| Literature DB >> 34584455 |
Chae Hong Lim1, Sang Eun Yoon2, Won Seog Kim2, Kyung-Han Lee3,4, Seok Jin Kim2,4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The clinical value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) is unknown. This study investigated the association between PET/CT features and prognosis in IVLBCL patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects were 30 newly diagnosed Asian variant IVLBCL patients at a single institution. Baseline PET/CT was analyzed for the distribution and intensity of FDG lesions, and PET/CT pattern groups were compared for the outcome.Entities:
Keywords: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; PET/CT; intravascular lymphoma; prognosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34584455 PMCID: PMC8464312 DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S330308
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Manag Res ISSN: 1179-1322 Impact factor: 3.989
Clinical Characteristics of 30 Study Subjects at Presentation
| Characteristics | Number of Subjects |
|---|---|
| Age >60 | 17 (56.7%) |
| Male gender | 17 (56.7%) |
| Performance status (ECOG >1) | 23 (76.7%) |
| B-symptoms present | 20 (66.7%) |
| Fever as first symptom | 16 (53.3%) |
| Ann Arbor stage | |
| I–II | 2 (6.7%) |
| III–IV | 28 (93.3%) |
| Serum LDH elevation | 30 (100.0%) |
| 1-3-fold of high normal range | 9 (30.0%) |
| > 3-fold of high normal range | 21 (70.0%) |
| Extra-nodal lesions >2 | 13 (43.3%) |
| Bone marrow involvement | 18 (60.0%) |
| CNS involvement | 8 (26.7%) |
| Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis | 12 (40.0%) |
| IPI score-based risk | |
| Low or low-intermediate risk (0–2) | 1 (3.3%) |
| High-intermediate risk (3) | 6 (20.0%) |
| High risk (4–5) | 23 (76.7%) |
| NCCN-IPI score-based risk | |
| Low or low-intermediate risk (0–3) | 1 (3.3%) |
| High-intermediate risk (4–5) | 11 (36.7%) |
| High risk (6–8) | 18 (60.0%) |
| Front-line treatment | |
| R-CHOP #4-8 | 23 (76.7%) |
| R-CHOP #1-3 | 7 (23.3%) |
| Additional MTX | 8 (26.7%) |
Abbreviations: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Group; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; CNS, central nervous system; IPI, International Prognostic Index; NCCN-IPI, National Comprehensive Cancer Network–revised IPI; R-CHOP, rituximab-cyclophosphamide-hydroxydaunorubicin-vincristine-prednisone; MTX, methotrexate.
Figure 1Maximum intensity projection (MIP) FDG PET/CT images of representative IVLBCL patients of the Nodal and EN/DS5 groups. (A) A 59-year-old patient (left) and a 52-year-old patient (right) with hypermetabolic LN involvement. (B) A 69-year-old patient with high-uptake involvement of the bone marrow and spleen (left) and a 70-year-old patient with high-uptake involvement of the liver and spleen (right).
Figure 2MIP FDG PET/CT images of representative IVLBCL patients of the EN/DS3-4 group. (A) A 56-year-old patient with spleen involvement (left) and a 64-year-old patient with bone marrow involvement (right). (B) A 57-year-old patient with lung bone marrow and spleen involvement (left) and a 61-year-old patient with skin and subcutaneous involvement (right).
Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and FDG Uptake Between PET/CT Groups
| Variables | Nodal Group (n = 8) | EN/DS3-4 (n = 14) | EN/DS5 (n = 8) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical characteristics | ||||
| Age > 60 | 4 (50.0%) | 8 (57.1%) | 5 (62.5%) | 0.879 |
| HLH | 2 (25.0%) | 6 (42.9%) | 4 (50.0%) | 0.568 |
| Fever as first symptom | 3 (37.5%) | 7 (50.0%) | 6 (75.0%) | 0.305 |
| B-symptoms present | 5 (62.5%) | 10 (71.4%) | 5 (62.5%) | 0.875 |
| High LDH (> 3x normal) | 5 (62.5%) | 10 (71.4%) | 6 (75.0%) | 0.851 |
| CNS involvement | 2 (25.0%) | 3 (21.4%) | 3 (37.5%) | 0.709 |
| High risk NCCN-IPI (>6) | 4 (50.0%) | 9 (64.3%) | 5 (62.5%) | 0.794 |
| FDG measurements | ||||
| Median SUVmax (range) | 14.0 (8.2–34.3) | 4.7 (3.0–6.1) | 12.9 (8.0–23.5) | <0.001 |
| Organ with highest SUV | ||||
| - Liver | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (28.6%) | 1 (12.5%) | 0.209 |
| - Bone marrow | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (28.6%) | 4 (50.0%) | 0.076 |
| - Spleen | 1 (12.5%) | 2 (14.3%) | 1 (12.5%) | 0.989 |
| - Lymph node | 6 (75.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: FDG, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; SUVmax, maximum standard uptake value; HLH, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; CNS, central nervous system; NCCN-IPI, National Comprehensive Cancer Network–revised International Prognostic Index.
Figure 3Examples of fusion PET/CT of organs with biopsy-proven IVLBCL involvement. (A) Axial fusion PET/CT and PET images of a Nodal group patient with bilateral focal consolidative lung involvement (left) and an EN/DS5 group patient with focal liver and bone marrow involvement (right) showing intense FDG uptake (DS 5). (B) Axial fusion PET/CT and PET images of an EN/DS3-4 group patient with lung involvement showing bilateral diffuse GGOs with mild FDG uptake (left; DS 3) and another patient with liver involvement showing diffuse moderate FDG uptake (right; DS 4).
Treatment Outcome and Survival Status According to FDG PET/CT Pattern
| Variables | Nodal Group (n = 8) | EN/DS3-4 (n = 14) | EN/DS5 (n = 8) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment outcome | ||||
| Completion of first-line R-CHOP | 6 (75.0%) | 9 (64.3%) | 8 (100%) | 0.162 |
| - Complete response | 6 | 9 | 7 | |
| - Partial response | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Failure to complete first-line R-CHOP | 2 (25.0%) | 5 (35.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0.162 |
| - Disease progression | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| - Treatment-related death | 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| - Follow-up loss during treatment | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Relapse following complete remission | 4 (50.0%) | 3 (21.4%) | 1 (12.5%) | 0.197 |
| Survival status | ||||
| Cancer-related death | 6 (75.0%) | 7 (50.0%) | 1 (12.5%) | 0.041 |
| - Death from relapse or progression | 5 (62.5%) | 4 (28.6%) | 1 (12.5%) | |
| -Treatment-related death | 1 (12.5%) | 3 (21.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Abbreviations: FDG, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose; EN, extranodal; DS, Deauville score.
Figure 4Kaplan–Meier curves for survival. Event-free survival rate (A) and overall survival rate (B) for the Nodal group, EN/DS3-4 group, and EN/DS5 group. Event-free survival rate (C) and overall survival rate (D) according to NCCN-IPI scores (high and low to intermediate risk).