| Literature DB >> 29192183 |
Priyanka Patel1,2, Praveen K Bharti1, Devendra Bansal3, Nazia A Ali1, Rajive K Raman4, Pradyumna K Mohapatra5, Rakesh Sehgal6, Jagadish Mahanta5, Ali A Sultan3, Neeru Singh7.
Abstract
Antimalarial drug resistance is a major global challenge in malaria control and elimination. Mutations in six different genes of Plasmodium falciparum (crt, mdr1, dhfr, dhps, ATPase6 and K-13 propeller) that confer resistance to chloroquine, sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine and artemisinin-based combination therapy were analyzed in samples from Chhattisgarh. Seventy-eight percent of the samples were found to have a pfcrt mutation (53% double, 24% triple and 1% single mutant), and 59% of pfmdr1 genes were found to have an N86Y mutation. Double mutations were recorded in pfdhfr gene among 76% of the samples while only 6% of the samples harbored mutant genotypes in pfdhps. No mutation was found in the K-13 propeller gene, while only one sample showed a mutant genotype for the PfATPase6 gene. The Tajima test confirmed that there is no role of evolutionary natural selection in drug resistance, and gene pairwise linkage of disequilibrium showed significant intragenic association. The high level of pfcrt mutations suggests that parasite resistance to chloroquine is almost at a fixed level, whereas resistance to SP is evolving in the population and parasites remain sensitive to artemisinin derivatives. These findings provide potential information and understanding of the evolution and spread of different drug resistance alleles in Chhattisgarh.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29192183 PMCID: PMC5709362 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16866-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Demographic characteristics of the study patients.
| Parameter | Value (n = 180) |
|---|---|
| Sex [no (%)] | |
| Male | 87 (48.33) |
| Female | 93 (51.67) |
| Age Category [no(%)] [mean ± SD] | |
| 0–4 Years | 24 (13.33) |
| 2.92 ± 0.19 | |
| >4–8 years | 24 (13.33) |
| 6.63 ± 0.22 | |
| >8–14 Years | 31 (17.22) |
| 11.55 ± 0.23 | |
| >14 Years | 101 (56.11) 30.44 ± 1.29 |
| Parasite Count [no/µl] | |
| Mean | 5827.05 |
| Range | 31.9–176720 |
| SD | ±17294.85 |
| 95% CI | 3283.29–8370.80 |
Mutation analysis of pfcrt, pfmdr1, pfdhfr, pfdhps, pfATPase6, and K13 genes in the study population.
| Candidate gene | Occurrence of mutation | Haplotype diversity | Nucleotide diversity | Test of neutrality Tajima’s D | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | 95% CI | π | Ɵ | |||
|
| 0.615 | 0.01102 | 0.00987 | 0.28315 | ||
| C72V73M74N75K76 | 32 (22.38) | 15.84–30.10 | ||||
| C72V73M74N75
| 1 (0.70) | 0.02–3.84 | ||||
|
| 76 (53.15) | 44.63–61.53 | ||||
| C72V73
| 34 (23.78) | 17.06–31.60 | ||||
|
| 0.486 | 0.00108 | 0.00039 | 1.83461 | ||
| N86 | 66 (40.74) | 33.10–48.73 | ||||
|
| 96 (59.26) | 51.27–66.90 | ||||
|
| 0.375 | 0.00122 | 0.00060 | 1.43780 | ||
| A16N51C59S108I164 | 36 (22.09) | 15.97–29.24 | ||||
| A16N51
| 1 (0.61) | 0.02–3.37 | ||||
| A16N51C59
| 2 (1.27) | 0.15–4.36 | ||||
| A16N51
| 124 (76.07) | 68.78–82.40 | ||||
|
| 0.106 | 0.00038 | 0.00100 | −1.02426 | ||
| S436A437K540A581A613 | 154 (94.48) | 89.78–97.45 | ||||
| S436
| 5 (3.06) | 1.00–7.01 | ||||
|
| 4 (2.45) | 0.67–6.16 | ||||
|
| 0.014 | 0.00004 | 0.00048 | −0.98824 | ||
| Wild-type | 142 (99.30) | 96.17–99.98 | ||||
| Non-synonymous mutation | ||||||
| A2167G (I723V) | 1 (0.70) | 0.02–3.84 | ||||
|
| — | — | — | — | ||
| Wild-type | 143 (100.0) | — | ||||
Figure 1Mutation rates in P. falciparum genes (Pfcrt, Pfdhfr, Pfdhps and Pfmdr1) that confer resistance to antimalarials.
Figure 2(A) Prevalence of grouped Pfcrt/Pfmdr1 alleles in P. falciparum linked to chloroquine resistance from central India. (B) Prevalence of grouped Pfdhps/Pfdhfr alleles in P. falciparum linked to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance from central India.
Figure 3Linkage disequilibrium (LD) between pairs of SNPs located in four different genes (Pfcrt, Pfdhfr, Pfdhps and Pfmdr1) implicated in drug resistance in P. falciparum populations of Central India. The strength of LD between the SNPs was determined from the association of statistical significance by calculating the r2 values and represented by the darkness of the boxes.