Literature DB >> 15522488

Microbicide acceptability research: current approaches and future directions.

Joanne E Mantell1, Landon Myer, Alex Carballo-Diéguez, Zena Stein, Gita Ramjee, Neetha S Morar, Polly F Harrison.   

Abstract

With growing recognition of the potential value of microbicides for HIV/STI prevention, the importance of the acceptability of this brand-new technology has been widely acknowledged. We review the current body of microbicide acceptability research, characterize the limitations in assessment approaches, and suggest strategies for improvement. Electronic databases and abstracts of recent meetings were searched for acceptability data regarding vaginal and rectal products that may be used for HIV prevention. Of the 61 studies reviewed, more than half assessed acceptability based primarily on the description of a hypothetical microbicide, or with the demonstration of a spermicide or lubricant. Physical characteristics of microbicidal products, their effects after insertion, and their effects on sensation during intercourse (for both partners) were the dimensions most frequently assessed (measured in 77%, 49% and 49% of studies, respectively). Attention to the social context of use was inadequate. As acceptability is likely to be a key determinant in the use-effectiveness of microbicides, in-depth understanding of the social processes that shape microbicide acceptability across diverse populations will become increasingly valuable. This includes exploring the effects that sexual partners, health care providers, and key opinion leaders have on the acceptability of microbicides among women and men, including youth and people living with HIV. Future research will benefit from studies of the acceptability of other contraceptive-barrier methods (especially the female condom), use of an agreed-upon operationalization of acceptability, use of acceptability assessments within clinical trials, expansion of measurement domains, and assessment of changes in perceptions of acceptability and use over time. Failure to understand the key factors associated with microbicide acceptability is likely to hinder the adoption and continued use of products that are effective in preventing HIV infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15522488     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  61 in total

1.  Meaning-making matters in product design: users' sensory perceptions and experience evaluations of long-acting vaginal gels and intravaginal rings.

Authors:  Rochelle K Rosen; Jacob J van den Berg; Sara E Vargas; Natali Senocak; Julia G Shaw; Robert W Buckheit; Kelley Alison Smith; Kate Morrow Guthrie
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Quantitative perceptual differences among over-the-counter vaginal products using a standardized methodology: implications for microbicide development.

Authors:  Ellen D Mahan; Kathleen M Morrow; John E Hayes
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Contraceptive efficacy, acceptability, and safety of C31G and nonoxynol-9 spermicidal gels: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anne E Burke; Kurt Barnhart; Jeffrey T Jensen; Mitchell D Creinin; Terri L Walsh; Livia S Wan; Carolyn Westhoff; Michael Thomas; David Archer; Hongsheng Wu; James Liu; William Schlaff; Bruce R Carr; Diana Blithe
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Assessing microbicide acceptability: a comprehensive and integrated approach.

Authors:  Kathleen M Morrow; Monica S Ruiz
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2007-06-26

5.  Acceptability of hypothetical microbicides among women in sex establishments in rural areas in Southern China.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Su-Su Liao; Margaret R Weeks; Jing-Mei Jiang; Maryann Abbott; Yue-Jiao Zhou; Bin He; Wei Liu; Katie E Mosack
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  HIV vaccine knowledge and beliefs among communities at elevated risk: conspiracies, questions and confusion.

Authors:  Kathleen Johnston Roberts; Peter A Newman; Naihua Duan; Ellen T Rudy
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Vaginal microbicide preferences among midwestern urban adolescent women.

Authors:  Amanda E Tanner; Jennifer M Katzenstein; Gregory D Zimet; Dena S Cox; Anthony D Cox; J Dennis Fortenberry
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 8.  Acceptability in microbicide and PrEP trials: current status and a reconceptualization.

Authors:  Barbara S Mensch; Ariane van der Straten; Lauren L Katzen
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.283

9.  Acceptability and use of sexual barrier products and lubricants among HIV-seropositive Zambian men.

Authors:  D L Jones; S M Weiss; N Chitalu; M Mumbi; A Shine; S Vamos; O Villar
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.078

10.  Vaginal microbicide and diaphragm use for sexually transmitted infection prevention: a randomized acceptability and feasibility study among high-risk women in Madagascar.

Authors:  Frieda M Behets; Abigail Norris Turner; Kathleen Van Damme; Ny Lovaniaina Rabenja; Noro Ravelomanana; Teresa A Swezey; April J Bell; Daniel R Newman; D'Nyce L Williams; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.