Literature DB >> 32779115

Researchers' Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group Study.

Tamarinde Haven1, H Roeline Pasman2, Guy Widdershoven3, Lex Bouter4,5, Joeri Tijdink4,3.   

Abstract

The research climate plays a key role in fostering integrity in research. However, little is known about what constitutes a responsible research climate. We investigated academic researchers' perceptions on this through focus group interviews. We recruited researchers from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and the Amsterdam University Medical Center to participate in focus group discussions that consisted of researchers from similar academic ranks and disciplinary fields. We asked participants to reflect on the characteristics of a responsible research climate, the barriers they perceived and which interventions they thought fruitful to improve the research climate. Discussions were recorded and transcribed at verbatim. We used inductive content analysis to analyse the focus group transcripts. We conducted 12 focus groups with 61 researchers in total. We identified fair evaluation, openness, sufficient time, integrity, trust and freedom to be mentioned as important characteristics of a responsible research climate. Main perceived barriers were lack of support, unfair evaluation policies, normalization of overwork and insufficient supervision of early career researchers. Possible interventions suggested by the participants centered around improving support, discussing expectations and improving the quality of supervision. Some of the elements of a responsible research climate identified by participants are reflected in national and international codes of conduct, such as trust and openness. Although it may seem hard to change the research climate, we believe that the realisation that the research climate is suboptimal should provide the impetus for change informed by researchers' experiences and opinions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Research climate; Research integrity; Responsible conduct of research

Year:  2020        PMID: 32779115      PMCID: PMC7755866          DOI: 10.1007/s11948-020-00256-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  21 in total

1.  Mentors, advisors and supervisors: their role in teaching responsible research conduct.

Authors:  S J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Fraud and the norms of science.

Authors:  Warren Schmaus
Journal:  Sci Technol Human Values       Date:  1983

3.  Reforming science: methodological and cultural reforms.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Perspective: research misconduct: the search for a remedy.

Authors:  Donald S Kornfeld
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Survey of organizational research climates in three research intensive, doctoral granting universities.

Authors:  James A Wells; Carol R Thrush; Brian C Martinson; Terry A May; Michelle Stickler; Eileen C Callahan; Karen L Klomparens
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Researchers' interpretations of research integrity: A qualitative study.

Authors:  David Shaw; Priya Satalkar
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 7.  Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.

Authors:  Ana Marusic; Elizabeth Wager; Ana Utrobicic; Hannah R Rothstein; Dario Sambunjak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-04

8.  The culture of scientific research.

Authors:  Catherine Joynson; Ottoline Leyser
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-03-13

9.  Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition.

Authors:  Marc A Edwards; Siddhartha Roy
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.907

10.  The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity.

Authors:  David Moher; Lex Bouter; Sabine Kleinert; Paul Glasziou; Mai Har Sham; Virginia Barbour; Anne-Marie Coriat; Nicole Foeger; Ulrich Dirnagl
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  5 in total

1.  For the "good of the lab": Insights from three focus groups concerning the ethics of managing a laboratory or research group.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Edith Lee; Bill Jirles; Elise Smith; Kathy Barker
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  RESPONSE_ABILITY A Card-Based Engagement Method to Support Researchers' Ability to Respond to Integrity Issues.

Authors:  Ulrike Felt; Florentine Frantz
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.777

3.  Stakeholders' Experiences of Research Integrity Support in Universities: A Qualitative Study in Three European Countries.

Authors:  Natalie Evans; Ivan Buljan; Emanuele Valenti; Lex Bouter; Ana Marušić; Raymond de Vries; Guy Widdershoven
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 3.777

4.  Leaving academia: PhD attrition and unhealthy research environments.

Authors:  Andrea Kis; Elena Mas Tur; Daniël Lakens; Krist Vaesen; Wybo Houkes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Moving towards less biased research.

Authors:  Mark Yarborough
Journal:  BMJ Open Sci       Date:  2021-01-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.