Literature DB >> 34573426

Genome-Wide Identification and Transcriptional Expression Profiles of Transcription Factor WRKY in Common Walnut (Juglans regia L.).

Fan Hao1, Ge Yang2, Huijuan Zhou1, Jiajun Yao3, Deruilin Liu3, Peng Zhao3, Shuoxin Zhang1,4.   

Abstract

The transcription factor WRKY is widely distributed in the plant kingdom, playing a significant role in plant growth, development and response to stresses. Walnut is an economically important temperate tree species valued for both its edible nuts and high-quality wood, and its response to various stresses is an important factor that determines the quality of its fruit. However, in walnut trees themselves, information about the WRKY gene family remains scarce. In this paper, we perform a comprehensive study of the WRKY gene family in walnut. In total, we identified 103 WRKY genes in the common walnut that are clustered into 4 groups and distributed on 14 chromosomes. The conserved domains all contained a WRKY domain, and motif 2 was observed in most WRKYs, suggesting a high degree of conservation and similar functions within each subfamily. However, gene structure was significantly differentiated between different subfamilies. Synteny analysis indicates that there were 56 gene pairs in J. regia and A. thaliana, 76 in J. regia and J. mandshurica, 75 in J. regia and J. microcarpa, 76 in J. regia and P. trichocarpa, and 33 in J. regia and Q. robur, indicating that the WRKY gene family may come from a common ancestor. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the WRKY gene family was involved in resistance traits and the plant-pathogen interaction pathway. In anthracnose-resistant F26 fruits (AR) and anthracnose-susceptible F423 fruits (AS), transcriptome and qPCR analysis results showed that JrWRKY83, JrWRKY73 and JrWRKY74 were expressed significantly more highly in resistant cultivars, indicating that these three genes may be important contributors to stress resistance in walnut trees. Furthermore, we investigate how these three genes potentially target miRNAs and interact with proteins. JrWRKY73 was target by the miR156 family, including 12 miRNAs; this miRNA family targets WRKY genes to enhance plant defense. JrWRKY73 also interacted with the resistance gene AtMPK6, showing that it may play a crucial role in walnut defense.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Juglans regia; WRKY; miR156; protein interaction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34573426      PMCID: PMC8466090          DOI: 10.3390/genes12091444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes (Basel)        ISSN: 2073-4425            Impact factor:   4.096


1. Introduction

WRKY transcription factors are ubiquitous among higher plants, and they harbor a highly conserved WRKYGQK amino acid sequence that is followed by a zinc-finger motif at the N-terminal domain [1,2]. In important crops, WRKY genes have been examined in their related genomes, including 75 in peanut [3], 174 in soybean [4], 148 in Brassica oleracea [5], 92 in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) [6], 126 in Raphanus sativus [7], 79 in potato (Solanum tuberosum) [8], 112 in Gossypium raimondii and 109 in Gossypium arboreum WRKY [9], in cotton (116 in G. raimondii and 102 in Gossypium hirsutum) [10], 89 in rice [11], 63 in Dendrobium officinale [12] and 86 in Barley [13]. In woody plants, WRKY genes have been examined in their related genomes, namely 147 genes in Musa acuminate and 132 in Musa balbisiana [14], 58 in castor bean [2], 54 in pineapple [15], 56 in tea [16], 51 in Citrus sinensis [16], 48 in Citrus clementina, 79 in Citrus unshiu [17], 69 in Dimocarpus longan [18], 58 in moso bamboo [19], 85 in Salix suchowensis [20], 59 in peach [21], 95 in Dendrobium officinale [22], 71 in Fragaria vesca [23], 53 in Elaeis guineensis [24], 71 in sesame [25] and 53 in Caragana intermedia [26]. The WRKY gene is an important factor in the regulation of plant growth and development, as well as in a plant’s response to different kinds of stress [27], including drought, dehydration and salt stress [28]; however, the most important aspect of the WRKY gene is its ability to respond to abiotic stresses. This has been seen in peanut WRKY1 and WRKY12 genes, which were upregulated with salt (SA) and jasmonate (JA) treatment [28], while two abiotic stresses (salt and cold) were observed in Raphanus sativus in relation to heat, salinity and heavy metals [7]. In rice, WRKY gene family members with roles in drought tolerance and transgenic crops [29] showed a response to cold stress and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatments [22]. In Brassica rapa, WRKY gene family members act against abiotic and biotic stresses [30,31]. The common walnut (Juglans regia L.), i.e., the English walnut, is one of the most important hardwood trees in the world, and it is famous for its economic value, edible nuts and nutritional value [32,33,34]. Walnut oil, a high-valued oil product, is extracted from walnut kernel and used widely in food and health care industries [32,33,34]. There is no previous study regarding the WRKY gene in common walnut (J. regia) [33,34]. In a recent publication of high-quality common walnut genome data, some gene families and transcript factors were reported in common walnut, such phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL), F-box, fatty acid desaturase (FAD), heat stress transcription factors (HSFs), nascent polypeptide-associated complex protein (NAC) and repressor of GAI; gibberellic acid-insensitive RGA and scarecrow SCR (GRAS) were also reported [35,36,37,38,39,40]. However, comprehensive information regarding the functional characterization of the WRKY gene family in common walnut is still unclear. In this study, based on the whole-genome sequencing of walnut, we performed a genome-wide identification of the transcription factor WRKY in J. regia. We systematically characterized WRKY transcription factors in common walnut. We revealed the phylogenetic tree, structural features, duplication and conserve motifs of JrWRKYs. To understand the expression profiles of JrWRKYs, we studied the transcriptional levels of JrWRKYs in anthracnose-resistant F26 (AR) and anthracnose-susceptible F423 (AS) fruits. Our results provide useful theoretical support for the functional characterization of these JrWRKY transcription factors that are involved in resistance in common walnut.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bioinformatics Analysis of Putative WRKY from Walnut

An entire protein sequence of common walnuts was downloaded from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/?term=Juglans+regia accessed on 20 December 2020) [41]. Arabidopsis WRKY family members were downloaded from the Arabidopsis Information Resource website (TAIR, https://www.arabidopsis.org/index.jsp accessed on 21 December 2020) using a basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) to search for prevalent walnut protein sequences, including the Arabidopsis WRKY sequence as a query sequence while considering those with an E value less than 1 × 10−10 as a typical walnut WRKY sequence. The Profile Hidden Markov Model (HMM) introduced in HMMER v3.2.1 (http://hmmer.org/download.html/ accessed on 28 December 2020) and Protein Family (Pfam) database (http://pfam.xfam.org/ accessed on 28 December 2020) with default parameters were used to search for prevalent walnut WRKY with WRKY domains. The WRKY sequence name and position information was acquired through BLAST with the parameters E-value < 10–15 and ID % > 50% [42]. The WRKY sequences were predicted on the Plant-mPLoc website to predict subcellular localization of plant proteins, including those with multiple sites [43]. The theoretical isoelectric point and molecular weight were predicted in a ProtParam tool (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/ accessed on 5 September 2021) [44].

2.2. Protein Alignment, Phylogenetic Analysis, Pfam Domain Detection and Chromosome Location Analysis of Walnut WRKY Genes

The complete WRKR sequence of walnut was aligned by MEGA7.0 (State College, PA, USA) software with default parameters [45]. Subsequently, an unrooted alignment-based phylogenetic tree was constructed with pairwise deletion of 1000 bootstrap and Poisson models with MEGA7.0 software [45,46]. The Pfam web server (http://pfam.xfam.org/ accessed on 5 January 2021) was used to identify prospective domains in each sequence. We split these sequences into 3 separate subfamilies based on specific domains discovered in these WRKY sequences and used TBtools [47].

2.3. Motif Analysis, Gene Structure and Protein Structure of Walnut WRKY Genes

Feature coordinates (exon-intron boundaries) were extracted from the GFF3 annotation files of walnut. The exon-intron structure was illustrated by TBtools [47]. Identification of patterns using various pattern alignments with the default pattern-initiated (MEME) program parameters was conducted with the maximum number of patterns set to 20, and the optimum pattern width was set to 15–20 [48]. Protein structure information was predicted by an online web server of a conserved domain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/bwrpsb/bwrpsb.cgi, accessed on 5 January 2021) (CDD-search) [49].

2.4. Synteny Analysis and Calculating Ka, Ks and Ka/Ks Values of Duplicated Gene Pairs

BLASTP was used to identify potential pairs of homologous genes across multiple genomes (Evalue < 1×10−5, top 5 matches) [42]. The homologous gene pairs were used to identify syntenic chains through MCScanX [50]. The detected duplicate gene pairs were detected byusing MCScanX, which included whole-genome duplication (WGD), tandem duplication, segmental and other types of gene pairs [50].

2.5. Plant Materials, Treatments and Collections

To analyze the expression levels of WRKY in common walnut, 17 transcriptome data were downloaded, including a total of 17 tissues from PJ Martínez-García et al., 2016 (PRJNA291087) [51], 10 anthracnose-resistant F26 fruits from the B26 clone (AR) and 10 anthracnose-susceptible F423 fruits from the 4–23 clone (AS) of walnut [52] (PRJNA612972) (Table S1). Cufflinks was used to [53] to quantify these gene expression levels based on fragments per million base readings per million mapped read (FPKM) values with default parameters, and expression level was calculated using Hemi 1.0 software with default parameters [54]. The DESeq R package (1.10.1) was used to identify differential gene expression (DESeq) with an adjusted p-value <0.05.

2.6. qRT-PCR Analysis of WRKY Genes

We then verified the JrWRKY transcript factors expression profiles in common walnut by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) reactions in different tissues (immature fruit, pistillate flower, mature pistillate flower, embryo, somatic embryo, vegetative bud, callus exterior, catkins, hull cortex, immature hull, young hull, mature hull, hull peel, immature leaves, young leaf, mature leaves, root) and AR and AS fruits and leaves [51,52] (samples and primer see details in Table S2). The primary specificities and associated melting curves were verified before the experiment. In each experiment, three replicates were performed. Real-time amplification responses were performed on an Applied Biosystems (USA) 7500 quick real-time PCR system. The relative concentration of expression of each gene was calculated using the 2-Ct method [55] (Table S2).

2.7. miRNA Predicted in Walnut WRKY Family Genes and the Interaction Network of JrWRKY Proteins

All of the genome sequences of the common walnut WRKY family genes were submitted as candidate genes to predict potential miRNAs by searching against the available walnut reference of miRNA sequences using the psRNATarget Server with default parameters [56]. We visualized the interactions between the predicted miRNAs and the corresponding target walnut WRKY genes using Cytoscape software with default parameters [57]. Persian walnut WRKYmatched a homologous Arabidopsis WRKY in the BLASTP program with an E value of 1 × 10−5 [58]. Regarding the Arabidopsis WRKY proteins that represented the walnut WRKY, 102 were uploaded to the STRING website to predict protein interactions (https://string-db.org/ accessed on 6 September 2021) [59].

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Classification of WRKY Genes

In this study, we detected a total of 103 WRKY genes in common walnut (Figure 1; Table 1). Based on the similar domain in which walnut WRKY genes were identified, the WRKY genes were classified into four groups, and the fourth group had the largest number of genes, including 51 members. These walnut WRKYs ranged in length from 281 to 760 amino acids, with a molecular weight from 0.76 Da to 0.69 Da and isoelectric points ranging from 4.97 to 9.72. Subcellular localization analysis indicated that all 103 walnut WRKY genes were localized in the nucleus (Figure 1; Table 1 and Table S3).
Figure 1

The phylogenetic tree of WRKY gene family in walnut based on the latest genome (NCBI version: GCA_001411555.2 Walnut 2.0). These 103 sequences were used to construct a neighbor-joining (NJ) tree. The tree was divided into four subfamilies; the names of different groups are displayed.

Table 1

Information on the WRKY gene family in common walnut.

Protein IDGene NameChrStartEndSubcellular LocationMolecular Weight (Da)Theoretical pI
Jr01_03140_p1 JrWRKY1 Chr0122577712258097Nucleus56,541.738.09
Jr01_03150_p1 JrWRKY2 Chr0122575002257520Nucleus49,890.376.37
Jr01_03780_p1 JrWRKY3 Chr0128461902846322Nucleus12,027.768.89
Jr01_06810_p1 JrWRKY4 Chr0146353104635698Nucleus21,804.489.57
Jr01_15550_p1 JrWRKY5 Chr011336154013361835Nucleus26,093.398.57
Jr01_15790_p1 JrWRKY6 Chr011375722213757429Nucleus21,922.286.52
Jr01_15800_p1 JrWRKY7 Chr011375722213757429Nucleus22,078.476.95
Jr01_18750_p1 JrWRKY8 Chr011735596717356096Nucleus59,268.475.68
Jr01_22930_p1 JrWRKY9 Chr012775967827759839Nucleus41,188.188.45
Jr02_00640_p1 JrWRKY10 Chr02765843766023Nucleus17,790.989.72
Jr02_04990_p1 JrWRKY11 Chr0249863794986534Nucleus65,659.196.77
Jr02_16420_p1 JrWRKY12 Chr022967209929672723Nucleus40,484.075.53
Jr02_17180_p1 JrWRKY13 Chr023043540730435516Nucleus35,003.515.69
Jr02_17190_p1 JrWRKY14 Chr023043540730435516Nucleus34,916.435.69
Jr02_25510_p1 JrWRKY15 Chr023692871936929192Nucleus64,334.267.65
Jr02_25520_p1 JrWRKY16 Chr023692821136928718Nucleus56,824.616.88
Jr02_26760_p1 JrWRKY17 Chr023781813437818221Nucleus80,308.265.73
Jr03_08810_p1 JrWRKY18 Chr0366879546688183Nucleus27,753.915.29
Jr03_11540_p1 JrWRKY19 Chr0389686288969068Nucleus68,711.716.71
Jr03_11550_p1 JrWRKY20 Chr0389686288969104Nucleus69,981.27.41
Jr03_15160_p1 JrWRKY21 Chr031250660112506994Nucleus36,299.276.66
Jr03_17800_p1 JrWRKY22 Chr031664340316644049Nucleus49,731.135.09
Jr03_22520_p1 JrWRKY23 Chr032882294228823420Nucleus51,969.628.97
Jr03_23890_p1 JrWRKY24 Chr033079233830792633Nucleus38,321.415.58
Jr03_26460_p1 JrWRKY25 Chr033367527733675552Nucleus63,267.428.37
Jr03_27180_p1 JrWRKY26 Chr033446203534462179Nucleus35,255.416.05
Jr04_00630_p1 JrWRKY27 Chr04535739535935Nucleus33,737.696.05
Jr04_00640_p1 JrWRKY28 Chr04535288535738Nucleus23,556.396.47
Jr04_01100_p1 JrWRKY29 Chr0411798651180318Nucleus63,547.66.45
Jr04_02750_p1 JrWRKY30 Chr0432276713228181Nucleus34,373.425.01
Jr04_03880_p1 JrWRKY31 Chr0453903705390567Nucleus51,825.99.37
Jr04_03890_p1 JrWRKY32 Chr0453900365390075Nucleus51,825.99.37
Jr04_10710_p1 JrWRKY33 Chr042346525823465703Nucleus36,869.576.5
Jr04_13770_p1 JrWRKY34 Chr042740497927405225Nucleus67,672.36.24
Jr04_15560_p1 JrWRKY35 Chr042903465929034819Nucleus28,695.915.15
Jr04_15570_p1 JrWRKY36 Chr042903465929034819Nucleus23,041.439.4
Jr05_06670_p1 JrWRKY37 Chr0560640236064340Nucleus28,782.995.15
Jr06_10190_p1 JrWRKY38 Chr061666019216660378Nucleus17,033.675.12
Jr06_10200_p1 JrWRKY39 Chr061666014116660378Nucleus18,792.405.07
Jr07_07490_p1 JrWRKY40 Chr0786240368624525Nucleus37,173.785.45
Jr07_07550_p1 JrWRKY41 Chr0787327868732963Nucleus23,041.439.4
Jr07_08410_p1 JrWRKY42 Chr071016909610169403Nucleus40,140.445.71
Jr07_11780_p1 JrWRKY43 Chr071674573816745973Nucleus37,411.325.68
Jr07_12950_p1 JrWRKY44 Chr071812705518127153Nucleus59,910.246.89
Jr07_32310_p1 JrWRKY45 Chr074714668747146990Nucleus34,545.668.75
Jr07_38970_p1 JrWRKY46 Chr075212478952125284Nucleus42,522.335.96
Jr07_38980_p1 JrWRKY47 Chr075212970752130044Nucleus35,255.135.36
Jr07_38990_p1 JrWRKY48 Chr075212970752130044Nucleus35,168.055.36
Jr08_00860_p1 JrWRKY49 Chr08742451742489Nucleus30,859.848.4
Jr08_00870_p1 JrWRKY50 Chr08753017753211Nucleus39,081.656.87
Jr08_00880_p1 JrWRKY51 Chr08753017753037Nucleus33,228.877.11
Jr08_00890_p1 JrWRKY52 Chr08753017753037Nucleus31,222.717.63
Jr08_11260_p1 JrWRKY53 Chr081000211810002312Nucleus34,664.948.7
Jr08_11410_p1 JrWRKY54 Chr081015126110151340Nucleus29,684.26.08
Jr08_14560_p1 JrWRKY55 Chr081750855717508602Nucleus48,352.444.97
Jr08_14570_p1 JrWRKY56 Chr081750973217509923Nucleus78,751.495.48
Jr09_02120_p1 JrWRKY57 Chr0987674408767490Nucleus54,475.989.02
Jr09_09980_p1 JrWRKY58 Chr091914872619148857Nucleus40,245.485.64
Jr09_10570_p1 JrWRKY59 Chr091965883319659206Nucleus20,577.389.51
Jr09_10580_p1 JrWRKY60 Chr091966515419665485Nucleus35,303.855.81
Jr09_16000_p1 JrWRKY61 Chr092369716323697517Nucleus63,785.547.13
Jr09_16010_p1 JrWRKY62 Chr092369716323697516Nucleus63,698.467.13
Jr10_01810_p1 JrWRKY63 Chr1011042911104561Nucleus56,392.698.07
Jr10_02340_p1 JrWRKY64 Chr1014845981484699Nucleus58,693.616.74
Jr10_04760_p1 JrWRKY65 Chr1030872513087411Nucleus16,281.599.68
Jr10_04770_p1 JrWRKY66 Chr1030868653087250Nucleus20,646.359.24
Jr10_04790_p1 JrWRKY67 Chr1030999663100126Nucleus16,281.599.68
Jr10_10930_p1 JrWRKY68 Chr1085535888553895Nucleus27,001.359.41
Jr10_11120_p1 JrWRKY69 Chr1087407348740998Nucleus24,938.487.2
Jr10_11130_p1 JrWRKY70 Chr1087407348740998Nucleus25,197.87.71
Jr10_13870_p1 JrWRKY71 Chr101247968212480398Nucleus67,557.196.53
Jr10_25600_p1 JrWRKY72 Chr103724149237241717Nucleus52,902.215.65
Jr11_16130_p1 JrWRKY73 Chr112574672825746820Nucleus31,410.15.4
Jr11_16150_p1 JrWRKY74 Chr112574616025746727Nucleus31,219.885.4
Jr11_16330_p1 JrWRKY75 Chr112589013725890461Nucleus34,342.426.67
Jr11_17180_p1 JrWRKY76 Chr112657355026573846Nucleus59,310.688.76
Jr11_17190_p1 JrWRKY77 Chr112657355026573807Nucleus58,058.198.62
Jr11_30170_p1 JrWRKY78 Chr113640116336401522Nucleus35,567.937.58
Jr11_30180_p1 JrWRKY79 Chr113642116936421419Nucleus29,474.948.99
Jr12_04410_p1 JrWRKY80 Chr1255222455522483Nucleus36,853.455.3
Jr12_04430_p1 JrWRKY81 Chr1255524435552620Nucleus24,150.488.82
Jr12_10150_p1 JrWRKY82 Chr121944921419449375Nucleus36,367.456.67
Jr12_20670_p1 JrWRKY83 Chr122836482728365189Nucleus35,713.88.87
Jr12_25170_p1 JrWRKY84 Chr123137446231374933Nucleus42,430.396.48
Jr13_05050_p1 JrWRKY85 Chr1337168453717165Nucleus60,666.516.13
Jr13_12290_p1 JrWRKY86 Chr1388571998857376Nucleus20,751.249.18
Jr13_14610_p1 JrWRKY87 Chr131102797311028382Nucleus33,873.065.86
Jr13_14850_p1 JrWRKY88 Chr131122796111228243Nucleus59,330.497.29
Jr13_16070_p1 JrWRKY89 Chr131273456312734607Nucleus63,019.028.13
Jr13_30130_p1 JrWRKY90 Chr133881256838813261Nucleus42,829.335.52
Jr13_30630_p1 JrWRKY91 Chr133930238239302974Nucleus47,896.25.55
Jr14_02960_p1 JrWRKY92 Chr1421747902174952Nucleus25,660.056.99
Jr14_08090_p1 JrWRKY93 Chr1461851076185468Nucleus66,068.987.37
Jr14_08100_p1 JrWRKY94 Chr1461851076185461Nucleus65,679.577.37
Jr14_22100_p1 JrWRKY95 Chr142846541828465452Nucleus17,747.016.51
Jr15_12650_p1 JrWRKY96 Chr151930313619303172Nucleus56,662.565.47
Jr15_12660_p1 JrWRKY97 Chr151930284819303172Nucleus37,1559.31
Jr15_12670_p1 JrWRKY98 Chr151930313619303172Nucleus56,790.695.47
Jr16_00890_p1 JrWRKY99 Chr1611332441133569Nucleus43,423.975.82
Jr16_12390_p1 JrWRKY100 Chr162041976420420258Nucleus56,611.546.41
Jr16_12590_p1 JrWRKY101 Chr162062277320623229Nucleus22,661.499.54
Jr16_14290_p1 JrWRKY102 Chr162225150422251576Nucleus20,667.069.3
Jr16_19690_p1 JrWRKY103 Chr162654596226546702Nucleus61,636.636.06

Note: protein ID, gene ID and CDS (coding sequence) ID indicate that the accession numbers of the WRKY gene family member sequences were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology (NCBI). Da indicates Daltons (unified atomic mass unit); pI indicates isoelectric point.

3.2. Phylogenetic Tree, Motif Composition, Conserved Domain and Gene Structure of WRKY Genes

According to the phylogenetic tree and motif composition, these gene families were divided into seven subfamilies (Figure 1). According to the gene structure and conserved motif distribution, WRKY genes showed diverse sequence structures (Figure 2, Table S4). In the present study, 15 conserved motifs were detected in WRKY proteins, and motif 2 was observed in most proteins as a subgroup that contained the most motifs (7), while the fewest motifs were found in subgroup 6, which contained only 3 motifs (Figure 2a,b). All WRKY genes contained at least one WRKY conserved domain, but subgroup 3 WRKY genes contained 2 WRKY domains; only two genes (JrWRKY76 and JrWRKY77) contained WRKY and CCCC73 domains (Figure 2c). In addition, WRKY genes were diverse in terms of gene structure, where various intron-exon numbers were observed (Figure 2d), which proved the validity of the phylogenetic tree and motif composition. The structure of WRKY genes in common walnut has different exon-intron organizations between subfamilies (Figure 3; Table S4). Intron numbers 2 to 6 were found in all WRKY genes (Figure 2d). Subgroup 1 contained 5 to 6 exons; subgroup 2 contained 3 to 4 exons; subgroup 3 contained 5 to 6 exons; subgroup 4 contained 4 to 5 exons; subgroup 5 contained 2 exons; subgroup 6 contained 3 exons; and subgroup 7 contained 3 to 4 exons (Figure 2d).
Figure 2

Phylogenetic analyses of the motifs in proteins and gene structures of WRKY genes, (a) phylogenetic tree, (b) conserved motif distribution of WRKY genes, (c) the conserved domains and (d) intron-exon distribution of WRKY genes.

Figure 3

Chromosome location and tandem analysis of WRKY genes. The blue boxes represent chromosomes of walnut; black lines represent the tandem relationships of WRKY genes in walnut.

3.3. Chromosome Distribution and Synteny Analysis of WRKY Genes

All WRKY genes could be mapped onto 12 chromosomes of walnut. Chromosome 10 contained the highest number of WRKY genes (10), whereas the fewest WRKY genes were located on chromosome 5 (1) (Figure 4). The results showed a high synteny rate within WRKY genes of walnut (Figure 4, Table S5). A total of 49 showed collinear relationships between WRKY genes of walnut, indicating that these genes were WGD events (Figure 4, Table S5). In total, 20 duplicated gene pairs were found in WRKY gene walnut genomes, including two duplicate modes: whole-genome duplication (WGD)/segmental duplication and tandem duplication (Figure 3). WGD/segmental duplications and tandem duplications were only observed in walnut WRKY genes (Figure 3 and Figure 4; Table S5). Additionally, we found 22 gene pairs were under selection—17 gene pairs were under positive selection and 5 were under negative selection, indicating that these genes were under selection in evolution (Table S6). The syntenic relationships within Juglans showed that, between J. microcarpa and J. mandshurica, we identified pairs of homologs: 71 between J. regia and J. microcarpa and 70 between J. regia and J. mandshurica, indicating that WRKY genes were highly conserved among the Juglans species (Figure 5; Table S7). Multiple colinear gene pairs were found in some selected species, namely P. trichocarpa, A. thaliana, Olea europaea and Quercus robur, which inferred that the genetic copies underwent lineage-specific expansion (Figure 6; Table S7). These findings reveal closer relationships in J. mandshurica species compared to other selected species, which is consistent with their evolutionary distance. Furthermore, our results imply that continuous colinear gene pairs were found in P. trichocarpa, A. thaliana, Olea europaea and Quercus robur; therefore, we suggest that the WRKY gene might have come from the same ancestor (Figure 3, Figure 5 and Figure 6; Tables S5–S7).
Figure 4

Chromosome location and synteny analysis of WRKY genes within walnut genome. The blue boxes represent chromosomes of walnut; red lines represent the syntenic relationships of WRKY genes in walnut.

Figure 5

Syntenic analysis of WRKY genes in Juglans species, including J. microcarpa and J. mandshurica. (a) the syntenic analysis of WRKY genes between J. regia and J. microcarpa. (b) the syntenic analysis of WRKY genes between J. regia and J. mandshurica.

Figure 6

Syntenic analysis of WRKY genes with other species. Pt indicates P. trichocarpa; At indicates A. thaliana; Oe indicates Olea europaea; Qr indicates Quercus robur.

3.4. GO and KEGG Enrichment Analysis of WRKY Gene Family in Walnut

We also investigated the function annotation of the WRKY gene family in walnut. GO enrichment analysis showed that the top five GO terms were response to heat, pollen-pistil interaction, recognition of pollen, response to temperature stimulus and multicellular organism processes of the biological process (Figure 7a; Table S8); however, KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the most prevalent term was the plant-pathogen interaction pathway (Figure 7b). Combining these two analytic approaches shows that the WRKY gene family might play an important role in a plant’s response to biotic and abiotic stresses (Figure 7; Table S8).
Figure 7

GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of WRKY gene family in walnut. (a) the GO enrichment analysis of WRKY genes in walnut. (b) the KEGG enrichment analysis of WRKY genes in walnut. The red marked indicates that the concerned terms in this study.

3.5. Three Genes (JrWRKY83, JrWRKY73 and JrWRKY74) May Be Involved in Resistance Traits of Walnut, Based on Transcriptome Data and qPCR

The GO and KEGG enrichment analysis results showed that JrWRKYs were differently expressed in different tissues, indicating that these genes have a variable function (Figure 8a; Table S9). In total 5 of 102 walnut WRKY members were expressed highly in peel compared to other tissues, particularly JrWRKY93, JrWRKY94, JrWRKY83, JrWRKY73 and JrWRKY74 (Figure 8a; Table S9). A mean box plot shows that there were three genes (JrWRKY83: 546-fold, JrWRKY73: 307-fold and JrWRKY74: 1920-fold) highly expressed in anthracnose-resistant F26 fruits (including 10 replicates), while these were lowly expressed in anthracnose-susceptible F423 fruits (10 replicates) (Figure 8b; Table S10; Figures S1 and S2). The morphology of leaves and fruits can be seen in the Xiangling and Shaanhe 5 cultivars, as shown in Figure 8c,d. To verify the transcriptome data, we found that there were three genes that were highly expressed in the Xiangling cultivar. We performed a qPCR analysis to verify these results. Based on our real-time PCR results, we observed that JrWRKY83 (23-fold), JrWRKY73 (10-fold) and JrWRKY74 (11-fold) were highly expressed in resistance traits compared to non-resistance traits, including leaf and fruit (Figure 8e,f; Table S11).
Figure 8

The expression profile of WRKY gene family in walnut: (a) the highly expressed genes among different tissues of walnut; IF6: immature fruit; FL3: pistillate flower; FL6: mature pistillate flower; EM8: embryo; SE7: somatic embryo; VB5: vegetative bud; CE5: callus exterior; CK3: catkins; HC2: hull cortex; HU3: immature hull; HL1: immature hull; HL6: young hull; HP3: hull peel; LY2: immature leaf; LY7: young leaf; LE5: mature leaves; RT6: root. (b) Mean box plot of WRKY members between anthracnose-resistant F26 fruits (AR) and anthracnose-susceptible F423 fruits (AS); each black circle represents each sample. (c,d) The morphology of walnut leaf (resistance (Cultivar Xiangling) and non-resistance (Cultivar Shanhe5)) and fruit (resistance (Cultivar Xiangling) and non-resistance (Cultivar Shanhe5)). (e,f) Relative expression levels of WRKY genes in walnut leaf (resistant cultivar Xiangling and non-resistant cultivar Shanhe5, and fruit resistant cultivar Xiangling and non-resistant cultivar Shanhe5).

3.6. MicroRNA Targeting and WRKY Interaction Network

To understand the underlying regulatory mechanism of miRNAs involved in the regulation of WRKYs, we identified 206 putative miRNAs targeting 45 common walnut WRKY genes (Figure 9a; Tables S12–S14). The most target genes were JrWRKY65 and JrWRKY67, containing 197 miRNAs, while the least targeted gene was JrWRKY55, containing 62 miRNAs (Figure 9a; Tables S12–S14). Based on transcriptome profile and qPCR results, we selected JrWRKY73 and the related 85 miRNAs to construct a relationship network using Cytoscape software (Figure 9a; Table S15). Of these 85 miRNAs, we found that the miRNA family with the closest relationship was JrWRKY73, which was targeted by the Jre-miR156 family, including 12 miRNAs (Jre-miR156a, Jre-miR156b, Jre-miR156c, Jre-miR156d, Jre-miR156e, Jre-miR156f, Jre-miR156g, Jre-miR156h, Jre-miR156i, Jre-miR156j, Jre-miR156k, Jre-miR156l) (Figure 9a; Table S15). Each JrWRKYswas in close association with at least one WRKY protein from Arabidopsis. Some JrWRKYs proteins were closely aligned with the same WRKY protein in Arabidopsis. We downloaded WRKYs from Arabidopsis to detect the predicted role of highly expressed genes in the fruits and leaves of AR of Persian walnut. A previous study claimed that these genes regulate the development of fruits and are responsible for stress. Therefore, we detected the interaction relationship between these genes, and the results indicate a strong relationship between JrWRKY73s and AtCYP78A9, AtMPK6, AtMPK10, AtARF19 and AtCYP78A9 (Figure 9b).
Figure 9

(a) A schematic representation of the regulatory network relationships between the putative miRNAs and their targeted walnut WRKY genes. (b) JrWRKYs interaction network. JrWRKYs interaction network was constructed using Arabidopsis homologous WRKYs. Proteins are represented by network nodes. The 3D protein structure is displayed inside the nodes. Edges represent associations of proteins.

4. Discussions

4.1. The Gene Family Member among Plants

WRKY plays a critical role in plant growth, development and resistance. Recently, there have been reports on the functional analysis of WRKY genes in plants [3,7,8,10,22,30,31]. However, their complex polyploidy and lack of genomic information have limited further study. WRKY is a large gene family in the plant kingdom, and the number of genes in the family varies from 48 to 148. This study demonstrated that the WRKY gene family contained 103 members in walnut. Comparative analysis showed that the number of WRKY genes in each plant was not determined the genome size of each plant; for instance, the maize genome was about 2300 Mb, the Arabidopsis genome was about 125 Mb and the rice genome was about 389 Mb, while the common walnut was about 584 Mb. As such, genome size was not the main determiner of the number of gene families [60,61] (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 4). The WRKY gene family in walnut may also have a basic capacity to resist stress from cold, salt and disease [31]. Recently, some studies have shown that the WRKY gene is localized to the nucleus [62,63]. Our results also show that all 103 WRKY genes were predicted to be in the nucleus of common walnut (Table 1).

4.2. The Evolution of WRKY Gene Family in Walnut

The WRKY gene family in walnut can be divided into four groups, similar to the classification of WRKY genes in Musa acuminate and Musa balbisiana, Castor bean, pineapple, soybean, C. sinensis, C. clementina and C. unshiu, Eucalyptus grandis, Quinoa, Dimocarpus longan, Raphanus sativus, potato, moso bamboo, G. raimondii and G. arboretum, Cassava, willow, Oryza officinalis, peach and Dendrobium officinale. The division of the family in such a manner suggests that the results of our classification were reasonable and reliable [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. In view of the conserved motifs, motifs 5, 9, 1, 2, 8, 10 and 7 were the typical motifs of group I; motifs 1 and 2 were the typical motifs of group II; and motifs 4, 1 and 2 were the typical motifs of group III. This result is consistent with our pervious study (Figure 2) [2]. Despite strong conservation of their DNA-binding domain, the overall structures of WRKYs are highly divergent and can be categorized into distinct groups, which reflects their different functions [62]. The intron and exon structures of a gene family always provide clues that demonstrate its evolution [63]. The coding sequence position and length of a single gene are always determined by intron positions, which contribute to the protein diversity caused evolution [63,64,65,66]. Duplication modes of genes, such as WGD or segmental duplication, tandem duplication and dispersed duplication, are characteristic features of the evolution of eukaryotic genomes [67]. Tandem and segmental duplication events played a critical role in the expansion of the WRKY gene family [8,9,24,28,68]. Whole-genome duplication events are common during angiosperm evolution and usually lead to the expansion of gene families [5,60]. In walnut, we found no tandem or segmental duplication events. This strongly indicates that the WRKY gene family members of walnut are predominantly influenced by WGD events, a finding that is consistent with previous studies [8,9,24,28,60,61] (Figure 3, Figure 5 and Figure 6).

4.3. The Function of WRKY Gene Family

The WRKY gene family is involved in many important biology processes, though the most important are response to abiotic stresses, pathogen defense, senescence and trichome development [3,7,8,10,22,30,31,63]. There were 20% (4/20) GO biological process pathways and 50% (1/2) KEGG pathways that were enriched in resistance pathways, which is consistent with previous studies claiming that WRKY genes work against abiotic and biotic stresses [30,31]. We were interested in WRKY genes that regulate the development of resistance traits; therefore, we analyzed public transcriptome data for J. regia (Table S1, Figure 8) and discovered that many family members were highly expressed in the hull. The hull is always impacted by stress [52,69], indicating that WRKYs may be responsible for conferring stress resistance in walnut (Figure 8) [30,31]. With the transcriptome data of AR fruits and AS fruits, we investigated the expression profile between these two fruits; three genes, JrWRKY83, JrWRKY732 and JrWRKY74, were highly expressed in AR fruits, indicating that these three genes increased their expression level when infected by the stress of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, which predominantly affects walnut anthracnose through C. gloeosporioides can cause leaf scorches or defoliation, as well as fruit gangrene, which is currently the most challenging disease in walnut production [52,69,70]. In line with previous studies, we collected leaves and fruits infected by C. gloeosporioides. Regarding our real-time PCR results, JrWRKY83, JrWRKY732 and JrWRKY74 were induced by C. gloeosporioides stress in the leaves and root tissues of walnut cultivars. JrWRKY83, JrWRKY732 and JrWRKY74 were more upregulated in response to C. gloeosporioides stress. In recent years, many studies have shown that miRNAs in plants respond primarily to stress by regulating the expression of genes associated with stress [71]. In terms of WRKY, some researchers have reported that Md-miR156ab and Md-miR395 resulted in a significant reduction in MdWRKYN1 and MdWRKY26 expression [72]. HaWRKY6 is a particularly divergent WRKY gene exhibiting a putative target site for the miR396; thus, the possible post-transcriptional regulation of HaWRKY6 by miR396 was investigated [73]. In our study, we found that 12 miRNAs of the miRNA156 family targeted the potentially resistant gene JrWRKY73, and we also reported that Md-miR156ab targeted WRKY transcription factors to influence apple resistance to leaf spot disease [72]. The diverse patterns of microRNA targeting WRKY genes indicate that the networks of microRNA156 and JrWRKY73 may be key regulator networks for the WRKY gene family in common walnut. The results of the interaction indicate a strong relationship between JrWRKY73 and AtCYP78A9 [74], AtMPK6 [75], AtMPK10 [76] and AtARF19 [77]. AtCYP78A9 induces large and seedless fruit in Arabidopsis, indicating that JrWRKY73 may participate in the development of walnut fruits [74]. JrWRKY73 interacts with AtMPK10 and AtMPK13, while AtMKK6 and AtMPK4 activate AtMPK13 and interact with AtMPK12 in yeast cells, indicating that they may have the same function [76]. JrWRKY73 interacts with the activator of a cholera toxin known as AtARF19, indicating that JrWRKY73 may have the same function [77]. JrWRKY73 showed a higher expression level in AS fruits when induced by C. gloeosporioides stress, which was consistent with previous studies reporting that ATMPK6 was involved in distinct signal transduction pathways responding to these environmental stresses [75]. These protein interactions showed that JrWRKY73 may play a key role in fruit development, yeast cells, activation of a cholera toxin and resistance in walnut. However, when combined with the expression profile, miRNA-targeted network and protein interacted network, the results showed that JrWRKY73 played critical role in walnut defense. Moreover, these findings could lay a theoretical foundation for the functional study of JrWRKYs and the further construction of common walnut resistance regulation networks.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we identified 103 WRKY genes in walnut. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the WRKY genes could be grouped into four groups (Figure 1). These walnut WRKY genes are distributed on 16 different chromosomes (Figure 2). A phylogenetic analysis and synteny analysis showed that this gene family was conserved in evolution (Figure 3, Figure 5 and Figure 6). Tissue expression profiles of the WRKY genes demonstrated that the WRKY gene family might play a vital role in resistance traits (Figure 8). Three genes (JrWRKY83, JrWRKY73 and JrWRKY74) were highly expressed in resistant cultivars compared to susceptible varieties (Figure 8). Furthermore, 206 putative miRNAs targeting 45 common walnut WRKY genes, especially JrWRKY73, were targeted by the Jre-miR156 family, including 12 miRNAs, and it was reported that this miRNA family could target WRKY genes to enhance disease resistance in plants. JrWRKY73 interact with four genes AtCYP78A9, AtMPK6, AtMPK10 and AtARF19, indicating that JrWRKY73 plays a crucial role in plant defense (Figure 9).
  70 in total

1.  CDD/SPARCLE: the conserved domain database in 2020.

Authors:  Shennan Lu; Jiyao Wang; Farideh Chitsaz; Myra K Derbyshire; Renata C Geer; Noreen R Gonzales; Marc Gwadz; David I Hurwitz; Gabriele H Marchler; James S Song; Narmada Thanki; Roxanne A Yamashita; Mingzhang Yang; Dachuan Zhang; Chanjuan Zheng; Christopher J Lanczycki; Aron Marchler-Bauer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Functional modification of a 21-kilodalton G protein when ADP-ribosylated by exoenzyme C3 of Clostridium botulinum.

Authors:  E J Rubin; D M Gill; P Boquet; M R Popoff
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  The Arabidopsis NFYA5 transcription factor is regulated transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally to promote drought resistance.

Authors:  Wen-Xue Li; Youko Oono; Jianhua Zhu; Xin-Jian He; Jian-Min Wu; Kei Iida; Xiao-Yan Lu; Xinping Cui; Hailing Jin; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Genome-Wide analysis of aluminum-activated malate transporter family genes in six rosaceae species, and expression analysis and functional characterization on malate accumulation in Chinese white pear.

Authors:  Xu Linlin; Qiao Xin; Zhang Mingyue; Zhang Shaoling
Journal:  Plant Sci       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 4.729

5.  Genome-wide characterization of the WRKY gene family in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) reveals its critical functions under different abiotic stresses.

Authors:  Bernard Kinuthia Karanja; Lianxue Fan; Liang Xu; Yan Wang; Xianwen Zhu; Mingjia Tang; Ronghua Wang; Fei Zhang; Everlyne M'mbone Muleke; Liwang Liu
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.570

6.  Genome-wide identification of WRKY genes and their expression profiles under different abiotic stresses in Elaeis guineensis.

Authors:  Yong Xiao; Lixia Zhou; Xintao Lei; Hongxing Cao; Yong Wang; Yajing Dou; Wenqi Tang; Wei Xia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genome-wide investigation of WRKY gene family in pineapple: evolution and expression profiles during development and stress.

Authors:  Tao Xie; Chengjie Chen; Chuhao Li; Jiarou Liu; Chaoyang Liu; Yehua He
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Genes with a large intronic burden show greater evolutionary conservation on the protein level.

Authors:  Olga Gorlova; Alexey Fedorov; Christopher Logothetis; Christopher Amos; Ivan Gorlov
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Genome-wide identification of WRKY family genes in peach and analysis of WRKY expression during bud dormancy.

Authors:  Min Chen; Qiuping Tan; Mingyue Sun; Dongmei Li; Xiling Fu; Xiude Chen; Wei Xiao; Ling Li; Dongsheng Gao
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.291

10.  Identification of WRKY Gene Family from Dimocarpus longan and Its Expression Analysis during Flower Induction and Abiotic Stress Responses.

Authors:  Dengwei Jue; Xuelian Sang; Liqin Liu; Bo Shu; Yicheng Wang; Chengming Liu; Jianghui Xie; Shengyou Shi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  4 in total

1.  Genome-wide identification of the Liriodendron chinense WRKY gene family and its diverse roles in response to multiple abiotic stress.

Authors:  Weihuang Wu; Sheng Zhu; Lin Xu; Liming Zhu; Dandan Wang; Yang Liu; Siqin Liu; Zhaodong Hao; Ye Lu; Liming Yang; Jisen Shi; Jinhui Chen
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.215

2.  Genome-wide identification and characterization of PdbHLH transcription factors related to anthocyanin biosynthesis in colored-leaf poplar (Populus deltoids).

Authors:  Xiao-Jing Wang; Xu-Qian Peng; Xiao-Chun Shu; Yu-Hang Li; Zhong Wang; Wei-Bing Zhuang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Genome-wide identification of Cymbidium sinense WRKY gene family and the importance of its Group III members in response to abiotic stress.

Authors:  Yong-Lu Wei; Jian-Peng Jin; Di Liang; Jie Gao; Jie Li; Qi Xie; Chu-Qiao Lu; Feng-Xi Yang; Gen-Fa Zhu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Genome-Wide Identification and Analysis of the WRKY Gene Family and Cold Stress Response in Acer truncatum.

Authors:  Yan Li; Xiang Li; Jiatong Wei; Kewei Cai; Hongzhi Zhang; Lili Ge; Zengjun Ren; Chunli Zhao; Xiyang Zhao
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.096

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.