Literature DB >> 34585663

Quantitative proteomics reveals the selectivity of ubiquitin-binding autophagy receptors in the turnover of damaged lysosomes by lysophagy.

Vinay V Eapen1,2, Sharan Swarup1,2, Melissa J Hoyer1,2, Joao A Paulo1, J Wade Harper1,2.   

Abstract

Removal of damaged organelles via the process of selective autophagy constitutes a major form of cellular quality control. Damaged organelles are recognized by a dedicated surveillance machinery, leading to the assembly of an autophagosome around the damaged organelle, prior to fusion with the degradative lysosomal compartment. Lysosomes themselves are also prone to damage and are degraded through the process of lysophagy. While early steps involve recognition of ruptured lysosomal membranes by glycan-binding galectins and ubiquitylation of transmembrane lysosomal proteins, many steps in the process, and their interrelationships, remain poorly understood, including the role and identity of cargo receptors required for completion of lysophagy. Here, we employ quantitative organelle capture and proximity biotinylation proteomics of autophagy adaptors, cargo receptors, and galectins in response to acute lysosomal damage, thereby revealing the landscape of lysosome-associated proteome remodeling during lysophagy. Among the proteins dynamically recruited to damaged lysosomes were ubiquitin-binding autophagic cargo receptors. Using newly developed lysophagic flux reporters including Lyso-Keima, we demonstrate that TAX1BP1, together with its associated kinase TBK1, are both necessary and sufficient to promote lysophagic flux in both HeLa cells and induced neurons (iNeurons). While the related receptor Optineurin (OPTN) can drive damage-dependent lysophagy when overexpressed, cells lacking either OPTN or CALCOCO2 still maintain significant lysophagic flux in HeLa cells. Mechanistically, TAX1BP1-driven lysophagy requires its N-terminal SKICH domain, which binds both TBK1 and the autophagy regulatory factor RB1CC1, and requires upstream ubiquitylation events for efficient recruitment and lysophagic flux. These results identify TAX1BP1 as a central component in the lysophagy pathway and provide a proteomic resource for future studies of the lysophagy process.
© 2021, Eapen et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autophagy; biochemistry; cargo receptors; cell biology; chemical biology; human; lysosome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34585663      PMCID: PMC8523161          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.72328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  83 in total

1.  A tissue-specific atlas of mouse protein phosphorylation and expression.

Authors:  Edward L Huttlin; Mark P Jedrychowski; Joshua E Elias; Tapasree Goswami; Ramin Rad; Sean A Beausoleil; Judit Villén; Wilhelm Haas; Mathew E Sowa; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Joshua E Elias; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 3.  Selective Autophagy: ATG8 Family Proteins, LIR Motifs and Cargo Receptors.

Authors:  Terje Johansen; Trond Lamark
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 4.  Preserving Lysosomal Function in the Aging Brain: Insights from Neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Wesley Peng; Georgia Minakaki; Maria Nguyen; Dimitri Krainc
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 5.  Detection and Clearance of Damaged Lysosomes by the Endo-Lysosomal Damage Response and Lysophagy.

Authors:  Chrisovalantis Papadopoulos; Hemmo Meyer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 6.  Building and decoding ubiquitin chains for mitophagy.

Authors:  J Wade Harper; Alban Ordureau; Jin-Mi Heo
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 94.444

7.  Apical sorting by galectin-3-dependent glycoprotein clustering.

Authors:  Delphine Delacour; Christoph Greb; Annett Koch; Emma Salomonsson; Hakon Leffler; Andre Le Bivic; Ralf Jacob
Journal:  Traffic       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 6.215

8.  Systematic analysis of ribophagy in human cells reveals bystander flux during selective autophagy.

Authors:  Heeseon An; J Wade Harper
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 28.824

9.  ULK complex organization in autophagy by a C-shaped FIP200 N-terminal domain dimer.

Authors:  Xiaoshan Shi; Adam L Yokom; Chunxin Wang; Lindsey N Young; Richard J Youle; James H Hurley
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 10.  Lysosome biology in autophagy.

Authors:  Willa Wen-You Yim; Noboru Mizushima
Journal:  Cell Discov       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 10.849

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The different autophagy degradation pathways and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Angeleen Fleming; Mathieu Bourdenx; Motoki Fujimaki; Cansu Karabiyik; Gregory J Krause; Ana Lopez; Adrián Martín-Segura; Claudia Puri; Aurora Scrivo; John Skidmore; Sung Min Son; Eleanna Stamatakou; Lidia Wrobel; Ye Zhu; Ana Maria Cuervo; David C Rubinsztein
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Stress granules and mTOR are regulated by membrane atg8ylation during lysosomal damage.

Authors:  Jingyue Jia; Fulong Wang; Zambarlal Bhujabal; Ryan Peters; Michal Mudd; Thabata Duque; Lee Allers; Ruheena Javed; Michelle Salemi; Christian Behrends; Brett Phinney; Terje Johansen; Vojo Deretic
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 8.077

Review 3.  Autophagy in cancer cell remodeling and quality control.

Authors:  Grace A Hernandez; Rushika M Perera
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 19.328

4.  A guide to membrane atg8ylation and autophagy with reflections on immunity.

Authors:  Vojo Deretic; Michael Lazarou
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 8.077

Review 5.  Mechanisms underlying ubiquitin-driven selective mitochondrial and bacterial autophagy.

Authors:  Ellen A Goodall; Felix Kraus; J Wade Harper
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 19.328

6.  Quantitative proteomics reveals the selectivity of ubiquitin-binding autophagy receptors in the turnover of damaged lysosomes by lysophagy.

Authors:  Vinay V Eapen; Sharan Swarup; Melissa J Hoyer; Joao A Paulo; J Wade Harper
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Maintenance and loss of endocytic organelle integrity: mechanisms and implications for antigen cross-presentation.

Authors:  Eleanor Childs; Conor M Henry; Johnathan Canton; Caetano Reis e Sousa
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 6.411

8.  PACSIN1 is indispensable for amphisome-lysosome fusion during basal autophagy and subsets of selective autophagy.

Authors:  Yukako Oe; Keita Kakuda; Shin-Ichiro Yoshimura; Naohiro Hara; Junya Hasegawa; Seigo Terawaki; Yasuyoshi Kimura; Kensuke Ikenaka; Shiro Suetsugu; Hideki Mochizuki; Tamotsu Yoshimori; Shuhei Nakamura
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.020

9.  TBK1 is part of a galectin 8 dependent membrane damage recognition complex and drives autophagy upon Adenovirus endosomal escape.

Authors:  Noémie Pied; Coralie F Daussy; Zoé Denis; Jessica Ragues; Muriel Faure; Richard Iggo; Mario P Tschan; Benoit Roger; Fabienne Rayne; Harald Wodrich
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 7.464

10.  Spatial snapshots of amyloid precursor protein intramembrane processing via early endosome proteomics.

Authors:  Frances V Hundley; Qing Yu; Hankum Park; Katherine A Overmyer; Dain R Brademan; Lia Serrano; Joao A Paulo; Julia C Paoli; Sharan Swarup; Joshua J Coon; Steven P Gygi; J Wade Harper
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-16       Impact factor: 17.694

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.