| Literature DB >> 33230329 |
Thomas Donoghue1, Matar Haller2, Erik J Peterson3, Paroma Varma2, Priyadarshini Sebastian3, Richard Gao3, Torben Noto3, Antonio H Lara2, Joni D Wallis2,4, Robert T Knight2,4, Avgusta Shestyuk2, Bradley Voytek5,6,7,8.
Abstract
Electrophysiological signals exhibit both periodic and aperiodic properties. Periodic oscillations have been linked to numerous physiological, cognitive, behavioral and disease states. Emerging evidence demonstrates that the aperiodic component has putative physiological interpretations and that it dynamically changes with age, task demands and cognitive states. Electrophysiological neural activity is typically analyzed using canonically defined frequency bands, without consideration of the aperiodic (1/f-like) component. We show that standard analytic approaches can conflate periodic parameters (center frequency, power, bandwidth) with aperiodic ones (offset, exponent), compromising physiological interpretations. To overcome these limitations, we introduce an algorithm to parameterize neural power spectra as a combination of an aperiodic component and putative periodic oscillatory peaks. This algorithm requires no a priori specification of frequency bands. We validate this algorithm on simulated data, and demonstrate how it can be used in applications ranging from analyzing age-related changes in working memory to large-scale data exploration and analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33230329 PMCID: PMC8106550 DOI: 10.1038/s41593-020-00744-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Neurosci ISSN: 1097-6256 Impact factor: 24.884