Eko Budiyanto1, Soma Salamon2, Yue Wang1, Heiko Wende2, Harun Tüysüz1. 1. Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Platz 1, 45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany. 2. Faculty of Physics and Center for Nanointegration Duisburg-Essen (CENIDE), University of Duisburg-Essen, 47057 Duisburg, Germany.
Abstract
The impact of reduction post-treatment and phase segregation of cobalt iron oxide nanowires on their electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction (OER) activity is investigated. A series of cobalt iron oxide spinel nanowires are prepared via the nanocasting route using ordered mesoporous silica as a hard template. The replicated oxides are selectively reduced through a mild reduction that results in phase transformation as well as the formation of grain boundaries. The detailed structural analyses, including the 57Fe isotope-enriched Mössbauer study, validated the formation of iron oxide clusters supported by ordered mesoporous CoO nanowires after the reduction process. This affects the OER activity significantly, whereby the overpotential at 10 mA/cm2 decreases from 378 to 339 mV and the current density at 1.7 V vs RHE increases by twofold from 150 to 315 mA/cm2. In situ Raman microscopy revealed that the surfaces of reduced CoO were oxidized to cobalt with a higher oxidation state upon solvation in the KOH electrolyte. The implementation of external potential bias led to the formation of an oxyhydroxide intermediate and a disordered-spinel phase. The interactions of iron clusters with cobalt oxide at the phase boundaries were found to be beneficial to enhance the charge transfer of the cobalt oxide and boost the overall OER activity by reaching a Faradaic efficiency of up to 96%. All in all, the post-reduction and phase segregation of cobalt iron oxide play an important role as a precatalyst for the OER.
The impact of reduction post-treatment and phase segregation of cobalt iron oxide nanowires on their electrochemical oxygen evolution reaction (OER) activity is investigated. A series of cobalt iron oxide spinel nanowires are prepared via the nanocasting route using ordered mesoporous silica as a hard template. The replicated oxides are selectively reduced through a mild reduction that results in phase transformation as well as the formation of grain boundaries. The detailed structural analyses, including the 57Fe isotope-enriched Mössbauer study, validated the formation of iron oxide clusters supported by ordered mesoporous CoO nanowires after the reduction process. This affects the OER activity significantly, whereby the overpotential at 10 mA/cm2 decreases from 378 to 339 mV and the current density at 1.7 V vs RHE increases by twofold from 150 to 315 mA/cm2. In situ Raman microscopy revealed that the surfaces of reduced CoO were oxidized to cobalt with a higher oxidation state upon solvation in the KOH electrolyte. The implementation of external potential bias led to the formation of an oxyhydroxide intermediate and a disordered-spinel phase. The interactions of iron clusters with cobalt oxide at the phase boundaries were found to be beneficial to enhance the charge transfer of the cobalt oxide and boost the overall OER activity by reaching a Faradaic efficiency of up to 96%. All in all, the post-reduction and phase segregation of cobalt iron oxide play an important role as a precatalyst for the OER.
Water electrolysis
plays an important role in green hydrogen production
and future clean energy technology. The major challenge in this process
lies in the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) that occurs at the anode
side of the cell. This half-reaction suffers from slow kinetics due
to the high energy barrier for four-electron transfer and requires
higher overpotential compared to the thermodynamic value of 1.23 V.
Therefore, extensive research has been performed within the past decade
to develop more effective and robust catalysts for the OER.[1−5]Owing to high abundancy in nature and competitive price, transition
metal-based oxides have been considered as a prime candidate as OER
electrocatalysts in alkaline conditions. Among the transition metal-based
oxides, cobalt oxide spinel is widely investigated as an OER electrocatalyst
due to its stability in harsh alkaline conditions, tunable morphology,
crystal, and electronic structures.[6−8] However, the overall
performance of cobalt oxide spinel as an anode material for an alkaline
water electrolyzer is still limited due to its low conductivity.[9] Numerous approaches have been carried out to
tune intrinsic properties and enhance the OER activity of cobalt-based
oxides. Substitution of di- and trivalent cobalt cations with other
heteroelements could tune the electronic structure and conductivity
of cobalt oxide that can enhance its OER performance.[10−15] Coupling of cobalt oxide with more conductive materials and substrates
like silver, gold, and carbon has been demonstrated to increase its
OER performance as well.[10,16,17] Recently, we reported that a small amount of iron incorporation
into the Co3O4 lattice structure could boost
the OER activity by altering the electronic structure of cobalt on
octahedral sites. As a result, the electrical conductivity of the
material could be increased, which resulted in a faster charge transfer
and higher OER performance.[7,18]The post-treatments
are widely used to tune the OER activity of
the electrocatalyst materials by inducing disordering on the nanoscale,
such as increased surface area, defect density, and formation of highly
active crystalline/amorphous phases. For instance, Jiao et al. reported
the formation of a hierarchical structure of mesoporous cobalt oxide
using Mg as the sacrificial agent. Through the selective leaching
of Mg, the hierarchical mesostructure with a surface area up to 250
m2/g could be achieved.[19] Similarly,
our group developed a selective acid leaching protocol to create a
cavity in mesostructured cobalt oxide.[20] As a result, mesostructured cobalt oxide with a fourfold higher
surface area could be synthesized. In another method, Waag et al.
demonstrated the OER catalytic enhancement of commercial CoFe2O4 utilizing pulsed laser fragmentation in liquid
(PLFL).[21] Thermal decomposition during
the laser irradiation could massively reduce particle size and induce
phase transformations toward crystalline CoO and amorphous CoFe2O4. This structural disorder was proven to improve
the charge transport kinetics of the PLFL products compared to the
CoFe2O4 nanoscale educt. Our group applied the
PLFL on mesostructured cobalt oxides in a similar direction.[22] The PLFL could lead to particle fragmentation
that significantly increases the surface area and the formation of
structural defects (Co2+ tetrahedral defect and oxygen
vacancies). This laser post-treatment yielded the fragmented cobalt
oxide that has superior OER activity compared to the starting material
and ordered mesoporous Co3O4. However, the applied
laser also induces the crystal phase transformation into Co3O4 and CoO crystalline phases.In another manner,
phase boundaries could be introduced into materials
via post-treatments. The phase and grain boundaries can provide defects
as well as new functionalities for the heterogeneously driven catalytic
reactions. Chen et al. reported the synthesis of Co3O4@CoO nanocubes by reducing the spinel surface with NaBH4.[23] These phase boundaries between
CoO and Co3O4 could lead to the formation of
active species that facilitates the chemical reactions without breaking
the bulk structure of the electrocatalysts. Suryanto et al. investigated
the strong electronic coupling effect between iron oxide and nickel
at the interface to enhance the overall water splitting activity.[24]Even though both post-treatment methods
were proven to enhance
the catalytic activity of the starting materials, the formation of
a spinel and rock-salt biphase is unavoidable due to high-temperature
local heating by laser irradiation. Likewise, sacrificial metals (Mg
or Mo) could not be totally removed by selective leaching methods.
The formation of either biphase cobalt oxides in laser treatment or
other metal residues in selective leaching added complexity to the
interpretation of catalytic activity enhancement and spectroscopic
studies. Hence, a model catalyst with a clean surface is needed to
tackle this issue. Regarding the cobalt iron oxide catalyst, the direct
assignment of the role of iron in the OER catalytic enhancement was
heavily limited by the small proportion of iron compared to cobalt
atoms. Hence, the local electronic structure of iron within the spinel
structure cannot be directly assessed by XPS or Mössbauer spectroscopy
due to the limited sensitivity of the instrument to quantify small
amounts of iron.Herein, we design the small iron oxide clusters
supported by ordered
mesoporous CoO nanowires. The role of the phase boundaries between
iron oxide and cobalt oxide to form an intermediate active state of
Co(Fe)-OOH under the OER conditions is investigated by the electrochemical in situ Raman microscopy. The mixed oxides are also prepared
with 57Fe-isotope enrichment to probe the local environment
and electronic structure of the iron oxide clusters with Mössbauer
spectroscopy without modifying the chemical properties. The reduced
samples showed twofold OER catalytic enhancement compared to the spinel
educts. This reduced sample was reoxidized to a disordered cobalt
oxide spinel phase in the OER resting state and was found to be responsible
for the activity enhancement.
Experimental Section
Material
Synthesis
Cobalt and cobalt iron oxides spinel
nanowires were synthesized by the nanocasting method with SBA-15 aged
at 100 °C as a hard template.[7,25] The precursor
solutions were prepared by dissolving stoichiometric amounts of Co(NO3)2·6H2O and/or Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (Sigma-Aldrich, ACS reagent, 98%
purity) in ethanol. After the first impregnation of metal precursors
into the SBA-15 template, the composite was dried slowly at 40 °C
overnight and calcined at 250 °C for 4 h in air. The final calcination
was performed after the second impregnation and carried out at 500
°C for 4 h in an air atmosphere. The ramping rate for calcination
was 2 °C/min. The SBA-15 template was then etched with hot 2
M NaOH solution. The initial spinel materials (Co3–FeO4) were
further labeled as Co3O4, Co/Fe 32, and Co/Fe
3.FeO-CoO samples were synthesized
from prepared cobalt iron oxide nanowires via post-treatment using
a mild reduction process.[26−28] Then, 200 mg of sample were placed
inside a tube furnace and kept in an ethanol/N2 atmosphere.
The ethanol/N2 flow was generated by purging N2 gas (100 mL/min) into liquid ethanol in a round-bottom flask. The
thermal treatment was performed at 270 °C for 4 h (ramping
rate of 2 °C/min). The samples after reduction (FeO–CoO) were further denoted as CoO, Co/Fe 32-red,
and Co/Fe 3-red. Mesoporous Fe3O4 (magnetite) was also prepared as a control sample
by applying similar reduction post-treatment on mesoporous α-Fe2O3 (hematite) as a starting material. The control
experiment with hydrogen reduction was performed in a tubular furnace
with 5% H2 flow in Ar (100 mL/min) at 270 °C for 2
h (ramping rate 2 °C/min).57Fe isotope-labeled
cobalt iron oxides were prepared
using a similar procedure. Instead of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, the iron precursor was prepared by diluting 57Fe-isotope powder (Chemotrade GmbH, 95% enrichment) in a
stoichiometric amount of HNO3:distilled water (1:1) solution.
These samples after reduction in ethanol/N2 were further
denoted as Co/57Fe 32-red and Co/57Fe 3-red.
Material Characterization
Powder X-ray diffraction
(XRD) data of the as-prepared samples were recorded with an STOE theta/theta
diffractometer operating in a reflection mode with a Cu Kα1,2 radiation X-ray source (λ: 1.5406 Å) using a
step size of 0.02° 2θ. The instrument was equipped with
an energy discriminating detector. For the sample deposited on carbon
fiber paper, the X-ray powder patterns for qualitative phase analysis
were collected on a Stoe STADI P transmission diffractometer using
Mo radiation (0.7093 Å). The instrument is equipped with a primary
Ge (111) monochromator (Mo Kα1) and a position-sensitive
Mythen1K detector. The samples were mounted on a transmission sample
holder. Data were recorded in the range of 2–40° 2θ
with a step width of 0.015° 2θ and 60 s per step of data
acquisition. For each sample, 8 scans were collected and summed after
data collection. Phase identification was referred to the experimental
data in the PDF-2 ICCD database.[29] Fourier-transform
infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded with a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum
Two spectrometer with 32 scan spectra acquisition.The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
(BET) surface area was calculated in the relative pressure range (p/p°) of 0.06 to 0.3 with a nitrogen
physisorption measurement that was carried out using a 3Flex Micromeritics
instrument at 77 K. Pore size distribution was calculated with the
Barrett, Joyner, and Halenda (BJH) method from the desorption branch
of the isotherms. Prior to the measurement, the powder samples were
degassed under vacuum at 120 °C for 10 h.High-resolution
transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) images
were recorded with a cold field-emission gun (FEG) Hitachi HF2000
operating at a 200 keV acceleration voltage. Secondary electron (SE)
and dark field images were recorded with a Hitachi HD-2700 Cs-corrected dedicated scanning
transmission
electron microscope (STEM) equipped with a cold field-emission gun
operated at 200 keV. The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX)
elemental mapping and line scan analysis were performed with an EDAX
Octane T Ultra W 200mm2 SDD. For samples deposited on carbon fiber
paper, scanning electron microscopy (SEM)-EDX mapping was recorded
with a Hitachi S-3500N equipped with a Si(Li) Pentafet plus detector
from Oxford instruments.The inductively coupled plasma-optical
emission spectrometry (ICP-OES)
measurement was carried out with a SPECTROGREEN instrument, and the
electrolyte solution samples were taken from the electrochemical cell
before and after the reaction. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
data were measured with a SPECS spectrometer with a hemispherical
analyzer (PHOIBOS 150). The monochromatized Mg Kα X-ray source
(E = 1254.6 eV) was operated at 50
W/10 kV. The narrow scans were measured with 20 eV
pass energy. The lens mode was set to the medium area, and the analysis
chamber was 5 × 10–10 mbar. The binding energy
was corrected for surface charging using the C 1s peak for contaminant
carbon as a reference at 284.5 eV.Mössbauer spectra
were recorded in transmission geometry
on powder samples, using a constant acceleration Mössbauer
driving unit with a 57Co source embedded in an Rh matrix.
α-Fe foil measured at room temperature was used as a reference
sample to calibrate the spectrometer. The samples were kept in a homogenous
magnetic field of 5 T, applied parallel to the γ-ray propagation
direction with the aid of a liquid helium bath cryostat containing
a superconducting magnet in split-pair geometry. Temperature-dependent
magnetization measurements were performed between 5 and 400 K at 10
mT following the zero-field-cooled field-cooled (ZFC-FC) protocol,
while field-dependent M(H) sweeps were recorded at 5 and 300 K at
field amplitudes of up to 9 T. All measurements were completed using
the vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) option of a Quantum Design
PPMS DynaCool.
Electrochemical Measurement
The
electrochemical oxygen
evolution reaction (OER) was measured with a VSP-300 BioLogic potentiostat
and a rotating disc electrode (RDE) system (Model: AFMSRCE, PINE Research
Instrumentation). The RDE was operated with a 3 electrode system,
using Pt wire as the counter electrode, a reference hydrogen electrode
(HydroFlex, Gaskatel) as the reference electrode, glassy carbon as
a working electrode, and 200 mL of 1 M KOH solution as the electrolyte.
Prior to the measurement, the cell was saturated with Ar flow. The
electrochemical cell was kept at 298 K using a thermostat. Working
electrodes were prepared by depositing electrocatalyst ink onto glassy
carbon (GC) electrodes (5 mm diameter, 0.196 cm2 geometric
surface area). GC electrodes were polished with Al2O3 slurry (1 and 0.05 μm, Buehler).The ink was
prepared by dispersing 4.8 mg of electrocatalyst in 0.75 mL of H2O, 0.25 mL isopropanol, and 50 μL of Nafion 117 (Sigma-Aldrich).
The dispersion was then sonicated for 30 min to obtain a homogeneous
ink. Finally, 5.25 μL of ink was drop-casted onto a clean GC
electrode surface and dried (calculated catalyst loading was equal
to 0.12 mg/cm2).For postmortem analysis, the sample
was deposited onto 1 cm2 of carbon fiber paper (Toray TGP-H-60
non–PTFE coated).
After prolonged immersion in 1 M KOH or chronopotentiometry, the working
electrode was dipped in ultrapure water, dried, and protected under
an Ar atmosphere.Linear scan voltammetry (LSV) curves were
recorded at a scan rate
of 10 mV/s within the 0.7 to 1.7 V vs RHE. Cyclic voltammetry (CV)
was measured at a scan rate of 50 mV/s within the 0.7 to 1.6 V vs
RHE potential window. The stability test was conducted with controlled
current (chronopotentiometry) at 10 mA/cm2 of geometric
current density. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was
measured within the 100 mHz–100 kHz frequency range at 1.6
V vs RHE and 5 mV of amplitude. Experimental Nyquist plots were then
fitted to the equivalent circuit model using the Z-Fit feature in
EC-Lab software. The IR drop was compensated at 85%.Faradaic
efficiency (FE) measurement was carried out with a VSP-300 bipotentiostat mode and rotating
ring-disc
electrode (RRDE) method. A glassy carbon disc and Pt ring were used
as the RRDE tip (model: E7R9, Pine Research Instrumentation, glassy
carbon disc outer diameter: 5.61 mm). The collection efficiency (N = 37.7%) of the RRDE was measured by oxidizing K4Fe(CN)6 solution at the disc and performing reduction
at the Pt ring. The RRDE was cleaned, and the sample was deposited
in the same manner for the RDE working electrode preparation. To measure
the ring background current, the disc electrode was held at an open-circuit
potential for 2 min, while the Pt ring was biased at 0.4 V vs RHE.
The rotation rate was kept at 1600 rpm, and the 1 M KOH electrolyte
was saturated with Ar flow for 30 min prior to each measurement step.Raman measurements were carried out with an Invia Renishaw Raman
microscope equipped with 532 nm of laser excitation wavelength, 1800
l/mm grading, and coupled with a 50× objective lens (Leica).
The ex situ Raman spectra were collected at 0.25
mW laser power. The In situ Raman measurement was
performed in a customized in situ electrochemical
flow cell. Pt wire and the hydrogen electrode (HydroFlex, Gaskatel)
were used as counter and reference electrodes, respectively. The sample
ink was then drop-casted on top of the rough Au foil and utilized
as the working electrode. The Au foil was roughened following the
previously reported protocol.[30,31] During the measurement,
Ar-saturated 1 M KOH flux was controlled with a peristaltic pump with
a flow rate of 1–8 mL/min, depending on the bubble generation
inside the cell. The sample was held at open-circuit potential (OCP)
for 15 min prior to the measurement. Ten consecutive scans with 3
s exposure time at 0.5 mW laser power were performed to measure in situ Raman spectra. The Raman spectra were recorded in situ in a chronoamperometric (CA) mode with potential
held for 1 min at OCP and 0.1 V gradual potential bias from 1.0 to
1.5 V vs RHE.
Results and Discussion
The ordered
mesoporous Co3O4 and iron-incorporated
cobalt oxide nanowires (with atomic ratios of Co/Fe 32 and Co/Fe 3)
were prepared via the nanocasting method using SBA-15 as a hard template.
These two ratios were chosen to examine the impact of the dilute amount
and a large amount of iron substitution (where the cobalt and cobalt
iron spinels’ miscible phase is expected) on the OER activity.
Their detailed structural analyses are provided in our previous study.[7] Ordered mesoporous CoO and iron oxide clusters
supported by ordered mesoporous CoO nanowires were synthesized by
the reduction of Co3O4 and cobalt iron oxide
spinel nanowires using ethanol/N2 gas flow as a mild and
selective reducing agent. In this reducing atmosphere, Co3+ at octahedral sites of spinel was expected to be reduced into Co2+, resulting in a rock-salt CoO structure. Subsequently, Fe3+ that preferred to occupy octahedral sites in the cobalt
iron oxide spinel lattice (as suggested by extended X-ray absorption
fine structure/EXAFS spectra from our previous work) was partially
reduced into Fe2+, creating a stable cluster of iron oxide.[7]The crystalline phase of the materials
before and after reduction
was evaluated with wide-angle powder XRD in a reflection mode (Figure a,b). A clear phase
transformation from a cobalt oxide spinel (PDF 00–042–1467)
into the rock-salt structure (PDF 00–048–1719) is observed
for all materials. Additionally, a crystalline phase corresponding
to magnetite (Fe3O4, PDF 00–019–0629)
evolves after reduction in Co/Fe 3-red. This indicates that the Fe3+ in the spinel lattice was partly reduced into Fe2+, creating a magnetite cluster. The magnetite phase might also be
generated on Co/Fe 32-red; however,
the magnetite reflections, in this case, are barely visible due to
the low amount of iron (2.3 mass % compared to the total mass of the
material).
Figure 1
Powder XRD pattern of sample series (a) before reduction and (b)
after reduction in an ethanol/N2 atmosphere. The XRD data
was measured with a Cu Kα1,2 radiation X-ray source
(λ: 1.5406 Å).
Powder XRD pattern of sample series (a) before reduction and (b)
after reduction in an ethanol/N2 atmosphere. The XRD data
was measured with a Cu Kα1,2 radiation X-ray source
(λ: 1.5406 Å).Nitrogen physisorption is performed to measure the textural parameters
of pristine samples and after the reduction. The adsorption–desorption
hysteresis loop and pore size distribution of both sample series are
depicted in Figure S1a–d. The samples
before and after reduction show typical mesoporous materials as depicted
by type IV isotherm (Figure S1a,b).[32] However, the BET surface area decreases slightly
from 116–125 to 95–96 m2/g after the reduction.
The decrease of the surface area after reduction could be attributed
to the volume shrinkage of cobalt oxide nanowires due to the mass
density difference between Co3O4 (6.11 g/cm3) and CoO (6.44 g/cm3).[26] In addition, the samples have
identical pore size distribution before and after reduction (Figure S1c,d), indicating that the pore structures
of the nanowire material were retained after heat treatment and reduction
at 270 °C.Electron microscopy studies were then carried
out to visualize
the morphology of materials after reduction as well as the formation
of iron oxide clusters within the nanowire’s matrix. A highly
ordered nanowire arrangement is observed in CoO, and shorter nanowire
arrays could be found in the sample that contained iron (Figure a–f). The
less ordered mesostructured and shorter nanowire arrays by incorporation
of iron in the pristine samples (Figure S2a,b) are caused by the different thermal decomposition temperatures
between the cobalt and iron nitrate precursor. This triggers the iron
oxide moieties to block the interconnected micropores during the calcination
and hinders the formation of a perfect negative replica.[7] After the reduction, the pore structure and nanowire
morphology were retained, consistent with the finding from nitrogen
physisorption. The high-resolution image (Figure d,f) reveals the formation of crystalline
phase boundaries between the nanoparticles and nanowires, indicating
that the nanoparticles (iron oxide cluster) are supported on the CoO
nanowires matrix. With the increasing amount of iron, as expected,
the observed iron oxide clusters within the sample increased accordingly
(Figure c,e).
Figure 2
TEM micrographs
of samples after reduction (a) CoO, (b) HR-TEM
of CoO, (c) Co/Fe 32-red, and (d) HR-TEM of Co/Fe 32-red. (e) Co/Fe
3-red, (f) HR-TEM of Co/Fe 3-red. HR-TEM images were recorded in the
region marked by white boxes. Cross-sectional EDX elemental mapping
of Co/Fe 32-red on (g) Co and (h) Fe.
TEM micrographs
of samples after reduction (a) CoO, (b) HR-TEM
of CoO, (c) Co/Fe 32-red, and (d) HR-TEM of Co/Fe 32-red. (e) Co/Fe
3-red, (f) HR-TEM of Co/Fe 3-red. HR-TEM images were recorded in the
region marked by white boxes. Cross-sectional EDX elemental mapping
of Co/Fe 32-red on (g) Co and (h) Fe.The surface topology of the samples after reduction was further
investigated with scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM)
imaging (Figure S3a–d). Even though
the nanowire arrays were maintained, the surface of the nanowires
became rough after reduction. This could be attributed to the iron
moieties, which left the spinel lattice and created iron oxide clusters.
EDX elemental mapping was then performed on the cross-sectioned sample
to visualize the iron and cobalt distribution within the nanowire
matrix. As depicted in Figure g, cobalt was distributed evenly within the nanowire’s
structure. On the other hand, localized iron clusters were observed
in several areas, as indicated by the yellow circles in Figure h.To probe the local
environment and electronic structure of iron
moieties, 57Fe isotope-enriched samples were prepared to
enhance the quality of Mössbauer spectra for the nanomaterials
with low iron content. The characterization data of 57Fe
isotope-labeled samples are presented in Figure S4a–f. The XRD patterns showed a similar phase transformation
from a cobalt iron oxide spinel into the rock-salt structure and Fe3O4 after the mild reduction process. TEM imaging
revealed the absence of big aggregates, and EDX analysis showed the
actual atomic ratio of cobalt to iron. Altogether, a similar synthesis
result could be reproduced via the substitution of the Fe precursor
with the 57Fe isotope counterpart.The magnetic properties
of the spinel and rock-salt system were
then measured to investigate the effect of phase transformation after
reduction (Figure S5a–c). A striking
difference could be observed in the zero-field-cooled (ZFC) curves
of Co/Fe 32 and Co/Fe 3 before and after reduction (Figure S5a,b). The Co/Fe 32 spinel showed a low Néel
temperature of 23.5 K that is similar to the Co3O4 nanoparticles with antiferromagnetic behaviors.[33] The Néel temperatures increase significantly for
the samples after reduction, approaching around 270 K, which is close
to the Néel temperature of CoO.[34,35] Similar behavior
could also be observed for Co/Fe 3 before and after reduction. At
low temperatures, the discrepancy between rock-salt/wustite-like and
Co-rich spinel phases is challenging, as both are expected to be antiferromagnetic.
In the 4 K M(H) curves (Figure S5c), we
can, however, still see typical behavior of a system going from a
Co-rich phase, predominantly antiferromagnetic Co3O4 or CoO, to a more Fe-rich one, with the resulting increase
in magnetization, remanence, and coercivity.Mössbauer
spectra were then measured at a 5 T magnetic field
parallel to the γ-ray propagation direction and 4.3 K to determine
the inversion parameter as well as the difference in the local iron
environment before and after reduction. Here, the relative spectral
areas of the respective subspectra can be assumed as proportional
to the amount of Fe ions on the tetrahedrally coordinated A-site and
the octahedrally coordinated B-site.[36] The
inversion parameter is used to differentiate the normal (0) and a
fully inverse spinel (1) phases; however, one has to consider that
the low amount of Fe in our samples does not permit the direct determination
of the resulting distribution of Co ions displaced by Fe. To avoid
any confusion, we will still refer to the calculated number as the
inversion parameter, but it should only be regarded as an indicator
for the Fe site occupation preferences. As seen in Figure a, the tetrahedral A-site is
strongly diminished for the Co/57Fe 3 spinel, with the
great majority of Fe ions having moved over to the B-site. At this
point, the inversion parameter was much closer to a normal spinel
at ca. 0.35 compared to the inversion degree of 0.65 that was found
for the CoFe2O4 reference sample (Figure S6). This result is consistent with our
finding from EXAFS measurement, where the Co2+/Co3+ ratio increased with the incorporation of iron.[7,37] Hence,
it can be concluded that Fe3+ preferred to substitute ions
on the octahedral site in the spinel lattice. In addition, it indicates
that while the iron ion distribution has strongly shifted, the spin
canting angle of ca. 41° (determined from the ratio of lines
2 and 3) has not significantly changed in comparison with the reference
samples shown in Figure S6.[38]
Figure 3
Mössbauer spectra of 57Fe isotope-labeled
samples:
(a) Co/57Fe 3, (b) Co/57Fe 3-red, (c) Co/57Fe 32, and (d) Co/57Fe 32-red measured at 5 T
and 4.3 K. The subspectra correspond to tetrahedrally coordinated
A-sites (green) and octahedral B-sites (blue).
Mössbauer spectra of 57Fe isotope-labeled
samples:
(a) Co/57Fe 3, (b) Co/57Fe 3-red, (c) Co/57Fe 32, and (d) Co/57Fe 32-red measured at 5 T
and 4.3 K. The subspectra correspond to tetrahedrally coordinated
A-sites (green) and octahedral B-sites (blue).For the Co/57Fe 3-red sample, a strong overlap of the
two subspectra was observed, although the presence of individual subspectra
is still evident by the broad lines 1 and 6 with the associated fine
structure in their peaks (Figure b). This sample was calculated to have a higher inversion
parameter (ca. 0.84) compared to the spinel counterpart, showing that
the distribution of iron across the two sites was strongly modified
by reduction post-treatment. Additionally, an increase of the mean
spin canting angle to ca. 50° was also observed, indicating that
the magnetic moments in this sample are less well-aligned relative
to the external field, which also explains why the two subspectra
are harder to separate.The overlap of subspectra was even more
pronounced for the Co/57Fe 32-red sample, and the more
intense lines 2 and 5 clearly
indicate the increased mean canting of ca 56° (Figure d), which is close to a random
3D orientation. Thus, this sample was moving toward an antiferromagnetic
order, also evident by the disappearance of the hysteresis in the
M(H) curves (Figure S5c). The inversion
parameter, however, could not be calculated for this sample due to
severe overlap of subspectra, and the data fit alone cannot discern
them anymore. This was even more pronounced for the Co/57Fe 32 spinel sample,
whereby the
two subspectra could not be fitted anymore (Figure c).All in all, the ethanol reduction
post-treatment could change the
electronic and crystal structure properties of the cobalt iron oxide
spinel by forming a mixed phase of rock-salt and self-standing iron
oxide moieties. 57Fe-enriched Mössbauer spectroscopy
revealed the change of iron distribution in the sample toward an increasingly
inverse spinel structure. This increase of the inversion parameter
also hints toward the formation of magnetite (inverse spinel) clusters
within the sample after the reduction process.Following the
detailed characterization, the OER catalytic activity
of the ethanol-reduced samples was investigated in alkaline conditions
using a 1 M KOH electrolyte. As shown by stabilized LSV curves (Figure a), CoO (reduced
sample) showed much better OER activity and increased the reaction
kinetics, as revealed by the Tafel slope (Figure d), compared to the pristine Co3O4. Moreover, the Co/Fe 32-red sample exhibited a higher
current density at 1.7 vs RHE compared to CoO. In contrast, the activity
decreased significantly when the iron content increased (Co/Fe 3-red).
Further comparison with the pristine cobalt iron spinel series (Figure b) showed an overall
twofold increase of current density at 1.7 V vs RHE for the reduced
samples. A similar OER activity trend as in the spinel series is also
observed on the iron oxide-supported CoO series. The overall increase
of OER activity after reduction even for the samples with high iron
content indicated the importance of rock-salt CoO formation to enhance
the catalytic activity of the material. The Co/Fe 32-red sample had
the optimal activity by decreasing the overpotential at 10 mA/cm2 from 378 to 339 mV, while the current density at 1.7 V vs RHE increased from 150 to
315 mA/cm2 compared to the spinel counterpart. This sample
series showed
a very good OER activity compared to the commercial RuO2 benchmark OER electrocatalyst (Figure S7) and recently published cobalt and cobalt iron-based electrocatalysts
(Table S1).
Figure 4
(a) OER LSV curves of
reduced cobalt iron oxide in 1 M KOH solution
compared to pristine Co3O4 and Fe3O4, (b) current density and overpotential summary of pristine
cobalt iron oxide spinels and reduced cobalt iron oxide, (c) cyclic
voltammogram comparison at 50th cycle at a scan rate of 50 mV/s, (d)
kinetic measurement by a Tafel slope, (e) experimental Nyquist plot
data, and (f) stability test measured at 10 mA/cm2 on carbon
fiber paper with the corresponding TEM micrograph of the catalyst
obtained from after 12 h of applied potential bias.
(a) OER LSV curves of
reduced cobalt iron oxide in 1 M KOH solution
compared to pristine Co3O4 and Fe3O4, (b) current density and overpotential summary of pristine
cobalt iron oxide spinels and reduced cobalt iron oxide, (c) cyclic
voltammogram comparison at 50th cycle at a scan rate of 50 mV/s, (d)
kinetic measurement by a Tafel slope, (e) experimental Nyquist plot
data, and (f) stability test measured at 10 mA/cm2 on carbon
fiber paper with the corresponding TEM micrograph of the catalyst
obtained from after 12 h of applied potential bias.Further observation of the initial stage and stabilized LSV
curves
(Figure S8a–d) showed a striking
difference between spinel cobalt iron and reduced samples. There is
no significant anodic peak change for the Co/Fe 32 spinel sample in
the initial LSV and after stabilization with 50 cyclic voltammetry
(CV) scan (Figure S8a). This indicated
that the bulk spinel phase was retained after the stabilization. However,
a clear change was readily observed on the Co/Fe 32-red sample even
after the first LSV scan (Figure S8c).
The broad and intense anodic peak at around 1.2 V vs RHE corresponding
to Co2+ → Co3+ oxidation wave was significantly decreased after the first LSV scan.[30] This intense anodic peak disappeared and was
not observed in the second LSV scan. On the other hand, the Co3+ → Co4+ oxidation
wave at around 1.45 V vs RHE became clearer after the stabilization.
It gave the first hint of irreversible surface restructuring of Co2+ in the Co/Fe 32-red sample under applied potential bias.
As shown by the CV curve (Figure S8b,d),
Co/Fe 32-red had a more pronounced Co2+ →
Co3+ oxidation wave (A1) compared to the
spinel Co/Fe 32. Assuming the formation of a CoO(OH) intermediate state during
potential bias, the increased intensity of the Co2+ → Co3+ oxidation wave
in Co/Fe 32-red could be attributed to the formation of Co2+/3+O(OH).[39,40] The formation of Co2+ moieties in the intermediate state was proposed to be beneficial
to initiate the formation of the μ-OO peroxide prior to the
OER.[41] Taking into account the Co2+/Co3+ as a descriptor for OER activity, Co3+ should be readily reduced into Co2+ in a reverse polarization
scan. Hence, one can estimate the reducibility of Co3+ moieties
as the second descriptor for OER activity. This Co3+-O
reducibility was proposed to be estimated by comparing the current
ratio on C1/C2 (Figure S8b,d).[39,42]Although a small amount of magnetite clusters in Co/Fe 32-red
could
enhance the OER activity, a control experiment with mesoporous magnetite
(Fe3O4) showed the lowest activity in the OER
(Figure a). This pointed
out the synergistic effect via the interaction of the magnetite cluster
and CoO support to catalyze OER, which will be discussed further below
in the in situ Raman and postmortem sections. Cyclic
voltammetry (CV) was used to investigate the redox behavior of the
selected samples. As seen in Figure c, a clear decrease of anodic peaks corresponding to
Co2+ → Co3+ and Co3+ →
Co4+ oxidation waves were observed for the Co/Fe 3-red
sample. It goes in line with the decrease of OER activity of this
sample compared to CoO. Hence, it can be proposed that the cobalt
species are active centers for the OER. Furthermore, the introduction
of iron oxide shifted the precatalytic, Co2+ → Co3+ oxidation wave to higher potential, which is proposed to
disproportionate di-μ-oxo-bridged Co3+–Co3+ intermediates and resulted in altered electrokinetic behavior.[43] A similar suppressing effect was also observed
to take place in Ni2+ → Ni3+ oxidation in the presence of Fe.[44,45]A kinetic
investigation was further carried out using the
Tafel
slopes. As shown in Figure d, the calculated Tafel slopes are within a similar value
(41–46 mV/dec) for the reduced sample, indicating that the
OER mechanism was following the same reaction pathway and rate-determining
step. These Tafel slope values are consistent with the previous work
on the CoO film by Dau et al., suggesting
the single-site reaction mechanism with the oxidation of Co3+ → Co4+ as the rate-determining step.[30,43,46,47] Among the reduced samples, Co/Fe 3-red has the slowest kinetics
due to the insulating properties of the
high iron content.[48] Especially the Tafel
slope values of reduced samples are lower than those of spinel cobalt
iron oxide series (54–61 mV/dec), denoting that the iron oxide
on CoO samples favored faster reaction kinetics compared to spinel
counterparts.Complementary electrochemical impedance spectroscopy
(EIS) is utilized
to probe the charge transfer behavior with the existence of iron oxide
clusters after reduction. Figure e depicts the Nyquist plots, from which the charge
transfer resistance could be calculated by fitting with the corresponding
circuit models. For CoO and Co3O4, the simplified
Randles model (RΩ)(RctQdl) was used to fit the
experimental data, whereas (RΩ)(RctQdl)(RfilmQfilm) was used to fit
the data from Co/Fe 32-red and Co/Fe 3-red due to the existence of
two semicircles in the Nyquist plot (Figure S9a–d).[49,50] The fitted value is shown in Table S2. Likewise, the electrolyte resistance
in this electrochemical cell was consistently measured at around 5
Ω for all samples. A pronounced decrease of charge transfer
resistance (Rct) is observed on the sample
with a small iron atomic ratio relative to cobalt (Co/Fe 32-red).
This denotes the importance of synergistic effects by surface interaction
on phase boundaries between iron oxide clusters with CoO support by
facilitating charge transportation. The activity enhancement could
only be observed at low iron content. With the increase of the iron
content, additional semicircle, which can be related to the formation
of less conductive oxide layer intermediate (Rfilm), becomes more pronounced and hampers the conductivity.
This could be originated from the formation of insulating FeOOH intermediate
on Co/Fe 3-red during the OER.[48] As a result,
Co/Fe 3-red exhibits the slowest reaction kinetics even though it
has a relatively similar overpotential compared to the CoO.The electrochemical surface area (ECSA) of the samples was further
calculated based on double-layer capacitance (Cdl) measurements by a cyclic voltammetry method. Co3O4 has a higher Cdl (0.19
mF) compared to the rock-salt CoO (0.11 mF), which is likely due to
the contribution of Co3+ in the
spinel phase.[51,52] It is analogous to the significant
decrease of the Cdl value on the substitution
of Co3+ by Fe3+ and Al3+ as reported
by Behrens et al.[53] Addition and further
increase of the iron amount decrease the values of Cdl as well as ECSA (Figure S10a), denoting that the cobalt is the active species for the OER. However,
the ECSA calculation by measuring Cdl in
the non-Faradaic region might be complex and inaccurate due to the
severe phase transformation of the rock-salt structure at elevated
potential bias. The rock-salt phase itself serves as a precatalyst
rather than the “real” catalyst. Taking into account
these aspects and the impact of elemental composition on the Cdl value, a direct comparison of ECSA-normalized
LSV curves might be an inaccurate descriptor.[53] Hence, we use the BET surface area as the better descriptor of catalytic
surface, as also suggested by Jaramillo et al. (Figure S10b).[54] BET surface area-normalized
LSV curves show that the specific activity of reduced cobalt oxide
(CoO) is more superior compared to the pristine Co3O4. An optimum specific catalytic activity enhancement was observed
with a small iron amount (Co/Fe 32-red).The chronopotentiometry
(CP) measurement is then performed
by depositing
the most active sample (Co/Fe 32-red) onto carbon fiber paper.
This sample retains the activity at 10
mA/cm2 for up to 12 h (Figure f). A slight deactivation occurred due to
the leaching of iron, as confirmed by ICP-OES by sampling the 1 M
KOH electrolyte solution after the test (Table S3). The leached iron was calculated to be around 2 wt % of
total iron contained in the deposited Co/Fe 32-red. The sample retained
the nanowires’ morphology after prolonged chronopotentiometry
tests without a visible formation of agglomeration, as seen in the
TEM image.The Faradaic efficiency (FE) for the molecular oxygen
production
over the catalysts before and after reduction was evaluated using
an RRDE. For this purpose, as proof of the concept, samples of Co3O4 and Co/Fe 32 were chosen. Co3O4 and Co/Fe 32 electrocatalysts showed FE values of 94 and
96%, respectively, similar to the previously reported FE value of
various cobalt oxide and cobalt iron oxides.[55,56] The discrepancy from full electric charge utilization might be related
to the alteration of the catalysts and side reactions like carbon
oxidation.[57] The carbon source for this
side oxidation might come from the Nafion binder. However, this value
is slightly decreased to 91 and 93%, respectively, after the reduction
(Figure S11). This could be attributed
to a drastic structural alteration of the reduced samples that consumes
extra electrical charge during the applied potential, which will be
discussed below in detail.To gain insight into phase transformation
and formation of intermediate
phases upon applied potential, in situ Raman study,
which is highly sensitive to probe the vibrational spectra of oxides,
is then carried out in an in situ Raman electrochemical
flow cell (Figure S12). The sample is deposited
on the electrochemically roughened Au foil surface to enhance the
sensitivity to probe local change on the catalyst surface via the
surface-enhanced Raman spectra (SERS) effect.[11,30] The CV and LSV curves recorded with the in situ Raman cell are shown in Figure S13a.
The LSV curve shows that the blank roughened Au foil has negligible
OER activity compared to the deposited sample within the potential
range. Nevertheless, the roughened Au contributes to the evolution
of an anodic peak at around 1.25 V vs RHE. To assign this anodic peak,
a gradual 0.1 V increase of potential bias is applied, and the Raman
spectra are recorded in each step (Figure S13b). This caused the formation of a small hump at 550 cm–1 starting from 1.3 V vs RHE that corresponds to Au–O stretching
vibration.[31] This peak is less intense
compared to the one observed by Bell et al.,[31] the possible cause for this discrepancy is that we used a 532 nm
laser excitation wavelength that has weaker resonance properties to
Au. Further oxidation on the Au foil does not increase the intensity
of the observed hump. This vibration appears close to the potential
windows of the evolved anodic peak; hence, the anodic peak observed
on CV with blank roughened Au foil could be attributed to the oxidation
of Au to AuO. The anodic peak is slightly
shifted to the negative potential with the sample due to the stabilization
effect of the Au–CoOOH interaction that reduces the switching
potential at which the oxidized phase is formed.[16]In situ Raman of the Co/Fe 32-red
sample deposited
on the roughened Au foil substrate revealed the evolution of the active
intermediate state and irreversible phase transformation induced by
applied potential bias in the OER (Figure a–c). The Raman spectra of the as-prepared
sample show broad bands with two maxima at 535 and 680 cm–1 that correspond to CoO.[58] The bands belonging
to the iron oxide species are not visible due to the diluted amount
of iron ratio compared to cobalt. Prior to the OER, the sample is
immersed in 1 M KOH for 15 min to explore the impact of the solvation
on the structural change on the catalyst’s surface. As seen
in Figure a, the sample
undergoes a surface restructuring upon 15 min of immersion in electrolyte
solution without applied potential bias, denoting that the as-prepared
sample acts as a precatalyst in this reaction. The band at 535 cm–1 becomes less intense, while the sharp band at 503
cm–1 and broad band at 520–620
cm–1, which are typical to the CoOOH,
start to evolve.[59,60] This indicates that the surface
is reconstructed from rock-salt CoO (Co2+) to the oxyhydroxide
(Co3+) structure.[61] At the same
time, a band at 680 cm–1 is red-shifted and gains
more intensity. A relatively sharp peak at this region could also
be attributed to the A1g main band of the spinel phase;[7] hence, the evolution of a minor amount of surface
spinel phase upon immersion in 1 M KOH should be taken into account.
The evolution of the Co(OH)2 phase is undetected due to
the absence of a sharp peak at around 420 cm–1,
that is originated from the A1g vibration mode of Co(OH)2.[60]
Figure 5
(a) In situ Raman spectra of the Co/Fe 32-red
sample measured in a 1 M KOH electrolyte within a 0.1 V potential
step. (b) Magnification of the A1g band (left) and active
oxygen species (right). (c) Spectra comparison of the Co/Fe 32-red
sample measured by in situ Raman and the as-prepared
Co/Fe 32 spinel before the reduction.
(a) In situ Raman spectra of the Co/Fe 32-red
sample measured in a 1 M KOH electrolyte within a 0.1 V potential
step. (b) Magnification of the A1g band (left) and active
oxygen species (right). (c) Spectra comparison of the Co/Fe 32-red
sample measured by in situ Raman and the as-prepared
Co/Fe 32 spinel before the reduction.The spectra remain unchanged at 1.0 V vs RHE applied potential
bias; this indicates that the oxidation reactions on the catalyst’s
surface have not taken place yet at this potential range. The observation
verifies the absence of the anodic peak on CV at 1.0 V vs RHE (Figure S13a, inset). An anodic peak starts to
evolve at 1.1 V vs RHE and goes inherently with the evolution of sharp
bands at 477 and 675 cm–1 that could be attributed
to F2g and A1g main bands of spinel, and a pronounced
broad band centered at 554 cm–1 that corresponds
to the A1g vibrational mode of CoOOH. However, this peak
is red-shifted compared to the center of the A1g vibrational
mode of CoOOH reported by previous studies and our control experiment
with the mesostructured CoO catalyst (Figure S14d).[30,31] One possible explanation for this discrepancy
is the vibrational frequency decrease due to the bond elongation in
the di-μ-oxo-bridged Co3+ Oh ions by the
incorporation of Fe3+ (0.645 Å) with slightly longer
ionic radii compared to Co3+ (0.610 Å).[39,62] The iron might be originated from the Fe-oxyhydroxide structure
(as a result of surface oxidation of small Fe3O4 clusters) with direct contact with CoOOH in the phase boundaries.
Hence, this oxyhydroxide intermediate phase is further denoted as
Co(Fe)OOH. This Co(Fe)OOH intermediate state is conductive under OER
conditions and could enhance the charge transfer as shown by the aforementioned
EIS measurements. In addition, the band corresponding to the rock-salt
structure is weakly observed after 1.1 V vs RHE potential bias. Taking
into account that Raman spectroscopy is a bulk sensitive technique
and the high stability of spinel and oxyhydroxide phases in this potential
range at pH 14 and 25 °C (based on Pourbaix diagram),[63,64] the rock-salt phase transformation appears to occur not only on
the surface but also in the bulk region. This will be further elaborated
in the XRD section below. A similar phenomenon was also observed for
the pristine CoO sample (Figure S14d,e).
The control experiment with pristine Co3O4 (Figure S14a–c) indicated that the band
corresponding to CoOOH is less pronounced compared to the one generated
by the rock-salt counterpart. Since oxyhydroxide species is proposed
to be the intermediate active phase for the OER, this discrepancy
could also explain the lower activity of spinel to catalyze the OER
compared to their rock-salt counterpart.[11,30,31]Increasing potential bias up to 1.5
V vs RHE attenuates the intensity
of the broad band centered at 554 cm–1 despite the
inherent evolution of the band corresponding to Au–O vibration.
This endorses that the Au–O vibration appears as a minor background,
and the attribution of the band at this region is dominated by the
Co(Fe)OOH phase. The attenuation of the band corresponding to the
Co(Fe)OOH intermediate phase also indicates the further alteration
of the catalyst into another intermediate phase. The direct interpretation
of the shift of this peak for the formation of Co4+ could
not be assigned due to its broad and lower intensity close to the
OER onset potential.[31,65,66]Nevertheless, the insight of the surface alteration close
to the
OER onset potential could be gained by following the trend on the
A1g band position and peak shape at around 675–690
cm–1 that corresponds to the Co3+–O
vibration mode in the octahedral sites of spinel. As seen in Figure b, the A1g band has asymmetric broadening. This asymmetric broadening supports
the decrease of the crystallinity of the material due to the formation
of amorphous surface species or randomizing effect of oxygen vacancies
and surface bond contraction in the as-formed distorted spinel phase.[65,67] In addition, the band is blue-shifted with the gradual increase
of potential bias up to 1.4 V vs RHE. However, the peak location is
unchanged on the OER onset potential (1.5 V vs RHE), presumably due
to the already formed Co4+–O• intermediate
pre-equilibrium state as mechanism proposed by Hu et al.[30] Blue-shifts in Raman bands indicate the lattice
distortion due to the bond compression and charge redistribution.[65,66] Considering the OER mechanism on cobalt oxide proposed by Hu et
al.,[30] the oxidation of six coordinated
Co3+–O• to Co4+–O• is the potential determining step before the OER onset
potential. Considering that the shorter atomic radii of six coordinated
Co4+ are shorter than Co3+, this oxidation should
shorten the overall bond length. This mechanism fits with our observation
on the A1g band, where the increasing potential bias up
to the OER onset potential blue-shifts the A1g band that
can be correlated to the shortening of cobalt–oxygen bonding.
This also goes in line with a slightly compressed Co–O bond
that could still be observed in Co3O4 during
the OER, indicating partial oxidation of the catalyst surface as reported
by Liu et al.[41,68] This finding is also consistent
with the control experiment performed with the pristine CoO catalyst
(Figure S14e). In contrast, the blue shift
on the A1g band was not observed in the control experiment
with pristine Co3O4 (Figure S14c). The unshifted Raman band positions upon applied potential
bias on Co3O4 under alkaline conditions were
also reported in other works.[41,69] The absence of the
blue-shift, in this case, could be correlated to the defect-free spinel
phase in the Co3O4 sample as shown by the symmetrical
A1g band compared to the asymmetric one generated from
reduced CoO samples (Figure b). However, we cannot rule out the formation of the Co4+ intermediate in Co3O4 that could be
simply undetected in this case due to the change that might take place
only in several atomic layers that is under the limitation of in situ Raman’s instrument sensitivity. A pronounced
phase transformation from Co3O4 to CoOOH, as
reported by Yeo et al., was not observed here due to the relatively
thicker powder catalyst deposition in our case compared to that work
(0.4–87 monolayers).[31,69]Additionally,
a metastable peak at 830 cm–1 (Figure b) that exclusively
evolves on the OER onset potential (1.5 V vs RHE) could be attributed
to the “O–O” stretch of an adsorbed *O–OH species on the Au surface.[70−72] Further investigation of this peak at higher potential was, however,
limited by the severe bubble generation. To verify the assignment
of this peak to the adsorbed *O–OH species on the Au surface,
two more control experiments were then conducted with the roughened
Au substrate in a 0.1 M KOH electrolyte to mitigate the bubble evolution
and with the carbon fiber paper (CFP) substrate in 1 M KOH to eliminate
the contribution of Au. For the first experiment with 0.1 M KOH, due
to the lower activity in this diluted electrolyte, the impact of bubble
evolution could be minimized and a good spectral resolution was obtained
up to 1.65 V vs RHE (Figure S15). The phase
transformation and peak shift were relatively more subtle in 0.1 M
KOH compared to in 1 M KOH, possibly due to the weaker solvation impact
in a more diluted electrolyte. Nevertheless, a similar shake-up peak
at around 830 cm–1 could be observed at the visible
onset potential of the OER in 0.1 M KOH (1.6–1.65 V vs RHE).The second control experiment was carried out by depositing Co/Fe
32-red onto the CFP substrate and used as the working electrode in
the in situ Raman cell. As shown in Figure S16a, the CFP substrate has no visible contribution
to the overall measured current and OER activity. The i measurement with the blank CFP substrate
also shows no peak corresponding to the carbon oxidation within the
region of interest (300–1200 cm–1). Spectra
measured with the Co/Fe 32-red sample
deposited on CFP (Figure S16c,d) reveals
the absence of shake-up peak at around 830 cm–1,
confirming that the observed peak at this location with the Au substrate
was limited to the adsorbed *O–OH species on the Au surface.
Besides, in situ Raman spectra measured in 1 M KOH
with roughened Au and CFP substrates show an analogous trend of peak
changes and peak shift, precluding the contribution of Au substrate
in the interpretation of measured in situ Raman spectra.By the time the applied potential is switched off, the A1g band reverted to its original position. This indicates that Co4+–O• is also metastable and governed
by the potential bias. In addition, the broad peak centered at 554
cm–1 corresponding to the Co(Fe)OOH phase becomes
more pronounced. It strengthens the hypothesis that the Co4+ is reduced back to the Co3+ state. The existence of an
oxyhydroxide intermediate phase itself is highly influenced by the
existence of the 1 M KOH electrolyte solution, as proven by the diminished
Co(Fe)OOH band on the dry sample after the in situ tests (Figure a).
Hence, this Co(Fe)–OOH intermediate might be the “real”
catalyst for the OER. The phase transformation of rock-salt to the
spinel phase after the in situ OER test is irreversible,
as revealed by the change into the black color that is typical for
the spinel color, in optical micrographs during the in situ Raman measurement and photographs of the as-prepared sample on the
Au substrate and after the OER (Figure S17). In addition, this phase transformation induced by potential bias
leads to the formation of a distorted spinel with a lower crystalline
degree, as seen by the asymmetric peak broadening and shift on the
A1g band (Figure c).[73−75] The overall geometry and structure of the material
were maintained as observed from the chronopotentiometry test, eliminating
the effect of phonon confinement to the change on Raman spectra.In-depth postmortem analysis was then conducted to characterize
the catalyst after the OER, where carbon fiber paper is used as a
working electrode. First, the Co/Fe 32-red sample deposited on carbon
fiber paper was immersed in 1 M KOH for 12 h to verify the solvation
impact on the material. Under the alkaline conditions, the surface
reconstruction took place even without the applied potential bias
as confirmed by XRD (Figure a,b). The emerged CoOOH phase (and potentially Co(Fe)OOH),
as also observed from in situ Raman, indicated that
the octahedrally coordinated Co2+ ions at the surface were
partly oxidized into some octahedrally coordinated Co3+ ions where CoO is still detectable.
Figure 6
XRD patterns of Co/Fe 32-red (a) before
CP, (b) after 12 h immersion
in 1 M KOH, and (c) after 12 h of CP. The XRD data was measured on
carbon fiber paper in a transmission mode with a Mo Kα1 (λ: 0.7093 Å) radiation source. High-resolution Co 2p
XPS data of Co/Fe 32-red are shown in (d) before CP, (e) after 12
h immersion in 1 M KOH, and (f) after 12 h of CP.
XRD patterns of Co/Fe 32-red (a) before
CP, (b) after 12 h immersion
in 1 M KOH, and (c) after 12 h of CP. The XRD data was measured on
carbon fiber paper in a transmission mode with a Mo Kα1 (λ: 0.7093 Å) radiation source. High-resolution Co 2p
XPS data of Co/Fe 32-red are shown in (d) before CP, (e) after 12
h immersion in 1 M KOH, and (f) after 12 h of CP.This finding was further supported by high-resolution Co 2p XPS,
where Co3+ from CoOOH was predominantly found on the surface
upon solvation in KOH, compared to only Co2+ from CoO before
CP (Figure d,e). The
assignment of Co2+ is based on the intense shake-up satellite
observed around 786 eV, while Co3+ exhibits
a weak satellite around 790 eV.[76−78] Next, the rock-salt-type
CoO phase was transformed into the Co3O4 spinel
structure after prolonged potential bias (Figure c,f). This goes in line with the previously
diminished Co2+ → Co3+ oxidation wave even after the first LSV scan and
observation from in situ Raman, indicating that,
unlike its spinel counterpart, CoO transformed irreversibly upon potential
bias. A shift of the spinel reflections to smaller 2θ angles
could be attributed to the contribution of the thickness of carbon
paper, which violates the focusing conditions of the diffraction event,
or to some lattice disorder due to the presence of iron in the electrochemically
formed spinel phase.[39] HR-TEM images of
the sample material removed from the working electrode showed the
formation of an amorphous phase on the surface of the nanowires (Figure S18a). This amorphous phase was an artifact
of surface restructuring and the formation of amorphous Co(Fe)OOH
as an intermediate state during applied potential bias as observed
in the in situ Raman.[6,23] Further magnification
of the nanowires and nanoparticle interface (Figure S18b) reveals that the phase boundaries between the nanowire
matrix and nanoparticle disappeared after the OER and formed a singular
crystalline spinel structure. This verifies that the formation of
the conductive Co(Fe)OOH intermediate phase during applied potential
bias is governed by the direct contact between the iron oxide cluster
with the cobalt oxide nanowire matrix in the phase boundaries.Finally, SEM-EDX measurements were carried out to verify the iron
leaching (Figure S18c,d). The increasing
atomic ratio of Co/Fe after 12 h of CP indicates that some of the
iron was etched into the electrolyte, as also confirmed by our ICP-OES
analysis (Table S3). The in-depth in situ and postmortem characterization suggested that the
iron oxide clusters supported on CoO nanowires acted as the precatalyst
for the OER. Under applied potential bias, the reduced sample undergoes
a phase transformation into oxyhydroxide intermediates and a distorted
spinel phase. The distorted spinel phase from this transformation
is beneficial to enhance the OER activity of the sample. Kinetic and
EIS studies further revealed that cobalt moieties play a role as the
active sites for the OER, whereas the iron oxide clusters were beneficial
to enhance the electronic charge transfer. However, a high amount
of iron is detrimental to the OER activity due to the formation of
FeOOH insulating species.
Conclusions
A highly active OER
catalyst has been prepared through a mild reduction
of cobalt iron oxide spinel nanowires. Following the reduction, iron
oxide clusters supported by the ordered mesoporous CoO nanowire matrix
were generated. A significant change in an ionic distribution upon
reduction could be confirmed by Mössbauer spectroscopy, thanks
to the enrichment of powder samples with the 57Fe isotope.
The reduction post-treatment improved the OER performance significantly
by boosting the current density from 150 to 315 mA/cm2 at 1.7 V vs
RHE and lowering the overpotential
down from 378 to 339 mV at 10 mA/cm2. In situ Raman and postmortem studies revealed that the reduced material
acted as the precatalyst for the OER due to the transformation of
rock-salt CoO into disordered cobalt oxide spinel through the implementation
of external potential bias. It has been found that Co2+ in the intermediate step of the reduced samples was more pronounced
compared to the spinel counterpart. This could enhance the formation
of the μ-OO peroxide prior to the OER as well as the Co3+-O reducibility in the reverse scan as a key activity descriptor.
The interaction of iron clusters with CoO at the phase boundaries
was found to be lucrative for the formation of more active OER species.
Authors: Zhi Wei Seh; Jakob Kibsgaard; Colin F Dickens; Ib Chorkendorff; Jens K Nørskov; Thomas F Jaramillo Journal: Science Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jakob Fester; Anton Makoveev; Doris Grumelli; Rico Gutzler; Zhaozong Sun; Jonathan Rodríguez-Fernández; Klaus Kern; Jeppe V Lauritsen Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 15.336