystems). The total number of cells per well was determined by
interpolating the unknown sample fluorescence values to the known
values from the standard curve.
Figure 2
Redox-dependent effects of NE on CF activation
and profibrotic
phenotype. Representative immunoblot of STAT3 phosphorylation in the
cell lysate from CFs treated for 6 h with NE (1 μM) alone or
concurrently with MAOIs (clorgiline + selegiline, 1 μM), FPS-ZM1
(223 nM), or l-carnosine (10 μM) (A). CF proliferation
after NE treatment for 48 h alone or concurrently with MAOIs or l-carnosine (B). Expression of Col1a1 (C), Cola1a3 (D), and
α smooth muscle actin (E) in CFs treated for 6 h with NE alone
or concurrently with MAOIs, FPS-ZM1, or l-carnosine. Collagen
I (F) and III (G) secretion by CFs following treatment with NE alone
for 96 h or concurrently with MAOIs, FPS-ZM1, or l-carnosine.
*P < 0.05 versus vehicle control and †P < 0.05 versus the NE alone group. Data are
representative of N = 3–6 with a minimum of
2 replicates for each experiment.
Redox-dependent effects of NE on CF activation
and profibrotic
phenotype. Representative immunoblot of STAT3 phosphorylation in the
cell lysate from CFs treated for 6 h with NE (1 μM) alone or
concurrently with MAOIs (clorgiline + selegiline, 1 μM), FPS-ZM1
(223 nM), or l-carnosine (10 μM) (A). CF proliferation
after NE treatment for 48 h alone or concurrently with MAOIs or l-carnosine (B). Expression of Col1a1 (C), Cola1a3 (D), and
α smooth muscle actin (E) in CFs treated for 6 h with NE alone
or concurrently with MAOIs, FPS-ZM1, or l-carnosine. Collagen
I (F) and III (G) secretion by CFs following treatment with NE alone
for 96 h or concurrently with MAOIs, FPS-ZM1, or l-carnosine.
*P < 0.05 versus vehicle control and †P < 0.05 versus the NE alone group. Data are
representative of N = 3–6 with a minimum of
2 replicates for each experiment.
ROS Visualization and Quantification in CFs
CFs cultured
on glass-bottom, optically clear 24-well plates (CellVis) were preloaded
with a 20 μM CellROX Deep Red reagent (Thermo Fisher) at 37
°C for 1 h. CFs were then washed with PBS and treated as described
in the figure legends. After the treatment period, CFs were counterstained
with a modified Hoechst stain (NucBlue Live ReadyProbes Reagent, Hoechst
33342). The treatment medium was replaced with a FluoroBrite DMEM
medium (Gibco), and the cells were imaged with an EVOS Auto FL 2 Imaging
System using light cubes with excitation/emission wavelengths of 357/447
nm and 628/685 nm for the modified Hoechst and CellROX dyes, respectively.
The average intensity of CellROX fluorescence per cell was calculated
using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, v1.53) software.
Immunoblot
Analysis
Following treatments indicated
in the figure legends, CF lysate (5 μg protein/lane) was loaded
onto a 4–20% gradient acrylamide gel and subjected to SDS-PAGE.
The proteins were then transferred to a PVDF membrane using a semi-dry
transfer apparatus (BioRad). Total protein on the PVDF membrane was
visualized using a No-Stain Protein Labeling Reagent (Thermo Fisher)
and imaged on an iBright FL1000. The membrane was incubated with 5%
BSA in TBS-Tween 20 to prevent nonspecific binding and then incubated
with primary antibodies specific for RAGE (Santa Cruz, sc-365,154),
phospho-STAT3 (Cell Signaling, 9145), and pan-STAT3 (Cell Signaling,
4904). Membranes were then washed and probed with appropriate secondary
antibodies. The chemiluminescence signal was developed with a SuperSignal
West Pico chemiluminescent substrate, western blots were imaged on
the iBright CL1500 Imaging System (Invitrogen), and densitometric
analysis was performed using their proprietary software (Invitrogen
iBright Analysis Software). Following the immunoblot for phospho-STAT3,
membranes were stripped using a Restore western blot stripping buffer,
reblocked, and reprobed with the pan-STAT3 antibody.
Treated CFs
were lysed using a TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen), and
mRNA was extracted following the manufacturer’s instructions.
From each mRNA sample, cDNA was then synthesized by reverse transcription
using SuperScript IV Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen). After addition
of PowerTrack SYBR Green Master Mix and appropriate primers to targets
of interest, cDNA was amplified on a QuantStudio3 Real-Time PCR system.
Cycle threshold (Ct) values were used
to calculate gene expression relative to vehicle-treated controls
using the 2-ΔΔCt method and normalized
to expression of 18S. The sequences for the forward
and reverse primers used in the qRT-PCR experiments are listed in Table S1.
Collagen Secretion
After CFs were treated as described
in the figure legends, the total protein in the media and CF lysate
was collected and collagen was extracted from CFs using a modified
form of a previously described method.[26] This method employs an acidic pepsin solution consisting of gastric
pepsin (1 mg/mL, Sigma-Aldrich) in 10 mM acetic acid to solubilize
any potentially cross-linked collagen in the samples.[27] The cells were washed with buffer, and collagen was extracted
using the acidic pepsin solution for 2 h at 4 °C with rocking.
The acidic solution was then collected, neutralized with 100 mM sodium
hydroxide, and combined with the media of CFs treated as described
in Figures and 3. For the quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA), serial dilutions of recombinant collagens I and III
(Novus Biologicals) were prepared for standard curves and incubated,
along with the CF samples, in a high-binding 96-well plate at 4 °C
overnight. The plates were then washed and blocked with 5% BSA at
4 °C overnight. The samples were then incubated with primary
antibodies for collagens I and III (Novus Biologicals) and then subsequently
incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody.
A solution of 10 μM Amplex Red (Thermo Fisher) was then added
to generate the fluorophore resorufin that was measured at Ex/Em of
567/590 nm.
Figure 3
Proinflammatory, profibrotic effect of exogenous DOPEGAL–BSA
adducts in CFs. The proinflammatory effect after treatment of CFs
with DOPEGAL–BSA adducts (1 μM) alone or concurrently
with FPS-ZM1 (223 nM) or l-carnosine (10 μM) on RAGE
protein after 72 h (A) and mRNA (B) and TNFα expression after
48 h (C) are shown. Expression of Col1a1 (D), Cola1a3 (E), and αSMA
(F) in CFs treated for 3 h with DOPEGAL–BSA alone or concurrently
with FPS-ZM1 or l-carnosine. Collagen I (G) and III (H) secretion
by CFs following treatment with DOPEGAL–BSA alone for 96 h
or concurrently with FPS-ZM1, NOX inhibitor apocynin (2 μM),
or l-carnosine. *P < 0.05 versus vehicle
control and †P < 0.05 versus the DOPEGAL–BSA-treated
group. Data are representative of N = 3–4
with a minimum of 2 replicates for each experiment.
Proinflammatory, profibrotic effect of exogenous DOPEGAL–BSA
adducts in CFs. The proinflammatory effect after treatment of CFs
with DOPEGAL–BSA adducts (1 μM) alone or concurrently
with FPS-ZM1 (223 nM) or l-carnosine (10 μM) on RAGE
protein after 72 h (A) and mRNA (B) and TNFα expression after
48 h (C) are shown. Expression of Col1a1 (D), Cola1a3 (E), and αSMA
(F) in CFs treated for 3 h with DOPEGAL–BSA alone or concurrently
with FPS-ZM1 or l-carnosine. Collagen I (G) and III (H) secretion
by CFs following treatment with DOPEGAL–BSA alone for 96 h
or concurrently with FPS-ZM1, NOX inhibitor apocynin (2 μM),
or l-carnosine. *P < 0.05 versus vehicle
control and †P < 0.05 versus the DOPEGAL–BSA-treated
group. Data are representative of N = 3–4
with a minimum of 2 replicates for each experiment.
Cytotoxicity Analysis
Living and dead CFs were quantified
and visualized after treatments using the LIVE/DEAD Viability/Cytotoxicity
Kit (Invitrogen). The LIVE/DEAD system relies on fluorophores generated
from two reagents: calcein AM and ethidium homodimer-1 (EthD-1). Esterase
activity in the cytosol of living cells produces a fluorophore from
calcein AM in the green spectrum (Ex/Em = 494/517 nm). Generally unavailable
to living cells with intact membranes, EthD-1 can bind to DNA in nonviable
cells to produce a fluorophore in the red spectrum (Ex/Em = 528/617
nm). Briefly, treated CFs were loaded with both reagents and then
imaged with an EVOS Auto FL 2 imaging system using FITC and TRITC
light cubes to capture the excitation/emission wavelengths of 470/525
nm and 531/593 nm for calcein and EthD-1, respectively. The relative
viability was also quantitatively assessed using LIVE/DEAD reagents.
After loading, the fluorescence of the plated cells was measured using
a SpectraMax M5 (Molecular Devices) plate reader at each of the fluorophore’s
aforementioned Ex/Em maxima. The fluorescence values were then used
to quantify cell death relative to groups of untreated cells, defined
as 100% viable, and cells treated with 70% methanol for 45 min, defined
as 100% dead.
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed
using a one-way
ANOVA with multiple post hoc Tukey tests to compare differences between
treatment groups. The analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism
9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). In the figures, data are presented
as a mean ± standard error of the mean, with a P value less than 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results
NE Catabolism
by MAO Generates Catechol-Modified Adducts and
Oxidative Stress in Primary Cardiac Fibroblasts
The aldehyde
group on DOPEGAL has been shown to readily react with nucleophilic
species on biomolecules, particularly amines, to form Schiff bases,
which then undergo Amadori rearrangement to form catechol-modified
adducts.[10] In order to isolate catechol-modified
adducts for quantification, we employed a method that we previously
optimized and validated for extracting DOPEGAL-modified protein adducts
from human myocardial tissues.[22] This method
uses an aminophenylboronic acid (APBA) resin to selectively bind catechol
moieties under basic conditions. Captured adducts can then be released
from the resin with acid and then quantified with a bicinchoninic
acid (BCA) assay (Figure A). Exposure to NE substantially increased catechol adduct
levels in primary murine cardiac fibroblasts (CFs), which were attenuated
with monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) clorgiline and selegiline
(Figure B).To probe the role of the aldehyde moiety in the chemistry of adduct
formation as well as its relevance in promoting a profibrotic phenotype
in CFs, we used l-carnosine in these experiments. l-Carnosine is an endogenous β-alanyl histidine dipeptide that
is highly enriched to millimolar quantities in the heart, muscle,
and brain[28−30] and has a potent capacity to sequester and detoxify
reactive carbonyl species.[31−34]l-Carnosine has been shown to form a stable
product with the aldehyde metabolite of dopamine, DOPAL, and DOPEGAL.[35] Concurrent treatment of NE with l-carnosine
abrogated the formation of catechol-modified protein adducts (Figure B).Given that
the catecholaldehydes necessary to form protein adducts
are generated alongside H2O2, we would expect
an increase in cellular ROS to accompany protein adduct formation.
Using the cytosolic ROS indicator CellROX,[36] we found that NE increased cytosolic ROS in the CFs along the same
time frame as catecholaldehyde formation (Figure C). This ROS is normalized through concurrent
treatments of MAOIs and l-carnosine, but not RAGE antagonist
FPS-ZM1.
NE Induces a Profibrotic Phenotype in CFs via MAO and Downstream
RAGE Signaling
NE is known to activate fibroblasts,[37−40] but a role for MAO-mediated NE metabolites in this physiological
process has never been explored. One pathway that putatively affects
changes in collagen secretion involves phosphorylation of STAT3 by
Janus kinase.[41,42] When fibroblasts were stimulated
with NE, there was a clear, corresponding phosphorylation of STAT3
with no accompanying change in the total STAT3 expression. Phosphorylation
of STAT3 was eliminated with the inhibition of MAO activity and ROS
formation (Figure A). NE stimulated an increase in CF proliferation that was also abrogated
with concurrent MAOI or l-carnosine treatment (Figure B).To assess
the extent of profibrotic shift in CFs, we measured the expression
of Col1a1 (Figure C), Col3a1 (Figure D), and α smooth muscle actin (αSMA, Figure E) genes in response to NE
and again found that NE-induced up-regulation of profibrotic gene
expression was blunted with concurrent treatment with MAOIs, l-carnosine, and FPS-ZM1. To further probe the functional consequences
of the MAO-mediated effect of NE, we developed and validated a quantitative
ELISA method based on a previously published method[26] to determine the total amount of collagen I and III secretion
by CFs, and these values were normalized to total cellular protein.
Secretions of both collagens I (Figure F) and III (Figure G) were stimulated by NE treatment, and this secretion
was abrogated by MAOIs, l-carnosine, and FPS-ZM1.
Exogenous
Catecholaldehyde Adducts Phenocopy MAO-Mediated NE
Metabolites in CFs via RAGE Signaling
Chronic activation
of RAGE has been shown to be involved in mediating the pathophysiological
cardiac remodeling observed in a number of diseases, including heart
failure, diabetes, and obesity.[3,43] Putatively, RAGE signaling
acts through phosphorylation of p38 MAPK and NF-κB activation,[44] phosphorylation of SMAD2/3,[45] and phosphorylation of STAT3[18] to activate fibroblasts and increase the production of inflammatory
factors. Given that the RAGE antagonist FPS-ZM1 attenuated the effect
of NE on fibroblast activation, we next tested the hypothesis that
CFs treated with exogenous (i.e., extracellular) catechol-modified
protein adducts act as RAGE agonists, similar to glycated albumin.
To investigate the pharmacological effects of catechol-modified adducts,
we treated fibroblasts with exogenously synthesized DOPEGAL-modified
bovine serum albumin. DOPEGAL–BSA-treated fibroblasts exhibited
a nearly 3-fold increase in RAGE protein levels (Figure A), accompanied by significant
up-regulations in RAGE (Figure B) and TNFα (Figure C) mRNA. Furthermore, DOPEGAL-adduct phenocopied NE
treatment in CFs, resulting in increased expression of profibrotic
markers Col1a1 (Figure D), Col3a1 (Figure E), and αSMA (Figure F) and secretion of collagen I (Figure G) and collagen III (Figure H). RAGE signaling putatively induces oxidative
stress in cells through a variety of pathways including activation
of NADPH oxidase (NOX), and this was observed in CFs stimulated with
DOPEGAL–BSA adducts (Figure S1).
Additionally, DOPEGAL adduct-induced increases in oxidative stress
and profibrotic, proinflammatory signaling could be completely abrogated
with FPS-ZM1 or l-carnosine and partially abrogated with
the NOX inhibitor apocynin.
Concentration-Dependent Cytotoxicity of DOPEGAL–BSA
Adducts
in CFs Is Mediated by RAGE Signaling
RAGE activation is known
to induce apoptosis in several cell types,[46−48] including fibroblasts.[49] Accumulation of ROS and activation of NF-κB,
p38 MAPK, and caspase-3 are thought to play roles in RAGE-dependent
apoptotic signaling.[46,50,51] We next quantified and visualized the concentration-dependent effect
of DOPEGAL–BSA on CFs and observed a dose-dependent cytotoxicity
(Figure A,B), which
was sensitive to RAGE signaling/oxidative stress inhibition (Figure C,D).
Figure 4
Toxicity of exogenous
DOPEGAL–BSA adducts in CFs. Representative
images (A) showing the dose-dependent toxicity of DOPEGAL–BSA
in CFs using calcein AM (green) to stain living cells and ethidium
homodimer-1 (red) to stain dead cells, and the overall ratio of live/dead
cells was quantified at each DOPEGAL–BSA concentration (B).
CFs were treated with a high dose of DOPEGAL–BSA adduct (200
μM) alone or concurrently with FPS-ZM1 (223 nM), apocynin (2
μM), or l-carnosine (100 μM), and the cells were
imaged (C) and quantified (D) using the same technique. *P < 0.001 versus vehicle control, **P < 0.0001
versus vehicle control, and †P < 0.05 versus
the DOPEGAL–BSA-treated group. Data are representative of N = 3–4 with a minimum of 2 replicates for each experiment.
Toxicity of exogenous
DOPEGAL–BSA adducts in CFs. Representative
images (A) showing the dose-dependent toxicity of DOPEGAL–BSA
in CFs using calcein AM (green) to stain living cells and ethidium
homodimer-1 (red) to stain dead cells, and the overall ratio of live/dead
cells was quantified at each DOPEGAL–BSA concentration (B).
CFs were treated with a high dose of DOPEGAL–BSA adduct (200
μM) alone or concurrently with FPS-ZM1 (223 nM), apocynin (2
μM), or l-carnosine (100 μM), and the cells were
imaged (C) and quantified (D) using the same technique. *P < 0.001 versus vehicle control, **P < 0.0001
versus vehicle control, and †P < 0.05 versus
the DOPEGAL–BSA-treated group. Data are representative of N = 3–4 with a minimum of 2 replicates for each experiment.
Discussion
Catecholamine overload
has long been known to be a major factor
in the pathophysiology of cardiac fibrosis. Both chronic exposure
to NE[52] and pathologies associated with
a hyperadrenergic state[53,54] have been associated
with severe fibrosis in the heart. Pathogenic mechanisms linking catecholamine
excess to cardiac fibrosis are thought to be mediated largely via
proapoptotic and/or profibrotic signaling driven by hyperstimulation
of α-/β-adrenergic receptors in myocardial cells. However,
a new paradigm of catecholamine pathogenicity in the heart has recently
emerged, which is completely independent of canonical adrenergic signaling
but rather dependent on the MAO-catalyzed oxidative metabolites formed
from intracellular catecholamine metabolism. Indeed, MAO is now recognized
as a nexus of oxidative stress that contributes to cardiac remodeling
and dysfunction in diabetes,[11,55] ischemia/reperfusion
injury,[13,56] and pressure overload.[57] The present study provides evidence of a previously unappreciated
redox signaling pathway that stems from the MAO-mediated metabolism
of NE in primary CFs. Collectively, we have found that (1) NE stimulates
ROS and catechol adducts in primary CFs in a MAO-dependent manner;
(2) oxidative metabolites of NE stimulate proliferation, profibrotic
gene expression, and collagen secretion via RAGE; (3) DOPEGAL–BSA
adducts recapitulate the pharmacological effects of NE via RAGE at
low concentrations; and (4) and DOPEGAL–BSA also causes cytotoxicity
at high concentrations via RAGE. These findings have significant implications
for extracellular matrix expansion under a broad range of cardiometabolic
disease states.MAO is tethered to the outer mitochondrial membrane
and as such
represents a substantial source of ROS in many cell types that have
high mitochondrial content.[12] In a recent
study, we found that catecholaldehyde protein adducts were markedly
increased in samples of atrial myocardium from diabetes patients as
compared with age- and comorbidity-matched patients without diabetes.[22] Furthermore, using APBA affinity chromatography,
we found that mitochondria isolated from these atrial tissues contain
>300 proteins modified by catechol adducts and that the total abundance
of these modifications increase with NE exposure. We also observed
that mitochondrial OXPHOS in the atrial myocardium is disrupted by
NE in diabetes patients, where MAO activity is increased and levels
of aldehyde dehydrogenase-2, a major aldehyde-detoxifying enzyme,
are decreased. Thus, it is important to recognize that in cardiometabolic
disease states (e.g., obesity/diabetes, heart failure, and atrial
fibrillation) where oxidative stress is coming from multiple sources
and is forcing a “bottleneck” in detoxification pathways,
the findings of the present study are of particular importance. NE
clearly stimulates catechol adduct formation and profibrotic phenotype
in primary CFs, and this effect is mediated by MAO, as concurrent
treatment with MAOIs and l-carnosine abrogates this effect
(Figure ).Biogenic
aldehydes, including DOPEGAL, react with nucleophilic
species on proteins to create adducts including advanced glycation
endproducts (AGEs) and advanced lipoxidation endproducts (ALEs).[58] These adducts are now recognized to be very
biologically active and mostly proinflammatory through their ability
to activate RAGE. RAGE signaling has been implicated as a causal factor
in many chronic diseases driven by oxidative stress[59−61] including cardiac
fibrosis.[43] RAGE is not only activated
by products derived from oxidative stress, RAGE signaling putatively
induces oxidative stress via activation of NADPH oxidase (NOX), which
leads to further AGE formation and thus amplifies RAGE activation
in a “vicious cycle”.[62] It
is important to note that the formation of catechol-modified adducts
coincided with an increase in overall cellular ROS (Figure ). However, the fact that the
increase in cellular ROS could be attenuated with MAOIs or l-carnosine, but not RAGE antagonist, suggests that the major route
for NE-induced oxidative stress is through MAO activity and subsequent
catecholaldehyde generation rather than NOX activation downstream
of RAGE.To our knowledge, the present study represents the
first attempt
to investigate the pharmacological activity of DOPEGAL-modified protein
adducts (i.e., DOPEGAL–BSA), and our findings indicate that
they occur through activation of RAGE. Inhibition of RAGE significantly
blunted both NE- (Figure ) and DOPEGAL–BSA-induced (Figure ) expression of profibrotic factors and secretion
of collagen in primary CFs. Taken with observed NE-induced phosphorylation
of STAT3, a known downstream target of oxidative stress and RAGE signaling,
the results of these experiments indicate a potential role for DOPEGAL
and DOPEGAL-modified protein adducts in fibroblast activation through
RAGE signaling. Although more work is clearly needed to better characterize
the identity and reactivity of catechol-modified adducts, a recent
structural study may help explain how DOPEGAL modification could make
albumin a RAGE ligand.[21] Modification of
basic amino acids, namely, lysine, with a neutral catechol group,
would make nearby negatively charged side chains available to bind
to positive species in the V domain of RAGE. As discussed above, our
group has identified potential targets for catechol adduct modification
in the human heart mitochondria,[22] and
proteomics analysis is currently ongoing to identify and characterize
catecholaldehyde–protein adducts in multiple other tissue/cell
types, including primary CFs.To conclude, our study provides
evidence that NE is capable of
activating and inducing a profibrotic phenotype in CFs via a redox
signaling pathway that is completely independent of canonical α-
or β-adrenergic signaling but is dependent on MAO and RAGE.
Given that MAO has been found to be up-regulated in the heart with
numerous cardiometabolic disorders, these findings indicate possible
contributing roles for oxidative metabolites formed from MAO-mediated
NE metabolism in extracellular matrix expansion and the pathogenesis
of cardiac fibrosis. Ultimately, a more detailed understanding of
how MAO affects adverse cardiac remodeling in vivo could potentially
inform therapeutic strategies by identifying druggable targets (i.e.,
detoxifying biogenic aldehydes, inhibiting MAO, and antagonizing RAGE).
Authors: William J Burke; Shu Wen Li; Hyung D Chung; David A Ruggiero; Bruce S Kristal; Eugene M Johnson; Patricia Lampe; Vijaya B Kumar; Mark Franko; Evelyn A Williams; Daniel S Zahm Journal: Neurotoxicology Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 4.294
Authors: Martin J Wanner; Ed Zuidinga; Dorette S Tromp; Jan Vilím; Steen Ingemann Jørgensen; Jan H van Maarseveen Journal: J Org Chem Date: 2019-12-30 Impact factor: 4.354
Authors: Jaqueline S da Silva; Renata G J Gonçalves; Juliana F Vasques; Bruna S Rocha; Bianca Nascimento-Carlos; Tadeu L Montagnoli; Rosália Mendez-Otero; Mauro P L de Sá; Gisele Zapata-Sudo Journal: Cells Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 6.600