Literature DB >> 3459555

Chromosomal translocations play a unique role in influencing prognosis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

D L Williams, J Harber, S B Murphy, A T Look, D K Kalwinsky, G Rivera, S L Melvin, S Stass, G V Dahl.   

Abstract

Certain types of chromosomal abnormalities have been shown to exert strong independent influence on treatment outcome in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). To identify the changes most closely associated with prognosis, we analyzed the completely banded blast cell karyotypes of 161 children with this disease. One hundred twenty-five cases had one or more chromosomal abnormalities, with 45 showing translocations. The frequency of translocations was highest (58%) among patients with pseudodiploid karyotypes and lowest (0%) in the hyperdiploid group defined by 51 or more chromosomes. During the maximum 6-year follow-up period, 30 of the 45 patients with a translocation failed therapy, compared with only 27 of the 116 who lacked this feature. Life-table estimates of event-free survival indicate that only 14% of the translocation group will be in complete remission at 3 years. The percentages of failures associated with random and nonrandom translocations were virtually identical (68% v 65%). When entered in a Cox proportional hazards model with seven other types of chromosomal abnormalities, and then with 11 clinical and laboratory variables of known prognostic value in ALL, translocation emerged as the strongest single predictor of treatment outcome (P less than 0.0001). The model indicated that translocation increases the risk of treatment failure six times by comparison with the absence of this feature. These findings offer an explanation for the majority of early treatment failures in childhood ALL, including those previously attributed to ploidy classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3459555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  8 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  J Armstrong; M Pomeroy; J J Fennelly; S Cahalane
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  Impact of rearrangements on function and position of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus and on human genetic disorders.

Authors:  M B Qumsiyeh
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 3.  Genetic and cytogenetic changes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  H G Ahuja; M J Cline
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1988

4.  Cytogenetic investigations of solid tumours of children.

Authors:  A D Pearson; M M Reid; E V Davison; N Bown; A J Malcolm; A W Craft
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 5.  A health-care system perspective on implementing genomic medicine: pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia as a paradigm.

Authors:  W E Evans; K R Crews; C-H Pui
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Chromosomes in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: karyotypic patterns in disease subtypes.

Authors:  M A Wodzinski; A E Watmore; J S Lilleyman; A M Potter
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Prognostic cytogenetic markers in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  A Settin; M Al Haggar; T Al Dosoky; R Al Baz; N Abdelrazik; M Fouda; S Aref; Y Al-Tonbary
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.319

8.  E2A-PBX1 exhibited a promising prognosis in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with the CCLG-ALL2008 protocol.

Authors:  Yixin Hu; Hailong He; Jun Lu; Yi Wang; Peifang Xiao; Jianqin Li; Jie Li; Yina Sun; Hui Lv; Junjie Fan; Yanhua Yao; Yihuan Chai; Shaoyan Hu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.147

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.