Literature DB >> 20484781

Predicting the efficacy of radiotherapy in individual glioblastoma patients in vivo: a mathematical modeling approach.

R Rockne1, J K Rockhill, M Mrugala, A M Spence, I Kalet, K Hendrickson, A Lai, T Cloughesy, E C Alvord, K R Swanson.   

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most malignant form of primary brain tumors known as gliomas. They proliferate and invade extensively and yield short life expectancies despite aggressive treatment. Response to treatment is usually measured in terms of the survival of groups of patients treated similarly, but this statistical approach misses the subgroups that may have responded to or may have been injured by treatment. Such statistics offer scant reassurance to individual patients who have suffered through these treatments. Furthermore, current imaging-based treatment response metrics in individual patients ignore patient-specific differences in tumor growth kinetics, which have been shown to vary widely across patients even within the same histological diagnosis and, unfortunately, these metrics have shown only minimal success in predicting patient outcome. We consider nine newly diagnosed GBM patients receiving diagnostic biopsy followed by standard-of-care external beam radiation therapy (XRT). We present and apply a patient-specific, biologically based mathematical model for glioma growth that quantifies response to XRT in individual patients in vivo. The mathematical model uses net rates of proliferation and migration of malignant tumor cells to characterize the tumor's growth and invasion along with the linear-quadratic model for the response to radiation therapy. Using only routinely available pre-treatment MRIs to inform the patient-specific bio-mathematical model simulations, we find that radiation response in these patients, quantified by both clinical and model-generated measures, could have been predicted prior to treatment with high accuracy. Specifically, we find that the net proliferation rate is correlated with the radiation response parameter (r = 0.89, p = 0.0007), resulting in a predictive relationship that is tested with a leave-one-out cross-validation technique. This relationship predicts the tumor size post-therapy to within inter-observer tumor volume uncertainty. The results of this study suggest that a mathematical model can create a virtual in silico tumor with the same growth kinetics as a particular patient and can not only predict treatment response in individual patients in vivo but also provide a basis for evaluation of response in each patient to any given therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20484781      PMCID: PMC3786554          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/12/001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  34 in total

1.  A four-dimensional computer simulation model of the in vivo response to radiotherapy of glioblastoma multiforme: studies on the effect of clonogenic cell density.

Authors:  G S Stamatakos; V P Antipas; N K Uzunoglu; R G Dale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Pre-treatment proliferation and the outcome of conventional and accelerated radiotherapy.

Authors:  George D Wilson; Michele I Saunders; Stanley Dische; Frances M Daley; Francesca M Buffa; Paul I Richman; Søren M Bentzen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Predicting outcome of patients with high-grade gliomas after radiotherapy using quantitative analysis of T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christina Tsien; Diana Gomez-Hassan; Thomas L Chenevert; Julia Lee; Theodore Lawrence; Randall K Ten Haken; Larry R Junck; Brian Ross; Yue Cao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.

Authors:  D R Macdonald; T L Cascino; S C Schold; J G Cairncross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Effects of radiation on a three-dimensional model of malignant glioma invasion.

Authors:  G S Bauman; B J Fisher; W McDonald; V R Amberger; E Moore; R F Del Maestro
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  1999 Aug-Oct       Impact factor: 2.457

6.  Radiosensitivity, recovery and dose-rate effect in three human glioma cell lines.

Authors:  X Yang; J L Darling; T J McMillan; J H Peacock; G G Steel
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Mathematical modelling of radiotherapy strategies for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Heiko Enderling; Alexander R A Anderson; Mark A J Chaplain; Alastair J Munro; Jayant S Vaidya
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 8.  The WHO classification of tumors of the nervous system.

Authors:  Paul Kleihues; David N Louis; Bernd W Scheithauer; Lucy B Rorke; Guido Reifenberger; Peter C Burger; Webster K Cavenee
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.685

9.  Regional hypoxia in glioblastoma multiforme quantified with [18F]fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography before radiotherapy: correlation with time to progression and survival.

Authors:  Alexander M Spence; Mark Muzi; Kristin R Swanson; Finbarr O'Sullivan; Jason K Rockhill; Joseph G Rajendran; Tom C H Adamsen; Jeanne M Link; Paul E Swanson; Kevin J Yagle; Robert C Rostomily; Daniel L Silbergeld; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  A patient-specific in vivo tumor and normal tissue model for prediction of the response to radiotherapy.

Authors:  Georgios Stamatakos; V P Antipas; N K Ozunoglu
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.176

View more
  94 in total

1.  Improving the time-machine: estimating date of birth of grade II gliomas.

Authors:  C Gerin; J Pallud; B Grammaticos; E Mandonnet; C Deroulers; P Varlet; L Capelle; L Taillandier; L Bauchet; H Duffau; M Badoual
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 6.831

2.  Increased re-entry into cell cycle mitigates age-related neurogenic decline in the murine subventricular zone.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stoll; Behnum A Habibi; Andrei M Mikheev; Jurate Lasiene; Susan C Massey; Kristin R Swanson; Robert C Rostomily; Philip J Horner
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 6.277

3.  Enhancing CHK1 inhibitor lethality in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Yong Tang; Yun Dai; Steven Grant; Paul Dent
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 4.  Mechanism-Based Modeling of Tumor Growth and Treatment Response Constrained by Multiparametric Imaging Data.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Ernesto A B F Lima; Matthew T McKenna; David T Fuentes; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-02

Review 5.  Clinical implications of in silico mathematical modeling for glioblastoma: a critical review.

Authors:  Maria Protopapa; Anna Zygogianni; Georgios S Stamatakos; Christos Antypas; Christina Armpilia; Nikolaos K Uzunoglu; Vassilis Kouloulias
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Quantifying the role of angiogenesis in malignant progression of gliomas: in silico modeling integrates imaging and histology.

Authors:  Kristin R Swanson; Russell C Rockne; Jonathan Claridge; Mark A Chaplain; Ellsworth C Alvord; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Proliferation saturation index in an adaptive Bayesian approach to predict patient-specific radiotherapy responses.

Authors:  Enakshi D Sunassee; Dean Tan; Nathan Ji; Renee Brady; Eduardo G Moros; Jimmy J Caudell; Slav Yartsev; Heiko Enderling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  Biophysical Modeling of In Vivo Glioma Response After Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy in a Murine Model of Brain Cancer.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Vito Quaranta; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  The biology and mathematical modelling of glioma invasion: a review.

Authors:  J C L Alfonso; K Talkenberger; M Seifert; B Klink; A Hawkins-Daarud; K R Swanson; H Hatzikirou; A Deutsch
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Hypoxic cell waves around necrotic cores in glioblastoma: a biomathematical model and its therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Alicia Martínez-González; Gabriel F Calvo; Luis A Pérez Romasanta; Víctor M Pérez-García
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 1.758

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.