Literature DB >> 34535867

Healthy or not? The impact of conflicting health-related information on attentional resources.

Patrick V Barnwell1, Erick J Fedorenko2, Richard J Contrada2.   

Abstract

Despite its ubiquity, little is known about the impact of exposure to conflicting health information on cognitive efficiency. We hypothesized that it would reduce attentional capacity, as evidenced by (1) increased response errors during the Attention Network Test (ANT), (2) decreased efficiency of each ANT system (alerting, orienting, execute control), and (3) increased self-reported workload, (4) nutritional confusion and (5) nutritional backlash. A sample of 184 online participants were assigned randomly to read an article containing either congruent or conflicting health information. Subsequently, they completed the ANT and self-report measures of workload, nutritional confusion, and backlash at nutritional recommendations and research. Participants in the conflicting health information condition made more errors, had overall slower reaction times, and reported greater workload, nutritional confusion, and backlash. No differences were found for individual ANT systems. These findings suggest that exposure to conflicting health information can degrade attentional mechanisms responsible for accurate and prompt responding to incoming information.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accuracy; Attentional capacity; Conflict; Health-related information; Reaction time

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34535867     DOI: 10.1007/s10865-021-00256-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Med        ISSN: 0160-7715


  38 in total

Review 1.  Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples.

Authors:  Jesse Chandler; Danielle Shapiro
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 18.561

Review 2.  Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Darren A Dewalt; Nancy D Berkman; Stacey Sheridan; Kathleen N Lohr; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy D Berkman; Stacey L Sheridan; Katrina E Donahue; David J Halpern; Karen Crotty
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy.

Authors:  J S Blumenthal-Barby; Heather Krieger
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Men's and women's responses to two-sided health news coverage: a moderated mediation model.

Authors:  Chingching Chang
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2013-07-25

6.  Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks.

Authors:  Jin Fan; Bruce D McCandliss; Tobias Sommer; Amir Raz; Michael I Posner
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Trends in dietary food groups and Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension (DASH) score among adults: A longitudinal study from the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study, 2006-2017.

Authors:  Maryam Aghayan; Somayeh Hosseinpour-Niazi; Bahar Bakhshi; Parvin Mirmiran; Fereidoun Azizi
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.008

8.  Utilization of Medications With Cognitive Impairment Side Effects and the Implications for Older Adults' Cognitive Function.

Authors:  Duy Do; Jason Schnittker
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2020-01-06

9.  Cognitive Processing Speed across the Lifespan: Beyond the Influence of Motor Speed.

Authors:  Deena Ebaid; Sheila G Crewther; Kirsty MacCalman; Alyse Brown; Daniel P Crewther
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 5.750

10.  An information theory account of cognitive control.

Authors:  Jin Fan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.