Effect of functional oils or probiotics on performance and microbiota profile of newly weaned piglets.

The study aimed to evaluate a commercial blend of functional oils based on liquid from the cashew nutshell and castor oil as a growth promoter in newly weaned piglets. A total of 225 piglets, castrated males and females with 28 days of age were randomly distributed in pens with 15 animals composing three treatments and five repetitions. The treatments were: control (without the inclusion of additives), probiotics, or functional oils. The performance was evaluated. At 50 days of age, a pool of fresh feces from 3 animals/repetition was collected to perform the sequencing of microbiota using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Supplementation with functional oils improved the piglets' daily weight gain and feed conversion ratio (P < 0.05) in the first weeks of the experiment, which resulted in higher final live weight (P < 0.05) in the phase when compared to the control treatment (24.34 kg and 21.55 kg, respectively). The animals that received probiotics showed an intermediate performance (23.66 kg final live weight) at the end of the 38 experimental days. Both additives were effective in increasing groups essential for intestinal health, such as Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae. The functional oils were more effective in reducing pathogenic bacteria, such as Campylobacter and Escherichia coli. In conclusion, the use of functional oils optimized performance and effectively modulated the microbiota of newly weaned piglets.

Introduction

Several stressors occur during the weaning of piglets, such as separation from the mother and siblings, transport and handling, or reformulation of the social hierarchy due to the mixing of different groups of piglets. These stressors lead to oxidative stress, as well as to inflammation and dysbiosis, which, may consequently result in diarrhea, decreased growth and increased mortality rate[1]. Diarrhea is an important factor with negative economic impact in the nursery, and its main pathogenic agent is enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) K88[2].

For decades, antibiotics have been fed at low dosages to nursery pigs to minimize the negative impact of weaning[3]. However, most countries have been implementing policies and regulations to reduce or ban the use of antimicrobials in animal production. These changes are motivated by the overuse of antibiotics, which results in the appearance of super resistant bacteria, compromising their effectiveness in human and/or animal health[4].

The regulatory restrictions in the use of antibiotics coupled with the reduced number of compounds with similar productive potential has resulted in reductions in performance and higher pig mortalities, especially during the nursery phase[5]. Therefore, new compounds are needed to replace the antibiotics in the diet of weaned piglets.

Probiotics are live microorganisms that modulate the host's intestinal microbiota. Their beneficial effects are associated with their adherence to the epithelium, the inhibition of the growth and the reduction of toxins produced by pathogenic bacteria[6]. For example, supplementation with Lactobacillus spp. has been shown to reduce the fecal counts of Salmonella serovar Typhimurium KCTC 2515 and Escherichia coli KCTC 2571 in weaned piglets, increasing the average daily gain and average daily feed intake[7].

Functional oils are defined as oils that have an action beyond their nutritional value[8], and are being disseminated in the pig industry due to their antimicrobial action and the modulation of intestinal microbiota[1].

The liquid from the cashew nut shell is a renewable resource, with cardol in its composition, which has an antimicrobial potential, mainly against gram-positive bacteria such as Streptococcus mutans, Bacillus subtilis and Staphylococcus aureus[9]. Additionally, ricinoleic acid, the main component of castor oil, acts by denaturing and coagulating proteins in bacterial cell wall[10].

The commercial mixture containing functional oils from cashew nut liquid and castor oil has already demonstrated positive effects on performance, modulation of intestinal microbiota and immune system of broilers challenged by coccidiosis[11-14]. However, there are no published studies analyzing the effects of this product on the performance and intestinal microbiota of swine.

Our hypothesis is that the use of functional oils or probiotics will provide piglets with better performance and an intestinal microbiota beneficial to the animal due to the modulation caused by the additives. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of supplementing a probiotic or a commercial blend of cashew nutshell liquid and castor oil, on the performance, blood parameters and intestinal microbial composition of weaned piglets.

Results

Performance and frequency of diarrhea

The effects of additives on the performance are shown in Table 1. The DWG in phases 1, 2 and the general average was higher for the group receiving the blend of functional oils in the diet when compared to the control group, the probiotic group showed an intermediate result (P < 0.05). Similar results were observed for the live weights at 57 and 66 days of life. Pigs supplemented with the blend of functional oils ate less than the other groups (p < 0.05), which also resulted in a better average FCR (p < 0.05).

Table 1

Effect of different feed additives on the performance of weaned pigs in phase 1 (28–43 days old), phase 2 (43–57 days old), phase 3 (57–66 days old), and on average (28–66 days old).

Item	Additives				p-value
	Control1	Oils2	Probiotic3	SEM4
Live weight, kg
Day 28	8.66	8.77	8.83	0.3261	0.6897
Day 43	11.25	12.21	11.5	0.4370	0.2936
Day 57	17.90b	19.84a	18.68ab	0.6206	0.0427
Day 66	21.55b	24.34a	23.66ab	0.8046	0.0498
Average daily gain, kg
Phase 1	0.182b	0.228a	0.211ab	0.0172	0.0147
Phase 2	0.522b	0.662a	0.587ab	0.0181	0.0031
Phase 3	0.431	0,491	0.494	0.0265	0.2845
Average	0.313 b	0.429a	0.395ab	0.0201	0.0165
Daily feed intake, kg
Phase 1	0.325	0.328	0.320	0.0100	0.2026
Phase 2	0.879	0.770	0.814	0.0480	0.3368
Phase 3	0.943	0.986	1.005	0.0320	0.3564
Average	0.725a	0.688b	0.709a	0.0210	0.0350
Feed conversion ratio, kg kg
Phase 1	1.771a	1.482b	1.538ab	0.2925	0.0371
Phase 2	1.726a	1.350b	1.387ab	0.0512	0.0385
Phase 3	2.174	1.932	2.050	0.3401	0.1689
Average	2.275a	1.732b	1.853a	0.0951	0.0470

Least squares: based on observations of 5 stalls per diet.

1Control: without the inclusion of zootechnical additives; 2Probiotics: inclusion of 0.4% probiotic. Probiotic composition: Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; 3Functional oils with inclusion of 0.2% Essential + 0.15% Integrity; 4SEM: standard error of the mean.

abAverages within the same row with different overwrites are statistically different (P < 0.05).

The percentage of diarrheal feces was lower for the pigs that received the functional oils (p < 0.05) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1

Frequency of diarrheal feces over 2 weeks and in the total period of rearing piglets submitted to different experimental diets in the nursery phase. Control: without the inclusion of zootechnical additives; oils: functional oils with inclusion of 0.2% Essential + 0.15% Integrity; 2Probiotics: inclusion of 0.4% probiotic. Probiotic composition: Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; abAverages within the same row with different overwrites are statistically different (P < 0.05).

Intestinal microbiota and leukogram

The study sequenced a total of 15 fecal pool samples, being three treatments (control, oils, and probiotics) with 5 replicates collected at 50 days of trial. Illumina sequencing analysis of the V3-V4 region of the 16S rDNA gene of 15 fecal pool samples generated a total of 967,431 trimmed quality sequences with an average number of reads per sample of 64,495.4 ± 18,795.6 (Table S1). One sample (181113520761-1-1-1) of the functional oils treatment was disregarded due to the low number of sequences compared to the other samples. The reads were processed and classified into 1690 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs).

The rarefaction curves generated from ASVs (Fig. S1) showed high sequencing coverage in all samples. The rarefaction curves tended to reach the saturation plateau, this result demonstrates that the microbiota of the 14 samples was deep enough to estimate the phenotypic richness and the diversity of the microbial community.

Variation in alpha and beta diversity of the microbiota.

Alpha diversity

The Chao 1 index was based on the richness amplicon sequence variant (ASVs) present in the sample. The Shannon index considered uniformity in taxa abundance, and the Simpson index was based on the taxa abundance dominance (Fig. 2). The Chao, Shannon and Simpson indices showed no significant difference among the three treatments (p > 0.05). However, there is a tendency to increase the indices and the uniformity in the functional oils group followed by the probiotics, in comparison to control.

Figure 2

Alpha diversity of fecal pool samples of weaned piglets at 50 days of trial. The study consisted of three feed additives in the nursery phase: basal diet (control), Functional Oils or Probiotics.

Beta diversity

The Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index (BC) was used to analyze inter-individual differences. Based on the PCoA graph (Fig. 3), it was possible to verify that the microbial populations of the animals of the three treatments showed homogeneous dispersion (p > 0.05). The index showed that the treatments had a similar microbial composition (Adonis with 999 permutations, p = 0.337).

Figure 3

Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of beta diversity based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity of fecal pool samples of weaned piglets at 50 days of trial. The study consisted of three feed additives in the nursery phase: basal diet (control), Functional Oils or Probiotics. Comparison among Oils, Probiotics and Control treatments (Adonis with 999 permutations, p = 0.337).

All sequences were classified into nine phyla, although four phyla were more common (> 1%): Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria and Tenericutes. Firmicutes was the most abundant phylum in all treatments (> 76%) (Fig. 4). A complete list of the identified sequences (relative abundance) per treatment is provided in Supplementary Table 3. Bacteroidetes and Tenericutes were more abundant for the blend and less abundant for probiotics treatment. Actinobacteria was more abundant in the blend of functional oils and in the group supplemented with probiotics when compared to the control group.

Figure 4

The relative abundance of the fecal microbiota of weaned piglets at 50 day of age receiving three treatments: basal diet (Control), Functional oils (Oils) or Probiotics. The 14 most abundant taxa at Family and Genus level.

Thirty-five families (35) were identified, of which fourteen (14) had relative abundance > 1% (Table S2 and Fig. 4). The Ruminococcaceae family was predominant in all groups (> 30%) and showed an increase in animals supplemented with probiotics with a log2 FoldChange of 0.6266 (padj < 0.001) (Fig. 4). The Lachnospiraceae family was the second most abundant (> 19%). Compared to the control, Lactobacillaceae were less abundant for both additives (~ 9% vs. ~ 3%). Similar behavior was observed for Muribaculaceae. Clostridiaceae 1 was more abundant for both additives.

Piglets fed the control diet showed a higher concentration of E.coli when compared to the treatment with the blend of functional oils, whereas the treatment with probiotic was not different from any of the other two treatments (P < 0.05; Fig. S2).

The leukogram (Table 2) showed that the concentration of lymphocytes in the control and probiotic groups was higher when compared to treatment with functional oils (p < 0.05). The other parameters, leukocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils and monocytes did not differ statistically among treatments (P > 0.05). Mortality tended to be lower in pigs supplemented with either of the two additives.

Table 2

Blood analysis of piglets at 50 days of age receiving different feed additives.

Item	Additives				p-value
	Control1	Oils2	Probiotic3	SEM
Mortality %	10.00	2.65	4.85	2.228	0.0504
Leukocytes, mm3	21,080	17,060	20,020	0.485	0.5218
Neutrophils, mm3	13,297	11,740	13,003	0.558	0.8490
Lymphocytes, mm3	6046a	3363b	5418a	0.437	0.0056
Eosinophils, mm3	926	606	649	1.271	0.7989
Monocytes, mm3	810	1262	948	0.755	0.2979

Least squares means based on 5 pen observations per diet.

1Control: without the inclusion of zootechnical additives; 2Probiotics: inclusion of 0.6% probiotic. Probiotic composition: Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; 3Blend of functional oils with the inclusion of 0.2% Essential + 0.15% Integrity.

abAverages within the same line with different overwrites are statistically different (P < 0.05).

Discussion

The first week after weaning is the most the critical phase of weaning, when the diet changes from highly digestible (breast milk) to a more complex digestible solid food. This change directly affects the physiology of the piglets' gastrointestinal tract that is not fully adapted[15], causing intestinal and immune system dysfunction and result in less health, growth, and feed intake[16]. The use of functional oils resulted in greater average daily weight gain (DWG) and feed conversion (FCR) in piglets during the first and second periods, which also resulted in heavier pigs at the end of the experiment, when compared to the control treatment.

Although it is not clear how the supplementation of functional oils improved pig growth, several mechanisms have been proposed, including antimicrobial activity, such as reducing pathogenic stress or increasing the abundance of beneficial microorganisms in the intestine, such as Lactobacillus spp.[1]; protecting intestinal villi and regulating enzyme activity[17]; also, modulating the intestinal microbiota and increasing the absorption of nutrients[18].

Previous studies have shown that the supplementation of a blend of essentials oils (cinnamaldehyde and thymol) in the diet of weaned piglets positively influenced characteristics of zootechnical interest, such as higher DWG and lower FCR (P < 0.05)[19,20], similarly to the results of the present study. Evaluating the supplementation of L. acidophilus in weaned piglets[21], observed an improvement in DWG and FCR (P < 0.05) compared to the control group, and the same result was observed in the group receiving probiotics in the present study.

Probiotics act by modulating the microbiota, mainly by adhesion and competitive exclusion of pathogens at binding sites in the intestinal epithelium[6]. The blend of functional oils used in this study acts by modulating the immune system and the intestinal microbiota with antimicrobial action, mainly against gram-positive bacteria[11,13]. Both additives provided better performance and modulation of the microbiota in the face of the weaning challenge due to different mechanisms of action. In this study, there was no difference in microbial diversity between the additives, estimated by the Chao, Shannon and Simpson indices. Similar results were found by[22] and[23], who evaluated the supplementation of essential oils and probiotics in weaned piglets, respectively. Although without a statistical difference, there was a tendency to increased diversity for the group supplemented with functional oils. The increase in microbial richness and diversity can be seen as a predictor of the stability of the microbial ecosystem[24].

It is important to highlight that for the microbiome analysis, the low number of replicates and the collection were conducted in just one period. The collection was performed at 50 days of age (22 days after weaning). The piglets' microbiota is more stabilized at this age[6]. However, evaluating the role of additives in the intestinal environment, even in the period when the microbiota is most stabilized, is extremely important to understand their role in animal performance. In this way, relative abundance was discussed as an exploratory analysis.

The phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, in decreasing order concerning relative abundance, are predominant in swine gastrointestinal tracts[6]. These results are in line with the findings in this study.

The ratio presented between Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes was 4.50, 5.51 and 5.17 respectively for the control treatments, functional oils and probiotics. It has been shown that heavier pigs tend to have a higher Firmicutes vs. Bacteroidetes ratio than lighter animals[25]. In this study there was no statistical difference, only a greater numerical relationship for the treatments with functional oils and probiotics. Functional oils modify the composition of intestinal microbiota, increasing the relative abundance of Firmicutes in the intestine, as demonstrated in broilers in vivo studies by[26] and in pigs by[22]. It is necessary to highlight that the increase in the Firmicutes. Bacteroidetes ratio is a natural trend found in the healthy intestinal microbiota of matured piglets. However, in dysbiotic situations, such as those caused by weaning, it can result in a decrease in Firmicutes and an increase in Bacteroidetes. These changes provide a favorable environment for the proliferation of some pathogenic genera of this second phylum and, consequently, a reduction in the feeding efficiency of the animals[27].

Also, a large reduction in Bacteroidetes can cause damage to the host. Bacteroidetes, despite encompassing some pathogenic species, are known to have a large number of genes that encode active carbohydrate enzymes and can readily switch between different energy sources, in addition to being an important source of propionate[28,29]. Additionally, Firmicutes has members nutritionally more specialized in the degradation of complex substrates, such as plant cell walls, starch particles and mucin[30]. Therefore, a stable relationship between Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes can result in better utilization of the diet by animals. In the present study, both additives were effective in maintaining the Firmicutes. Bacteroidetes ratio, a fact that may have contributed to the better performance of the animals in both supplemented groups.

Tenericutes also seem to be involved in improving the use of nutrients by the host. In a study with piglets[31], found a positive correlation of this phylum with a better apparent digestibility of crude fiber. However, data on the relationship of this phylum with animal performance are still scarce. Proteobacteria are known to harbor numerous opportunistic pathogens in animals and humans, including Escherichia coli, Escherichia Shigella, Salmonella, Brucella, Rickettsiaos spp. Thus, it is associated with several intestinal disorders and infectious diseases[32,33]. In this study, the use of functional oils increased Tenericutes and inhibited Proteobacteria.

Although only the Ruminococcaceae family showed different relative abundance between treatments. The supplementation with both additives kept the relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae stable, increased the Ruminococcaceae and Prevotellaceae abundances, and reduced Lactobacillaceae. These four families are known to be part of a group fundamental to the microbial activity in the piglets' intestines[34].

Ruminococcaceae, for example, are associated with fiber degradation and higher concentrations of butyrate in piglets[35]. Butyrate contributes to a better absorption of nutrients stimulating the growth of intestinal mucosa cells, improving the retention of calcium and phosphorus in the diet, mitigating the challenge of weaning[36] and inducing secretion of mucin, a glycoprotein, which forms a protective layer in enterocytes[37]. The genus Faecalibacterium, from Ruminococcaceae, has been negatively associated with feed efficiency in pigs. In the present study, this genus was present in a higher percentage in the probiotics group when compared to the other treatments.

Prevotella and Lachnospiraceae are positively correlated with gene functions associated with the metabolism of amino acids, energy, cofactors and vitamins, indispensable to the host[38]. Prevotella has also been positively associated with higher luminous IgA concentrations and body weight in weaned piglets, showing its importance to the health of piglets[38].

Lactobacillus is prevalent in the fecal microbiota of piglets in early life and tends to decrease during the weaning transition[39]. Several species of Lactobacillus are associated with beneficial characteristics for the host. It has been shown that the swine microbial population differs between more efficient and less efficient animals. More efficient animals have a higher number of Lactobacillus spp. than less efficient animals[40].

Interestingly, the opposite behavior was observed in the present study, where the blend and probiotics groups showed numerically a less relative abundance of this genus (~ 3%), but better performance, while the control group, greater relative abundance (~ 9%) and less performance. The higher concentration of Lactobacillus in the control group may be associated with the activation of the immune system of animals in this group in the face of a greater challenge (as evidenced by the higher rate of diarrheal incidence and E. coli count in feces of these animals). Many species of Lactobacilli act in the innate and acquired system stimulating immune cells to release pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and interleukin-12 (IL-12)[41]. It is possible to conclude that the lower concentration of Lactobacillus in the functional oils and probiotics groups did not result in losses to the animals' performance.

The Clostridiaceae family is known to have different species, including C. pectinovor one, Clostridium butyricum, Clostridium perfringens. Clostridium butyricum, for example, acts in the production of short-chain fatty acids and has been studied as a probiotic in other animal species, such as broilers, where resulted in the improvement of the function of the intestinal barrier and the inhibition of pathogens[42]. The groups supplemented with Functional Oils and Probiotics presented an average of 4% and the control 2% of relative abundance of this family.

Curiously, the supplementation with probiotics (Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium and Saccharomyces cerevisiae) did not result in an increase of these genera, other than for Bifidobacterium, in the fecal microbiota of piglets. Two factors may explain this result. On one hand, the technology and conditions involved in the preservation of these probiotics, which can negatively influence the viability of the strains used until they reach the small intestine of piglets. On the other hand, it is known that different species of bacteria are subject to adverse conditions in the gastrointestinal tract, and when a exogenous microorganism is fed as a probiotic and enters the gastrointestinal tract, it needs to compete with the existing microbiota ecosystem[43]. Thus, in some cases, unfavorable circumstances may end up hindering the proliferation of the microorganism used as a probiotic[44].

The blend of functional oils kept the Muribaculaceae family (phylum Bacteroidetes) stable when compared to the other treatments. Bacteria in this group have been positively related to the regulation of genes for carbohydrate metabolism in mice[45]. Muribaculaceae members may be involved in the fermentation of starch into propionate, and its composition is an important predictor of higher concentrations of short-chain fatty acids in healthy intestinal microbiota of the animals[46].

In contrast, the Probiotic provided a greater relative abundance of Veillonellaceae (4%) compared to the functional oils group (2%), but not compared to the control (5%). This family is directly involved in metabolic functions related to proteins and enzymes essential to the host[47].

Shigella spp. and Escherichia coli are closely related and, although they have some differences, they are considered unique genome species. Shigella spp. are among the most important enteric pathogens that cause bacillary dysentery worldwide, especially in humans[48]. As observed in Enterobacteriaceae, it was very low, 0.07% for the control, 0.03% and 0.04% for the functional and probiotic oils. This may have occurred due to the age of sample collection or due to the limitation of the technique. In this same sense, using the E. coli culture technique, it significantly reduced (P < 0.05) E. coli in the feces of piglets treated with the blend, a result that agrees with those observed by[22]. These authors showed that supplementation of 100 ppm of functional oils based on thymol and cinnamaldehyde to the control diet reduced the E. coli count in the feces of weaned piglets.

The reason for these effects may be associated with the antimicrobial activity of phytogenics, demonstrated in vitro by[42]. The authors evaluated a mixture based on thymol and cinnamaldehyde and observed its ability to damage the cell membrane and alter the morphology of E. coli and S. aureus pathogenic cells. Similarly[49], evaluated the supplementation of six essential oils in vivo (including thymol, carvacrol, and eugenol) in piglets challenged by enteropathogenic species (E. coli, Salmonella spp. and C. perfringens), reporting antimicrobial activity of these essential oils against at least one of these species. The intermediate results of the Probiotic group agree with other studies[21,44], which also reported the ability of the Probiotic supplementation (L. acidophilus, Pediococcus acidilactici) to reduce fecal E. coli in weaned piglets.

The genus Campylobacter was found in 0.03% of the microbiota when supplemented with functional oils and 0.05% and 0.08%, respectively for the control and probiotic group. Campylobacter is the predominant bacterial agent in diarrheal piglets, reducing the relative abundance of bacterial species of the classes Bacteroidia and Clostridia. Both ferment the non-digestible carbohydrate. This reduction results in less production of short-chain fatty acids, which are the main metabolites of the intestinal microbiota, and which could promote barrier function and maintain a healthy and slightly acidic environment in the colon[42].

The erythrocyte, hematocrit, hemoglobin and platelet values of all treatments varied within the reference intervals for young piglets, as recommended by[50]. This indicates that the animals were, in general, in good health and not anemic. Similarly[47], found no significant effect of supplementing 40 ppm of functional Oregano oils on the hematological status of weaned piglets.

The difference in leukocytes circulating in pigs may be associated with two specific factors: inflammatory state or stress state, caused during the weaning period[51]. In a study with rats under stress, the levels of circulating inflammatory leukocytes increased by directly stimulating the proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells[52]. Similarly, it has been reported that some types of stressors have increased the total leukocyte count and the proliferation of T cells in pigs[53].

In another study, evaluating hematological parameters in piglets challenged by Salmonella[54], found no significant differences in Salmonella concentrations in the animals' feces, and suggested that variations in hematological parameters, in that study, were more related to the state of stress than to actual infection by this pathogen. On the other hand, the increase in the percentage of lymphocytes in the blood in piglets challenged by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli[17] was associated with a change in the inflammatory state of these animals, due to the challenge. Opposite results weres observed in this study for the blend of functional oil group, suggesting that it can mitigate E. coli infection.

Research that reports the impact of additives during the microbiota transition period, that is, before weaning and in the first 14 days of weaning are still needed to elucidate the effect of additives on piglet intestinal health.

The commercial blend of functional oils based on cashew nut shell liquid and castor oil improved the performance of piglets weaned during the nursery period. The animals that received probiotics presented intermediate performance and the piglets that did not receive either additive performed worse. The use of functional oils reduced the concentration of Escherichia coli in piglet feces at 50 days of age, demonstrating a modulating effect on the intestinal microbiota of newly weaned piglets.

Material and methods

The described study was performed according to protocol nº 3665110718 and approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals at the Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, performed in strict accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and reported according to the ARRIVE guidelines (https://www.nc3rs.org.uk/arrive-guidelines). This experiment was performed in a group of piglets that were reared in a commercial pig farm, located in the municipality of Jaguaruna—Santa Catarina/Brazil.

Animals, facilities and diets

A total of 225 piglets descended from commercial lines of F1 females (Landrace × Large White) with tricross males (Hampshire × Duroc × Pietrain), weaned at 28 days of age, females and castrated males, weighing 8.54 ± 0.622 kg were randomly distributed in 15 pens, with a density of 0.3 piglets/m3, hollow wooden floor and equipped with automatic feeder and drinker.

Water and feed were offered ad libitum throughout the experimental period. The study was divided into the three phases according to their age. Phase I: from 28 to 43 days; phase II: from 43 to 57 days; and phase III: from 57 to 66 days. All diets were formulated to meet the nutritional requirements of piglets[55]. The only difference among diets was the additive used, as described in Supplementary Table 3. The treatments were: (1) control group—without the inclusion of zootechnical additives; (2) probiotic group—inclusion of 0.6%; (3) blend group of functional oils with inclusion of 0.35% (0.2% of Essential + 0.15% of Integrity). All feed additives were included in the diets by replacing inert (kaolin) in the basal diet in all phases. Additive doses were used according to the manufacturer's recommendation. The commercial product Integrity is basically composed of cardanol (75 g/kg) and cardol (15 g/kg) and Essential by cardanol (200 g/kg), ricinoleic acid (90 g/kg) and cardol (40 g/kg). The composition of the probiotic used was Bacillus subtilis (3.66 × 107 cfu/kg), Enterococcus faecium (3.5 × 106 cfu/kg), Lactobacillus acidophilus (3.5 × 107 cfu/kg), Bifidobacterium bifidum (3.5 × 107 cfu/kg) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (2 × 109 cfu/kg).

Experimental procedures and collections

Animals were weighed at the beginning and the end of each phase to determine average daily weight gain (DWG), average daily feed consumption (DFI), and to calculate the feed conversion (FCR). The left-overs were collected daily, weighed and subtracted from the quantity supplied to the animals.

During the first 14 days of the experiment, the occurrence of diarrhea was monitored daily by visual observation, always by the same observer. Fecal consistency was assessed according to the following scores: 1—normal feces; 2—pasty feces; and 3—liquid feces. Feces assigned with scores 1 and 2 were considered normal and feces with score 3 were considered diarrhea. The frequency of diarrhea was calculated based on the number of observation days. The frequency of fecal scores 1, 2 and 3 was the percentage of days that piglets presented these fecal scores in each pen. The calculation was performed as follows: Frequency of feces scores 1 or 2 or 3 (%) = [[(P1 × D) + (P2 × D) + (Pn × D)]/n/TD × 100], where P (1, 2 … N) = represents each piglet inside the pen (n); D = number of days that each piglet showed fecal scores 1, 2 or 3 within a pen; TD = total number of days on which the diarrhea scores were monitored[56].

At 50 days of age, 2 mL of blood were collected to perform a blood count. The collection was performed through the jugular vein of one piglet per repetition—animal weighing closest to the average weight of the group in each pen. An automatic cell counter (Vet Scan HM 5; Abaxis) was used to evaluate hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes and leukocytes, and the ratio between neutrophils to lymphocytes was calculated.

At 50 days of age, a pool of fresh feces from 3 animals per repetition was swabbed to isolate Escherichia coli. These swabs were striated in Petri dishes containing MacConkey agar (Merck), incubated at 37 °C for 24 h to count the colony forming units. From this same pool, 2 g of feces were used for the sequencing of the microbiota by Illumina MiSeq. The samples were identified and frozen at − 20 °C for further analysis.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing

The feces pool samples were placed in a sterile 1.5 mL tube and sent to Neoprospecta Microbiome Technologies (Florianópolis-SC, Brazil). All procedures were performed according to the methodology previously described[57]. Sample preparation and sequencing were performed by Neoprospecta Microbiome Technologies. For total DNA extraction, the commercial QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) was used according to the manufacturer's instructions. It consisted of the V3/V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene, which were amplified using primers 341F (5′-CCTACGGGRSGCAGCAG-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′), with Illumina adapters, necessary for sequencing. The amplification was performed in 35 cycles at 50 °C of the annealing temperature, which was tripled for each sample. The sequencing was performed by Illumina MiSeq using V2 kits, with runs of 300 single-ended nucleotides.

Sequence analysis

Read quality was assessed using the FastQC software (version 0.11.5) (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). Low quality reads and adapters were removed using the Trimmomatic program. The following steps were implemented using QIIME2 software (v. 2020.2)[58] (https://qiime2.org/). The reads were subjected to a Denoising approach for low quality sequence removal, sequencing error correction, chimera removal and identification of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) using the DADA2 method with default parameters, and 290 truncated read length. Taxonomy was attributed to ASVs using the SILVA database (v. 132), with 97% correspondence. Rare ASVs below a frequency of 0.1% in the samples were removed.

Statistical analysis

The experimental design was completely randomized with three treatments (without additives, probiotics and a blend of functional oils), five repetitions per treatment (pens) and 15 piglets per repetition. The variables of performance, frequency of diarrhea, blood and E. coli quantification were subjected to an analysis of variance with 5% significance level, and means were tested by Tukey, using the SAS statistical program. Relative abundance, alpha rarefaction, alpha (Chao-1, Shannon and Simpson) and beta diversity indices were performed using the R program (v. 3.6.1) (https://www.R-project.org/) and plyr (v. 1.8.4)[59], reshape2 (v. 1.4.3)[59] and phyloseq packages (v. 1.14.0)[60]. Beta diversity was estimated after normalization by centered log-ratio using the DESeq2 R package (v. 1.26.0). After normalization, a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index by vegan (v. 2.4.1)[61] and heatmaps (v. 1.8.0) packages[61]. Alpha diversity and relative abundance were tested using the Kruskal–Wallis test. The Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (Adonis at 999 permutations) was performed based on beta diversity, the assumption of homogeneity of variances was checked (p > 0.05) using the R vegan package. Differential abundances statistical was calculated using the DESeq2 R package[62], aggregating the data at Family level.

Supplementary Figure S1.

Supplementary Figure S2.

Supplementary Table S1.

Supplementary Table S2.

Supplementary Table S3.