OBJECTIVES: Delirium is a common and frequently underdiagnosed complication in acutely hospitalized patients, and its severity is associated with worse clinical outcomes. We propose a physiologically based method to quantify delirium severity as a tool that can help close this diagnostic gap: the Electroencephalographic Confusion Assessment Method Severity Score (E-CAM-S). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS: Three-hundred seventy-three adult patients undergoing electroencephalography to evaluate altered mental status between August 2015 and December 2019. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We developed the E-CAM-S based on a learning-to-rank machine learning model of forehead electroencephalography signals. Clinical delirium severity was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method Severity (CAM-S). We compared associations of E-CAM-S and CAM-S with hospital length of stay and inhospital mortality. E-CAM-S correlated with clinical CAM-S (R = 0.67; p < 0.0001). For the overall cohort, E-CAM-S and CAM-S were similar in their strength of association with hospital length of stay (correlation = 0.31 vs 0.41, respectively; p = 0.082) and inhospital mortality (area under the curve = 0.77 vs 0.81; p = 0.310). Even when restricted to noncomatose patients, E-CAM-S remained statistically similar to CAM-S in its association with length of stay (correlation = 0.37 vs 0.42, respectively; p = 0.188) and inhospital mortality (area under the curve = 0.83 vs 0.74; p = 0.112). In addition to previously appreciated spectral features, the machine learning framework identified variability in multiple measures over time as important features in electroencephalography-based prediction of delirium severity. CONCLUSIONS: The E-CAM-S is an automated, physiologic measure of delirium severity that predicts clinical outcomes with a level of performance comparable to conventional interview-based clinical assessment.
OBJECTIVES: Delirium is a common and frequently underdiagnosed complication in acutely hospitalized patients, and its severity is associated with worse clinical outcomes. We propose a physiologically based method to quantify delirium severity as a tool that can help close this diagnostic gap: the Electroencephalographic Confusion Assessment Method Severity Score (E-CAM-S). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS: Three-hundred seventy-three adult patients undergoing electroencephalography to evaluate altered mental status between August 2015 and December 2019. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We developed the E-CAM-S based on a learning-to-rank machine learning model of forehead electroencephalography signals. Clinical delirium severity was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method Severity (CAM-S). We compared associations of E-CAM-S and CAM-S with hospital length of stay and inhospital mortality. E-CAM-S correlated with clinical CAM-S (R = 0.67; p < 0.0001). For the overall cohort, E-CAM-S and CAM-S were similar in their strength of association with hospital length of stay (correlation = 0.31 vs 0.41, respectively; p = 0.082) and inhospital mortality (area under the curve = 0.77 vs 0.81; p = 0.310). Even when restricted to noncomatose patients, E-CAM-S remained statistically similar to CAM-S in its association with length of stay (correlation = 0.37 vs 0.42, respectively; p = 0.188) and inhospital mortality (area under the curve = 0.83 vs 0.74; p = 0.112). In addition to previously appreciated spectral features, the machine learning framework identified variability in multiple measures over time as important features in electroencephalography-based prediction of delirium severity. CONCLUSIONS: The E-CAM-S is an automated, physiologic measure of delirium severity that predicts clinical outcomes with a level of performance comparable to conventional interview-based clinical assessment.
Authors: Richard N Jones; Sevdenur Cizginer; Laura Pavlech; Asha Albuquerque; Lori A Daiello; Kumar Dharmarajan; Lauren J Gleason; Benjamin Helfand; Lauren Massimo; Esther Oh; Olivia I Okereke; Patricia Tabloski; Laura A Rabin; Jirong Yue; Edward R Marcantonio; Tamara G Fong; Tammy T Hshieh; Eran D Metzger; Kristen Erickson; Eva M Schmitt; Sharon K Inouye Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Thomas Donoghue; Matar Haller; Erik J Peterson; Paroma Varma; Priyadarshini Sebastian; Richard Gao; Torben Noto; Antonio H Lara; Joni D Wallis; Robert T Knight; Avgusta Shestyuk; Bradley Voytek Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Shobhit Singla; Gabriella E Garcia; Grace E Rovenolt; Alexandria L Soto; Emily J Gilmore; Lawrence J Hirsch; Hal Blumenfeld; Kevin N Sheth; S Bulent Omay; Aaron F Struck; M Brandon Westover; Jennifer A Kim Journal: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 6.030
Authors: Monique S Boord; Bahar Moezzi; Daniel Davis; Tyler J Ross; Scott Coussens; Peter J Psaltis; Alice Bourke; Hannah A D Keage Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Ryan A Tesh; Haoqi Sun; Jin Jing; Mike Westmeijer; Anudeepthi Neelagiri; Subapriya Rajan; Parimala V Krishnamurthy; Pooja Sikka; Syed A Quadri; Michael J Leone; Luis Paixao; Ezhil Panneerselvam; Christine Eckhardt; Aaron F Struck; Peter W Kaplan; Oluwaseun Akeju; Daniel Jones; Eyal Y Kimchi; M Brandon Westover Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2022-01-18