Literature DB >> 23886062

Men's and women's responses to two-sided health news coverage: a moderated mediation model.

Chingching Chang1.   

Abstract

This study explores how audiences respond to news coverage of food and nutrition topics when that coverage provides either 2-sided (positive and negative) information or 1-sided, unanimously positive information. A moderated mediation model helps clarify the different impacts of 2- and 1-sided news coverage and the psychological processes they elicit. Specifically, gender moderates the relative effects of 1- and 2-sided news stories; ambivalent feelings play a mediating role in the process. The findings confirm the model predictions: When reading 2-sided as opposed to 1-sided news, men experience more ambivalent feelings, less favorable attitudes toward the health issues, and lower intentions to adopt the advocated behaviors, whereas women do not exhibit such differences. Moreover, the ambivalent feelings mediate the interaction between gender and news presentation (i.e., 1- or 2-sided) on attitudes toward health issues and behavioral intentions to adopt advocated health behaviors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23886062     DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.778363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  11 in total

1.  Source-specific Exposure to Contradictory Nutrition Information: Documenting Prevalence and Effects on Adverse Cognitive and Behavioral Outcomes.

Authors:  Chul-Joo Lee; Rebekah H Nagler; Ningxin Wang
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-02-02

2.  The Impact of Smokeless Tobacco Risk Information on Smokers' Risk Perceptions and Use Intentions: A News Media Experiment.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; Michelle T Bover Manderski; M Jane Lewis; Cristine D Delnevo
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-12-13

3.  Nutrition and Cancer Prevention: Why is the Evidence Lost in Translation?

Authors:  Katie M Di Sebastiano; Gayathri Murthy; Kristin L Campbell; Sophie Desroches; Rachel A Murphy
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  Healthy or not? The impact of conflicting health-related information on attentional resources.

Authors:  Patrick V Barnwell; Erick J Fedorenko; Richard J Contrada
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2021-09-18

5.  Effects of Prior Exposure to Conflicting Health Information on Responses to Subsequent Unrelated Health Messages: Results from a Population-Based Longitudinal Experiment.

Authors:  Rebekah H Nagler; Rachel I Vogel; Sarah E Gollust; Marco C Yzer; Alexander J Rothman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2022-05-18

6.  Effects of Media Exposure to Conflicting Information About Mammography: Results From a Population-based Survey Experiment.

Authors:  Rebekah H Nagler; Marco C Yzer; Alexander J Rothman
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-08-29

7.  The effects of HIV testing advocacy messages on test acceptance: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Monica L Kasting; Anthony D Cox; Dena Cox; Kenneth H Fife; Barry P Katz; Gregory D Zimet
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Caught in the Crossfire: How Contradictory Information and Norms on Social Media Influence Young Women's Intentions to Receive HPV Vaccination in the United States and China.

Authors:  Shuya Pan; Di Zhang; Jingwen Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-03

9.  Public perceptions of conflicting information surrounding COVID-19: Results from a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults.

Authors:  Rebekah H Nagler; Rachel I Vogel; Sarah E Gollust; Alexander J Rothman; Erika Franklin Fowler; Marco C Yzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Israeli news media coverage of COVID-19 and use of cannabis and tobacco: A case study of inconsistent risk communication.

Authors:  Sharon R Sznitman; Nehama Lewis
Journal:  Int J Drug Policy       Date:  2022-03-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.