Literature DB >> 17401264

Prognostic cytogenetic markers in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

A Settin1, M Al Haggar, T Al Dosoky, R Al Baz, N Abdelrazik, M Fouda, S Aref, Y Al-Tonbary.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) showing resistance to immediate induction chemotherapy in relation to conventional and advanced cytogenetic analysis.
METHODS: This work was conducted on 63 ALL children (40 males and 23 females) with age range 4.5 months-16 years (mean = 7.76 years). They included 37 cases attained true remission and 26 complicated by failure of remission, early relapse or death. They were subjected to history, clinical examination and investigations including CBC, BM examination, karyotyping, FISH for translocations and flowcytometry for immunophenotyping and minimal residual disease diagnosis.
RESULTS: Cases aged 50.000/mm3 also showed better but non-significant remission rates. Most of the present cases were L2 with better remission compared to other immunophenotypes. Forty informative karyotypes were subdivided into 15 hypodiploid, 10 pseudodiploid, 8 normal diploid and 7 hyperdiploid cases; the best remission rates were noticed among the most frequent ploidy patterns. Chromosomes 9, 11 and 22 were the most frequently involved by structural aberrations followed by chromosomes 5, 12 and 17. Resistance was noted with aberrations not encountered among remission group; deletions involving chromosomes 2p, 3q, 10p and 12q; translocations involving chromosome 5; trisomies of chromosomes 16 and 21; monosomies of 5 and X and inversions of 5 and 11.
CONCLUSION: Some cytogenetic and molecular characterizations of childhood ALL could add prognostic criteria for proper therapy allocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17401264     DOI: 10.1007/s12098-007-0040-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-5456            Impact factor:   5.319


  53 in total

1.  Multipaint FISH: a rapid and reliable way to define cryptic and complex abnormalities.

Authors:  C A Joyce; F M Ross; N R Dennis; N D Wyre; J C Barber
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  Trisomy of leukemic cell chromosomes 4 and 10 identifies children with B-progenitor cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia with a very low risk of treatment failure: a Pediatric Oncology Group study.

Authors:  M B Harris; J J Shuster; A Carroll; A T Look; M J Borowitz; W M Crist; R Nitschke; J Pullen; C P Steuber; V J Land
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Prognostic value of structural chromosomal rearrangements and small cell clones with high hyperdiploidy in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Zuzana Zemanova; Kyra Michalova; Lenka Sindelarova; Petr Smisek; Jana Brezinova; Sarka Ransdorfova; Vladimir Vavra; Alena Dohnalova; Jan Stary
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.156

4.  Prognostic implications of cytogenetic studies in an intensively treated group of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  J A Fletcher; V M Kimball; E Lynch; M Donnelly; K Pavelka; R D Gelber; R Tantravahi; S E Sallan
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1989-11-01       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  [Clinical application of gene technology for diagnosis and treatment of leukemia].

Authors:  S Hashino; M Imamura
Journal:  Rinsho Byori       Date:  1997-01

6.  Suppression of human colorectal carcinoma cell growth by wild-type p53.

Authors:  S J Baker; S Markowitz; E R Fearon; J K Willson; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-08-24       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Differences in prognosis for boys and girls with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  H Sather; D Miller; M Nesbit; R Heyn; D Hammond
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-04-04       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Prognostic implications of blast cell morphology in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Childrens Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  D R Miller; M Krailo; W A Bleyer; J N Lukens; S E Siegel; P R Coccia; J Weiner; D Hammond
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-10

9.  Six-year follow-up of the clinical significance of karyotype in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  C D Bloomfield; L M Secker-Walker; A I Goldman; H Van Den Berghe; A de la Chapelle; T Ruutu; G Alimena; O M Garson; H M Golomb; J D Rowley
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1989-07-15

10.  Rearrangement of the MLL gene confers a poor prognosis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, regardless of presenting age.

Authors:  F G Behm; S C Raimondi; J L Frestedt; Q Liu; W M Crist; J R Downing; G K Rivera; J H Kersey; C H Pui
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  4 in total

1.  BCR-ABL Translocation in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Southern India.

Authors:  D Sugapriya; S Preethi; P Shanthi; N Chandra; G Jeyaraman; P Sachdanandam; S Thilagavathy; S Venkatadesilalu
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Pattern of chromosome involvement in childhood hyperdiploid pre-B-cell acute lymhoblastic leukemia cases from India.

Authors:  Lily S Kerketta; Vundinti Baburao; Kanjaksha Ghosh
Journal:  Indian J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-01

3.  Impact of cytogenetics on outcomes in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Rachana Chennamaneni; Sadashivudu Gundeti; Meher Lakshmi Konatam; Stalin Bala; Ashok Kumar; Lakshmi Srinivas
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

4.  Rare and recurrent chromosomal abnormalities and their clinical relevance in pediatric acute leukemia of south Indian population.

Authors:  Seyed Hashem Mir Mazloumi; Prasanna Kumari; D S Madhumathi; L Appaji
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2012-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.