Literature DB >> 34545629

Monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio as an independent risk factor for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Hongzhi Xu1, Yufeng Pang2, Xueqing Li1, Bingbing Zha3, Tao He1, Heyuan Ding3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is considered to be an inflammatory disease. This study aimed to investigate the association of monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR) with PTC.
METHODS: Clinical parameters from 300 patients with PTC and 552 patients with benign thyroid nodule were compared. Serum renal function and liver enzymes, fasting plasma glucose, lipid profile, and blood cell count were measured.
RESULTS: Patients with PTC had a higher MONO (p < 0.001) and MHR (p < 0.001). There was a step-wise increase in the prevalence of PTC (p = 0.003) with the tertile of MHR. Logistic regression analysis revealed that MHR could be considered an independent risk factor (p < 0.001) in the case-control study and the cohort study. Pearson correlation analysis and simple linear regression analysis indicated that MHR was positively associated with neutrophil (NEU) and lymphocyte (LYM) count as well as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Area under the curve (AUC) was 0.711. The optimal cutoff of MHR was 0.33 × 109 /mmol.
CONCLUSION: This study identifies novel evidence that patients with PTC have a higher MHR. MHR is an independent risk factor for PTC. These findings support the application of MHR to predict, diagnose, and evaluate the occurrence of PTC.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; inflammation; monocyte; monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio; papillary thyroid carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34545629      PMCID: PMC8605115          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


INTRODUCTION

There is increasing and consistent evidence that inflammation is closely related to the occurrence and development of cancer. , , Numerous studies have suggested that activation of inflammation is a crucial mechanism that underlies the initiation and progression of thyroid cancer. , Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common histological type of differentiated thyroid malignancy. Systemic inflammatory markers, which include systemic inflammation response index, C‐reactive protein, neutrophil‐(NEU)‐to‐lymphocyte (LYM) ratio (NLR), , , platelet‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte‐to‐monocyte ratio (LMR), , mean platelet volume (MPV), and red cell distribution width (RDW) have recently been shown to be independent prognostic factors in patients with PTC. Monocyte (MONO) to high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C) ratio (MHR) is obtained by dividing the MONO count by HDL‐C. Monocytes are essential immune system cells that have unique roles during the inflammatory response while HDL‐C has several biological activities including inhibition of the proliferation, differentiation, and activation of monocytes, and anti‐inflammatory and anti‐oxidative roles. , HDL‐C, alone or with the ratio of uric acid (UA), is associated with metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, thyroiditis, and liver steatosis. MHR is a new biomarker of inflammation and oxidative stress , and is being increasingly recognized as a novel clinically relevant biomarker of pathological inflammation and a new predictor and prognostic factor in cardiovascular disease, , , peripheral artery disease, metabolic syndrome, diabetic nephropathy, and multiple sclerosis. Papillary thyroid carcinoma is also associated with increased inflammatory burden. There are no data about the relationship between MHR and PTC. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate this association.

METHODS

Study design and population

The study was carried out from January 2018 to December 2020 and involved 372 patients with PTC and 651 people with benign thyroid nodule (BTN) who were recruited from the inpatient departments of Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University. Diagnosis of PTC and BTN was based on pathology. Retrospective analysis of parameters was performed according to the process described in Figure 1. Subjects were excluded from the study if they had any of the following: history of acute infectious disease, abnormal liver or renal function, leukopenia, or any treatment with immunosuppressive agents. Finally, data from 300 patients with PTC and 552 patients with BTN were analyzed.
FIGURE 1

Flow chart of the study. BTN, benign thyroid nodule; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio

Flow chart of the study. BTN, benign thyroid nodule; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio The study protocol was approved by the medical ethics committee of Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University (NO.2018–114). Informed consent was obtained from all patients and subjects.

Data collection

Patient age and medical history, including medication, and body mass index (BMI) were recorded. After a 12‐h overnight fast, blood was obtained for assessment of renal function, liver enzymes, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), lipid profile, and blood cell count.

Laboratory data

Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), urea nitrogen (UN), UA, creatinine (Crea), total cholesterol (TC), HDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C), and FPG were analyzed using an automatic analyzer (Cobas702; Roche Corporation). NEU, LYM, MONO, and C‐reactive protein (CRP) were analyzed using an automatic blood cell analyzer (Sysmex XN9000). NLR is the ratio of NEU (×109/L) to LYM (×109/L). LMR is the ratio of LYM (×109/L) to MONO (×109/L). MHR (×109/mmol) is the ratio of MONO (×109/L) to HDL‐C (mmol/L).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 22.0. Normally distributed continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and were analyzed by Student t or ANOVA test. Non‐normally distributed variables are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR) and were analyzed by nonparametric test (Mann‐Whitney or Kruskal‐Wallis). Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and proportions, analyzed by chi‐square test. Pearson correlation analysis and simple linear regression analysis were used to evaluate the association of parameters with MHR. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association of serum MHR with PTC after adjusting for other clinical and biochemical variables. A p value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Demographics of women with PTC and healthy controls in the case‐control study

The clinical characteristics of the PTC group (n = 300) and BTN group (n = 552) are shown in Table 1. Compared with the BTN group, ALT (14.0 [11.0, 17.0] vs. 16.0 [11.0, 21.5] U/L, p = 0.004), MONO (0.40 ± 0.14 vs. 0.44 ± 0.16 × 109/L, p < 0.001), and MHR (0.32 ± 0.15 vs. 0.37 ± 0.18 × 109/mmol, p < 0.001) were significantly increased in the PTC group, while age (54 ± 13 vs. 49 ± 12 years, p < 0.001) and HDL‐C (1.39 ± 0.38 vs. 1.32 ± 0.36 mmol/L, p = 0.017) were significantly decreased (Table 1). There was no significant difference in gender, smoke, BMI, UN, UA, Crea, TC, LDL‐C, FPG, NEU, LYM, NLR, LMR, or CRP between the two groups (p > 0.05, Table 1).
TABLE 1

Demographics of the study population

VariablesTotalBNT groupPTC group p
n (Male/Female)852 (211:641)552 (126:426)300 (85:215)0.081
Smoke, n (%)191 (22.4%)123 (22.3%)68 (22.7%)0.932
Age (years)52 ± 1354 ± 1349 ± 12 <0.001
BMI (kg/m2)23.6 ± 2.823.6 ± 2.923.7 ± 2.60.685
ALT (U/L)16.0 (11.0, 23.0)14.0 (11.0, 17.0)16.0 (11.0, 21.5) 0.004
UN (mmol/L)4.83 ± 1.324.86 ± 1.364.76 ± 1.240.297
UA (µmol/L)282 ± 80281 ± 81284 ± 780.549
Crea (µmol/L)61.5 ± 13.261.6 ± 13.661.3 ± 12.50.753
TC (mmol/L)4.59 ± 0.964.60 ± 0.924.56 ± 1.030.588
HDL‐C (mmol/L)1.37 ± 0.371.39 ± 0.381.32 ± 0.36 0.017
LDL‐C (mmol/L)2.96 ± 0.852.97 ± 0.822.93 ± 0.890.567
FPG (mmol/L)4.87 (4.56, 5.30)5.06 (4.57, 5.60)4.72 (4.60, 5.01)0.530
NEU (×109/L)4.40 ± 1.374.38 ± 1.384.43 ± 1.340.573
LYM (×109/L)1.63 ± 0.531.61 ± 0.531.67 ± 0.550.129
MONO (×109/L)0.42 ± 0.150.40 ± 0.140.44 ± 0.16 <0.001
NLR3.03 ± 1.593.07 ± 1.692.95 ± 1.390.281
LMR4.33 ± 1.944.43 ± 2.024.16 ± 1.790.050
MHR(×109/mmol)0.34 ± 0.170.32 ± 0.150.37 ± 0.18 <0.001
CRP (mg/L)4.0 (2.0, 9.0)4.0 (2.0, 8.5)5.0 (2.0, 10.5)0.058

Data of normal distribution are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed by student t test. Non‐normally distributed variables are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR), and analyzed by nonparametric test (Mann‐Whitney). Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and proportions, and analyzed by using chi‐square test. Bold indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; BNT, benign thyroid nodule; Crea, creatinine; CRP, C‐reactive protei; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LMR, lymphocyte‐to‐monocyte ratio; LYM, lymphocyte; MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio; MONO, monocyte; NEU, neutrophil; NLR, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; TC, total cholesterol; UA, uric acid; UN, urea nitrogen.

Demographics of the study population Data of normal distribution are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed by student t test. Non‐normally distributed variables are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR), and analyzed by nonparametric test (Mann‐Whitney). Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and proportions, and analyzed by using chi‐square test. Bold indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; BNT, benign thyroid nodule; Crea, creatinine; CRP, C‐reactive protei; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LMR, lymphocyte‐to‐monocyte ratio; LYM, lymphocyte; MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio; MONO, monocyte; NEU, neutrophil; NLR, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; TC, total cholesterol; UA, uric acid; UN, urea nitrogen.

Comparison of clinical parameters among three groups categorized by tertile of MHR in the cohort study

Subjects were divided into three groups according to tertile of MHR: lowest (below 0.24), middle (0.24–0.37), or highest (above 0.37). There was a step‐wise increase in the prevalence of PTC (30.4% vs. 32.3% vs. 42.7%, p = 0.003; Figure 2), and increased level of ALT (14.0 [11.0, 16.0] vs. 11.0 [10.0, 16.0] vs. 16.5 [12.0, 23.8] U/L, p < 0.001], UA (258 ± 68 vs. 281 ± 83 vs. 306 ± 79 µmol/L, p < 0.001), Crea (57.2 ± 10.5 vs. 62.2 ± 13.9 vs. 61.5 ± 13.2 µmol/L, p < 0.001), NEU (3.72 ± 1.30 vs. 4.39 ± 1.29 vs. 5.04 ± 1.18 × 109/L, p < 0.001), LYM (1.51 ± 0.50 vs. 1.63 ± 0.51 vs. 1.75 ± 0.57 × 109/L, p < 0.001), MONO (0.29 ± 0.08 vs. 0.40 ± 0.08 vs. 0.56 ± 0.13 × 109/L, p < 0.001), NLR(2.83 ± 1.73 vs. 3.02 ± 1.56 vs. 3.22 ± 1.48, p = 0.010), and CRP (4.0 [2.0, 8.0] vs. 4.0 [2.0, 7.0] vs. 4.0 [1.4, 11.0] mg/L, p = 0.042) with MHR tertile and a step‐wise decrease in TC (4.75 ± 0.92 vs. 4.60 ± 0.95 vs. 4.42 ± 0.98 mmol/L, p < 0.001), HDL‐C (1.65 ± 0.36 vs. 1.37 ± 0.28 vs. 1.09 ± 0.25 mmol/L, p < 0.001), and LMR (5.58 ± 2.20 vs. 4.21 ± 1.53 vs. 3.29 ± 1.30, p < 0.001; Table 2).
FIGURE 2

Prevalence of PTC among three groups categorized by tertile of MHR. PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio

TABLE 2

Comparison of parameters among three groups categorized by tertile of MHR in the cohort study

VariablesLowest groupMiddle groupHighest group p
MHR (×109/mmol)below 0.240.24–0.37above 0.37
n (Male/Female)270 (21:249)294 (74:220)288 (116:172) <0.001
Smoke, n (%)70 (25.9%)61(20.7%)60 (20.8%)0.247
Age (years)52 ± 1353 ± 1251 ± 131.000
BMI (kg/m2)23.3 ± 2.823.7 ± 2.724.0 ± 2.70.152
ALT (U/L)14.0 (11.0, 16.0)11.0 (10.0, 16.0)16.5 (12.0, 23.8) <0.001
UN (mmol/L)4.78 ± 1.194.84 ± 1.364.87 ± 1.391.000
UA (µmol/L)258 ± 68281 ± 83306 ± 79 <0.001
Crea (µmol/L)57.2 ± 10.562.2 ± 13.961.5 ± 13.2 <0.001
TC (mmol/L)4.75 ± 0.924.60 ± 0.954.42 ± 0.98 <0.001
HDL‐C (mmol/L)1.65 ± 0.361.37 ± 0.281.09 ± 0.25 <0.001
LDL‐C (mmol/L)2.97 ± 0.843.00 ± 0.812.90 ± 0.891.000
FPG (mmol/L)4.83 (4.40, 5.27)5.04 (4.70, 5.65)4.81 (4.48, 5.41)0.854
NEU (×109/L)3.72 ± 1.304.39 ± 1.295.04 ± 1.18 <0.001
LYM (×109/L)1.51 ± 0.501.63 ± 0.511.75 ± 0.57 <0.001
MONO (×109/L)0.29 ± 0.080.40 ± 0.080.56 ± 0.13 <0.001
NLR2.83 ± 1.733.02 ± 1.563.22 ± 1.48 0.010
LMR5.58 ± 2.204.21 ± 1.533.29 ± 1.30 <0.001
CRP (mg/L)4.0 (2.0, 8.0)4.0 (2.0, 7.0)4.0 (1.4, 11.0) 0.042

Data of normal distribution are expressed as means ± standard deviation and analyzed by student t test. Non‐normally distributed variables are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR), and analyzed by nonparametric test (Kruskal‐Wallis H). Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and proportions, and analyzed by chi‐squaretest. Bold indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; Crea, creatinine; CRP, c‐reactive protein; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LMR, lymphocyte‐to‐monocyte ratio; LYM, lymphocyte; MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio; MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio; MONO, monocyte; NEU, neutrophil; NLR, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio; TC, total cholesterol; UA, uric acid; UN, urea nitrogen.

Prevalence of PTC among three groups categorized by tertile of MHR. PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio Comparison of parameters among three groups categorized by tertile of MHR in the cohort study Data of normal distribution are expressed as means ± standard deviation and analyzed by student t test. Non‐normally distributed variables are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR), and analyzed by nonparametric test (Kruskal‐Wallis H). Categorical variables are expressed as frequencies and proportions, and analyzed by chi‐squaretest. Bold indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index; Crea, creatinine; CRP, c‐reactive protein; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LMR, lymphocyte‐to‐monocyte ratio; LYM, lymphocyte; MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio; MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio; MONO, monocyte; NEU, neutrophil; NLR, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio; TC, total cholesterol; UA, uric acid; UN, urea nitrogen.

Monocyte to high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio was an independent risk factor for PTC

To determine independent risk factors for PTC in the case‐control study, age, ALT, and MHR, were entered into a binary logistic regression model (enter method). Age (β [SE] = −0.027 [0.006], OR [95% CI] = 0.973 [0.962, 0.985], p < 0.001), ALT (β [SE] = 0.011[0.006], OR [95% CI] = 1.011[1.000, 1.023], p < 0.049), and MHR (β [SE] = 0.036 [0.360], OR [95% CI] = 4.882 [2.037, 11.700], p < 0.001) were independently associated with PTC (Table 3). Then, age, ALT, HDL‐C, and MONO were entered into a binary logistic regression model (enter method). Age (β [SE] = −0.028 [0.006], OR [95% CI] = 0.973[0.961, 0.984], p < 0.001), and MONO (β [SE] = 1.511[0.497], OR [95% CI] = 4.531 [1.711, 12.001], p = 0.002) were independently associated with PTC (Table 3).
TABLE 3

Logistic regression analysis (enter method) to determine the risk factors for development of PTC in case‐control study

Variablesβ (SE)OR (95% CI) p
Age (years)−0.027 (0.006)0.973 (0.962, 0.985) <0.001
ALT (U/L)0.011 (0.006)1.011 (1.000, 1.023) 0.049
MHR (×109/mmol)0.036 (0.360)4.882 (2.037, 11.700) <0.001
Age (years)−0.028 (0.006)0.973 (0.961,0.984) <0.001
ALT (U/L)0.011 (0.006)1.011 (1.000,1.023)0.050
HDL‐C (mmol/L)−0.340 (0.206)0.712 (0.475,1.066)0.099
MONO (×109/L)1.511 (0.497)4.531 (1.711,12.001) 0.002

Data are presented as regression coefficient (standard error), odds ratio (95% confidence interval) and p value. Logistic regression analysis (enter method) was used determine the risk factors for development of PTC in the case‐control study. Bold indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio; MONO, monocyte; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Logistic regression analysis (enter method) to determine the risk factors for development of PTC in case‐control study Data are presented as regression coefficient (standard error), odds ratio (95% confidence interval) and p value. Logistic regression analysis (enter method) was used determine the risk factors for development of PTC in the case‐control study. Bold indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio; MONO, monocyte; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma. To determine independent risk factors for development of PTC in the cohort study, gender, ALT, Crea, TC, NEU, LYM, CRP, and MHR were entered into a binary logistic regression model (enter method). MHR (β [SE] = 3.740 [0.892], OR [95% CI] = 41.102 [7.335, 241.672], p < 0.001) was independently associated with PTC (Table 4). Then, gender, ALT, Crea, TC, NEU, LYM, HDL‐C, and MOHO were entered into a binary logistic regression model (enter method). MONO (β [SE] = 1.912 [0.592], OR [95% CI] = 6.766 [2.120, 21.590], p < 0.001) was independently associated with PTC (Table 4).
TABLE 4

Logistic regression analysis (enter method) to determine the risk factors for development of PTC in the cohort study

Variablesβ (SE)OR (95% CI) p
Gender0.195 (0.041)1.216 (0.554, 2.670)0.626
ALT (U/L)−0.010 (0.011)0.990 (0.968, 1.013)0.394
Crea (µmol/L)−0.024 (0.014)0.976 (0.949, 1.004)0.095
TC (mmol/L)0.026 (0.149)1.026 (0.766, 1.375)0.861
NEU (×109/L)−0.079 (0.109)0.924 (0.746, 1.144)0.468
LYM (×109/L)−0.396 (0.303)0.673 (0.371, 1.219)0.191
CRP (mg/L)−0.001(0.013)0.999 (0.973, 1.025)0.916
MHR (×109/mmol)3.740 (0.892)41.102 (7.335, 241.672) <0.001
Gender0.253 (0.228)1.288 (0.824, 2.014)0.268
ALT (U/L)−0.011 (0.006)1.011 (1.000, 1.023)0.058
Crea (µmol/L)−0.012 (0.007)0.988 (0.974, 1.002)0.096
TC (mmol/L)−0.002 (0.081)0.998 (0.851, 1.171)0.983
NEU (×109/L)−0.084 (0.064)0.919 (0.810, 1.043)0.190
LYM (×109/L)0.029 (0.142)1.030 (0.780, 1.360)0.835
HDL‐C (mmol/L)−0.311 (0.220)0.733 (0.476, 1.129)0.159
MONO (×109/L)1.912 (0.592)6.766 (2.120, 21.590) 0.001

Data are presented as regression coefficient (standard error), odds ratio (95% confidence interval) and p value. Logistic regression analysis (enter method) was used to determine the risk factors for development of PTC in the cohort study. Bold indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; Crea, creatinine; CRP, C‐reactive protein; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LYM, lymphocyte; MONO, monocyte; NEU, neutrophil; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; TC, total cholesterol; UA, uric acid.

Logistic regression analysis (enter method) to determine the risk factors for development of PTC in the cohort study Data are presented as regression coefficient (standard error), odds ratio (95% confidence interval) and p value. Logistic regression analysis (enter method) was used to determine the risk factors for development of PTC in the cohort study. Bold indicates statistical significance (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; Crea, creatinine; CRP, C‐reactive protein; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LYM, lymphocyte; MONO, monocyte; NEU, neutrophil; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; TC, total cholesterol; UA, uric acid.

Correlation of MHR with other inflammatory parameters

Pearson correlation analysis revealed that MHR was positively correlated with NEU (r = 0.402, p < 0.001, Figure 3A), LYM (r = 0.193, p < 0.001, Figure 3B), and NLR (r = 0.097, p = 0.004, Figure 3C).
FIGURE 3

(A) Pearson correlation between MHR and NEU; (B) Pearson correlation between MHR and LYM; (C) Pearson correlation between MHR and NLR. MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio; NEU, neutrophil; LYM, lymphocyte; NLR, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio

(A) Pearson correlation between MHR and NEU; (B) Pearson correlation between MHR and LYM; (C) Pearson correlation between MHR and NLR. MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio; NEU, neutrophil; LYM, lymphocyte; NLR, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio Simple linear regression analysis revealed that MHR was also positively associated with NEU (R2 = 0.160, p < 0.001, Figure 4A), LYM (R2 = 0.036, p < 0.001, Figure 4B), and NLR (R2 = 0.008, p = 0.004, Figure 4C).
FIGURE 4

(A) Simple linear regression analysis between MHR and NEU; (B)Linear regression analysis between MHR and LYM; (C) Linear regression analysis between MHR and NLR. MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio; NEU, neutrophil; LYM, lymphocyte; NLR, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio

(A) Simple linear regression analysis between MHR and NEU; (B)Linear regression analysis between MHR and LYM; (C) Linear regression analysis between MHR and NLR. MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio; NEU, neutrophil; LYM, lymphocyte; NLR, neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio

The accuracy of MHR for the diagnosis of PTC

The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of MHR was 0.711 (95% CI: 0.668–0.754, p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff values of PFR were evaluated. The cutoff value with the highest Youden index (0.346) was defined as the optimization. The optimal value of MHR as an indicator for monitoring the development of PTC was 0.33 × 109/mmol, which yielded a sensitivity of 64.0% and a specificity of 70.4% (Figure 5).
FIGURE 5

ROC curve of MHR for diagnosing PTC. AUC = 0.711 (95% CI: 0.668–0.754, p < 0.001). PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio; AUC, area under the ROC curve

ROC curve of MHR for diagnosing PTC. AUC = 0.711 (95% CI: 0.668–0.754, p < 0.001). PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; MHR, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio; AUC, area under the ROC curve

DISCUSSION

Papillary thyroid carcinoma is related to inflammatory factors, but its pathogenesis has not been fully elucidated. We innovatively analyzed the relationship between MHR and PTC. The present study revealed novel evidence that MHR is closely related to PTC and an independent risk factor for PTC. Monocyte is involved in the occurrence of PTC. Park et al. found that thyroid tumors had a high infiltration with inflammatory MONO, while blood and bone marrow were unaffected in a mouse model. In human PTC, the abundance and proportion of MONO were significantly increased, and MONO appeared to play a tumor‐promoting role. The present study revealed that the level of MONO in the peripheral blood of PTC patients was significantly increased and MONO was an independent risk factor for PTC. Monocyte to high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio is a new biomarker of inflammation and oxidative stress. , Combining two indicators of opposite changes, MHR is a valuable marker in systemic inflammatory diseases. It is being increasingly recognized as a novel clinically relevant biomarker of pathological inflammation and a new predictor and prognostic factor in cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, metabolic syndrome, diabetic nephropathy, and multiple sclerosis. , , , , , , , , Nonetheless rarely has MHR been studied in thyroid disease. One large‐scale study reported that MHR level was significantly increased in patients with thyroid nodules; MHR was significantly associated with the presence of thyroid nodule and strongly associated with the presence and size of thyroid nodule irrespective of gender. There has been no report of a correlation between MHR and PTC. Our study confirmed our hypothesis that MHR was significantly increased in and closely related to PTC and an independent risk factor for PTC. Although NEU, LYM, and NLR are classic inflammatory indicators, studies have suggested that they are associated with the incidence of PTC. , , , In our study, NEU, LYM, and NLR were significantly higher in the lowest tertile of MHR group compared with the highest. MHR was positively correlated with NEU, LYM, and NLR. We speculated that MHR might participate in the pathogenesis of PTC by affecting inflammation. This study has some limitations. The cross‐sectional method prevented exploration of a causal relationship between MHR and PTC. Future longitudinal studies may provide clarification. In summary, this study identifies novel evidence that patients with PTC have a higher MHR. MHR is an independent risk factor for PTC. These findings support the application of MHR to predict, diagnose, and evaluate the occurrence of PTC.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.
  35 in total

1.  Monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio predicts adverse cardiac events in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Firdevs Aysenur Ekizler; Serkan Cay; Burak Açar; Bahar Tekin Tak; Habibe Kafes; Ozcan Ozeke; Elif Hande Ozcan Cetin; Firat Ozcan; Serkan Topaloglu; Omac Tufekcioglu; Dursun Aras
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.851

2.  Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio is Useful in Differentiation of Malign and Benign Thyroid Nodules.

Authors:  Mustafa Sit; Gulali Aktas; Hayri Erkol; Semih Yaman; Fatih Keyif; Haluk Savli
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 0.705

Review 3.  HDL abnormalities in familial hypercholesterolemia: Focus on biological functions.

Authors:  Shiva Ganjali; Amir Abbas Momtazi; Maciej Banach; Petri T Kovanen; Evan A Stein; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Prog Lipid Res       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 16.195

4.  Mitochondria Are a Subset of Extracellular Vesicles Released by Activated Monocytes and Induce Type I IFN and TNF Responses in Endothelial Cells.

Authors:  Florian Puhm; Taras Afonyushkin; Ulrike Resch; Georg Obermayer; Manfred Rohde; Thomas Penz; Michael Schuster; Gabriel Wagner; Andre F Rendeiro; Imene Melki; Christoph Kaun; Johann Wojta; Christoph Bock; Bernd Jilma; Nigel Mackman; Eric Boilard; Christoph J Binder
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 5.  Thyroid cancer and inflammation.

Authors:  Valentina Guarino; Maria Domenica Castellone; Elvira Avilla; Rosa Marina Melillo
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.102

6.  Could Red Cell Distribution Width be a Marker of Thyroid Cancer?

Authors:  Gulali Aktas; Mustafa Sit; Ibrahim Karagoz; Edip Erkus; Bahri Ozer; Mehmet Zahid Kocak; Semih Yaman; Fatih Keyif; Rabia Altinordu; Hayri Erkol; Haluk Savli
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 0.711

7.  The prognostic value of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio for high-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Linlin Song; Jingqiang Zhu; Zhihui Li; Tao Wei; Rixiang Gong; Jianyong Lei
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 3.989

8.  Association between Serum Uric Acid to HDL-Cholesterol Ratio and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Lean Chinese Adults.

Authors:  Ya-Nan Zhang; Qin-Qiu Wang; Yi-Shu Chen; Chao Shen; Cheng-Fu Xu
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.257

9.  Monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio as an independent risk factor for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Hongzhi Xu; Yufeng Pang; Xueqing Li; Bingbing Zha; Tao He; Heyuan Ding
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.352

10.  Hashimoto's thyroiditis is associated with elevated serum uric acid to high density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio.

Authors:  Ozge Kurtkulagi; Burcin Meryem Atak Tel; Gizem Kahveci; Satilmis Bilgin; Tuba Taslamacioglu Duman; Asli Ertürk; Buse Balci; Gulali Aktas
Journal:  Rom J Intern Med       Date:  2021-11-20
View more
  2 in total

1.  Monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio as an independent risk factor for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Hongzhi Xu; Yufeng Pang; Xueqing Li; Bingbing Zha; Tao He; Heyuan Ding
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Risk factors and diagnostic prediction models for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaowen Zhang; Yuyang Ze; Jianfeng Sang; Xianbiao Shi; Yan Bi; Shanmei Shen; Xinlin Zhang; Dalong Zhu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 6.055

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.