Literature DB >> 30992183

Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography for syndesmosis injury diagnosis compared to conventional computed tomography.

Marion Hamard1, Angeliki Neroladaki2, Ilias Bagetakos3, Victor Dubois-Ferrière4, Xavier Montet5, Sana Boudabbous6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Syndesmosis injury can lead to ankle mortise instability and early osteoarthritis. Several multiple detector computed tomography (MDCT) methods for measurement have been developed. Weight-bearing cone beam CT (WB CBCT) is an emerging technique that offers the possibility of upright-position scanning and lower doses. This study sought to assess the diagnostic accuracy of WB CBCT in syndesmose injury compared to MDCT, with instability confirmed via manual testing upon arthroscopic examination.
METHODS: Three musculoskeletal radiologists with different levels of expertise prospectively analyzed 11 MDCT and eight WB CBCT scans of the same trauma-afflicted ankles with clinical suspicion of syndesmosis lesion over a period of 5 months. They evaluated 10 methods of measurement in both sides. Syndesmosis was considered pathological on arthroscopic examination in four patients. Correlation between readers was evaluated with intra-class correlation testing (p < 0.05 was considered significant). Capacity of discrimination was assessed by area under the curve (AUC) for all methods.
RESULTS: Inter-observer agreement was near excellent for both WB CBCT and MDCT for the anterior tibio-fibular (TF) distance (ICC = 0.781 and 0.831, respectively), posterior TF distance (ICC = 0.841 and 0.826), minimal TF distance (ICC = 0.899 and 0.875), and TF surface (ICC = 0.93 and 0.84). AUC were better for MDCT than WB CBCT in assessing syndesmosis instability for: anterior TF distance (ROC = 0.869 vs. 0.555, p = 0.01), minimal TF distance (ROC = 0.883 vs. 0.608, p = 0.02) and antero-posterior fibular translation (ROC = 0.894 vs. 0.467, p = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: MDCT demonstrated better ability to distinguish pathological syndesmosis than WB CBCT, with the antero-posterior fibular translation the best discriminating measurement. The physiological widening of the contralateral syndesmosis occurring with the WB CBCT upright position may explain these results.
Copyright © 2019 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopic exam; Injury; Measurement; Multiple detector computed tomography; Syndesmosis; Weight-bearing cone beam CT

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30992183     DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2019.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg        ISSN: 1268-7731            Impact factor:   2.705


  9 in total

1.  Weightbearing Computed Tomography for Assessment of Foot and Ankle Deformities: The Iowa Experience.

Authors:  Edward O Rojas; Nacime Salomao Barbachan Mansur; Kevin Dibbern; Matthieu Lalevee; Elijah Auch; Eli Schmidt; Victoria Vivtcharenko; Shuyuan Li; Phinit Phisitkul; John Femino; Cesar de Cesar Netto
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021

2.  Effect of weightbearing and foot positioning on 3D distal tibiofibular joint parameters.

Authors:  Firas Souleiman; Martin Heilemann; Robert Hennings; Pierre Hepp; Boyko Gueorguiev; Geoff Richards; Georg Osterhoff; Dominic Gehweiler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Can Weightbearing Cone-beam CT Reliably Differentiate Between Stable and Unstable Syndesmotic Ankle Injuries? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Firas J Raheman; Djamila M Rojoa; Charles Hallet; Khaled M Yaghmour; Srirangan Jeyaparam; Raju S Ahluwalia; Jitendra Mangwani
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Comparative CT with stress manoeuvres for diagnosing distal isolated tibiofibular syndesmotic injury in acute ankle sprain: a protocol for an accuracy- test prospective study.

Authors:  João Carlos Rodrigues; Alexandre Leme Godoy Santos; Marcelo Pires Prado; José Felipe Marion Alloza; Renato Amaral Masagão; Laercio Alberto Rosemberg; Durval do Carmo Santos Barros; Adham do Amaral E Castro; Marco Kawamura Demange; Mario Lenza; Mario Ferretti
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Determining diagnosis of scaphoid healing: Comparison of cone beam CT and X-ray after six weeks of immobilization.

Authors:  Lucia Calisto Farracho; Berenice Moutinot; Angeliki Neroladaki; Marion Hamard; Karel Gorican; Pierre Alexandre Poletti; Jean Yves Beaulieu; Cindy Bouvet; Sana Boudabbous
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2020-09-02

Review 6.  Which test is the best? An updated literature review of imaging modalities for acute ankle diastasis injuries.

Authors:  Nico Ng; James Randolph Onggo; Mithun Nambiar; Julian Tam Maingard; David Ng; Gaurav Gupta; Dee Nandurkar; Sina Babazadeh; Harvinder Bedi
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2022-05-03

7.  "Flexible nature of fixation" in syndesmotic stabilization of the inferior tibiofibular joint affects the radiological reduction outcome.

Authors:  Robert Hennings; Carolin Fuchs; Ulrich J Spiegl; Jan Theopold; Firas Souleiman; Christian Kleber; Annette B Ahrberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.479

8.  3D measurement techniques for the hindfoot alignment angle from weight-bearing CT in a clinical population.

Authors:  Chiara Pavani; Claudio Belvedere; Maurizio Ortolani; Mauro Girolami; Stefano Durante; Lisa Berti; Alberto Leardini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Does the orientation of syndesmosis fixative device affect the immediate reduction of the distal tibiofibular joint?

Authors:  Robert Hennings; Ulrich J Spiegl; Carolin Fuchs; Pierre Hepp; Johannes K M Fakler; Annette B Ahrberg
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 2.928

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.