| Literature DB >> 34596277 |
Anna Rabe1, Julia Büker2, Soma Salamon3, Adarsh Koul4, Ulrich Hagemann5,6, Joachim Landers3, Klaus Friedel Ortega7, Baoxiang Peng2, Martin Muhler2, Heiko Wende3, Wolfgang Schuhmann4, Malte Behrens1,6,7.
Abstract
By using the crystalline precursor decomposition approach and direct co-precipitation the composition and mesostructure of cobalt-based spinels can be controlled. A systematic substitution of cobalt with redox-active iron and redox-inactive magnesium and aluminum in a cobalt spinel with anisotropic particle morphology with a preferred 111 surface termination is presented, resulting in a substitution series including Co3 O4 , MgCo2 O4 , Co2 FeO4 , Co2 AlO4 and CoFe2 O4 . The role of redox pairs in the spinels is investigated in chemical water oxidation by using ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN test), electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and H2 O2 decomposition. Studying the effect of dominant surface termination, isotropic Co3 O4 and CoFe2 O4 catalysts with more or less spherical particles are compared to their anisotropic analogues. For CAN-test and OER, Co3+ plays the major role for high activity. In H2 O2 decomposition, Co2+ reveals itself to be of major importance. Redox active cations in the structure enhance the catalytic activity in all reactions. A benefit of a predominant 111 surface termination depends on the cobalt oxidation state in the as-prepared catalysts and the investigated reaction.Entities:
Keywords: co-precipitation; cobalt spinels; crystalline precursor decomposition approach; oxygen evolution reaction; structure-reactivity relationship
Year: 2021 PMID: 34596277 PMCID: PMC9298119 DOI: 10.1002/chem.202102400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemistry ISSN: 0947-6539 Impact factor: 5.020
Figure 1PXRD patterns of the as‐prepared hydroxide (top), layered double hydroxide (bottom) precursors and the corresponding reference patterns of β‐Co(OH)2 (ICSD No. 88940) and Hydrotalcite (ICSD. No. 6296).
Figure 2DTG curves resulting from the thermogravimetric analysis of the precursors. In the temperature range highlighted in grey no mass loss occurs and calcination temperatures were therefore chosen within this range.
Figure 3Rietveld refinements of the anisotropic cobalt spinel substitution series and isotropic Co3O4 and CoFe2O4. Measured data is shown in grey, the calculated pattern in red and the difference plot in blue. The main reflections of the cubic spinel phase were labelled.
Lattice parameters, domain sizes, surface areas, nominal and experimental cobalt to metal ratios of the anisotropic cobalt spinel substitution series and the isotropic Co3O4 and CoFe2O4.
|
Sample |
Lit. lattice parameter [Å] |
Lattice parameter [Å] [a] |
Domain size [nm][b] |
Surface area [m2 g−1][c] |
Nominal Co/M |
Exp. Co/M[d] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Co3O4 |
8.065 |
8.078 |
15.0 |
30 |
– |
– |
|
MgCo2O4 |
8.107 |
8.130 |
4.3 |
50 |
2 |
2.33±0.43 |
|
Co2FeO4 |
8.242 |
8.130 8.171 |
5.8 4.6 |
90 |
2 |
1.80±0.04 |
|
Co2AlO4 |
8.087 |
8.058 |
3.5 |
176 |
2 |
2.38±0.44 |
|
CoFe2O4 |
8.394 |
8.376 |
12.8 |
28 |
0.5 |
0.46±0.01 |
|
iso‐Co3O4 |
8.065 |
8.079 |
23.2 |
30 |
– |
– |
|
iso‐CoFe2O4 |
8.394 |
8.366 |
8.8 |
40 |
0.5 |
0.50±0.01 |
[a] Derived from Rietveld refinement. All samples consist of a cubic spinel phase with the space group Fd3 m. a=b=c. [b] The domain size was determined as the volume‐weight mean column height from integral breadth. [c] Calculated with the BET method. [d] Based on XRF of the spinel catalysts. The error was determined by error propagation using the uncertainty specified by the instrument.
Figure 4SEM images of the as‐prepared spinel substitution series.
Figure 5SAED and TEM micrographs of iso‐Co3O4 and Co2FeO4 showing the ordered orientation of the spinel crystallites within one platelet in the former and the disordered orientation in the latter sample. The zone axis is [111] relative to the spinel structure suggesting together with the platelet orientation perpendicular to the viewing direction a predominant 111 termination of the lateral surfaces of the platelets.
Figure 6Initial rates for the CAN test of the anisotropic cobalt spinel substitution series (closed symbols) and the isotropic samples (open symbols). Error bars result from twofold measurements. For anisotropic Co2FeO2, Co2AlO4, CoFe2O4 and the isotropic spinels the error bars do not exceed the symbol sizes. The inset shows the oxygen evolution per time unit over 2 h for Co2AlO4 as an example.
Figure 7Measured potential at 10 mA cm−2 normalized by the geometric area of the electrode for the anisotropic substitution series (closed symbol) and the isotropic samples (open symbols). 10 mA cm−2 was chosen as point for comparison based on the suggestion by McCrory et al. The data point for isotropic cobalt ferrite was extrapolated, as it did not reach 10 mA cm−2 in the applied potential range. Error bars result from three independent measurements.
Figure 8Initial rates for chemical water oxidation (CAN test) vs. the overpotential for electrochemical OER at 10 mA cm−2 for the cobalt spinel substitution series. The ratio Co3/Mothers is specified in brackets. Error bars for the overpotential are determined from three independent measurements.
Figure 9Rates after 3 min for H2O2 decomposition of the anisotropic cobalt spinel substitution series (closed symbols) and the isotropic samples (open symbols).
Figure 10Normalized relative activity for the three investigated reactions. The most active catalyst was set to 100 % performance and the least active to 0 % to highlight the relative differences.