Literature DB >> 20089719

Variability of renal apparent diffusion coefficients: limitations of the monoexponential model for diffusion quantification.

Jeff L Zhang1, Eric E Sigmund, Hersh Chandarana, Henry Rusinek, Qun Chen, Pierre-Hugues Vivier, Bachir Taouli, Vivian S Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether variability in reported renal apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in literature can be explained by the use of different diffusion weightings (b values) and the use of a monoexponential model to calculate ADC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by institutional review board and was HIPAA-compliant, and all subjects gave written informed consent. Diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging of the kidneys was performed in three healthy volunteers to generate reference diffusion decay curves. In a literature meta-analysis, the authors resampled the reference curves at the various b values used in 19 published studies of normal kidneys (reported ADC = [2.0-4.1] x 10(-3) mm(2) / sec for cortex and [1.9-5.1] x 10(-3) mm(2) / sec for medulla) and then fitted the resampled signals by monoexponential model to produce "predicted" ADC. Correlation plots were used to compare the predicted ADC values with the published values obtained with the same b values.
RESULTS: Significant correlation was found between the reported and predicted ADC values for whole renal parenchyma (R(2) = 0.50, P = .002), cortex (R(2) = 0.87, P = .0002), and medulla (R(2) = 0.61, P = .0129), indicating that most of the variability in reported ADC values arises from limitations of a monoexponential model and use of different b values.
CONCLUSION: The use of a monoexponential function for DW imaging analysis and variably sampled diffusion weighting plays a substantial role in causing the variability in ADC of healthy kidneys. For maximum reliability in renal apparent diffusion coefficient quantification, data for monoexponential analysis should be acquired at a fixed set of b values or a biexponential model should be used. (c) RSNA, 2010.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20089719      PMCID: PMC2851010          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.09090891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  34 in total

1.  In vivo MR measurements of regional arterial and venous blood volume fractions in intact rat brain.

Authors:  T Q Duong; S G Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Abdomen: diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pulse-triggered single-shot sequences.

Authors:  Petra Mürtz; Sebastian Flacke; Frank Träber; Johan S van den Brink; Jürgen Gieseke; Hans H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Single breath-hold diffusion-weighted imaging of the abdomen.

Authors:  Lawrence C Chow; Roland Bammer; Michael E Moseley; F Graham Sommer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  The capillary network: a link between IVIM and classical perfusion.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; R Turner
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; E Breton; D Lallemand; M L Aubin; J Vignaud; M Laval-Jeantet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Noninvasive measurement of concurrent single-kidney perfusion, glomerular filtration, and tubular function.

Authors:  J D Krier; E L Ritman; Z Bajzer; J C Romero; A Lerman; L O Lerman
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2001-10

7.  An evaluation of the sensitivity of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) method of blood flow measurement to changes in cerebral blood flow.

Authors:  J J Neil; C S Bosch; J J Ackerman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in the evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary results.

Authors:  M Cova; E Squillaci; F Stacul; G Manenti; S Gava; G Simonetti; R Pozzi-Mucelli
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  Bachir Taouli; Ravi K Thakur; Lorenzo Mannelli; James S Babb; Sooah Kim; Elizabeth M Hecht; Vivian S Lee; Gary M Israel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Abdominal diffusion mapping with use of a whole-body echo-planar system.

Authors:  M F Müller; P Prasad; B Siewert; M A Nissenbaum; V Raptopoulos; R R Edelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  63 in total

1.  Diffusion-prepared fast imaging with steady-state free precession (DP-FISP): a rapid diffusion MRI technique at 7 T.

Authors:  Lan Lu; Bernadette Erokwu; Gregory Lee; Vikas Gulani; Mark A Griswold; Katherine M Dell; Chris A Flask
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Cardiac motion in diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver: artifact and a method of correction.

Authors:  Joy Liau; Jimmy Lee; Michael E Schroeder; Claude B Sirlin; Mark Bydder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  [Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the kidneys].

Authors:  R S Lanzman; M Notohamiprodjo; H J Wittsack
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of tumor microenvironment in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  E E Sigmund; G Y Cho; S Kim; M Finn; M Moccaldi; J H Jensen; D K Sodickson; J D Goldberg; S Formenti; L Moy
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  In vivo assessment of optimal b-value range for perfusion-insensitive apparent diffusion coefficient imaging.

Authors:  Moti Freiman; Stephan D Voss; Robert V Mulkern; Jeannette M Perez-Rossello; Michael J Callahan; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  MRI-detectable nanoparticles: the potential role in the diagnosis of and therapy for chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Jennifer R Charlton; Scott C Beeman; Kevin M Bennett
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.620

7.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment of renal function in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2.

Authors:  Tijana Mrđanin; Olivera Nikolić; Una Molnar; Milena Mitrović; Viktor Till
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  Renal Adiposity Confounds Quantitative Assessment of Markers of Renal Diffusion With MRI: A Proposed Correction Method.

Authors:  Behzad Ebrahimi; Ahmed Saad; Kai Jiang; Christopher M Ferguson; Hui Tang; John R Woollard; James F Glockner; Stephen C Textor; Lilach O Lerman
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Routinely performed multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging helps to differentiate common subtypes of renal tumours.

Authors:  F Cornelis; E Tricaud; A S Lasserre; F Petitpierre; J C Bernhard; Y Le Bras; M Yacoub; M Bouzgarrou; A Ravaud; N Grenier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Is low b-factors-based apparent diffusion coefficient helpful in assessing renal dysfunction?

Authors:  Jiule Ding; Jie Chen; Zhenxing Jiang; Hua Zhou; Jia Di; Shijun Xing; Wei Xing
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.