| Literature DB >> 34596427 |
José A Bauermeister1, Ryan C Tingler1, Sherri Johnson2, Nicole Macagna2, Jonathan Lucas2, Clara Dominguez-Islas3, Daniel Szydlo4, Julie Ngo4, Cindy E Jacobson5, Lindsay Kramzer5, Devika Singh5, Charlene S Dezzutti5,6, Ratiya Pamela Kunjara Na Ayudhya7, Jeanna Piper8, Bríd Devlin9, Craig W Hendrix6,10, Ken Ho5.
Abstract
We triangulated quantitative and qualitative assessments to evaluate participants' acceptability of 0.05% dapivirine rectal microbicide (RM) gel administered via two separate modalities (a rectal applicator and an artificial phallus for use as a coital simulation device) as part of a Phase I trial (N = 14) among men who have sex with men (MSM) randomized using a 1:1 ratio. Overall, participants reported favorable acceptability of the gel (n = 11; 78.6%), the same or more at the end of the study compared to when they started the study. Additionally, when discussing their preferred administration modality, they noted that both methods had positive qualities but also potential areas of improvement. Our findings underscore the need to create multiple delivery methods for a future microbicide gel (i.e., with and without the need for an applicator) and highlight the importance of offering MSM choices in how biomedical HIV prevention strategies are delivered.Entities:
Keywords: HIV; HIV prevention; behavioral congruence; microbicides; rectal
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34596427 PMCID: PMC8637489 DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2021.33.5.361
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS Educ Prev ISSN: 0899-9546