Literature DB >> 9412492

Activation kinetics of AMPA receptor channels reveal the number of functional agonist binding sites.

J D Clements1, A Feltz, Y Sahara, G L Westbrook.   

Abstract

AMPA and NMDA receptor channels are closely related molecules, yet they respond to glutamate with distinct kinetics, attributable to differences in ligand binding and channel gating steps (for review, see Edmonds et al., 1995). We used two complementary approaches to investigate the number of functional binding sites on AMPA channels on outside-out patches from cultured hippocampal neurons. The activation kinetics of agonist binding were measured during rapid steps into low concentrations of selective AMPA receptor agonists and during steps from a competitive AMPA receptor antagonist, 6-cyano-7-nitro-quinoxaline-2,3-dione, into a saturating concentration of agonist. Both approaches revealed sigmoidal kinetics, which suggests that multiple agonist binding steps or antagonist unbinding steps are needed for channel activation. A kinetic model with two independent binding sites gave a better fit to the activation phase than models with one or three independent sites. A more refined analysis incorporating cooperative interaction between the two binding sites significantly improved the fits to the responses. The affinity of the first binding step was two to three times higher than the second step. These results demonstrate that binding of two agonist molecules are needed to activate AMPA receptors, but the two binding sites are not identical and independent. Because NMDA receptors require four ligand molecules for activation (two glycine and two glutamate; Benveniste and Mayer, 1991; Clements and Westbrook, 1991), it may be that some binding sites on AMPA receptors are functionally silent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9412492      PMCID: PMC6793380     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  59 in total

1.  NMDA channel behavior depends on agonist affinity.

Authors:  R A Lester; C E Jahr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Agonist selectivity of glutamate receptors is specified by two domains structurally related to bacterial amino acid-binding proteins.

Authors:  Y Stern-Bach; B Bettler; M Hartley; P O Sheppard; P J O'Hara; S F Heinemann
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  NMDA and non-NMDA receptors are co-localized at individual excitatory synapses in cultured rat hippocampus.

Authors:  J M Bekkers; C F Stevens
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Activation kinetics reveal the number of glutamate and glycine binding sites on the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor.

Authors:  J D Clements; G L Westbrook
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Structural determinants of allosteric regulation in alternatively spliced AMPA receptors.

Authors:  K M Partin; D Bowie; M L Mayer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 6.  N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor structure and function.

Authors:  C J McBain; M L Mayer
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  A molecular determinant for submillisecond desensitization in glutamate receptors.

Authors:  J Mosbacher; R Schoepfer; H Monyer; N Burnashev; P H Seeburg; J P Ruppersberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-11-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Control of kinetic properties of AMPA receptor channels by nuclear RNA editing.

Authors:  H Lomeli; J Mosbacher; T Melcher; T Höger; J R Geiger; T Kuner; H Monyer; M Higuchi; A Bach; P H Seeburg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-12-09       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Glutamate receptor channels in isolated patches from CA1 and CA3 pyramidal cells of rat hippocampal slices.

Authors:  P Jonas; B Sakmann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  Molecular diversity of glutamate receptors and implications for brain function.

Authors:  S Nakanishi
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of the number of agonist molecules needed to activate a ligand-gated channel from the current rising phase.

Authors:  E Ratner; O Tour; H Parnas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  How AMPA receptor desensitization depends on receptor occupancy.

Authors:  Antoine Robert; James R Howe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Binding site stoichiometry and the effects of phosphorylation on human alpha1 homomeric glycine receptors.

Authors:  Luc J Gentet; John D Clements
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Synaptic neurotransmitter-gated receptors.

Authors:  Trevor G Smart; Pierre Paoletti
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  TARP subtypes differentially and dose-dependently control synaptic AMPA receptor gating.

Authors:  Aaron D Milstein; Wei Zhou; Siavash Karimzadegan; David S Bredt; Roger A Nicoll
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  A nondesensitizing kainate receptor point mutant.

Authors:  Naushaba Nayeem; Yihong Zhang; Devin K Schweppe; Dean R Madden; Tim Green
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  Defining affinity with the GABAA receptor.

Authors:  M V Jones; Y Sahara; J A Dzubay; G L Westbrook
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  From the stochasticity of molecular processes to the variability of synaptic transmission.

Authors:  Claire Ribrault; Ken Sekimoto; Antoine Triller
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory protein regulation of competitive antagonism: a problem of interpretation.

Authors:  David M Maclean; Derek Bowie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Brominated 7-hydroxycoumarin-4-ylmethyls: photolabile protecting groups with biologically useful cross-sections for two photon photolysis.

Authors:  T Furuta; S S Wang; J L Dantzker; T M Dore; W J Bybee; E M Callaway; W Denk; R Y Tsien
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.