Literature DB >> 34591708

For the "good of the lab": Insights from three focus groups concerning the ethics of managing a laboratory or research group.

David B Resnik1, Edith Lee2, Bill Jirles3, Elise Smith4, Kathy Barker5.   

Abstract

To obtain some exploratory, qualitative data on ethical issues and values in managing a research laboratory, we conducted three focus groups with experienced investigators and laboratory managers. After validating the focus group transcripts for accuracy, two coders used deductive and inductive coding to develop themes from the text. Participants regarded ethics as important in managing a laboratory (or research group) for various reasons, ranging from conducting research with integrity to exhibiting leadership and promoting an ethical research climate. Participants identified many different types of ethical issues that arise in managing a research laboratory, including issues involving the management people, financial and material resources, projects, and data. An overarching ethical dilemma identified by participants was balancing the desire for productivity against apparently competing values, such as treating people fairly and promoting the wellbeing of individuals. Participants also indicated that graduate and post-graduate education and training did not prepare them to deal with the ethical, financial, interpersonal, and other issues related to managing a research laboratory, and that communication and leadership are crucial to managing a research laboratory ethically.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ethics; fairness; integrity; laboratory management; leadership; productivity; research climate; stewardship

Year:  2021        PMID: 34591708      PMCID: PMC8964830          DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1983799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  14 in total

1.  Developing drugs for the developing world: an economic, legal, moral, and political dilemma.

Authors:  D B Resnik
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.294

2.  The qualitative content analysis process.

Authors:  Satu Elo; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Are Leadership and Management Essential for Good Research? An Interview Study of Genetic Researchers.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Adelina Mart; James M DuBois
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  The importance of organizational justice in ensuring research integrity.

Authors:  Brian C Martinson; A Lauren Crain; Raymond De Vries; Melissa S Anderson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Stewardship of research resources.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Those who have the gold make the evidence: how the pharmaceutical industry biases the outcomes of clinical trials of medications.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Assessing the climate for research ethics in labs: Development and validation of a brief measure.

Authors:  Erin D Solomon; Tammy English; Matthew Wroblewski; James M DuBois; Alison L Antes
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  The lab management practices of "Research Exemplars" that foster research rigor and regulatory compliance: A qualitative study of successful principal investigators.

Authors:  Alison L Antes; Ashley Kuykendall; James M DuBois
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Researchers' Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group Study.

Authors:  Tamarinde Haven; H Roeline Pasman; Guy Widdershoven; Lex Bouter; Joeri Tijdink
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.525

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.