Jian Zhong Zhang1, François Lintz2, Alessio Bernasconi3, Shu Zhang1. 1. 1 Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 2. 2 Foot and Ankle Surgery Center, Clinique de l'Union, Saint-Jean, France. 3. 3 Foot and Ankle Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) is a useful tool for the assessment of hindfoot alignment (HA). Foot ankle offset (FAO) is a recently introduced parameter, determined from WBCT images using semiautomatic software. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical relevance and reproducibility of FAO for the evaluation of HA. METHODS: A prospective comparative study was performed on consecutive patients requiring bilateral WBCT between September 2017 and April 2018. Based on the clinical assessment of HA, patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) normal alignment group (G1), (2) valgus (G2), and (3) varus (G3). FAO and long axial view (HACT) were measured on WBCT images, and the groups were compared. The reproducibility of FAO and HACT was determined through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Regression analysis was performed to investigate the correlation between the 2 methods. Overall, 249 feet (126 patients) were included (G1 = 115, G2 = 78, and G3 = 56 feet). RESULTS: The mean values for FAO and HACT were 1.2% ± 2.8% and 3.9 ± 3.1, respectively, in G1; 8.1% ± 3.7% and 9.7 ± 4.9 in G2; and -6.6% ± 4.8% and -8.2 ± 6.6 in G3. Intra- and interobserver reliability was 0.987 and 0.988 for FAO and 0.949 and 0.949 for HACT, respectively. There was a good linear correlation between HACT and FAO ( R2 = 0.744), with a regression slope of 1.064. CONCLUSIONS: WBCT was a useful method for the characterization of HA. FAO was reproducible and correlated well with physical examination. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.
BACKGROUND: Weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) is a useful tool for the assessment of hindfoot alignment (HA). Foot ankle offset (FAO) is a recently introduced parameter, determined from WBCT images using semiautomatic software. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical relevance and reproducibility of FAO for the evaluation of HA. METHODS: A prospective comparative study was performed on consecutive patients requiring bilateral WBCT between September 2017 and April 2018. Based on the clinical assessment of HA, patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) normal alignment group (G1), (2) valgus (G2), and (3) varus (G3). FAO and long axial view (HACT) were measured on WBCT images, and the groups were compared. The reproducibility of FAO and HACT was determined through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Regression analysis was performed to investigate the correlation between the 2 methods. Overall, 249 feet (126 patients) were included (G1 = 115, G2 = 78, and G3 = 56 feet). RESULTS: The mean values for FAO and HACT were 1.2% ± 2.8% and 3.9 ± 3.1, respectively, in G1; 8.1% ± 3.7% and 9.7 ± 4.9 in G2; and -6.6% ± 4.8% and -8.2 ± 6.6 in G3. Intra- and interobserver reliability was 0.987 and 0.988 for FAO and 0.949 and 0.949 for HACT, respectively. There was a good linear correlation between HACT and FAO ( R2 = 0.744), with a regression slope of 1.064. CONCLUSIONS: WBCT was a useful method for the characterization of HA. FAO was reproducible and correlated well with physical examination. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.
Authors: Edward O Rojas; Nacime Salomao Barbachan Mansur; Kevin Dibbern; Matthieu Lalevee; Elijah Auch; Eli Schmidt; Victoria Vivtcharenko; Shuyuan Li; Phinit Phisitkul; John Femino; Cesar de Cesar Netto Journal: Iowa Orthop J Date: 2021
Authors: Alessio Bernasconi; Cesar DE Cesar; Lauren Roberts; François Lintz; Alexandre Leme Godoy-Santos; Martin Joseph O'Malley Journal: Acta Ortop Bras Date: 2021 May-Jun Impact factor: 0.513
Authors: Marta Peña Fernández; Dorela Hoxha; Oliver Chan; Simon Mordecai; Gordon W Blunn; Gianluca Tozzi; Andy Goldberg Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Leonard Simon Brandenburg; Markus Siegel; Jakob Neubauer; Johanna Merz; Gerrit Bode; Jan Kühle Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2021-04-22 Impact factor: 2.928