Literature DB >> 17114628

Functional evaluation of transplanted kidneys with diffusion-weighted and BOLD MR imaging: initial experience.

Harriet C Thoeny1, Dominik Zumstein, Sonja Simon-Zoula, Ute Eisenberger, Frederik De Keyzer, Lucie Hofmann, Peter Vock, Chris Boesch, Felix J Frey, Peter Vermathen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate feasibility and reproducibility of diffusion-weighted (DW) and blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with renal allografts, as compared with these features in healthy volunteers with native kidneys.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local ethics committee approved the study protocol; patients provided written informed consent. Fifteen patients with a renal allograft and in stable condition (nine men, six women; age range, 20-67 years) and 15 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers underwent DW and BOLD MR imaging. Seven patients with renal allografts were examined twice to assess reproducibility of results. DW MR imaging yielded a total apparent diffusion coefficient including diffusion and microperfusion (ADC(tot)), as well as an ADC reflecting predominantly pure diffusion (ADC(D)) and the perfusion fraction. R2* of BOLD MR imaging enabled the estimation of renal oxygenation. Statistical analysis was performed, and analysis of variance was used for repeated measurements. Coefficients of variation between and within subjects were calculated to assess reproducibility.
RESULTS: In patients, ADC(tot), ADC(D), and perfusion fraction were similar in the cortex and medulla. In volunteers, values in the medulla were similar to those in the cortex and medulla of patients; however, values in the cortex were higher than those in the medulla (P < .05). Medullary R2* was higher than cortical R2* in patients (12.9 sec(-1) +/- 2.1 [standard deviation] vs 11.0 sec(-1) +/- 0.6, P < .007) and volunteers (15.3 sec(-1) +/- 1.1 vs 11.5 sec(-1) +/- 0.5, P < .0001). However, medullary R2* was lower in patients than in volunteers (P < .004). Increased medullary R2* was paralleled by decreased diffusion in patients with allografts. A low coefficient of variation in the cortex and medulla within subjects was obtained for ADC(tot), ADC(D), and R2* (<5.2%), while coefficient of variation within subjects was higher for perfusion fraction (medulla, 15.1%; cortex, 8.6%). Diffusion and perfusion indexes correlated significantly with serum creatinine concentrations.
CONCLUSION: DW and BOLD MR imaging are feasible and reproducible in patients with renal allografts. (c) RSNA, 2006.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17114628     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2413060103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  74 in total

1.  [Functional magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of radiation-induced renal damage].

Authors:  S Haneder; J Boda-Heggemann; S O Schoenberg; H J Michaely
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  [Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the kidneys].

Authors:  R S Lanzman; M Notohamiprodjo; H J Wittsack
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Noninvasive evaluation of kidney hypoxia and fibrosis using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tsutomu Inoue; Eito Kozawa; Hirokazu Okada; Kouichi Inukai; Shinichi Watanabe; Tomohiro Kikuta; Yusuke Watanabe; Tsuneo Takenaka; Shigehiro Katayama; Junji Tanaka; Hiromichi Suzuki
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 4.  Renal relevant radiology: renal functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Behzad Ebrahimi; Stephen C Textor; Lilach O Lerman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 5.  MRI-detectable nanoparticles: the potential role in the diagnosis of and therapy for chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Jennifer R Charlton; Scott C Beeman; Kevin M Bennett
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.620

6.  Variability of renal apparent diffusion coefficients: limitations of the monoexponential model for diffusion quantification.

Authors:  Jeff L Zhang; Eric E Sigmund; Hersh Chandarana; Henry Rusinek; Qun Chen; Pierre-Hugues Vivier; Bachir Taouli; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging shows promising results to assess renal transplant dysfunction with fibrosis.

Authors:  Octavia Bane; Stefanie J Hectors; Sonja Gordic; Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Amanda Weiss; Rafael Khaim; Zhengzi Yi; Weijia Zhang; Veronica Delaney; Fadi Salem; Cijiang He; Madhav C Menon; Sara Lewis; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  Evaluation of renal allograft function early after transplantation with diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Ute Eisenberger; Harriet C Thoeny; Tobias Binser; Mathias Gugger; Felix J Frey; Chris Boesch; Peter Vermathen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Evaluation of breast cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) histogram analysis: comparison with malignant status, histological subtype, and molecular prognostic factors.

Authors:  Gene Young Cho; Linda Moy; Sungheon G Kim; Steven H Baete; Melanie Moccaldi; James S Babb; Daniel K Sodickson; Eric E Sigmund
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of kidneys in patients with chronic kidney disease: initial study.

Authors:  Xueqin Xu; Wenqiang Fang; Huawei Ling; Weimin Chai; Kemin Chen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.