Literature DB >> 30344781

Inverse Prognostic Relationships of 18F-FDG PET/CT Metabolic Parameters in Patients with Distal Bile Duct Cancer Undergoing Curative Surgery.

Hyun Kyung Yi1, Yong-Jin Park1, Ji Hoon Bae1, Jong Kyun Lee2, Kwang Hyuk Lee2, Seong Ho Choi3, Kyung-Han Lee1, Byung-Tae Kim1, Joon Young Choi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: As there were few previous studies with a small number of subjects, the purpose of this was to evaluate the prognostic significance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with distal bile duct cancer undergoing curative surgery.
METHODS: The study included 40 patients (M/F = 24:16; age 68.0 ± 8.0 years) who underwent preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT followed by curative surgical resection. The participant's age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance-status score, baseline serum CA 19-9 level, stage, pathologic T and N stages, tumor size, tumor grade, tumor growth pattern, R0 resection, and adjuvant therapy were included as clinicopathological variables for predicting overall survival. The PET variables were maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), average SUV (SUVavg), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the tumor. The Kaplan-Meyer method and Cox proportional hazards model were used for the survival analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 15 of 40 patients (37.5%) died during the follow-up period. In univariate analysis, low SUVmax (≤ 2.7, p = 0.0005) and low SUVavg (≤ 2.6, p = 0.0034) were significant predictors of poor overall survival. In multivariate analyses, only low SUVmax (HR = 6.7016, 95% CI 1.9961-22.4993, p = 0.0047) was an independent prognostic factor associated with poor overall survival.
CONCLUSION: The SUVmax of the primary tumor measured by 18F-FDG PET/CT was an independent significant prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with distal bile duct cancer. However, different results from a previous study warrant further large sample-sized study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG; Cholangiocarcinoma; Distal bile duct cancer; PET; Prognosis

Year:  2018        PMID: 30344781      PMCID: PMC6177342          DOI: 10.1007/s13139-018-0542-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1869-3474


  21 in total

1.  Prognostic Impact of Tumor Growth Type on 7th AJCC Staging System for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: a Single-Center Experience of 659 Cases.

Authors:  Shin Hwang; Young-Joo Lee; Gi-Won Song; Kwang-Min Park; Ki-Hun Kim; Chul-Soo Ahn; Deok-Bog Moon; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Prognostic Significance of Volume-based Metabolic Parameters by (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Gallbladder Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jang Yoo; Joon Young Choi; Kyu Taek Lee; Jin Seok Heo; Soo Bin Park; Seung Hwan Moon; Yearn Seong Choe; Kyung-Han Lee; Byung-Tae Kim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-06-19

3.  Metabolic Characteristics of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer Using 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Their Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Kyoung-Min Cho; Do-Youn Oh; Tae-Yong Kim; Kyung Hun Lee; Sae-Won Han; Seock-Ah Im; Tae-You Kim; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-06-22

Review 4.  Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nataliya Razumilava; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Preoperative 18F-FDG PET-CT maximum standardized uptake value predicts recurrence of biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Min-Su Park; Sang-Mok Lee
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors.

Authors:  A Nakeeb; H A Pitt; T A Sohn; J Coleman; R A Abrams; S Piantadosi; R H Hruban; K D Lillemoe; C J Yeo; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Primary tumor maximum standardized uptake value measured on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography is a prognostic value for survival in bile duct and gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Ji Yong Lee; Hong Joo Kim; Seo Hyung Yim; Dong Suk Shin; Jung Hee Yu; Deok Yun Ju; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Yong Kyun Cho; Chong Il Sohn; Woo Kyu Jeon; Byung Ik Kim
Journal:  Korean J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10

8.  Prognostic Value of SUVmax Measured by Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography with Computed Tomography in Patients with Gallbladder Cancer.

Authors:  Jae Pil Hwang; Ilhan Lim; Im Ii Na; Eung Ho Cho; Byung Ii Kim; Chang Woon Choi; Sang Moo Lim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-12-06

9.  Prognostic Value of Pre- and Post-Treatment FDG PET/CT Parameters in Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Hyoungwoo Kim; Ie Ryung Yoo; Sun Ha Boo; Hye Lim Park; Joo Hyun O; Sung Hoon Kim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-08-11

10.  Prognostic factors following surgical resection of distal bile duct cancer.

Authors:  Young Jae Chung; Dong Wook Choi; Seong Ho Choi; Jin Seok Heo; Dong Hun Kim
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2013-10-25
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Applications of Technetium-99m Quantitative Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Won Woo Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-03-15

2.  Imaging Features and Prognostic Value of FDG PET/CT in Patients with Intravascular Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Chae Hong Lim; Sang Eun Yoon; Won Seog Kim; Kyung-Han Lee; Seok Jin Kim
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Diagnostic Performance and Prognostic Relevance of FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Patients with Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nam Hee Kim; Sung Ryol Lee; Young Hwan Kim; Hong Joo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 3.500

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.