| Literature DB >> 34565330 |
You-Zhen Feng1, Xiao-Qiao Chen2, Zhong-Yuan Cheng1, Qi-Ting Lin1, Ping-Kang Chen1, Ding-Kun Si-Tu1, Rui Cao3, Long Qian4,5, Baoli Heng6,7, Xiang-Ran Cai8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current study investigated the performance of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion (IVIM) technology in monitoring early renal injury in streptozotocin rats.Entities:
Keywords: Early diabetic nephropathy; Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion; Noninvasive; Pathological correlation; Streptozotocin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34565330 PMCID: PMC8474753 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-021-02530-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nephrol ISSN: 1471-2369 Impact factor: 2.388
Fig. 1Placement of regions of interest (ROI) into the b0 image. CO, cortex; OS, outer stripe of the outer medulla; IS, inner stripe of the outer medulla; and IM, inner medullary
Fig. 2IVIM parametric maps are shown for rats at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after streptozotocin-induced diabetes (DM Group) and citrate buffer injection (Control Group)
Comparison of body weight, kidney weight/body weight, urine volume, BUN and Scr values between the two groups
| Body weight(g) | Kidney weight/body weight (‰) | Amount of urine(ml) | BUN (mmol/L) | Scr (μmol/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 w | Control ( | 338.64±15.816 | 7.71±0.646 | 39.87±8.648 | 5.79±0.587 | 23.17±4.446 |
| DM ( | 334.72±16.531 | 8.29±0.634 | 42.15±8.701 | 6.25±0.447 | 24.33±3.777 | |
| 4 w | Control ( | 427.78±19.262 | 6.67±0.829 | 43.98±22.537 | 5.89±0.981 | 24.00±2.000 |
| DM ( | 339.42±41.721* | 10.28±0.641* | 188.78±44.316* | 13.51±2.399* | 27.33±4.502 | |
| 8 w | Control ( | 489.59±25.149 | 5.81±0.351 | 48.63±30.142 | 5.96±1.032 | 24.22±3.251 |
| DM ( | 327.60±31.998* | 10.88±1.047* | 271.07±109.045* | 13.22±2.371* | 27.33±3.724 | |
| 12 w | Control ( | 522.40±10.944 | 5.89±0.304 | 39.57±25.146 | 6.01±1.022 | 25.36±4.269 |
| DM ( | 301.39±47.567* | 13.13±2.530* | 126.22±29.715* | 14.19±3.295* | 30.17±7.512 |
Note: * the results of t-test for two groups of two samples at each time point (P < 0.05)
The change trend comparison of IVIM parameters between rat groups over time
| Time | Time*Group | Intersubjective | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | F | F | |||||
| 0.34 | 0.799 | 3.38 | 13.45 | ||||
| 4.09 | 3.50 | 30.49 | |||||
| 4.58 | 0.71 | 0.556 | 5.04 | ||||
| 54.37 | 10.66 | 0.00 | 0.974 | ||||
| 1.50 | 0.244 | 1.75 | 0.192 | 0.00 | 0.093 | ||
| 7.47 | 1.92 | 0.147 | 0.05 | 0.822 | |||
| 12.19 | 0.94 | 0.433 | 2.38 | 0.154 | |||
| 52.86 | 14.20 | 0.29 | 0.604 | ||||
| 8.97 | 0.60 | 0.562 | 0.11 | 0.743 | |||
| 11.76 | 5.07 | 1.006 | 1.20 | 0.300 | |||
| 21.96 | 1.17 | 0.337 | 0.08 | 0.782 | |||
| 6.98 | 11.02 | 34.49 | |||||
| 1.37 | 0.280 | 0.26 | 0.738 | 4.81 | 0.053 | ||
| 0.76 | 0.530 | 1.98 | 0.139 | 35.37 | |||
| 5.22 | 0.67 | 0.580 | 5.94 | ||||
| 4.05 | 3.67 | 25.40 | |||||
Note: D true diffusivity, D* pseudodiffusion coefficient, f perfusion fraction, ADC apparent diffusion coefficient. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The P values in bold type are of statistical significance. D, ADCs are presented in × 10−5 mm2/s, D* is presented in × 10−3 mm2/s, and f is presented as a percentage. CO, renal cortex, OS, outer stripe of the outer medulla, IS, inner stripe of the outer medulla, IM, internal medulla
P1 indicates a difference in the changes in IVIM parameters over time between the two groups
P2 indicates a difference in the difference of the IVIM parametric means between the two groups over time
P3 indicates a difference in the IVIM parametric means between the two groups
Fig. 3The ADC, D, D*, and f values of CO, OS, IS, and IM in the DM and control groups at each time point (0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks). CO, cortex; OS, outer stripe of the outer medulla; IS, inner stripe of the outer medulla; and IM, inner medullary. ADC (standard ADC, mm2/s), apparent diffusion coefficient; D (slow ADC, mm2/s), extravascular effects of passive diffusion; D* (fast ADC, mm2/s), pseudodiffusion coefficient; f, (fraction of fast ADC, %), perfusion fraction
IVIM parameters between rat groups at different time
| 0 week | 4 week | 8 week | 12 week | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 176.55±12.42 | 155.83±13.12 | 151.33±9.79 | 176.67±20.50 | |||
| 164.73±15.14 | 176.50±20.25 | 1778.67±18.15 | 173.33±17.70 | |||
| 0.43/0.530 | 9.07/ | 1.31/0.279 | 0.49/0.501 | |||
| 11.01±2.66 | 11.70±1.49 | 10.37±1.06 | 12.40±1.24 | |||
| 10.48±1.99 | 17.81±2.23 | 15.40±5.46 | 14.07±2.31 | |||
| 1.02/0.336 | 1.07/0.325 | 1.70/0.222 | 2.65/0.135 | |||
| 31.20±4.99 | 33.18±2.00 | 33.85±2.14 | 35.67±4.33 | |||
| 27.05±5.40 | 2.53±4.18 | 29.53±4.02 | 32.73±1.13 | |||
| 0.67/0.434 | 0.06/0.817 | 0.04/0.850 | 0.10/0.762 | |||
| 178.79±4.48 | 216.17±9.07 | 199.50±5.96 | 230.83±9.52 | |||
| 176.00±8.32 | 210.17±11.43 | 224.33±5.47 | 214.50±13.40 | |||
| 1.39/0.266 | 2.13/0.175 | 8.98/ | 5.39/ | |||
| 167.76±11.81 | 171.83±15.57 | 157.33±9.79 | 176.67±20.51 | |||
| 165.00±9.27 | 184.33±14.36 | 178.67±18.15 | 173.33±17.7 | |||
| 0.27/0.613 | 3.34/0.098 | 2.55/0.142 | 0.13/0.730 | |||
| 15.96±2.39 | 16.27±2.84 | 10.28±0.81 | 13.20±5.68 | |||
| 14.98±3.60 | 17.15±5.10 | 13.78±4.41 | 11.37±4.04 | |||
| 0.02/0.896 | 1.49/0.251 | 0.82/0.388 | 1.54/0.243 | |||
| 24.85±3.00 | 32.43±5.17 | 28.20±3.22 | 34.35±3.46 | |||
| 23.15±2.83 | 30.35±4.16 | 29.53±3.17 | 30.65±3.84 | |||
| 0.16/0.698 | 0.12/0.738 | 1.69/0.233 | 0.08/0.790 | |||
| 176.09±10.69 | 213.67±9.48 | 194.00±6.00 | 233.67±8.82 | |||
| 177.00±7.46 | 213.33±9.03 | 220.67±3.98 | 210.17±11.62 | |||
| 0.02/0.899 | 3.33/0.098 | 1.62/0.231 | 23.02/ | |||
| 209.11±15.09 | 187.67±14.46 | 175.33±11.55 | 194.00±21.43 | |||
| 210.0±15.58 | 187.33±13.52 | 180.50±15.50 | 183.00±9.96 | |||
| 0.60/0.475 | 0.02/0.891 | 0.78/0.398 | 0.65/0.438 | |||
| 16.57±1.27 | 16.60±1.19 | 10.12±1.61 | 10.86±1.16 | |||
| 14.44±3.07 | 15.78±3.62 | 11.30±3.61 | 16.13±3.14 | |||
| 2.16/0.172 | 0.10/0.754 | 0.03/0.864 | 2.73/0.129 | |||
| 18.13±2.35 | 28.05±5.68 | 30.93±4.18 | 34.53±8.28 | |||
| 17.28±3.12 | 29.82±3.42 | 33.52±3.86 | 30.03±3.79 | |||
| 0.71/0.419 | 0.03/0.858 | 1.19/0.301 | 0.03/0.869 | |||
| 211.13±5.06 | 228.50±18.09 | 196.17±21.87 | 260.50±17.90 | |||
| 210.00±4.15 | 214.17±10.21 | 219.50±16.81 | 209.50±9.85 | |||
| 0.06/0.812 | 0.68/0.429 | 0.00/1.000 | 26.81/ | |||
| 202.50±10.86 | 200.67±8.73 | 203.83±9.09 | 220.83±49.14 | |||
| 207.83±4.54 | 224.50±9.33 | 223.17±41.97 | 233.83±33.23 | |||
| 1.23/0.290 | 20.86/ | 1.22/0.300 | 0.29/0.600 | |||
| 15.02±1.68 | 13.60±2.84 | 13.84±2.44 | 12.20±1.44 | |||
| 15.73±2.67 | 14.68±2.90 | 17.50±3.37 | 17.48±1.96 | |||
| 0.39/0.550 | 0.43/0.530 | 4.63/0.057 | 28.23/ | |||
| 12.80±1.20 | 18.15±3.54 | 19.13±2.03 | 17.26±4.02 | |||
| 13.60±2.65 | 25.50±1.58 | 25.51±15.02 | 20.53±7.26 | |||
| 0.45/0.520 | 21.59/ | 1.06/0.330 | 0.93/0.360 | |||
| 218.67±7.87 | 219.17±8.45 | 221.33±6.25 | 222.50±7.58 | |||
| 215.00±8.37 | 264.17±17.03 | 246.33±33.27 | 246.00±27.26 | |||
| 0.61/0.450 | 33.61/ | 3.27/0.100 | 4.14/0.070 | |||
Note: D true diffusivity, D* pseudodiffusion coefficient, f perfusion fraction, ADC apparent diffusion coefficient. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The P values in bold type are of statistical significance. D, ADCs are presented in × 10−5 mm2/s, D* is presented in × 10−3 mm2/s, and f is presented as a percentage. CO renal cortex, OS outer stripe of the outer medulla, IS inner stripe of the outer medulla, IM internal medulla
Fig. 4Histological analysis of kidney tissue sections in diabetic rats and controls. Histology of Glomeruli (G) and Renal Tubule (T). All sections were stained with H&E stain. Dilated renal tubules (arrowheads), capillary proliferation (white arrows), renal tubular epithelial necrosis and exfoliation (black arrows) are demonstrated
Fig. 5Histological analysis of kidney tissue sections in diabetic rats and controls. Histology of glomeruli (G) and renal tubule (T). All sections were stained with podocin stains. Dilated renal tubules (arrowheads), capillary proliferation (white arrows), renal tubular epithelial necrosis and exfoliation (black arrows) are demonstrated
Correlation analysis between IVIM parameters and IV collagen expression, Urine volume, BUN, and Scr
| IV collagen | Urine volume | BUN | Scr | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | r | r | r | |||||
| 0.146 | 0.496 | 0.34 | 0.104 | 0.228 | 0.284 | 0.046 | 0.832 | |
| 0.115 | 0.592 | 0.311 | 0.14 | |||||
| 0.347 | 0.097 | 0.276 | 0.192 | 0.339 | 0.105 | 0.313 | 0.136 | |
| -0.202 | 0.344 | 0.275 | 0.193 | 0.108 | 0.617 | 0.061 | 0.778 | |
| 0.282 | 0.182 | 0.329 | 0.116 | 0.054 | 0.801 | |||
| 0.19 | 0.373 | 0.293 | 0.165 | 0.163 | 0.445 | 0.248 | 0.242 | |
| 0.232 | 0.275 | 0.132 | 0.539 | -0.055 | 0.799 | |||
Note: D true diffusivity, D* pseudodiffusion coefficient, f perfusion fraction, ADC apparent diffusion coefficient. The P values in bold type are of statistical significance. D, ADC are presented in × 10−5 mm2/s, D* is presented in × 10−3 mm2/s, and f is presented as a percentage. CO renal cortex, OS outer stripe of the outer medulla, IS inner stripe of the outer medulla, IM internal medulla. : P value corrected by Bonferroni