Literature DB >> 34571162

Identifying brain regions supporting amygdalar functionality: Application of a novel graph theory technique.

Melanie A Matyi1, Sebastian M Cioaba2, Marie T Banich3, Jeffrey M Spielberg4.   

Abstract

Effective amygdalar functionality depends on the concerted activity of a complex network of regions. Thus, the role of the amygdala cannot be fully understood without identifying the set of brain structures that allow the processes performed by the amygdala to emerge. However, this identification has yet to occur, hampering our ability to understand both normative and pathological processes that rely on the amygdala. We developed and applied novel graph theory methods to diffusion-based anatomical networks in a large sample (n = 1,052, 54.28% female, mean age=28.75) to identify nodes that critically support amygdalar interactions with the larger brain network. We examined three graph properties, each indexing a different emergent aspect of amygdalar network communication: current-flow betweenness centrality (amygdalar influence on information flowing between other pairs of nodes), node communicability (clarity of communication between the amygdala and other nodes), and subgraph centrality (amygdalar influence over local network processing). Findings demonstrate that each of these aspects of amygdalar communication is associated with separable sets of regions and, in some cases, these sets map onto previously identified sub-circuits. For example, betweenness and communicability were each associated with different sub-circuits that have been identified in previous work as supporting distinct aspects of memory-guided behavior. Other regions identified span basic (e.g., visual cortex) to higher-order (e.g., insula) sensory processing and executive functions (e.g., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex). Present findings expand our current understanding of amygdalar function by showing that there is no single 'amygdala network', but rather multiple networks, each supporting different modes of amygdalar interaction with the larger brain network. Additionally, our novel method allowed for the identification of how such regions support the amygdala, which has not been previously explored.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amygdala; Brain network; Graph theory

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34571162      PMCID: PMC8802335          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  61 in total

Review 1.  The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Kristen A Lindquist; Tor D Wager; Hedy Kober; Eliza Bliss-Moreau; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Reproducibility and intercorrelation of graph theoretical measures in structural brain connectivity networks.

Authors:  Timo Roine; Ben Jeurissen; Daniele Perrone; Jan Aelterman; Wilfried Philips; Jan Sijbers; Alexander Leemans
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Direct diffusion-based parcellation of the human thalamus.

Authors:  Vinod Kumar; Sarah Mang; Wolfgang Grodd
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 4.  Emotion processing and the amygdala: from a 'low road' to 'many roads' of evaluating biological significance.

Authors:  Luiz Pessoa; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 5.  Anxious brain networks: A coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity studies in anxiety.

Authors:  Jie Xu; Nicholas T Van Dam; Chunliang Feng; Yuejia Luo; Hui Ai; Ruolei Gu; Pengfei Xu
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Human Connectome Project informatics: quality control, database services, and data visualization.

Authors:  Daniel S Marcus; Michael P Harms; Abraham Z Snyder; Mark Jenkinson; J Anthony Wilson; Matthew F Glasser; Deanna M Barch; Kevin A Archie; Gregory C Burgess; Mohana Ramaratnam; Michael Hodge; William Horton; Rick Herrick; Timothy Olsen; Michael McKay; Matthew House; Michael Hileman; Erin Reid; John Harwell; Timothy Coalson; Jon Schindler; Jennifer S Elam; Sandra W Curtiss; David C Van Essen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A functional MRI study of amygdala responses to angry schematic faces in social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Karleyton C Evans; Christopher I Wright; Michelle M Wedig; Andrea L Gold; Mark H Pollack; Scott L Rauch
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.505

8.  Model-based analysis of multishell diffusion MR data for tractography: how to get over fitting problems.

Authors:  Saad Jbabdi; Stamatios N Sotiropoulos; Alexander M Savio; Manuel Graña; Timothy E J Behrens
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Exploring the morphospace of communication efficiency in complex networks.

Authors:  Joaquín Goñi; Andrea Avena-Koenigsberger; Nieves Velez de Mendizabal; Martijn P van den Heuvel; Richard F Betzel; Olaf Sporns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluation and statistical inference for human connectomes.

Authors:  Franco Pestilli; Jason D Yeatman; Ariel Rokem; Kendrick N Kay; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  1 in total

1.  Graph Theory Analysis of the Cortical Functional Network During Sleep in Patients With Depression.

Authors:  Yingjie Song; Kejie Wang; Yu Wei; Yongpeng Zhu; Jinfeng Wen; Yuxi Luo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.755

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.