| Literature DB >> 34568082 |
He Yan1, Jun Feng1,2, Jian-Hai Yin1, Fang Huang1, Xiang-Li Kong3, Kang-Ming Lin4, Tao Zhang5, Xin-Yu Feng1, Shui-Sen Zhou1, Jian-Ping Cao1,2, Zhi-Gui Xia1.
Abstract
Background: Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is recommended for intermittent preventive treatment in Africa against Plasmodium falciparum infection. However, increasing SP resistance (SPR) of P. falciparum affects the therapeutic efficacy of SP, and pfdhfr (encoding dihydrofolate reductase) and pfdhps (encoding dihydropteroate synthase) genes are widely used as molecular markers for SPR surveillance. In the present study, we analyzed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of pfdhfr and pfdhps in P. falciparum isolated from infected Chinese migrant workers returning from Africa.Entities:
Keywords: Plasmodium falciparum; dihydrofolate reductase; dihydropteroate synthase; migrants from Africa; sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34568082 PMCID: PMC8456993 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.673194
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Figure 1Sample collection and distribution, samples collection sites and sample screening and follow-up analysis of subject patterns.
Prevalence of pfdhfr and pfdhps polymorphisms in imported African isolates.
| Gene | Position | Wild type | Mutant type | Mutant isolates(n) | Frequency(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 51 | AAT | ATT | 138 | 86.79 |
| 59 | TGT | 143 | 89.94 | ||
| 108 | AGC | A | 156 | 98.11 | |
|
| 431 | ATA | 12 | 7.55 | |
| 436 | TCT | 43 | 27.04 | ||
| 437 | GCT | G | 15 | 9.43 | |
| 540 | AAA | 44 | 27.67 | ||
| 581 | GCG | G | 14 | 8.81 | |
| 613 | GCC | 3 | 1.89 |
The bold values stand for mutant nucleic acid base.
Prevalence of pfdhfr and pfdhps haplotypes.
| Gene | Genotype | Mutations | Sample size | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| NCS | 0 | 3 | 1.89% |
| NC | 1 | 3 | 1.89% | |
| 2 | 10 | 6.29% | ||
| N | 2 | 15 | 9.43% | |
|
| 3 | 128 | 80.50% | |
|
| ISAKAA | 0 | 63 | 39.62% |
| ISA | 1 | 41 | 25.79% | |
| I | 1 | 24 | 15.09% | |
| IS | 1 | 6 | 3.77% | |
| ISAK | 1 | 2 | 1.26% | |
| 2 | 2 | 1.26% | ||
| I | 2 | 7 | 4.40% | |
| ISA | 2 | 2 | 1.26% | |
| I | 2 | 1 | 0.63% | |
| I | 2 | 1 | 0.63% | |
| 3 | 8 | 5.03% | ||
| 3 | 1 | 0.63% | ||
| 4 | 1 | 0.63% |
The bold values stand for mutant nucleic acid base.
Geographical genetic analysis of pfdhfr/pfdhps genotypes.
| Region | No. samples | Country | No. samples | No. of mutations | No. of genotypes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Africa | 2 | Libya | 1 | 3 | IRN/ISAKAA | 1 |
| Sudan | 1 | 3 | 1 | |||
| East Africa | 23 | Kenya | 1 | 3 | 1 | |
| Madagascar | 2 | 2 | N | 2 | ||
| Ethiopia | 3 | 3 | 1 | |||
| 4 | 1 | |||||
| 4 | 1 | |||||
| Zambia | 4 | 3 | N | 1 | ||
| 4 | 3 | |||||
| Uganda | 6 | 4 | 6 | |||
| Mozambique | 7 | 2 | ICN/ISAKAA | 1 | ||
| 4 | 6 | |||||
| West Africa | 54 | Mali | 1 | 3 | 1 | |
| Sierra Leone | 2 | 2 | NC | 1 | ||
| 3 | 1 | |||||
| Guinea | 2 | 3 | 1 | |||
| 4 | 1 | |||||
| Liberia | 3 | 1 | NC | 1 | ||
| 4 | 2 | |||||
| Cote d'lvoire | 8 | 0 | NCS/ISAKAA | 1 | ||
| 2 | N | 1 | ||||
| 3 | 2 | |||||
| 4 | 3 | |||||
| 4 | 1 | |||||
| Ghana | 16 | 1 | NCS/I | 1 | ||
| 2 | N | 1 | ||||
| 3 | 3 | |||||
| 3 | 1 | |||||
| 3 | N | 1 | ||||
| 4 | 3 | |||||
| 4 | 2 | |||||
| 4 | 1 | |||||
| 4 | N | 1 | ||||
| 5 | 1 | |||||
| 5 | 1 | |||||
| Nigeria | 22 | 2 | N | 1 | ||
| 3 | 6 | |||||
| 4 | 5 | |||||
| 4 | 1 | |||||
| 5 | 1 | |||||
| 5 | 1 | |||||
| 5 | N | 1 | ||||
| 6 | 6 | |||||
| Central Africa | 80 | Chad | 1 | 6 | 1 | |
| Central Africa | 3 | 2 | N | 2 | ||
| 3 | 1 | |||||
| Congo | 4 | 2 | N | 2 | ||
| 3 | 2 | |||||
| Equatorial Guinea | 6 | 3 | 3 | |||
| 4 | 1 | |||||
| 5 | 1 | |||||
| 6 | 1 | |||||
| Gabon | 10 | 3 | 7 | |||
| 4 | 3 | |||||
| Angola | 14 | 2 | 2 | |||
| 2 | NC | 1 | ||||
| 3 | 4 | |||||
| 4 | 2 | |||||
| 4 | 1 | |||||
| 4 | 3 | |||||
| 4 | 1 | |||||
| Cameroon | 14 | 3 | 5 | |||
| 4 | 4 | |||||
| 4 | 1 | |||||
| 5 | 2 | |||||
| 5 | 1 | |||||
| 6 | 1 | |||||
| DR Congo | 28 | 2 | 1 | |||
| 2 | N | 1 | ||||
| 3 | 6 | |||||
| 3 | N | 1 | ||||
| 3 | 3 | |||||
| 4 | 1 | |||||
| 4 | 3 | |||||
| 4 | 1 | |||||
| 4 | 9 | |||||
| 5 | 2 |
Figure 2Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis of pfdhfr and pfdhps SNPs. For the pfdhfr gene, the single amino acid mutations were N51I, C59R, and S108N, respectively. Likewise, pfdhps gene are related to the mutations S436A, A437G, K540E, and A613S, respectively. The dark and light red squares indicate a linkage that was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Cambridge blue squares indicate a linkage that is present but is not statistically significant (P > 0.05). A white square with indicates that no linkage is present.