| Literature DB >> 34596742 |
Carla Trevisan M Ribeiro1, Tatiana Hamanaka2, Sheila Pone2, Mitsue Senra Aibe2, Saint Clair Gomes2, Karin Nielsen-Saines3, Elizabeth B Brickley4, Maria Elisabeth Moreira2, Marcos Pone2.
Abstract
Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS) is characterized by many impairments especially in the central nervous system, potentially compromising neurodevelopment and causing significant morbidity in affected children. The aim was to assess gross motor function in children with CZS. This was a cross-sectional investigation nested within a prospective cohort study of children with CZS based in a Brazilian referral hospital in Rio de Janeiro. Between March/2017 and February/2018, we performed gross motor function assessments using the Gross Motor Function Classification (GMFCS) and the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM), estimating the mean and standard deviation of GMFM scores among GMFCS groups. The study sample included 72 children, with a median age of 13 months (7-25). Of these, 63 (87.5%) had severe motor impairment, 3 (4%) had moderate impairment, and 6 (8%) had mild impairment. The mean GMFM score for each group was respectively 11.6, 26.1, and 81.6, with statistically significant differences (p-value < 0.001). Severely affected children only achieved head control in the sitting posture when supported. Children with milder forms were able to develop walking skills.Entities:
Keywords: Neurodevelopmental disorders; Zika; Zika virus infection
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34596742 PMCID: PMC8821062 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-021-04270-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Pediatr ISSN: 0340-6199 Impact factor: 3.860
Description of study population according to GMFCS classification as mild, moderate, and severe impairment groups
| GMFCS | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mild | Moderate | Severe | |||
|
| n = 6 | n = 3 | n = 63 | N = 72 | |
|
| 14.5 (1.4) | 11.7 (0.6) | 14.1 (4.7) | 13.9 (4.4) | |
|
| Female | 3 (50.0%) | 1 (33.3%) | 29 (46.0%) | 33 (45.8%) |
| Male | 3 (50.0%) | 2 (66.7%) | 34 (54.0%) | 39 (54.2%) | |
|
| Yes | 2 (33.3%) | 0 | 51 (81.0%) | 53 (73.6%) |
| No | 4 (66.7%) | 3 (100%) | 12 (19.0%) | 19 (26.4%) | |
|
| Moderate | 1 (50.0%) | 0 | 16 (31.4%) | 17 (32.1%) |
| Severe | 1 (50.0%) | 0 | 35 (68.6%) | 36 (67.9%) | |
|
| Yes | 4 (66.7%) | 2 (66.7%) | 25 (39.7%) | 31 (43%) |
|
| No | 2 (33.3%) | 1 (33.3%) | 38 (60.3%) | 41 (57%) |
|
| Yes | 4 (66.7%) | 3 (100%) | 56 (88.9%) | 65 (87.5%) |
| No | 2 (33.3%) | 0 | 7 (11.1%) | 9 (12.5%) | |
|
| I = 0 | II = 3 | IV = 42 | – | |
| II = 6 | V = 21 | ||||
|
| 81.6 (5.9) | 26.1 (7.0) | 11.6 (3.6) | 17.6 (20.2) | |
GMFCS, gross motor function classification system; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; ZIKV, Zika virus
Mean (SD) GMFM scores in each dimension according to gross motor function impairment groups
| Mild | Moderate | Severe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimension A | 100 (0) | 84.3 (16.7) | 38.3 (14.9) |
| Dimension B | 98.6 (2.2) | 42.2 (12.5) | 16.8 (6.2) |
| Dimension C | 90.0 (11.3) | 4.0 (6.9) | 0 (0) |
| Dimension D | 83.3 (9.3) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| Dimension E | 36.4 (15.7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Means and standard deviation in parentheses