Literature DB >> 24952646

Chronic variable stress activates hematopoietic stem cells.

Timo Heidt1, Hendrik B Sager1, Gabriel Courties1, Partha Dutta1, Yoshiko Iwamoto1, Alex Zaltsman1, Constantin von Zur Muhlen2, Christoph Bode2, Gregory L Fricchione3,4, John Denninger3,4, Charles P Lin1, Claudio Vinegoni1, Peter Libby5, Filip K Swirski1, Ralph Weissleder1,6, Matthias Nahrendorf1.   

Abstract

Exposure to psychosocial stress is a risk factor for many diseases, including atherosclerosis. Although incompletely understood, interaction between the psyche and the immune system provides one potential mechanism linking stress and disease inception and progression. Known cross-talk between the brain and immune system includes the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, which centrally drives glucocorticoid production in the adrenal cortex, and the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary axis, which controls stress-induced catecholamine release in support of the fight-or-flight reflex. It remains unknown, however, whether chronic stress changes hematopoietic stem cell activity. Here we show that stress increases proliferation of these most primitive hematopoietic progenitors, giving rise to higher levels of disease-promoting inflammatory leukocytes. We found that chronic stress induced monocytosis and neutrophilia in humans. While investigating the source of leukocytosis in mice, we discovered that stress activates upstream hematopoietic stem cells. Under conditions of chronic variable stress in mice, sympathetic nerve fibers released surplus noradrenaline, which signaled bone marrow niche cells to decrease CXCL12 levels through the β3-adrenergic receptor. Consequently, hematopoietic stem cell proliferation was elevated, leading to an increased output of neutrophils and inflammatory monocytes. When atherosclerosis-prone Apoe(-/-) mice were subjected to chronic stress, accelerated hematopoiesis promoted plaque features associated with vulnerable lesions that cause myocardial infarction and stroke in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24952646      PMCID: PMC4087061          DOI: 10.1038/nm.3589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   53.440


To explore the impact of stress on the human immune system, we analyzed blood samples from 29 medical residents working on a tertiary hospital intensive care unit (ICU), a challenging, fast–paced work environment that frequently includes the responsibility of life–or–death decisions. Compared to off duty, residents working on ICU reported an increased stress perception which we assessed with Cohen’s perceived stress scale[5] (Fig. 1a). Visual analog scales[6] documented a higher stress intensity and frequency while working on ICU (Supplementary Fig. 1a). When comparing samples taken during work to samples taken off duty, we observed an increase in blood leukocytes (Fig. 1b), with higher numbers of neutrophils, monocytes and lymphocytes, after one week of intensive care rotation (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Monocytes’ relative subset frequency did not change (Supplementary Fig. 1c).
Figure 1

Chronic stress increases proliferation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in the bone marrow

a, Cohen’s perceived stress scale score in medical ICU residents (n = 10–15, Student’s t–test). b, Blood leukocytes in residents (n = 29, Wilcoxon test). c, Leukocytes in mouse blood and d, bone marrow after 3 weeks of stress (n = 9 per group, Student’s t–test). e, Gating for LSK and HSC. Proliferation was assessed after 3 weeks of stress (n = 5 per group, Mann–Whitney test). f, Bone marrow colony forming unit (CFU) assay after one week of stress (n = 5 per group, Mann–Whitney test). g, Bone marrow HSC and LSK after 3 weeks of stress (n = 10 per group, Student’s t–test). h, Long–term competitive repopulation assay using limiting dilutions of whole bone marrow from stressed or non–stressed mice (Poisson statistics for LT–HSC frequencies, P = 0.2 two–tailed t–test). i, Competitive reconstitution with 2×106 bone marrow cells from stressed or non–stressed controls co–injected with equal numbers of naive competitor cells, followed by assessment of blood chimerism (n = 10 mice per group, one–way ANOVA). Mean ± s.e.m., * P < 0.05.

To test the hypothesis that stress–induced leukocytosis results from increased leukocyte production, we exposed mice to chronic variable stressors validated by behavioral neuroscience studies (Supplementary Table 1)[7-9]. Compared to non–stressed controls, stressed mice had increased numbers of leukocytes, neutrophils and monocytes in blood (Fig. 1c), extending our observation in humans. These cells were also more numerous in the mouse bone marrow (Fig. 1d). We next investigated the influence of chronic stress on blood cell production in the bone marrow and detected increased cycling of Lin− Sca–1+ ckit+ CD150+ CD48− hematopoietic stem cells[10] (HSC, Fig. 1e), which also incorporated increased amounts of BrdU (Supplementary Fig. 2a). To study quiescence, we pursued a BrdU pulse–chase label retention experiment. BrdU exposure in drinking water for 2 weeks led to >90% labeling of HSC as previously reported[11]. After completion of the labeling phase, mice were stressed for 3 weeks which accelerated HSC BrdU wash–out when compared to stress–free controls (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Augmented colony forming capacity of bone marrow harvested from stressed mice reflected increased progenitor proliferation (Fig. 1f). Enhanced proliferation resulted in higher bone marrow numbers of HSC, Lineage− Sca–1+ c–kit+ progenitors (LSK, Fig. 1g), granulocyte macrophage progenitors (GMP), macrophage dendritic cell progenitors (MDP, Supplementary Fig. 3a) and common lymphoid progenitors (CLP, Supplementary Fig. 3b). While CD150+ CD48SLAM staining phenotypically quantitates HSC, only a fraction of the cells in this gate are functional long–term HSC (LT–HSC)[10]. A competitive repopulation assay[12] comparing limiting bone marrow dilutions obtained from stressed and non–stressed donors indicates that the frequency of LT–HSC does not significantly change in stressed mice (Fig. 1h, Supplementary Table 2). When viewed together with the increased bone marrow cellularity in stressed mice (1.64 × 107 versus 2.46 × 107 per femur, p<0.0001, n = 14–18 mice), stress does neither increase nor exhaust LT–HSC. An unchanged number of LT–HSC in stressed mice is further supported by comparable donor blood chimerism 16 weeks after transfer of 2 × 106 bone marrow cells from either stressed or non–stressed donors with equal numbers of naive competitor cells into lethally irradiated recipients (Fig. 1i). In contrast, infection and interferons increase HSC proliferation while exhausting LT–HSC[13] or impairing their engraftment[14], possibly because these stimuli are more severe than stress. Of note, interferons were unchanged in the bone marrow of stressed mice (Supplementary Fig. 4a). A 5–Fluoruracil (5–FU) challenge completely abolished stress–induced leukocytosis. Surprisingly, stressed mice had an enhanced leukocyte rebound on day 14 after 5–FU injection, likely due to increased cycling of hematopoietic progenitors (Supplementary Fig. 4b). Serial intravital microscopy[15] in the calvarium of mice that had undergone adoptive transfer of 25,000 DiD–labeled LSK detected accelerated dilution of the membrane dye in mice exposed to 7 days of stress (Fig. 2a), indicating accentuated cell proliferation. Flow cytometry confirmed the accelerated membrane dye dilution after stress exposure (Fig. 2b). Taken together, these data indicate that chronic stress activates HSC, which increase proliferation and differentiate into downstream progenitors.
Figure 2

Hematopoietic progenitors in the bone marrow of stressed mice dilute DiD membrane dye faster

a, Intravital microscopy of the mouse calvarium after adoptive transfer of DiD–labelled LSK (white arrows) before and seven days after stress (n = 5 mice per group, Mann–Whitney test). Dotted lines outline bone. Scale bar indicates 50 μm. Single dots in graphs represent DiD+ cells’ target–to–background ratio before (upper panel) and after stress (lower panel). b, DiD fluorescence on day 0 and 7 days after adoptive transfer of DiD+ GFP+ LSK in non–stressed control (CT) or stressed mice (n = 5 per group). The bar graph illustrates the DiD fluorescence in GFP+ LSK (Mann–Whitney test). Mean ± s.e.m., * P < 0.05.

Noradrenaline is a prototypical stress hormone that also regulates circadian progenitor cell migration[16] and proliferation[17,18]. We wondered if heightened hematopoietic system activity during stress could relate to this catecholamine. Indeed, noradrenaline levels increased in the bone marrow of stressed mice (Fig. 3a). Immunoreactive staining for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), a rate–limiting enzyme for noradrenaline synthesis[19], rose along blood vessels in the bone marrow (Fig. 3b). Because noradrenaline regulates CXCL12 synthesis[16], this rise led to a sharp decrease in CXCL12 mRNA and protein within whole bone marrow (Fig. 3c,d). Conditional deletion of TH containing cells in crossbred iDTR TH–cre mice[18] preserved CXCL12 levels and blunted the bone marrow’s stress response (Supplementary Fig. 5). In the hematopoietic niche, CXCL12 derives from mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblasts and endothelial cells[20-22]. Its primary functions include inhibiting hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC) proliferation and migration, and it also retains neutrophils in the bone marrow[23]. CXCL12 deficient mice[24] and mice that lack the chemokine’s cognate receptor (CXCR4)[25] show increased HSC cycling and progenitor pool expansion and increased neutrophil release into circulation. Linking the autonomic nervous system and leukocyte trafficking, the β3 adrenergic receptor expressed on niche cell surfaces regulates CXCL12 release[16]. Among relevant niche cells, mesenchymal stem cells express the highest level of the β3 receptor (Supplementary Fig. 6). We therefore investigated if chronic stress acts on hematopoiesis via the β3 adrenergic receptor. Indeed, mice with genetic lack of the receptor displayed protection against stress (Supplementary Fig. 7). Treating stressed mice with the β3 selective receptor blocker SR 59230A restored CXCL12 mRNA and protein levels (Fig. 3c,d), decreased BrdU incorporation into HSC and reduced HSPC numbers in the bone marrow (Fig. 3e). Consecutively, downstream GMP and MDP numbers fell (Supplementary Fig. 8a), resulting in lower levels of neutrophils and Ly–6Chigh monocytes in circulation (Fig. 3f). Treatment with a β2 receptor blocker failed to protect the bone marrow against stress (Supplementary Fig. 8b,c).
Figure 3

Stress–induced sympathetic nervous signaling regulates proliferation of bone marrow HSC via CXCL12

a, Noradrenaline ELISA after 3 weeks of stress (n = 8 per group, Student’s t–test). b, Immunoreactive staining for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) in bone marrow. Scale bar indicates 10 μm. Bar graph shows TH–positive area (n = 5 mice per group, Mann–Whitney test). c, CXCL12 mRNA in bone marrow (n = 10 per group, one–way ANOVA). d, CXCL12 protein in bone marrow (n = 7 per group, one–way ANOVA). e, Dot plots and quantification of LSK and HSC (n = 5 per group, Mann–Whitney test). f, Effects of β3 adrenoreceptor blocker on blood leukocytes (n = 5 per group, Mann–Whitney test). Mean ± s.e.m., * P < 0.05.

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease driven by hyperlipidemia[26-28]. Atherosclerotic plaques consist of cholesterol deposits and a leukocyte infiltrate that is dominated by innate immune cells[29]. Inflammatory monocytes and macrophages may lead to plaque rupture, myocardial infarction and stroke[30,31], and higher blood levels of monocytes and neutrophils correlate with increased mortality[29,32]. Proteases released from inflammatory leukocytes weaken the fibrous cap and favor plaque disruption that permits contact between the plaque’s necrotic core and clotting factors in the blood stream, inciting local thrombosis, and thereby jeopardizing oxygen supply to the heart and brain[30,33]. A number of risk factors contribute to inflammatory complications of atherosclerosis. Chronic stress is well recognized among them[4,34-37]. Yet the mechanisms that link chronic stress to higher cardiovascular event rates are incompletely understood. This study tested the hypothesis that chronic stress acts on the bone marrow via sympathetic nervous system activity by increasing inflammatory leukocyte supply to atherosclerotic lesions. Stress enhanced the hematopoietic system’s activity in atherosclerosis–prone ApoE−/− mice (Supplementary Fig. 9a,b) while body weight and lipid levels remained unaffected (Supplementary Fig. 9c,d). Plaque protease levels were measured after exposure to 6 weeks of stress. FMT/CT imaging revealed an increase in protease plaque activity in stressed mice (Fig. 4a). Innate immune cells produce most proteases in the plaque[29,30]. Accordingly, we detected higher CD11b+ myeloid cell and neutrophil content in plaque by histology (Fig. 4b) and increased numbers of neutrophils, monocytes and macrophages in whole aortae by flow cytometry (Fig. 4c). Neutrophils may aid monocyte entry into plaque[38] but can also themselves have inflammatory functions[39]. The aorta also exhibited an inflammatory cytokine expression profile after stress (Fig. 4d), including increased expression of myeloperoxidase, a pro–oxidant enzyme abundant in neutrophils and inflammatory monocytes. While aortic root plaque size did not change (Supplementary Fig. 10), the inflammatory milieu led to thinner fibrous caps and larger necrotic plaque cores (Fig. 4e), hallmarks of rupture–prone lesions in patients with acute MI or stroke[29,33]. Heightened recruitment of leukocytes into plaques may also result from enhanced action of adhesion molecules; however, mRNA and protein levels, with the exception of E–selectin, were unchanged in stressed ApoE−/− mice (Supplementary Fig. 11a,b). When we adoptively transferred equal numbers of GFP+ myeloid cells into stressed and non–stressed ApoE−/− mice, we detected similar recruitment (Supplementary Fig. 11c). Hypertension, a known risk factor for atherosclerosis, occurred only during stress exposure (Supplementary Fig. 12a) and therefore likely did not dominate the observed disease progression. Blood pressure, cholesterol and corticosterone levels were unchanged in ApoE−/− mice that received a β3 adrenergic receptor blocker (Supplementary Fig. 12b,c); however, this treatment reduced the number of neutrophils, inflammatory monocytes and macrophages in plaque (Supplementary Fig. 13).
Figure 4

Chronic stress increases inflammation in mouse atherosclerotic plaques

a, Protease activity in aortic roots of ApoE−/− mice measured by FMT–CT after 6 weeks of stress. Circles indicate aortic root (n = 5 per group, Mann–Whitney test). b, Immunoreactive staining of aortic roots for CD11b and Ly6G. Bar graphs show percentage of positive area per root (n = 9–10 per group, Student’s t–test). Scale bar indicates 200 μm. c, Gating and quantification of aortic myeloid cells (n = 10 per group, Student’s t–test). d, qPCR for inflammatory genes in aorta (n = 9–10 per group, Student’s t–test). e, Masson trichrome staining (n = 9 per group, Student’s t–test). Scale bar indicates 50 μm, arrows point at fibrous cap covering necrotic core. Bar graphs show fibrous cap thickness and necrotic core area. Mean ± s.e.m., *P < 0.05.

In summary, we report a previously unknown mechanism unleashed by chronic stress episodes on hematopoiesis and describe a new axis of interaction between the central nervous system, immunity and atherosclerosis. In mice exposed to stress, increased sympathetic nervous system activity decreased CXCL12 expression in the hematopoietic stem cell niche, accelerated HSC proliferation, and enhanced neutrophil and monocyte production. These mechanisms yielded extensive release of inflammatory leukocytes into circulation and promoted plaque inflammation. Administering a β3 adrenergic receptor blocker limited disease progression, supporting the notion that sympathetic nervous signaling via this receptor and targeting CXCL12/CXCR4 interaction in the bone marrow should be explored as potential therapeutic avenues. The preclinical data parallel our observations in ICU residents; however, we interpret this association with care as nature and timing of stress differed. Further, we were unable to investigate HSC activity in stressed humans. Nevertheless, ICU residents were exposed to chronic rather than acute stress, favoring a long–term increase of leukocyte supply over short–term leukocyte mobilization. Taken together, these data provide new evidence of the hematopoietic system’s role in cardiovascular disease[29,40] and elucidate a direct biological link between chronic variable stress and chronic inflammation, a general concept with implications beyond atherosclerosis.

ONLINE METHODS SECTION

Clinical Study

The clinical study titled ‘Effects of socioenvironmental stress on the human hematopoietic system’ was an open, monocenter, single arm study enrolling medical residents working on the intensive care unit at University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany. This study was registered with the German Registry for Clinical Studies (DRKS00004821) and approved by the Ethics Committee of Albert–Ludwigs–University Freiburg, Germany (No: 52/13). All residents working on ICU were considered eligible to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria were smoking, any acute or chronic illness, regular intake of medication and failure to consent. Twentynine volunteers (23 male, 6 female, mean age 33.7 ± 0.8 years) were enrolled after signing the informed consent form. Residents gave two blood samples (baseline and stress). The off duty sample (baseline) was collected after 10±0.9 consecutive days off duty. The on duty sample (stress) was collected after 7±0.3 consecutive days ICU duty. Participants completed the Perceived Stress Scale 10 item inventory[5] before starting to work on ICU (baseline) as well as after several weeks on duty (stress). Short term perception for stress frequency and intensity was measured with visual analog scales (scale 0–10)[6] which each participant completed at the time of the blood sampling. The mean circadian time difference between the baseline and the stress sample was 20 ± 15.9 minutes. Blood samples were analyzed in a blinded fashion at the routine clinical laboratory of the University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.

Mice

We used female C57BL/6, UBC–GFP (C57BL/6–Tg(UBC–GFP)30Scha/J), ApoE−/− mice (B6.129P2–Apoetm1Unc/J), TH–cre (B6.Cg–Tg(Th–cre)1Tmd/J) and iDTR (C57BL/6–Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(HBEGF)Awai/J) mice aged 10–12 weeks (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME). Adrb3−/− mice were donated by Drs. Paul Frenette (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA) and Bradford Lowell (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA). Nestin–GFP mice were a gift from Dr. Grigori Enikolopov (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, NY). All procedures were approved by the Subcommittee on Animal Research Care at MGH. For each experiment, age–matched litter mates were randomly allocated to study groups. Animal studies were performed without blinding of the investigator.

Stress procedures

Mice were exposed to socioenvironmental stressors[7-9] for one or three weeks in C57BL/6 or six weeks in ApoE−/− mice. Stress procedures were performed between 7 am and 6 pm. The following stressors were applied: Cage tilt: The cage was tilted in an 45 degree angle and kept in this position for six hours. Isolation: Mice were individually housed in an area one quarter of the original cage size (12 × 8 cm) for four hours, followed by Crowding, during which 10 animals were housed in one cage for two hours. Mice were monitored during the crowding procedure and “fighters” were separated. Damp bedding: Water was added to the cage to moisture the bedding without generating large pools. Mice were kept for six hours with damp bedding. Rapid light–dark changes: Using an automatic timer the light was switched with an interval of seven minutes for two hours. Overnight illumination: Mice were housed in a separate room with illumination from 7 pm to 7 am. All stressors were randomly shuffled in consecutive weeks. Efficacy of the chronic stress procedures was confirmed by measurement of blood corticosterone levels (Supplementary Fig. 12c).

Lethal irradiation

Mice were irradiated using a split dose of 2 × 600 cGy with an interval of 3 hours in between doses. Animals were irradiated 12 hours prior to bone marrow reconstitution.

Bone marrow reconstitution assays

For competitive bone marrow repopulation assays[41] we co–transferred 2 × 106 whole bone marrow cells from CD45.1 mice after three weeks of stress or from non–stressed controls together with equal cell numbers of CD45.2 competitor cells into lethally irradiated Ubc–GFP CD45.2 mice. Engraftment was assessed comparing blood leukocyte chimerism for CD45.1 cells between groups after 2, 3 and 4 months. For limiting dilution experiments[41] donor doses of 1.5 × 104, 6 × 104, 12.5 × 104 and 5 × 105 whole bone marrow cells from CD45.1 mice after three weeks of stress or non–stressed controls were co–transferred with 5 × 105 CD45.2 competitor cells into lethally irradiated CD45.2 recipients. Engraftment was assessed after four months as at least > 0.1% multi–lineage blood chimerism for B–lymphocytes, T–lymphocytes and myeloid lineage derived from donor bone marrow. Poisson’s statistic was calculated using L–calc software (Stemcell Technologies) and ELDA software[42]. Bone marrow of two mice was pooled for each cell population.

Treatment with adrenergic receptor antagonists

To inhibit β3 adrenergic signaling, a specific antagonist for the adrenergic receptor β3 (SR 59230A, Sigma–Aldrich) was injected at 5 mg/kg i.p. twice per day[43]. For inhibition of β2 adrenergic signaling, ICI118,551 hydrochloride (Sigma–Aldrich) was injected daily at a dose of 1 mg/kg i.p.[18] for three weeks. The control groups received saline injections.

Depletion of sympathetic nerve fibers

TH–cre were cross–bred with iDTR mice. 10–12 week old female TH–iDTR mice were intraperitoneally injected with 0.1 μg/kg bodyweight diphtheria toxin (DT) on days 0 and day 3 after initiation of stress procedures[18]. Age–matched litter mates (Th–cre, iDTR or WT) which were also stressed and injected with DT served as controls.

5–FU challenge

Non–stressed mice and mice that had been stressed for three weeks were injected intravenously with 150 mg/kg bodyweight 5–FU (Sigma)[44] on day 0. Mice were then followed over the course of 21 days and absolute number of blood leukocytes were measured after 7, 14 and 21 days. Stress exposure continued for the remaining 3 weeks after 5–FU exposure.

Tissue processing

Flushed bone marrow was passed through a 40μm cell strainer and collected in phosphate–buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 1% fetal bovine serum (FACS buffer). Aortae were excised, minced and digested in collagenase I (450 U/ml), collagenase XI (125 U/ml), DNase I (60 U/ml) and hyaluronidase (60 U/ml) (all Sigma–Aldrich) at 37o C at 750 rpm for 1 hour. For sorting niche cells, bones were harvested from nestin–GFP mice. Bone marrow endothelial cells (EC) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) were obtained by flushing out bone marrow which was then digested in 10 mg/ml collagenase type IV (Worthington) and 20 U/ml DNase I (Sigma)[45]. For obtaining bone osteoblastic lineage cells we crushed bones, washed off residual bone marrow cells three times and then digested and incubated the bone fragments[46,47].

Flow cytometry

For myeloid cells, cells were first stained with mouse hematopoietic lineage markers (1:600 dilution for all antibodies) including phycoerythrin (PE) anti–mouse antibodies directed against B220 (BD Bioscience, clone RA3–6B2), CD90 (BD Bioscience, clone 53–2.1), CD49b (BD Bioscience, clone DX5), NK1.1 (BD Bioscience, clone PK136), and Ter–119 (BD Bioscience, clone TER–119). This was followed by a second staining for CD45.2 (BD Bioscience, clone 104, 1:300), CD11b (BD Bioscience, clone M1/70, 1:600), CD115 (eBioscience, clone M1/70, 1:600), Ly–6G (BD Bioscience, clone 1A8, 1:600), CD11c (eBioscience, clone HL3, 1:600), F4/80 (Biolegend, clone BM8, 1:600) and Ly6C (BD Bioscience, clone AL–21, 1:600). Neutrophils were identified as (CD90/B220/CD49b/NK1.1/Ter119)low (CD45.2/CD11b)high CD115low Ly6Ghigh . Monocytes were identified as (CD90/B220/CD49b/NK1.1/Ter119)low CD11bhigh (F4/80/CD11c)low Ly–6Chigh/low or (CD45.2/CD11b)high Ly6Glow CD115high Ly–6Chigh/low. Macrophages were identified as (CD90/B220/CD49b/NK1.1/Ter119)low CD11bhigh Ly6C low/int Ly6Glow F4/80high. For hematopoietic progenitor staining we first incubated cells with biotin–conjugated anti–mouse antibodies (1:600 dilution for all antibodies) directed against B220 (eBioscience, clone RA3–6B2), CD11b (eBioscience, clone M1/70), CD11c (eBioscience, clone N418), NK1.1 (eBioscience, clone PK136), TER–119 (eBioscience, clone TER–119), Gr–1 (eBioscience, clone RB6–8C5), CD8a (eBioscience, clone 53–6.7), CD4 (eBioscience, clone GK1.5) and IL7Rα (eBioscience, clone A7R34) followed by pacific orange–conjugated streptavidin anti–biotin antibody. Then cells were stained with antibodies directed against c–kit (BD Bioscience, clone 2B8, 1:600), sca–1 (eBioscience, clone D7, 1:600), SLAM markers[10] CD48 (eBioscience, clone HM48–1, 1:300) and CD150 (Biolegend, clone TC15–12F12.2, 1:300), CD34 (BD Bioscience, clone RAM34, 1:100), CD16/32 (BD Bioscience, clone 2.4G2, 1:600) and CD115 (eBioscience, clone AFS98, 1:600). LSK were identified as (B220 CD11b CD11c NK1.1 Ter–119 Ly6G CD8a CD4 IL7Rα)low c–kithigh sca–1high. HSC were identified as (B220 CD11b CD11c NK1.1 Ter–119 Ly6G CD8a CD4 IL7Rα)low c–kithigh sca–1high CD48low CD150high. GMP were defined as (B220 CD11b CD11c NK1.1 Ter–119 Ly6G CD8a CD4 IL7Rα)low c–kithigh sca–1low (CD34/CD16/32)high CD115 int/low. MDP were defined as (B220 CD11b CD11c NK1.1 Ter–119 Ly6G CD8a CD4 IL7Rα)low c–kitint/high sca–1low (CD34/CD16/32)high CD115high. CLP were identified as (B220 CD11b CD11c NK1.1 Ter–119 Ly6G CD8a CD4)low c–kitint sca–1int IL7Rαhigh. For staining endothelial cells we used ICAM–1 (Biolegend, clone Yn1/1.7.4, 1:300), ICAM–2 (Biolegend, clone 3C4, 1:300), VCAM–1 (Biolegend, clone 429, 1:300), E–Selectin (CD62E) (BD Bioscience, clone 10E9.6, 1:100), P–Selectin (CD62P) (BD Bioscience, clone RB40.34, 1:100), CD31 (Biolegend, clone 390, 1:600), CD107a (LAMP–1) (Biolegend, clone 1D4B, 1:600) and CD45.2 (Biolegend, clone 104, 1:300). Streptavidin–Pacific Orange was used to label biotinylated antibodies. Endothelial cells were identified as CD45.2low, CD31high and CD107aintermed/high. For analysis of human monocyte subsets, cells were stained with HLA–DR (Biolegend, clone L243, 1:600), CD16 (Biolegend, clone 3G8, 1:600) and CD14 (Biolegend, clone HCD14, 1:600) after red blood cell lysis (RBC Lysis buffer, Biolegend). Monocytes were identified using forward and side scatter as well as HLA–DR. Within this population, frequencies of monocyte subsets CD14high, CD16high and CD14high/CD16high were quantified.

BrdU experiments

For BrdU pulse experiments we used APC/FITC BrdU flow kits (BD Bioscience). One mg BrdU was injected i.p. 24 hours prior to organ harvest. BrdU staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For BrdU application over seven days osmotic micro–pumps (Alzet) filled with 18mg BrdU were implanted. For the BrdU label–retaining pulse chase assay, BrdU was added to drinking water (1 mg/ml) for 17 days[11].

Cell cycle analysis

After surface staining, an intracellular staining was performed according to eBioscience’s protocol: cells were were fixed and permeabilized using the Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (eBioscience) and then stained for the nuclear antigen Ki67 (eBioscience, clone SolA15). The cell cycle was determined using 4,6–diamidino–2–phenylindole (DAPI, FxCycle Violet Stain, Life Technologies).

Cell sorting

To isolate HSPC we used MACS depletion columns (Miltenyi) after incubation with a cocktail of biotin–labeled antibodies (as described in the flow cytometry section) followed by an incubation with streptavidin–coated microbeads (Miltenyi). Then cells were stained with c–kit and sca–1 and LSK were FACS–sorted using a FACSAria II cell sorter (BD Biosystems). To purify niche cells from hematopoietic cells we used MACS depletion columns after incubation with a cocktail of biotin–labeled antibodies as above followed by an incubation with streptavidin–coated microbeads. Then cells were stained with CD45.2, sca–1, CD31 and CD51 (Biolegend, clone RMV–7, 1:100). Endothelial cells were identified as linlow CD45low sca–1high CD31high. Bone marrow MSC were identified as linlow CD45low CD31low sca–1high/intermediate and GFP+. Osteoblasts were linlow CD45low sca–1low CD31low CD51high. For adoptive transfer of GFP+ neutrophils and Ly6Chigh monocytes, bone marrow cells were collected from Ubc–GFP mice for purification of neutrophils and monocytes using MACS depletion columns after incubation with a cocktail of PE–labeled antibodies including B220, CD90, CD49b, NK1.1 and Ter–119 followed by an incubation with PE–coated microbeads. Aortic endothelial cells were identified as CD45.2low CD31high CD107aint/high and FACS–sorted using a FACSAria II cell sorter.

Adoptive transfer

We injected 2 × 106 neutrophils together with 2 × 106 Ly6Chigh monocytes intravenously into non–stressed and stressed ApoE−/− mice (stressed for six weeks, cells injected two days prior to the end of these six weeks). Aortae were harvested 48 hours later. The number of CD11bhigh GFP+ cells within the aorta was quantified by using flow cytometry.

Histology

Aortic roots were harvested and embedded to produce 6μm sections which were stained using an anti–CD11b (BD Biosciences, clone M1/70) or anti–Ly6G (Biolegend, clone 1A8) antibody followed with a biotinylated secondary antibody. For color development we used the VECTA STAIN ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Inc.) and AEC substrate (DakoCytomation). Necrotic core and fibrous cap thickness were assessed using Masson trichrome (Sigma) staining. Necrotic core was evaluated measuring the total acellular area within each plaque. For fibrous cap thickness three to five measurements representing the thinnest part of the fibrous cap were averaged for each plaque as previously described[48]. For tyrosine hydroxylase staining, femurs were harvested and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 3 hours, then decalcified in 0.375 M EDTA in PBS for 10 days prior to paraffin embedding. Sections were cut and stained with anti–tyrosine hydroxylase antibody (Millipore) after deparaffinization and rehydration. Sections were scanned with NanoZoomer 2.0–RS (Hamamatsu) in 40 × magnification and analyzed using IPLab (Scanalytics).

Intravital microscopy (IVM)

For intravital microscopy of hematopoietic progenitors in the bone marrow of the calvarium, LSK were isolated from either wild type C57BL/6 or C57BL/6–Tg(UBC–GFP)30Scha/J mice and labelled with the lipophilic membrane dye DiD (1,1′–dioctadecyl–3,3,3′,3′–tetramethylindodicarbocyanine perchlorate, Invitrogen). 25,000 labelled LSK were transferred IV into non–irradiated C57BL/6 recipient mice. For blood pool contrast, TRITC–dextran (Sigma) was injected immediately prior to imaging. OsteoSense 750 (PerkinElmer) was injected i.v. 24 hours before in vivo imaging to outline bone structures in the calvarium[49]. In vivo imaging was performed on days 1 and 7 after the adoptive cell transfer using an IV100 confocal microscope (Olympus)[15]. Three channels were recorded (DiD: excitation/emission 644/665 nm, OsteoSense 750: excitation/emission 750/780 nm, TRITC–Dextran: excitation/emission 557/576 nm) to generate Z–stacks of each location at 2 μm steps. Image post–processing was performed using Image J software. Mean DiD fluorescence intensity was measured for each labelled cell and then normalized to the background by calculating the target to background ratio.

CFU–assay

Colony forming unit (CFU) assays were performed using a semisolid cell culture medium (Methocult M3434, Stem Cell Technology) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Bones were flushed with Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (Lonza) supplemented with 2% fetal calf serum. 2 × 104 bone marrow cells were plated on a 35 mm plate in duplicates and incubated for 7 days. Colonies were counted using a low magnification inverted microscope.

Blood pressure and heart rate measurement

Blood pressure and heart rate were measured using a non–invasive tail–cuff system (Kent Scientific Corporation) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each value the mean of three consecutive measurements was used.

Quantitative real–time PCR

Messenger RNA (mRNA) was extracted from aortic arches or bone marrow using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) or from FACS–sorted cells using the Arcturus PicoPure RNA Isolation Kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturers’ protocol. One microgram of mRNA was transcribed to complimentary DNA (cDNA) with the high capacity RNA to cDNA kit (Applied Biosystems). We used Taqman primers (Applied Biosystems). Results were expressed by Ct values normalized to the house keeping gene Gapdh.

Fluorescence Molecular Tomography–Computed Tomography (FMT/CT)

After six weeks of stress, FMT/CT imaging was performed and compared to non–stressed, age–matched ApoE−/− controls. Pan–cathepsin protease sensor (Prosense–680, PerkinElmer, 5 nmol) was injected intravenously 24 hours prior to the imaging as previously described[50].

ELISA

Blood corticosterone levels were measured by ELISA (Abcam). Serum was collected between 10 am and 12 pm. For measurements of noradrenaline in the bone marrow a 2–CAT (A–N) Research ELISA (Labor Diagnostika Nord) was used. One femur was snap–frozen and immediately homogenized in a catecholamine stabilizing solution containing sodium metabisulfite (4 mM), EDTA (1 mM) and hydrochloric acid (0.01 N). Prior to the ELISA the pH of the sample was adjusted to 7.5 using sodium hydroxide (1 N). ELISAs for CXCL12 (R&D), INF–α (PBL Biomedical Laboratories) and INF–γ (R&D) in the bone marrow were performed by using one femur and one tibia per mouse[14]. ELISAs were performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions.

Statistics

Statistical analysis were performed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). Results are depicted as mean ± standard error of mean if not stated otherwise. For a two–group comparison, a t–test was applied if the pre–test for normality (D’Agostino–Pearson normality test) was not rejected at 0.05 significance level, otherwise a Mann–Whitney test for nonparametric data was used. For a comparison of more than two groups an ANOVA test, followed by a Bonferroni test for multiple comparison, was applied. For analysis of clinical data a Wilcoxon test for matched pairs was used. P values of < 0.05 indicate statistical significance.
  50 in total

1.  Quantitative assay for totipotent reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells by a competitive repopulation strategy.

Authors:  S J Szilvassy; R K Humphries; P M Lansdorp; A C Eaves; C J Eaves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Stress-induced immune dysfunction: implications for health.

Authors:  Ronald Glaser; Janice K Kiecolt-Glaser
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 53.106

3.  SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells.

Authors:  Mark J Kiel; Omer H Yilmaz; Toshihide Iwashita; Osman H Yilmaz; Cox Terhorst; Sean J Morrison
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Effects of desipramine and tramadol in a chronic mild stress model in mice are altered by yohimbine but not by pindolol.

Authors:  Ipek Yalcin; Fazilet Aksu; Catherine Belzung
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 4.432

5.  Catecholaminergic neurotransmitters regulate migration and repopulation of immature human CD34+ cells through Wnt signaling.

Authors:  Asaf Spiegel; Shoham Shivtiel; Alexander Kalinkovich; Aya Ludin; Neta Netzer; Polina Goichberg; Yaara Azaria; Igor Resnick; Izhar Hardan; Herzel Ben-Hur; Arnon Nagler; Menachem Rubinstein; Tsvee Lapidot
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 6.  Translating molecular discoveries into new therapies for atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Daniel J Rader; Alan Daugherty
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Cardiovascular events during World Cup soccer.

Authors:  Ute Wilbert-Lampen; David Leistner; Sonja Greven; Tilmann Pohl; Sebastian Sper; Christoph Völker; Denise Güthlin; Andrea Plasse; Andreas Knez; Helmut Küchenhoff; Gerhard Steinbeck
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Social stress and atherosclerosis in normocholesterolemic monkeys.

Authors:  J R Kaplan; S B Manuck; T B Clarkson; F M Lusso; D M Taub; E W Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-05-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Haematopoietic stem cell release is regulated by circadian oscillations.

Authors:  Simón Méndez-Ferrer; Daniel Lucas; Michela Battista; Paul S Frenette
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  The bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells.

Authors:  Sean J Morrison; David T Scadden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  270 in total

1.  Ischemic stroke activates hematopoietic bone marrow stem cells.

Authors:  Gabriel Courties; Fanny Herisson; Hendrik B Sager; Timo Heidt; Yuxiang Ye; Ying Wei; Yuan Sun; Nicolas Severe; Partha Dutta; Jennifer Scharff; David T Scadden; Ralph Weissleder; Filip K Swirski; Michael A Moskowitz; Matthias Nahrendorf
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 2.  The hematopoietic stem cell niche in homeostasis and disease.

Authors:  Laura M Calvi; Daniel C Link
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Sympathetic nervous system regulation of the tumour microenvironment.

Authors:  Steven W Cole; Archana S Nagaraja; Susan K Lutgendorf; Paige A Green; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 4.  Lifestyle effects on hematopoiesis and atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Matthias Nahrendorf; Filip K Swirski
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 5.  Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk, Hematopoiesis, and Innate Immunity.

Authors:  Maximilian J Schloss; Filip K Swirski; Matthias Nahrendorf
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  CD8+ T cells promote cytokine responses to stress.

Authors:  Sarah M Clark; Chang Song; Xin Li; Achsah D Keegan; Leonardo H Tonelli
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.861

7.  The Gut Microbiome Regulates Psychological-Stress-Induced Inflammation.

Authors:  Chunliang Xu; Sung Kyun Lee; Dachuan Zhang; Paul S Frenette
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 31.745

8.  Amygdalar activity predicts future incident diabetes independently of adiposity.

Authors:  Michael T Osborne; Amorina Ishai; Basma Hammad; Brian Tung; Ying Wang; Amos Baruch; Zahi A Fayad; Jon T Giles; Janet Lo; Lisa M Shin; Steven K Grinspoon; Karestan C Koenen; Roger K Pitman; Ahmed Tawakol
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 4.905

9.  Positive mental well-being and immune transcriptional profiles in highly involved videogame players.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Snodgrass; Michael G Lacy; H J François Dengah; Evan R Polzer; Robert J Else; Jesusa M G Arevalo; Steven W Cole
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 7.217

10.  Social Stress Mobilizes Hematopoietic Stem Cells to Establish Persistent Splenic Myelopoiesis.

Authors:  Daniel B McKim; Wenyuan Yin; Yufen Wang; Steve W Cole; Jonathan P Godbout; John F Sheridan
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.