Literature DB >> 34557277

Role of biofilms in the survival of Legionella pneumophila to sodium chloride treatment.

Abdelwahid Assaidi1,2, Mostafa Ellouali1, Hassan Latrache1, Hafida Zahir1, El Mostafa Mliji2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Legionnaires' disease continues to be a public health concern. Colonized water distribution systems are often implicated in Legionella transmission, despite the use of various disinfection strategies, the bacterium is capable to persist and survive in water systems. The aim of this study was to investigate the persistence of Legionella pneumophila to sodium chloride over time at different temperatures and analysing the role of biofilms in the survival of this bacteria.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: L. pneumophila serogroup 1 and L. pneumophila serogroup 2-15 were used to study the effect of sodium chloride on planktonic and sessile cells. The tested concentrations were: 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 6% and 8% (W/V) NaCl. Biofilms were grown on 24-well microplates.
RESULTS: At 20°C, L. pneumophila planktonic cells were able to survive in sodium chloride concentrations up to 2%. However, at 37°C, a sodium chloride concentration over 1.5%, reduced systematically the numbers of bacterial cells. Biofilms were grown for 20 days in the absence and presence of sodium chloride. The results show that bacterial strains were able to survive and regrow after the sodium chloride shock (2-3%). Moreover, it seems that this effect is less expressed with the age of the biofilm; old biofilms were more persistent than the young ones.
CONCLUSION: Results from this study demonstrate that the sodium chloride disinfection strategy was effective on Legionella pneumophila planktonic cells but not on biofilms, which demonstrate the role of biofilms in the persistence and recolonization of L. pneumophila in water distribution systems.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilms; Disinfection; Legionella pneumophila; Sodium chloride; Water-borne diseases

Year:  2021        PMID: 34557277      PMCID: PMC8421579          DOI: 10.18502/ijm.v13i4.6973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Microbiol        ISSN: 2008-3289


INTRODUCTION

Legionella pneumophila is a waterborne pathogen and the causative agent of Legionnaires’ disease, an atypical pneumonia (1) and Pontiac fever, a self-limited flu-like illness (2). Currently, the genus Legionella comprises 59 species and more than 70 distinct serogroups (3). L. pneumophila causes approximately 90% of all reported Legionnaires’ disease cases, 84% of which are associated to L. pneumophila serogroup 1 (3, 4). The infection is normally transmitted through the inhalation of aerosols containing the bacteria generated from contaminated water sources such as cooling towers, water distribution networks, spa pools, fountains, etc. L. pneumophila is an inhabitant of natural and manmade aquatic environments, which can be involved in biofilm-associated contamination of plumbing systems (5, 6) surviving free and as an intracellular parasite of protozoa (7). Various factors can influence the colonization and proliferation of bacteria on pipeline surfaces and biofilm formation including temperature, type of pipe materials, chemical element concentration of the water and hardness and, flow rate, presence of nutrients and disinfectants (8). Contamination of water networks occurs when opportunistic pathogens are released from a biofilm as a consequence of physical disturbance or active detachment of infectious cells, which then pose a potential threat to human health (9, 10). These pathogens have the potential to detach from the biofilm to return to the planktonic state or colonize other surfaces which increases the risk of water contamination (11, 12). In water distribution systems, L. pneumophila can colonise and adhere to solid surfaces of pipe materials, hot water tanks, taps, shower, cooling towers. Biofilm, as being a microbial community which may include bacteria, yeasts, fungi, and protozoa adherent to a surface and surrounded by matrix composed of organic polymers (13), may play an important role as a niche protecting bacteria from external stresses such as the action of disinfectants (14). Previous studies have been conducted in order to compare the susceptibility of L. pneumophila to various concentrations of free residual chlorine, temperature and pH values (15–17) and L. pneumophila has been found to be much more resistant and persistent to chlorine, and also able to surviveand recolonize water networks after repeated cycles of treatment (15, 18). It has been generally concluded that higher pH values, lower temperatures and lower chlorine content increase the survival rate of L. pneumophila (16, 18). Temperatures between 20 and 50°C are suitable for the growth of L. pneumophila. Accelerated growth occurs at temperatures between 37 and 42°C, while measurable slow growth commences at temperatures above 50°C (14, 18). Despite the increased monitoring and advances in detection methods, there is still a lack of knowledge about the microbial ecology of Legionella and its response to treatment. Therefore, contamination of hot water systems with Legionella remains a persistent major concern and a threat to public health. In order to improve the efficiency of water treatment, we aimed to investigate the persistence of Legionella pneumophila to sodium chloride over time at different temperatures (20 and 37°C) and analysing the role of biofilms in the survival of this bacterium.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, growth conditions and preparation of bacterial suspension.

Strains used in this study were L. pneumophila serogroup 1 and L. pneumophila serogroup 2–15 obtained as previously described (14). L. pneumophila strains were cultured in Glycine-Vancomycin-Polymyxin-Cycloheximide (GVPC) at 37°C ± CO2 (2.5%) for 72 h. After culture, the cells were harvested by centrifugation for 15 min at 8400 g and were washed twice and resuspended in KNO3 solution with ionic strength 0.1M.

Survival experiments of planktonic cells.

The survival of L. pneumophila in planktonic culture was investigated as follow. Sodium chloride was dissolved in distilled water, autoclaved, and distributed in test tubes (10 ml). Five different solutions were prepared to investigate the sodium chloride tolerance of L. pneumophila. The tested concentrations were: 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, 6% and 8% (W/V) NaCl and sterile distilled water was used as control. The effect of two different temperature on the survival of L. pneumophila in NaCl solutions was tested. Each concentration of NaCl was examined at 20 and 37°C. All test liquids were inoculated with 100 μL of the test suspension (106 cfu/mL) and incubated at 37°C for 72 h. Cell numbers were determined by plate count immediately after inoculation of the tubes and after 6, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 72 h. Analysis was performed in triplicate on each sample.

Survival experiments of L. pneumophila biofilm.

This study was conducted using the 24-well microplates. 3 mL of broth medium supplemented with L-Cysteine (BYE) was added to each well. A total volume of 100 μl of the test inoculum was added to each well. The plates were sealed with parafilm and incubated at 37°C, with the media being replaced at two or three days. Biofilm development was followed over a period of 20 days, based on the determination of total cell counts. CFUs were counted by using the serial dilution technique of the bacterial suspension obtained after sonication. Counts were determined on GVPC after incubation at 37°C ± 2.5% CO2 for 72 h. Sodium chloride shock was performed on day 6 and 15 for the biofilm previously formed on each well. Therefore, NaCl was prepared into sterile distilled water to provide concentrations of 1%, 2%, 4%, 6% et 8%. The 24-well microplates were rinsed twice with 3 ml of sterile distilled water and agitated gently to remove any non-adherent cells, then 3 ml of each salt concentration were added to each well. The microplates are covered and incubated at room temperature for 6 hours. Subsequently, the microplates were rinsed twice with 3 ml of sterile distilled water to remove any residual sodium chloride. The adhered cells were detached by sonication (2 min/60 kHz). The number of colonies forming units (CFU) was determined immediately after shock and after 6, 10, 15, 18 and 20 h. The plates were incubated at 37°C ± 2.5% CO2 for 72 h.

Data analysis.

Cell counts were log-transformed to meet the assumption of homoscedasticity. Statistical analyses of the NaCl effects on sessile vs. planktonic cells and time in culture were performed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tests were two tailed, with a = 0.05. All analyses were performed using SPSS 13.0.

Ethical approval.

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

RESULTS

Effect of sodium chloride on planktonic cells.

We investigated the ability of planktonic cultures of L. pneumophila to survive to sodium chloride disinfection at 20 and 37°C. The NaCl concentrations ranging from 1% to 4%. The results of L. pneumophila survival after incubation at 20 and 37°C in NaCl solution with different concentrations are shown in Figs. 1 and 2.
Fig. 1.

Effect of NaCl concentrations on the survival of L. pneumophila sg1 at 20°C (A) and 37°C (B).

Fig. 2.

Effect of NaCl concentrations on the survival of L. pneumophila sg2–15 at 20°C (A) and 37°C (B).

Effect of NaCl concentrations on the survival of L. pneumophila sg1 at 20°C (A) and 37°C (B). Effect of NaCl concentrations on the survival of L. pneumophila sg2–15 at 20°C (A) and 37°C (B). A slight decrease was observed during the first hours at 20 and 37°C for concentrations up to 2%. At 20°C, the reduction occurred mainly during the first hours of incubation, after which cell numbers remained relatively unchanged between day one and day 3 for the concentrations up to 3%. The salt concentrations had only a minimal effect on the reduction of cell numbers at concentrations below 3%. The reduction in all assays was about 1 log units, showing that the level of salt concentration had no effect on the survival rate of L. pneumophila. However, at 37°C, higher sodium chloride concentrations had a great influence on the survival of L. pneumophila. As seen before at lower incubation temperatures, NaCl concentrations up to 2% and 3% had a minimal effect on the reduction rates, but when the concentrations were increased further, cell numbers declined rapidly. At 37°C, 96 h after inoculation into 1% and 1.5% NaCl solutions, the reduction was about 2 log units. The reduction at 2% and 3% were 2.5 and 3 log units, respectively. At 4%, the log reduction exceeded 5 log units. However, low concentrations of 0.5% clearly improve the survival rate of L. pneumophila in comparison with the control without NaCl. Comparing the survival of positive control, no noticeable differences were seen over the whole experimental period. The comparison of the survival curves obtained at 20 and 37°C showed that the decrease of cell numbers was more important at 37°C and the reaction was more pronounced. These results indicate that the combined deleterious effects of sodium chloride and temperature were most pronounced when stressing bacteria with 4% NaCl and incubation temperature of 37°C. The reduction of the cells is greater at 37 than at 20°C for the tested concentrations (the efficiency of sodium chloride is better at 37°C). We have found that the combination of high temperature (37°C) with concentrations above 4% showed a significant reduction in bacterial cell numbers. These finding suggest that the efficiency of these concentrations was not sufficient to reduce the numbers of Legionella may occasionally survive in waters that have been judged to be microbiologically acceptable.

Effect of sodium chloride on biofilm.

Biofilm development was followed over a period of 20 days, based on the determination of total cell counts. Biofilm was grown on 24-well microplates. Sodium chloride shock took place on day 6 and 15 for the biofilm previously formed on each well. Therefore, sodium chloride was prepared into sterile distilled water to provide concentrations of 1%, 2%, 4%, 6% et 8%. The number of colonies forming units (CFU) was determined immediately after shock and after 6, 10, 15, 18 and 20 h. The plates were incubated at 37°C ± 2.5% CO2 for 72 h. Fig. 3. shows the growth of L. pneumophila sg1 and 2–15 biofilm challenged with a range of sodium chloride concentrations at day 6 and 15. The total number of cells increased rapidly on the surface of each well. However, neither of the two L. pneumophila strains tested was detectable immediately after sodium chloride shock.
Fig. 3.

The growth of L. pneumophila sg1 (A and B) and L. pneumophila sg2–15 (C&D) when challenged with a range of NaCl concentrations at day 6 and 15.

The growth of L. pneumophila sg1 (A and B) and L. pneumophila sg2–15 (C&D) when challenged with a range of NaCl concentrations at day 6 and 15. Biofilms of the L. pneumophila sg1 and sg2–15 strains both decreased in viable count after challenge with sodium chloride at various tested concentrations. Comparing biofilm growth curves after NaCl shock on 6th and 15th day, a minimal reduction of cells forming the biofilm was observed after treatmentat concentrations up to 1 and 2%. This allows a re-increase of the biofilm biomass the days after treatment. However, solutions exceeding 4% have allowed an important and continuous reduction of biofilm. Immediately after treatment, no colonies were recovered, but detectable cells being observed six days after. The number of cells forming biofilms recovered from the treated biofilms re-increase in a stable progression, however, did not reach the rate of the untreated biofilms. The biofilms re-increase to become about 100-fold smaller than the positive control. For 15-day biofilms of L. pneumophila, the greatest log reduction rate was observed after exposure to 4% (4 log units). The sodium chloride did not eradicate all the biofilm cells, rather they continued to grow, but at levels lower than the untreated biofilms. The majority of biofilms exposed to sodium chloride reached 5.79 log for L. pneumophila sg2–15 and 5.6 log for L. pneumophila sg1, compared to 9.81 × 106 CFU per ml for L. pneumophila sg1 and 1.25 ×107 CFU for L. pneumophila sg2–15 for the positive control, which indicate a measurable reduction of cells forming biofilms resulting from the effect of sodium chloride (Fig. 3). The reduction in number of cells forming the six-day biofilm is greater than that of the 15-day biofilm, suggesting that the old biofilm is more resistant to treatment compared to the young biofilm.

DISCUSSION

The colonization of various water systems by bacteria is increasingly identified as a recurring source of problems for industry and society. It has been estimated that about 95% of all microbial cells present in water distribution systems exist as biofilms on pipe surfaces and only 5% occur in the water phase (9); similarly, in a domestic hot water system, most of the culturable bacteria (72%) were found to be surface-associated (19). During the past several years, Legionella has been isolated from shower heads, taps, hot water systems of hotels, hospitals and homes. In a number of cases, the occurrence of Legionella in the plumbing systems was associated with diseases. The contamination of hot water systems with Legionella remains a persistent environmental challenge and a threat to public health. The fact that a large number of residentials facilities and hotels are in coastal Moroccan cities, we thought to use seawater as an alternative approach to disinfect the water systems. Therefore, to improve the efficiency of water treatment and validate our assumption, we examined in laboratory conditions the effect of sodium chloride against L. pneumophila planktonic cells and biofilm; we have tested the NaCl sock to reduce and minimize the colonisation and proliferation of L. pneumophila in water distribution systems. It is known that the chlorination and thermal disinfection were the two-disinfection method usually used worldwide, but despite the advantages they present, they are expensive, and they can generate indisputable effects relating to the deterioration of the pipe materials and canalisation. Many disinfection procedures exist, such as hyperchlorination, monochloramine, copper–silver ionization, temperature, point-of-use-filtration, and UV light; however, each of these methods has benefits and shortfalls (20, 21). The effect of sodium chloride on growth and survival of Legionella in water distribution systems has been exanimated by a few studies. Results on the effectiveness of salt shock, chlorine and other methods for the eradication of these bacteria differ (22). Several studies have tested the response of the Legionella planktonic cells in the presence of free chlorine and the effect of hyperchlorination on biofilms but have not observed a significant reduction in the number of the cells (11, 23–25). In other hand, previous studies have reported the success of different procedures for removing bacterial cells from premise plumbing systems (20, 21). Most of the disinfection methods are often unsuccessful against Legionella biofilms, for this reason, the determination of the persistence of these pathogens is primordial. In the present study, L. pneumophila was found to persist in salt solutions up to 2% NaCl at temperature of 20 and 37°C. These finding indicate that these bacteria can survive also in sea water as the NaCl level in Moroccan seawater does not exceed 2.5% and seawater temperature is about 20°C. At 37°C, a relationship was observed between increased salt concentrations and the higher reduction rate of cell numbers. The specific role played by sodium chloride in the metabolism of L. pneumophila has not been examined, but it is well known that sodium is involved in metabolic carrier systems and is also important co-factor in enzymes. For chloride ions, a mild association with growth of L. pneumophila has been described with earlier studies which mentioned the fact that L. pneumophila can resist to NaCl effect. Moreover, Żbikowska (26) demonstrated that L. pneumophila organism are more resistant to the combined bactericidal effect of sea water and sunlight than normal sewage bacteria. Furthermore, the present results also agree with the investigations of Gast (27) who showed that Legionella were capable of growing in broth containing low concentrations of NaCl. On the other hand, several authors have reported an inhibitory effect of NaCl on growth and isolation of L. pneumophila (28). To some extent, our findings confirm these toxic effects of NaCl. Small amounts of 0.5% NaCl promote bacterial growth. Salt concentrations up to 0.5% had no toxic effects, but association of concentrations over 2% and high temperature clearly decreased the cell numbers.

CONCLUSION

Resistance among biofilms is higher, this finding showed an overview of the ability offered by biofilms to L. pneumophila to survive sodium chloride disinfection and continue to grow even after treatment. Sodium chloride concentrations up to 2% did not have effective effects on planktonic cells, but concentrations over 2% clearly decreased the number of cells. Results from this study demonstrate that the sodium chloride disinfection strategy was effective on Legionella pneumophila planktonic cells but not on biofilms, which demonstrate the role of biofilms in the persistence and recolonization of L. pneumophila in water distribution systems. Therefore, new preventive and eradication strategies should be developed to reduce L. pneumophila infections.
  21 in total

Review 1.  Microbiological safety of drinking water.

Authors:  U Szewzyk; R Szewzyk; W Manz; K H Schleifer
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 15.500

2.  Distribution of bacteria in a domestic hot water system in a Danish apartment building.

Authors:  Lene Karen Bagh; Hans Jørgen Albrechtsen; Erik Arvin; Kaj Ovesen
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 11.236

3.  Legionella pneumophila transcriptional response to chlorine treatment.

Authors:  Charles Bodet; Tobias Sahr; Mathieu Dupuy; Carmen Buchrieser; Yann Héchard
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 4.  Literature review--efficacy of various disinfectants against Legionella in water systems.

Authors:  B R Kim; J E Anderson; S A Mueller; W A Gaines; A M Kendall
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Influence of temperature, chlorine residual and heavy metals on the presence of Legionella pneumophila in hot water distribution systems.

Authors:  Anita Rakić; Jelena Perić; Lucija Foglar
Journal:  Ann Agric Environ Med       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.447

6.  Effects of disinfection on Legionella spp., eukarya, and biofilms in a hot water system.

Authors:  Maha Farhat; Marina Moletta-Denat; Jacques Frère; Séverine Onillon; Marie-Cécile Trouilhé; Enric Robine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Effectiveness of different methods to control legionella in the water supply: ten-year experience in an Italian university hospital.

Authors:  I Marchesi; P Marchegiano; A Bargellini; S Cencetti; G Frezza; M Miselli; P Borella
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Disinfectant efficacy of chlorite and chlorine dioxide in drinking water biofilms.

Authors:  G A Gagnon; J L Rand; K C O'leary; A C Rygel; C Chauret; R C Andrews
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 11.236

9.  Amoebae and Legionella pneumophila in saline environments.

Authors:  Rebecca J Gast; Dawn M Moran; Mark R Dennett; Wayne A Wurtsbaugh; Linda A Amaral-Zettler
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.744

10.  Resistance of Legionella pneumophila serotype 1 biofilms to chlorine-based disinfection.

Authors:  I R Cooper; G W Hanlon
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 3.926

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.