Literature DB >> 34603541

The glutamatergic synapse: a complex machinery for information processing.

Vito Di Maio1.   

Abstract

Being the most abundant synaptic type, the glutamatergic synapse is responsible for the larger part of the brain's information processing. Despite the conceptual simplicity of the basic mechanism of synaptic transmission, the glutamatergic synapse shows a large variation in the response to the presynaptic release of the neurotransmitter. This variability is observed not only among different synapses but also in the same single synapse. The synaptic response variability is due to several mechanisms of control of the information transferred among the neurons and suggests that the glutamatergic synapse is not a simple bridge for the transfer of information but plays an important role in its elaboration and management. The control of the synaptic information is operated at pre, post, and extrasynaptic sites in a sort of cooperation between the pre and postsynaptic neurons which also involves the activity of other neurons. The interaction between the different mechanisms of control is extremely complicated and its complete functionality is far from being fully understood. The present review, although not exhaustively, is intended to outline the most important of these mechanisms and their complexity, the understanding of which will be among the most intriguing challenges of future neuroscience.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AMPA; Brain information processing; EPSC; EPSP; Glutamatergic synapse; LTD; LTP; NMDA; Synaptic information processing; Synaptic modeling; Synaptic transmission; dendritic integration; dendritic spines

Year:  2021        PMID: 34603541      PMCID: PMC8448802          DOI: 10.1007/s11571-021-09679-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn        ISSN: 1871-4080            Impact factor:   3.473


  222 in total

1.  Analysis of calcium channels in single spines using optical fluctuation analysis.

Authors:  B L Sabatini; K Svoboda
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Activation of synaptic NMDA receptors induces membrane insertion of new AMPA receptors and LTP in cultured hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  W Lu; H Man; W Ju; W S Trimble; J F MacDonald; Y T Wang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Synaptic democracy in active dendrites.

Authors:  Clifton C Rumsey; L F Abbott
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Intrinsic quantal variability due to stochastic properties of receptor-transmitter interactions.

Authors:  D S Faber; W S Young; P Legendre; H Korn
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-11-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Regulation of information passing by synaptic transmission: a short review.

Authors:  Vito Di Maio
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Activation kinetics of AMPA receptor channels reveal the number of functional agonist binding sites.

Authors:  J D Clements; A Feltz; Y Sahara; G L Westbrook
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Calcium dynamics in single spines during coincident pre- and postsynaptic activity depend on relative timing of back-propagating action potentials and subthreshold excitatory postsynaptic potentials.

Authors:  H J Koester; B Sakmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  How could SNARE proteins open a fusion pore?

Authors:  Qinghua Fang; Manfred Lindau
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-07

9.  Computational quest for understanding the role of astrocyte signaling in synaptic transmission and plasticity.

Authors:  Maurizio De Pittà; Vladislav Volman; Hugues Berry; Vladimir Parpura; Andrea Volterra; Eshel Ben-Jacob
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  A Glutamatergic Spine Model to Enable Multi-Scale Modeling of Nonlinear Calcium Dynamics.

Authors:  Eric Hu; Adam Mergenthal; Clayton S Bingham; Dong Song; Jean-Marie Bouteiller; Theodore W Berger
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.