Jennifer M Joseph1, Davide Gori2, Catherine Curtin3, Jennifer Hah4, Vy Thuy Ho5, Steven M Asch6, Tina Hernandez-Boussard7. 1. Department of Medicine, Stanford University, CA. 2. Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy. 3. Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, CA; Department of Surgery, Stanford University, CA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/ccurtinprs. 4. Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, CA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/JenniferHahMD. 5. Department of Surgery, Stanford University, CA. 6. Department of Medicine, Stanford University, CA; Center for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, CA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/steveaschmd. 7. Department of Medicine, Stanford University, CA; Department of Surgery, Stanford University, CA; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, CA. Electronic address: boussard@stanford.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was an assessment of availability postoperative pain management quality measures and National Quality Forum-endorsed measures. Postoperative pain is an important clinical timepoint because poor pain control can lead to patient suffering, chronic opiate use, and/or chronic pain. Quality measures can guide best practices, but it is unclear whether there are measures for managing pain after surgery. METHODS: The National Quality Forum Quality Positioning System, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Indicators, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Measures Inventory Tool databases were searched in November 2019. We conducted a systematic literature review to further identify quality measures in research publications, clinical practice guidelines, and gray literature for the period between March 11, 2015 and March 11, 2020. RESULTS: Our systematic review yielded 1,328 publications, of which 206 were pertinent. Nineteen pain management quality measures were identified from the quality measure databases, and 5 were endorsed by National Quality Forum. The National Quality Forum measures were not specific to postoperative pain management. Three of the non-endorsed measures were specific to postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: The dearth of published postoperative pain management quality measures, especially National Quality Forum-endorsed measures, highlights the need for more rigorous evidence and widely endorsed postoperative pain quality measures to guide best practices.
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was an assessment of availability postoperative pain management quality measures and National Quality Forum-endorsed measures. Postoperative pain is an important clinical timepoint because poor pain control can lead to patient suffering, chronic opiate use, and/or chronic pain. Quality measures can guide best practices, but it is unclear whether there are measures for managing pain after surgery. METHODS: The National Quality Forum Quality Positioning System, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Indicators, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Measures Inventory Tool databases were searched in November 2019. We conducted a systematic literature review to further identify quality measures in research publications, clinical practice guidelines, and gray literature for the period between March 11, 2015 and March 11, 2020. RESULTS: Our systematic review yielded 1,328 publications, of which 206 were pertinent. Nineteen pain management quality measures were identified from the quality measure databases, and 5 were endorsed by National Quality Forum. The National Quality Forum measures were not specific to postoperative pain management. Three of the non-endorsed measures were specific to postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: The dearth of published postoperative pain management quality measures, especially National Quality Forum-endorsed measures, highlights the need for more rigorous evidence and widely endorsed postoperative pain quality measures to guide best practices.
Authors: Chad M Brummett; Jennifer F Waljee; Jenna Goesling; Stephanie Moser; Paul Lin; Michael J Englesbe; Amy S B Bohnert; Sachin Kheterpal; Brahmajee K Nallamothu Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Davide Gori; Rajendra Dulal; Douglas W Blayney; James D Brooks; Maria P Fantini; Kathryn M McDonald; Tina Hernandez-Boussard Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2018-09-18
Authors: Karishma Desai; Ian Carroll; Steven M Asch; Tina Seto; Kathryn M McDonald; Catherine Curtin; Tina Hernandez-Boussard Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Roger Chou; Debra B Gordon; Oscar A de Leon-Casasola; Jack M Rosenberg; Stephen Bickler; Tim Brennan; Todd Carter; Carla L Cassidy; Eva Hall Chittenden; Ernest Degenhardt; Scott Griffith; Renee Manworren; Bill McCarberg; Robert Montgomery; Jamie Murphy; Melissa F Perkal; Santhanam Suresh; Kathleen Sluka; Scott Strassels; Richard Thirlby; Eugene Viscusi; Gary A Walco; Lisa Warner; Steven J Weisman; Christopher L Wu Journal: J Pain Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Arjun Parthipan; Imon Banerjee; Keith Humphreys; Steven M Asch; Catherine Curtin; Ian Carroll; Tina Hernandez-Boussard Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gabriel A Brat; Denis Agniel; Andrew Beam; Brian Yorkgitis; Mark Bicket; Mark Homer; Kathe P Fox; Daniel B Knecht; Cheryl N McMahill-Walraven; Nathan Palmer; Isaac Kohane Journal: BMJ Date: 2018-01-17