Literature DB >> 28606606

Potential risks of using cement-augmented screws for spinal fusion in patients with low bone quality.

M Martín-Fernández1, A López-Herradón1, A R Piñera1, F Tomé-Bermejo1, J M Duart1, M D Vlad2, M G Rodríguez-Arguisjuela1, L Alvarez-Galovich3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Dramatic increases in the average life expectancy have led to increases in the variety of degenerative changes and deformities observed in the aging spine. The elderly population can present challenges for spine surgeons, not only because of increased comorbidities, but also because of the quality of their bones. Pedicle screws are the implants used most commonly in spinal surgery for fixation, but their efficacy depends directly on bone quality. Although polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-augmented screws represent an alternative for patients with osteoporotic vertebrae, their use has raised some concerns because of the possible association between cement leakages (CLs) and other morbidities.
PURPOSE: To analyze potential complications related to the use of cement-augmented screws for spinal fusion and to investigate the effectiveness of using these screws in the treatment of patients with low bone quality. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective single-center study. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study included 313 consecutive patients who underwent spinal fusion using a total of 1,780 cement-augmented screws. METHODS AND OUTCOME MEASURES: We analyzed potential complications related to the use of cement-augmented screws, including CL, vascular injury, infection, screw extraction problems, revision surgery, and instrument failure. There are no financial conflicts of interest to report.
RESULTS: A total of 1,043 vertebrae were instrumented. Cement leakage was observed in 650 vertebrae (62.3%). There were no major clinical complications related to CL, but two patients (0.6%) had radicular pain related to CL at the S1 foramina. Of the 13 patients (4.1%) who developed deep infections requiring surgical debridement, two with chronic infections had possible spondylitis that required instrument removal. All patients responded well to antibiotic therapy. Revision surgery was performed in 56 patients (17.9%), most of whom had long construction. A total of 180 screws were removed as a result of revision. There were no problems with screw extraction.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the efficacy and safety of cement-augmented screws for the treatment of patients with low bone mineral density.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cement leakage; Cement-augmented screws; Osteoporosis; PMMA; Risk factors; Spinal fusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28606606     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  16 in total

1.  Analysis of bone cement distribution around fenestrated pedicle screws in low bone quality lumbosacral vertebrae.

Authors:  Sergio Gómez González; Gerard Cabestany Bastida; Maria Daniela Vlad; José López López; Pablo Buenestado Caballero; Luis Alvarez-Galovich; Maria Rodríguez-Arguisjuela; Enrique Fernández Aguado
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The cement leakage in cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in degenerative lumbosacral diseases: a retrospective analysis of 202 cases and 950 augmented pedicle screws.

Authors:  Hui-Zhi Guo; Yong-Chao Tang; Dan-Qing Guo; Shun-Cong Zhang; Yong-Xian Li; Guo-Ye Mo; Pei-Jie Luo; Ten-Peng Zhou; Yan-Huai Ma; Xiao-Bing Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Simplified Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.

Authors:  Nicolas Plais; Charles Mengis; Jesús Manuel Gallego Bustos; Felix Tomé-Bermejo; Alejandro Peiro-Garcia; America Novoa Buitrago; Luis Alvarez-Galovich
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

4.  Kyphoplasty versus percutaneous posterior instrumentation for osteoporotic vertebral fractures with posterior wall injury: a propensity score matched cohort study.

Authors:  Manuel Moser; Julien Jost; Edin Nevzati
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-03

5.  Comparison of three different screw trajectories in osteoporotic vertebrae: a biomechanical investigation.

Authors:  J-S Jarvers; S Schleifenbaum; C Pfeifle; C Oefner; M Edel; N von der Höh; C-E Heyde
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  [Polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screw fixation in treatment of senile thoracolumbar tuberculosis combined with severe osteoporosis].

Authors:  Qingda Li; Hao Chen; Tuanjiang Liu; Limin He; Peng Liu; Yuanting Zhao; Jinpeng Du; Peng Zou; Zhengping Zhang; Baorong He; Junsong Yang; Dingjun Hao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-12-15

7.  Cementless posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of OI patients with severe spine deformity-a case series.

Authors:  Ron Gurel; Dror Ovadia; David E Lebel; Leonid Zeitlin; Amit Sigal
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.721

8.  Who benefits more in osteoporotic fractures: Pedicle screw instrumentation or kyphoplasty for American Society of Anesthesiologists II/III patients?

Authors:  Tjark Tassemeier; Marcel Haversath; Moritz Schutzbach; Marcus Jäger
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

Review 9.  Surgical Trend Analysis for Use of Cement Augmented Pedicle Screws in Osteoporosis of Spine: A Systematic Review (2000-2017).

Authors:  Vishwajeet Singh; Rajat Mahajan; Kalidutta Das; Harvinder Singh Chhabra; Tarush Rustagi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-09-27

10.  Effect and potential risks of using multilevel cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic spine with lumbar degenerative disease.

Authors:  Yong-Chao Tang; Hui-Zhi Guo; Dan-Qing Guo; Pei-Jie Luo; Yong-Xian Li; Guo-Ye Mo; Yan-Huai Ma; Jian-Cheng Peng; Shun-Cong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.