Literature DB >> 29192183

Prevalence of mutations linked to antimalarial resistance in Plasmodium falciparum from Chhattisgarh, Central India: A malaria elimination point of view.

Priyanka Patel1,2, Praveen K Bharti1, Devendra Bansal3, Nazia A Ali1, Rajive K Raman4, Pradyumna K Mohapatra5, Rakesh Sehgal6, Jagadish Mahanta5, Ali A Sultan3, Neeru Singh7.   

Abstract

Antimalarial drug resistance is a major global challenge in malaria control and elimination. Mutations in six different genes of Plasmodium falciparum (crt, mdr1, dhfr, dhps, ATPase6 and K-13 propeller) that confer resistance to chloroquine, sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine and artemisinin-based combination therapy were analyzed in samples from Chhattisgarh. Seventy-eight percent of the samples were found to have a pfcrt mutation (53% double, 24% triple and 1% single mutant), and 59% of pfmdr1 genes were found to have an N86Y mutation. Double mutations were recorded in pfdhfr gene among 76% of the samples while only 6% of the samples harbored mutant genotypes in pfdhps. No mutation was found in the K-13 propeller gene, while only one sample showed a mutant genotype for the PfATPase6 gene. The Tajima test confirmed that there is no role of evolutionary natural selection in drug resistance, and gene pairwise linkage of disequilibrium showed significant intragenic association. The high level of pfcrt mutations suggests that parasite resistance to chloroquine is almost at a fixed level, whereas resistance to SP is evolving in the population and parasites remain sensitive to artemisinin derivatives. These findings provide potential information and understanding of the evolution and spread of different drug resistance alleles in Chhattisgarh.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29192183      PMCID: PMC5709362          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16866-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Malaria is a global public health problem, and India alone contributes to 89% of malaria cases in the southeast region[1]. Chhattisgarh State (Central India) is the second most highly malarious state, contributing 14% of the total country’s malaria cases with more than 80% of Plasmodium falciparum infections[2]. Over the past decade, the total number of malaria cases and deaths due to malaria has progressively decreased in most of the countries where malaria is endemic[1]. This significant gain has become possible with multisector efforts including the use of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACT). In India, the combination of artesunate and sulphadoxinepyrimethamine (AS + SP) is used as a first-line treatment for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria except in the northeastern states where artemether + lumefantrine is used. Furthermore, a recent rise in ACT resistance against P. falciparum in Cambodia and neighboring countries poses a serious threat to malaria control and elimination globally and in India[3,4]. Considering the evolution and spread of malaria, parasites resistant to different antimalarials such as chloroquine (CQ), sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), and an artemisinin derivative (ART) influence malaria’s epidemiological outcome and present a great challenge to malaria control programs[5-7]. Resistance to chloroquine has been found to be associated with mutations at several amino acid positions in the P. falciparum chloroquine-resistance transporter (pfcrt) and P. falciparum multidrug resistance (pfmdr1) genes[8]. Point mutations at codons 72–76 of pfcrt and N86Y, Y184F in pfmdr1 are known for chloroquine resistance[9,10]. Antifolate resistance has been associated with point mutations in the dihydrofolate reductase (pfdhfr) and dihydropteroate synthase (pfdhps) genes[11-13]. Point mutations at codons 16, 51, 59, 108 and 164 of pfdhfr inhibit its activity, and the parasite becomes resistant to pyrimethamine, while mutations at 436, 437, 540, 580 and 613 of pfdhps reduce the substrate binding capacity and confer resistance to sulphadoxine[14]. Polymorphisms of the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase ortholog in P. falciparum (PfATPase6) have been associated with ART resistance although the association of SNPs in pfatpase6 with resistance to ART is not yet fully confirmed[15,16]. However, recently, K-13 propeller (Pf3D7-1343700 kelch propeller) as a key molecular marker for ART resistance has been reported[17]. Tracking the pattern of mutations, estimating the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) level and assessing linkage among the SNPs in the population are the most efficient ways to understand the evolution of a particular gene[18]. Therefore, to achieve the goal of malaria elimination, molecular data on anti-malarial drug resistance with wide coverage in India, particularly in highly endemic states, is needed for proper implementation of antimalarial drug treatment policy. With this aim, we assessed the prevalence of point mutations involved in the antimalarial resistance genes pfcrt & pfmdr1 (for CQ), pfdhfr & pfdhps (for SP) and PfATPase6 & K-13 propeller (for ART) among P. falciparum samples from Chhattisgarh, Central India. The molecular data from this study could contribute to the comprehensive baseline information on antimalarial drug resistance prior to a malaria elimination phase in India.

Results

Demographic profile of the study population

A total of 6718 patients were screened; of these patients, 5.2% (n = 352) were found to be positive for malaria parasite {P. falciparum (n = 271), P. vivax (n = 79) or a mixed P. falciparum and P. vivax infection (n = 2)}. Of 271 P. falciparum patients, 180 polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive patients who fulfilled the enrolment criteria were included in the study (Table 1). The majority of the participants were from the tribal community (75%, n = 134).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics of the study patients.

ParameterValue (n = 180)
Sex [no (%)]
Male87 (48.33)
Female93 (51.67)
Age Category [no(%)] [mean ± SD]
0–4 Years24 (13.33)
2.92 ± 0.19
>4–8 years24 (13.33)
6.63 ± 0.22
>8–14 Years31 (17.22)
11.55 ± 0.23
>14 Years101 (56.11) 30.44 ± 1.29
Parasite Count [no/µl]
Mean5827.05
Range31.9–176720
SD±17294.85
95% CI3283.29–8370.80
Demographic characteristics of the study patients.

Molecular analysis of pfcrt & pfmdr1 genes

DNA was isolated from all the enrolled samples (n = 180), and analysis of pfcrt, pfmdr1, pfdhfr, pfdhps, PfATPase6 and K-13 propeller mutations was attempted using DNA sequencing methodology. A total of 143 samples were successfully analyzed for the pfcrt gene covering codons 44–177. Out of these, 78% of the samples were mutant genotypes, while only 22% were wild type (Table 2). In addition, codon K76T was found as a mutant position in all the mutant genotypes (NCBI GenBank database accession KY862117- KY862119). Fifty-three percent of isolates were found to be a double mutant at positions C72S and K76T followed by 24% triple mutants at codons M74I, N75E, K76T, and a single point mutation at K76T was observed in only 1% of samples (Fig. 1).
Table 2

Mutation analysis of pfcrt, pfmdr1, pfdhfr, pfdhps, pfATPase6, and K13 genes in the study population.

Candidate geneOccurrence of mutationHaplotype diversityNucleotide diversityTest of neutrality Tajima’s D
N (%)95% CIπƟ
pfcrt (n = 143)0.6150.011020.009870.28315
C72V73M74N75K76 32 (22.38)15.84–30.10
C72V73M74N75 T 76 1 (0.70)0.02–3.84
S 72V73M74N75 T 76 76 (53.15)44.63–61.53
C72V73 I 74 E 75 T 76 34 (23.78)17.06–31.60
pfmdr1 (n = 162)0.4860.001080.000391.83461
N86 66 (40.74)33.10–48.73
Y 86 96 (59.26)51.27–66.90
pfdhfr (n = 163)0.3750.001220.000601.43780
A16N51C59S108I164 36 (22.09)15.97–29.24
A16N51 R 59S108I164 1 (0.61)0.02–3.37
A16N51C59 N 108I164 2 (1.27)0.15–4.36
A16N51 R 59 N 108I164 124 (76.07)68.78–82.40
pfdhps (n = 163)0.1060.000380.00100−1.02426
S436A437K540A581A613 154 (94.48)89.78–97.45
S436 G 437K540A581A613 5 (3.06)1.00–7.01
A 436G437 E 540A581A613 4 (2.45)0.67–6.16
PfATPase6 (n = 143)0.0140.000040.00048−0.98824
Wild-type142 (99.30)96.17–99.98
Non-synonymous mutation
A2167G (I723V)1 (0.70)0.02–3.84
K13 (n = 143)
Wild-type143 (100.0)
Figure 1

Mutation rates in P. falciparum genes (Pfcrt, Pfdhfr, Pfdhps and Pfmdr1) that confer resistance to antimalarials.

Mutation analysis of pfcrt, pfmdr1, pfdhfr, pfdhps, pfATPase6, and K13 genes in the study population. Mutation rates in P. falciparum genes (Pfcrt, Pfdhfr, Pfdhps and Pfmdr1) that confer resistance to antimalarials. The pfmdr1 gene was amplified and analyzed from 162 samples, and 59% were found mutant at N86Y (Table 2). Combining the pfcrt and pfmdr1 mutations, only 18% of samples were found to be wild-type, and the majority (82%) were mutant genotypes (Fig. 2). Additionally, 27% of the samples harbored a double mutant (SVMNT) pfcrt genotype with mutant pfmdr1, and 7% had a triple mutant (CVIET) genotype with mutant pfmdr1 (NCBI GenBank database accession KY862127- KY862128).
Figure 2

(A) Prevalence of grouped Pfcrt/Pfmdr1 alleles in P. falciparum linked to chloroquine resistance from central India. (B) Prevalence of grouped Pfdhps/Pfdhfr alleles in P. falciparum linked to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance from central India.

(A) Prevalence of grouped Pfcrt/Pfmdr1 alleles in P. falciparum linked to chloroquine resistance from central India. (B) Prevalence of grouped Pfdhps/Pfdhfr alleles in P. falciparum linked to sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance from central India.

Analysis of pfdhfr and pfdhps mutations

A total of 163 P. falciparum samples were successfully amplified and analyzed for both the pfdhfr and pfdhps genes. Out of the five pfdhfr codon mutations (A16V, N51I, C59R, S108N/T and I164l) conferring pyrimethamine resistance, only two, C59R and S108N, were found in this study either as single mutants or in the form of a double mutant (Table 2). Only 22% of samples were found to be the wild-type genotype (A16N51C59S108I164). The majority (76%, n = 124) of samples were double mutants and only 2% (n = 3) of samples were single mutants (Fig. 1). A total 4 haplotypes were determined with haplotype diversity of 0.375 (NCBI GenBank database accession KY862120- KY862122). Out of the five pfdhps mutations (S436F/A, A437G, K540E, A581G AND A613 S/T) known to be involved in sulphadoxine resistance, three codons, S436A, A437G and K540E, were found to be mutant either as single or double mutants (Table 2). A low level (6%) of mutant genotypes (3% single and 3% double mutant) (Fig. 1) and a total of 3 haplotypes were found with 0.106 haplotype diversity (NCBI GenBank database accession KY862123- KY862126). Furthermore, the combined results for both pfdhfr and pfdhps showed that only 20% of samples were wild type. Quadruple mutations of pfdhfr (59,108) and pfdhps (436,540) were found in only 3% of isolates (Fig. 2).

Analysis of PfATPase6 and K-13 mutations

The PfATPase6 gene was successfully sequenced from the PCR products of 143 samples (79%, n = 143/180) and was analyzed by comparing with the reference strain 3D7 (Pf3D7_0106300) covering codons 653–797. The known SNPs, N683K and S769N substitutions, associated with ART resistance in the pfATPase6 gene were absent and genotyped as wild type (NCBI GenBank database accession KY862115-KY862116). However, only one sample with a non-synonymous mutation was found at nucleotide position A2167G, which covers codon I723V (Table 2). Additionally, the propeller region of the K-13 gene was successfully sequenced from 143P. falciparum samples. No polymorphism was found in any of the 17 locations in the K-13 propeller region covering codons 427–702 that confer resistance to ART (NCBI GenBank database accession KY862114). Furthermore, we extended our analysis, and Tajima’s D test of neutrality confirmed that there was no role of evolutionary natural selection in the drug resistance genes. However, pairwise LD estimation to assess the selection of P. falciparum resistance markers revealed a total of 34 possible pairs of SNPs with fine statistically significant intragenic associations, but no intragenic associations were found between different genes (Fig. 3).
Figure 3

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) between pairs of SNPs located in four different genes (Pfcrt, Pfdhfr, Pfdhps and Pfmdr1) implicated in drug resistance in P. falciparum populations of Central India. The strength of LD between the SNPs was determined from the association of statistical significance by calculating the r2 values and represented by the darkness of the boxes.

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) between pairs of SNPs located in four different genes (Pfcrt, Pfdhfr, Pfdhps and Pfmdr1) implicated in drug resistance in P. falciparum populations of Central India. The strength of LD between the SNPs was determined from the association of statistical significance by calculating the r2 values and represented by the darkness of the boxes.

Discussion

Drug resistance in P. falciparum malaria has become an important hurdle for malaria control and elimination globally. In 2010, ACT was implemented as a first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in India. Although artemisinin (ART) resistance has not appeared in India, its presence in Myanmar, 25 km away from the Indian border[4], generates concern about drug-resistant strains following the same historical corridor and spreading into India, as seen previously with other anti-malarials[19]. Hence, continuous monitoring or molecular surveillance of drug resistance is very important to provide early warning and to guide national drug policies. The emergence of drug-resistant parasites in India is quite alarming, as drug resistance against CQ and SP has already been circulating in the northeast and other parts of the country[5,6,19-21]. The availability of easy and rapid molecular methods is extremely useful for the detection of drug resistance and plays an important role in epidemiological surveys as well as in regular updating of antimalarial drug policy. We investigated mutations in the pfcrt, pfmdr1, pfdhfr, pfdhps, PfATPase6 and K-13 propeller genes of P. falciparum samples collected from Chhattisgarh, Central India, to determine the current extent of resistance to CQ, SP, and ART. A number of recent studies have shown reoccurrence of CQ sensitivity among P. falciparum populations after its withdrawal[22-24]. In the present study, we found four different haplotypes including 22% wild type (CQ sensitive), which is rarely observed throughout the country[25-27]. However, our findings corroborate recent reports (after 6 years of CQ withdrawal) where 20–40% of samples carried a wild-type haplotype[28,29], suggesting that CQ-sensitive P. falciparum strains might have returned after the withdrawal of CQ. In this study only one case of single point mutation (C72V73M74N75 T ) were found while majority of the cases (53%) were double mutant genotype (S V73M74N75 T ) which is already established to be the chloroquine resistant genotype[5]. We also found that 24% of samples carried triple mutations (C72V73 I 74 E 75 T 76 haplotype) known to confer higher resistance to CQ, suggesting a high level of CQ resistance still in the P. falciparum parasite population in this region. Moreover, in the pfmdr1 gene, a mutation at codon N86Y is known to contribute to CQ resistance[30], but the pfmdr1 gene has been found to correlate poorly with CQ resistance[31]. The prevalence of the N86Y mutation varies from 0 to 100% across the country[21,27,29,32,33]. In this study, 35% of samples had a mutant genotype of the pfcrt gene along with an N86Y pfmdr1 mutant genotype, which agrees with Djimde et al. 2001 who also reported that the N86Y mutation modulates a higher level of CQ resistance when present with the mutant K76T pfcrt genotype[34]. Mutations in the pfdhfr and pfdhps genes are associated with SP resistance and have been reported in most parts of the country[25,26,35-38]. In this study, a high level (78%) of the pfdhfr mutation (A16N51 R 59S108I164, A16N51C59 N 108I164, A16N51 R 59 N 108I164) and a low level (6%) of pfdhps mutations (S436 G 437K540A581A613, A 436G437 E 540A581A613) was recorded. This suggests a moderate degree of reduced susceptibility to SP and a low risk of treatment failure at the time of the study, as the authors have assessed the efficacy of artesunate + sulphadoxinepyrimethamine against uncomplicated P. falciparum and found 100% efficacy (unpublished data). Single point mutation among these genes is the only early sign of the improper action of the drugs, while double mutation (A16N51 R N I164) showed that the sensitivity of parasite against drug is decreasing and it might be responsible for drug resistance. However, the triple (A16N51 R N L ) and quadruple (A16 A R N I164) mutation in the Pfdhfr gene conferred the resistance against the drugs. In the presesent study, 3% of samples had a quadruple mutation (pfdhfr 59 + 108 and pfdhps 436 + 540), indicating that these parasite populations need one more SNP in pfdhfr to become resistant P. falciparum haplotypes[39]. It is worth mentioning that we did not find a single case of triple mutation in either the pfdhfr or pfdhps gene despite the high rate of malaria transmission in the region. ART resistance is considered a major risk to public health with the hazard of ART resistant parasites spreading from western Cambodia to the greater Mekong sub-region[17]. However, in India, artemisinin derivatives remain quite effective in treating malaria, but the presence of non-synonymous mutations in the propeller region and decreased drug efficacy are important deterrents in the fight against malaria[6,40-43]. Mutations in K-13 propeller have been identified as an important and putative molecular marker for ART resistance. Currently, 108 non-synonymous mutations from different geographic regions of the world[44] and four point mutations, i.e., Y493H, R539T, I543T and C580Y, have exhibited associations with ART resistance[17]. In addition, 13 other point mutations have also been associated with late parasite clearance[3,45,46]. Recently, K-13 propeller mutations have been reported in southeast countries[44] and Bangladesh[47]. However, in India, very limited polymorphism has been reported[7,42]; in the present study, all samples were found to be wild type, which agrees with a report from the West Bengal region[48]. Interestingly, in the PfATPase6 gene, one sample had a non-synonymous mutation at the I723V position, which is consistent with previous reports from India and Equatorial Guinea[39,49]. Furthermore, in the present study, the π value of nucleotide diversity was higher in the pfcrt gene and lower than that in the PfATPase6 gene. This confirmed that mutant alleles are fixed in the population; Chauhan et al. 2014 and Antony et al. 2016 reported similar findings among Indian isolates[29,33]. These data confirm that resistance against SP is low while resistance against ART was not observed in this study. We observed significant intragenic association among the pfcrt, pfdhfr and pfdhps genes, which is in agreement with previous reports from Odisha and Pondicherry states[18,29]. Additionally, no significant intergenic association was found in the SNPs of different genes; this finding, however, contrasts with Kar et al. 2016 who found strong intergenic associations with the pfcrt gene in combination with the pfmdr, pfdhfr and pfdhps genes[28]. Therefore, further large-scale genetic population studies are required to compare the LD association of different endemic malaria regions. The genotyping of drug resistance markers can reveal the efficacy of current treatment regime. Therefore, the data generated from this study can be used to improve the patient care and disease management and help researchers working on clinical efficacy of different antimalarials. The principle limitations of this study are that (i) we did not carry out an in vivo therapeutic efficacy study from the same site and that (ii) we did not correlate the clinical outcome with mutation patterns. However, there is no obvious bias in the sample collection, and these comprehensive molecular data are a representation of both past and present antimalarial drugs. The strengths of this study is the comprehensive use of sensitive and standardized assays, rendering our findings amenable to a detailed analysis of genetic polymorphisms responsible for antimalarial P. falciparum resistance genes from an area where malaria is a major health problem. In the present study, we aimed for such analysis to be relevant for epidemiologic investigations, and design of control measures for malaria control and subsequent to elimination.

Methods

Study area, population and sample collection

This study was carried out at Janakpur Community Health Care (CHC), district Baikunthpur, Chhattisgarh, Central India (23.7191°N, 81.7883°E and 550 M height above sea level). This is a secondary health care facility situated in a remote area of the district surrounded by dense forest (60%), and the majority (65%) of the population work mainly in forest nurseries and use traditional folk medicine for their treatment. P. falciparum is the predominant species followed by P. vivax, and both Anopheles culicifacies and A. fluviatilis are responsible for transmitting the disease in this area. The present study was carried out from August 2013 to March 2015, and symptomatic patients were screened for malaria parasites by microscopy using thick and thin blood smears stained with JSB stain. Patients having asexual stage of P. falciparum monoinfection with no other symptoms of severe malaria were included in this study. Patients have chronic infection of any other disease were excluded from the study. Patients were given the treatment with Artemisinin combination therapy (Artesunate plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine) as per national guideline (National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme) and this combination therapy is 100% efficacious for uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in this region. Intravenous blood samples, in sterile conditions, were collected from the patients positive for P. falciparum malaria after taking their written informed consent.

Ethical approval

The study protocol for patient participation and collection of blood samples for laboratory testing was reviewed and approved by the institutional ethics committee of NIRTH, Jabalpur. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. All study participants provided written informed consent prior to their participation according to Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India guidelines. A copy of the consent form in the local language was also provided and explained to the patients or the parents/guardian of children. The participation of other institutes was also approved by the ICMR.

Genomic DNA extraction and parasite genotyping

Genomic DNA was isolated by QIAamp DNA blood mini kit as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, CA, USA) and stored at −20 °C for further use. The K76T and N86Y mutations in the pfcrt and pfmdr1 genes, respectively, which are the primary determinant markers of CQ resistance, were targeted using nested PCR and Sanger sequencing. The pfcrt region covering codons 44–177 (582 bp) was performed as described earlier[5]. The pfmdr1 region covering codons 1–177 (521 bp) was sequenced as per protocol described earlier by Djimde et al. 2001[34]. Alleles of the pfdhfr and pfdhps genes, primary molecular markers for sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance, were amplified and analyzed as described previously[35,50]. The PCR amplification of the pfdhfr gene spanning codons 51–164 and pfdhps gene spanning codons 425–640 was carried out and the details of nested PCR primers and cycling conditions are given in the supplementary table. In brief, primary PCR was performed in a volume of 25 μL with 0.2 U of Taq polymerase enzyme (Invitrogen, life technologies), 0.2 mM each dNTP, 1 μM each primer and 1.5 mM MgCl2. The newly discovered molecular markers K-13 propeller [17] and PfATPase6 for tracking the emergence and spread of ART resistance in P. falciparum were determined. The PfATPase6 gene was amplified using single-step PCR covering codons 653–797 as described by Zhang G et al. 2008[51]. In this study all the amplicon sizes were less than 1Kb and positive control samples always provided correct sequences.

Nucleotide sequencing

The PCR products were purified from the agarose gel using a HiyieldTM gel/PCR DNA extraction kit according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. The gel-purified product was used with the ABI Big dye Terminator Ready Reaction Kit Version 3.1 for sequencing PCR. The sequencing PCR was performed in a volume of 20 μl with 1 μl of Terminator Ready Reaction Mix (TRR), 3.2 pmol of gene specific primer and 5X sequencing buffer. The cycling conditions for the sequencing PCR include 25 cycles of denaturation at 96 °C for 10 sec, annealing at 50 °C for 5 sec and extension at 60 °C for 4 min. The sequences were aligned and analyzed using Bio edit Sequence Alignment Editor v.7.0.5.2 software and online sequence alignment tool Clustal W.

Statistical analysis

Data were entered in Microsoft Excel and exported to Stata version 12.0 for analysis. Chi-square and Fischer exact tests were used where applicable to assess the relationship between single and multiple mutations. In addition, haplotype diversity[52] and nucleotide diversity (Ɵ & π) were estimated for each gene. The nucleotide diversity parameter π is estimated based on the average number of pairwise nucleotide differences per site[53] and Ɵ estimates are dependent on the number of segregating sites. All the parameters were estimated using DnaSP version 5.10.01. To determine the association between SNPs (present in pfcrt, pfmdr1, pfdhfr and pfdhps) in the population, both inter- and intragenic linkage disequilibrium (LD) tests were performed using the Haploview Software[54].

Conclusion

This was the first comprehensive molecular study carried out in this geographical area focusing on mutations of the pfcrt, pfmdr1, pfdhfr, pfdhps, PfATPase6 and K-13 propeller genes that were strongly associated with CQ, SP and ART resistance. This study showed a high level of CQ resistance genotypes, a moderate level of SP resistance and evolving SP resistance genotypes. Fortunately, no mutations were found against ART resistance.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Table S1
  49 in total

1.  Application of a molecular marker for surveillance of chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria.

Authors:  A Djimdé; O K Doumbo; R W Steketee; C V Plowe
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Monitoring the efficacy of antimalarial medicines in India via sentinel sites: Outcomes and risk factors for treatment failure.

Authors:  Neelima Mishra; Bina Srivastava; Ram Suresh Bharti; Roma Rana; Kamlesh Kaitholia; Anupkumar R Anvikar; Manoj Kumar Das; Susanta K Ghosh; Rajendra M Bhatt; Prajesh K Tyagi; Vas Dev; Sobhan Phookan; Suman Lata Wattal; Gagan Singh Sonal; Akshay Chand Dhariwal; Neena Valecha
Journal:  J Vector Borne Dis       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.688

3.  Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Chanaki Amaratunga; Benoit Witkowski; Nimol Khim; Didier Menard; Rick M Fairhurst
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria.

Authors:  Frédéric Ariey; Benoit Witkowski; Chanaki Amaratunga; Johann Beghain; Anne-Claire Langlois; Nimol Khim; Saorin Kim; Valentine Duru; Christiane Bouchier; Laurence Ma; Pharath Lim; Rithea Leang; Socheat Duong; Sokunthea Sreng; Seila Suon; Char Meng Chuor; Denis Mey Bout; Sandie Ménard; William O Rogers; Blaise Genton; Thierry Fandeur; Olivo Miotto; Pascal Ringwald; Jacques Le Bras; Antoine Berry; Jean-Christophe Barale; Rick M Fairhurst; Françoise Benoit-Vical; Odile Mercereau-Puijalon; Didier Ménard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Spread of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ashley; Mehul Dhorda; Rick M Fairhurst; Chanaki Amaratunga; Parath Lim; Seila Suon; Sokunthea Sreng; Jennifer M Anderson; Sivanna Mao; Baramey Sam; Chantha Sopha; Char Meng Chuor; Chea Nguon; Siv Sovannaroth; Sasithon Pukrittayakamee; Podjanee Jittamala; Kesinee Chotivanich; Kitipumi Chutasmit; Chaiyaporn Suchatsoonthorn; Ratchadaporn Runcharoen; Tran Tinh Hien; Nguyen Thanh Thuy-Nhien; Ngo Viet Thanh; Nguyen Hoan Phu; Ye Htut; Kay-Thwe Han; Kyin Hla Aye; Olugbenga A Mokuolu; Rasaq R Olaosebikan; Olaleke O Folaranmi; Mayfong Mayxay; Maniphone Khanthavong; Bouasy Hongvanthong; Paul N Newton; Marie A Onyamboko; Caterina I Fanello; Antoinette K Tshefu; Neelima Mishra; Neena Valecha; Aung Pyae Phyo; Francois Nosten; Poravuth Yi; Rupam Tripura; Steffen Borrmann; Mahfudh Bashraheil; Judy Peshu; M Abul Faiz; Aniruddha Ghose; M Amir Hossain; Rasheda Samad; M Ridwanur Rahman; M Mahtabuddin Hasan; Akhterul Islam; Olivo Miotto; Roberto Amato; Bronwyn MacInnis; Jim Stalker; Dominic P Kwiatkowski; Zbynek Bozdech; Atthanee Jeeyapant; Phaik Yeong Cheah; Tharisara Sakulthaew; Jeremy Chalk; Benjamas Intharabut; Kamolrat Silamut; Sue J Lee; Benchawan Vihokhern; Chanon Kunasol; Mallika Imwong; Joel Tarning; Walter J Taylor; Shunmay Yeung; Charles J Woodrow; Jennifer A Flegg; Debashish Das; Jeffery Smith; Meera Venkatesan; Christopher V Plowe; Kasia Stepniewska; Philippe J Guerin; Arjen M Dondorp; Nicholas P Day; Nicholas J White
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Therapeutic efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria from three highly malarious states in India.

Authors:  Praveen K Bharti; Man M Shukla; Pascal Ringwald; Sri Krishna; Pushpendra P Singh; Ajay Yadav; Sweta Mishra; Usha Gahlot; Jai P Malaiya; Amit Kumar; Shambhu Prasad; Pradeep Baghel; Mohan Singh; Jaiprakash Vadadi; Mrigendra P Singh; Maria Dorina G Bustos; Leonard I Ortega; Eva-Maria Christophel; Sher S Kashyotia; Gagan S Sonal; Neeru Singh
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.979

7.  Molecular surveillance of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance in the Republic of Congo: four and nine years after the introduction of artemisinin-based combination therapy.

Authors:  Felix Koukouikila-Koussounda; Sankarganesh Jeyaraj; Christian N Nguetse; Charles Nchotebah Nkonganyi; Kossiwa Clarisse Kokou; Mandingha K Etoka-Beka; Francine Ntoumi; Thirumalaisamy P Velavan
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.979

8.  No PfATPase6 S769N mutation found in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from China.

Authors:  Guoqing Zhang; Yayi Guan; Bin Zheng; Song Wu; Linhua Tang
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  Polymorphism in drug resistance genes dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase in Plasmodium falciparum in some states of India.

Authors:  Divya Sharma; Manila Lather; Prashant K Mallick; Tridibes Adak; Amita S Dang; Neena Valecha; Om P Singh
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Characterization of drug resistance associated genetic polymorphisms among Plasmodium falciparum field isolates in Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Authors:  Ashish Pathak; Andreas Mårtensson; Sudhir Gawariker; Jagdish Mandliya; Ashish Sharma; Vishal Diwan; Johan Ursing
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.979

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Molecular assays for determining sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine drug resistance in India: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shradha Bhullar; Neelima Mishra
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 2.383

Review 2.  Diagnosing the drug resistance signature in Plasmodium falciparum: a review from contemporary methods to novel approaches.

Authors:  Laxman Kumar Murmu; Arpita Arsmika Sahu; Tapan Kumar Barik
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2021-01-07

3.  Artemisinin combination therapy fails even in the absence of Plasmodium falciparum kelch13 gene polymorphism in Central India.

Authors:  Sabyasachi Das; Amrita Kar; Subhankar Manna; Samaresh Mandal; Sayantani Mandal; Subhasis Das; Bhaskar Saha; Amiya Kumar Hati
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Status of Artemisinin Resistance in Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum from Molecular Analyses of the Kelch13 Gene in Southwestern Nigeria.

Authors:  Mary Aigbiremo Oboh; Daouda Ndiaye; Hiasindh Ashmi Antony; Aida Sadikh Badiane; Upasana Shyamsunder Singh; Nazia Anwar Ali; Praveen Kumar Bharti; Aparup Das
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Molecular surveillance of putative drug resistance markers of antifolate and artemisinin among imported Plasmodium falciparum in Qatar.

Authors:  Devendra Bansal; Praveen K Bharti; Anushree Acharya; Mohamed H Abdelraheem; Priyanka Patel; Ashraf Elmalik; Salem Abosalah; Fahmi Y Khan; Mohamed ElKhalifa; Hargobinder Kaur; Elmoubasher Farag; Nilanju P Sarmah; Pradyumna K Mohapatra; Rakesh Sehgal; Jagadish Mahanta; Ali A Sultan
Journal:  Pathog Glob Health       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum field isolates with deletions in histidine-rich protein 2 and 3 genes in context with sub-Saharan Africa and India: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Loick P Kojom; Vineeta Singh
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 7.  An Overview of Drug Resistance in Protozoal Diseases.

Authors:  Rita Capela; Rui Moreira; Francisca Lopes
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  The genomic architecture of antimalarial drug resistance.

Authors:  Annie N Cowell; Elizabeth A Winzeler
Journal:  Brief Funct Genomics       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Characterization of drug resistance and genetic diversity of Plasmodium falciparum parasites from Tripura, Northeast India.

Authors:  S J Patgiri; K Sarma; N Sarmah; N Bhattacharyya; D K Sarma; T Nirmolia; D R Bhattacharyya; P K Mohapatra; D Bansal; P K Bharti; R Sehgal; J Mahanta; A A Sultan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Genetic profiling of the Plasmodium falciparum parasite population in uncomplicated malaria from India.

Authors:  Amit Kumar; Shri Pat Singh; Rajendra Bhatt; Vineeta Singh
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.979

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.