| Literature DB >> 25898122 |
Qing Niu1, Pinghua Li1, Shuaishuai Hao1, Yeqiu Zhang1, Sung Woo Kim2, Huizhi Li1, Xiang Ma1, Shuo Gao1, Lichun He1, WangJun Wu1, Xuegen Huang3, Jindi Hua3, Bo Zhou1, Ruihua Huang1.
Abstract
The gut microbiota plays an important role in nutrient digestibility in animals. To examine changes in the pig gut microbiota across growth stages and its effects on nutrient digestion, the gut microbiota population in pigs at 28 days (before weaning), and 60, 90, and 150 days of age was assessed by 16S rDNA gene sequencing. The apparent digestibility of crude fiber (CF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), crude protein (CP) and ether extract (EE) was also assessed in these pigs. A total of 19,875 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified from all samples. Both bacterial abundance and diversity increased with age. A total of 22 phyla and 249 genera were identified from all fecal samples; Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the most dominant phyla in all samples. With increasing age, the proportion of TM7 and Tenericutes increased, whereas the proportion of Lentisphaerae and Synergistetes decreased. The abundance of 36 genera varied with age, and the apparent digestibility of CF increased with age. Three phyla, Proteobacteria, Tenericutes and TM7, and 11 genera, including Anaeroplasma, Campylobacter, and Clostridium, were correlated with apparent CF digestibility.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25898122 PMCID: PMC4404679 DOI: 10.1038/srep09938
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Comparison of the OTUs in the four groups.
The number of observed OTUs sharing ≥97% nucleotide sequence identity. (A) A Venn diagram was generated to describe the common and unique OTUs among the 4 groups. (B) From the numbers of OTUs in the four groups, we found that bacterial diversity increased with age. (C) The bacterial abundance is reflected in the Chao1 index; the Chao1 index was significantly different between the four groups (*P<0.05, **P<0.01), indicating that bacterial abundance increased with age.
Figure 2Phyla distribution of gut flora and a Venn diagram of the genera.
Distribution of the phyla as a percentage of the total number of identified 16S rDNA sequences in individual groups (A). A Venn diagram was generated to compare genera between the groups at the same time points and to depict genera that were unique to the 4 groups (B).
Figure 3The bacterial abundances of 5 distinct phyla significantly differ among the four groups.
The apparent nutrient digestibility in the four groups and Pearson's correlations with age. a,b,* The correlation is significant at a level of 0.05; A,B,** the correlation is significant at a level of 0.01.
| Age | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample component | 60 d | 90 d | 150 d | Pearson's correlation |
| CF % | 37.05±2.49 C | 49.11±3.14 B | 63.10±1.78 A | 0.84 ** |
| NDF % | 56.74±2.29 B | 69.35±1.48 A | 62.43±3.53 AB | 0.17 |
| ADF % | 28.46±2.71 B | 30.53±2.48 B | 44.55±2.70 A | 0.68 ** |
| Hemicellulose % | 74.95±4.19 | 74.30±3.86 | 73.93±2.34 | −0.03 |
| CP % | 73.66±1.14 Bb | 77.18±0.90 Aa | 77.39±0.68 Aa | 0.38 * |
| EE % | 26.83±3.77 | 20.83±3.78 | 26.97±2.73 | 0.07 |
Phyla correlated to the apparent fiber digestibility and Pearson's correlation between phyla and apparent fiber digestibility. * The correlation is significant at a level of 0.05; ** the correlation is significant at a level of 0.01.
| Phyla | Apparent CF digestibility | Apparent ADF digestibility | Apparent hemicellulose digestibility |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson's correlation | Pearson's correlation | Pearson's correlation | |
| −0.054 | −0.062 | 0.448* | |
| 0.508** | 0.593** | −0.082 | |
| −0.089 | −0.071 | 0.400* | |
| 0.445* | 0.301 | −0.114 | |
| 0.516** | 0.599** | 0.016 |
Genera correlated to fiber digestibility and Pearson's correlation between genera and apparent fiber digestibility. * The correlation is significant at a level of 0.05; ** the correlation is significant at a level of 0.01.
| Genera | Apparent CF digestibility | Apparent NDF digestibility | Apparent ADF digestibility | Apparent hemicellulose digestibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson's correlation | Pearson's correlation | Pearson's correlation | Pearson's correlation | |
| 0.60** | −0.1 | 0.48* | −0.18 | |
| 0.51** | −0.05 | 0.44* | −0.06 | |
| 0.3 | −0.17 | 0.44* | −0.12 | |
| 0.3 | −0.17 | 0.55** | −0.23 | |
| 0.45* | −0.03 | 0.34 | −0.06 | |
| 0.42* | −0.3 | 0.43* | −0.24 | |
| 0.4 | −0.21 | 0.34 | −0.22 | |
| 0.12 | 0.1 | 0.50* | 0.07 | |
| 0.57** | 0.45 | 0.56** | 0.33 | |
| 0.43* | 0.09 | 0.49* | −0.01 | |
| 0.22 | 0.47* | 0.12 | 0.22 | |
| 0.50* | 0.02 | 0.46* | 0.01 | |
| 0.51** | −0.14 | 0.37 | 0.07 | |
| 0.25 | −0.05 | 0.46* | −0.1 | |
| 0.61** | 0.34 | 0.65** | 0.22 | |
| 0.40* | −0.28 | 0.48* | −0.33 | |
| 0.32 | 0.44 | 0.3 | 0.19 | |
| 0.54** | 0.55** | 0.54** | 0.33 |
Figure 4The bacterial abundance of Clostridium significantly differs between the four groups.