Literature DB >> 34529184

Functional calibration does not improve the concurrent validity of magneto-inertial wearable sensor-based thorax and lumbar angle measurements when compared with retro-reflective motion capture.

Daniel S Cottam1, Amity C Campbell2, Paul C Davey2, Peter Kent2,3, Bruce C Elliott4, Jacqueline A Alderson4,5,6.   

Abstract

Magneto-inertial measurement unit (MIMU) systems allow calculation of simple sensor-to-sensor Euler angles, though this process does not address sensor-to-segment alignment, which is important for deriving meaningful MIMU-based kinematics. Functional sensor-to-segment calibrations have improved concurrent validity for elbow and knee angle measurements but have not yet been comprehensively investigated for trunk or sport-specific movements. This study aimed to determine the influence of MIMU functional calibration on thorax and lumbar joint angles during uni-planar and multi-planar, sport-specific tasks. It was hypothesised that functionally calibrating segment axes prior to angle decomposition would produce smaller differences than a non-functional method when both approaches were compared with concurrently collected 3D retro-reflective derived angles. Movements of 10 fast-medium cricket bowlers were simultaneously recorded by MIMUs and retro-reflective motion capture. Joint angles derived from four different segment definitions were compared, with three incorporating functionally defined axes. Statistical parametric mapping and root mean squared differences (RMSD) quantified measurement differences one-dimensionally and zero-dimensionally, respectively. Statistical parametric mapping found no significant differences between MIMU and retro-reflective data for any method across bowling and uni-planar trunk movements. The RMSDs for the functionally calibrated methods and non-functional method were not significantly different. Functional segment calibration may be unnecessary for MIMU-based measurement of thorax and lumbar joint angles.
© 2021. Crown.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bowling; Inertial measurement unit; Trunk

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34529184     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-021-02440-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  21 in total

1.  An effortless procedure to align the local frame of an inertial measurement unit to the local frame of another motion capture system.

Authors:  Julien Chardonnens; Julien Favre; Kamiar Aminian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Functionally interpretable local coordinate systems for the upper extremity using inertial & magnetic measurement systems.

Authors:  W H K de Vries; H E J Veeger; A G Cutti; C Baten; F C T van der Helm
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Accuracy of inertial motion sensors in static, quasistatic, and complex dynamic motion.

Authors:  Alison Godwin; Michael Agnew; Joan Stevenson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Functional calibration procedure for 3D knee joint angle description using inertial sensors.

Authors:  J Favre; R Aissaoui; B M Jolles; J A de Guise; K Aminian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Three-dimensional lumbar segment kinetics of fast bowling in cricket.

Authors:  René E D Ferdinands; Uwe Kersting; R N Marshall
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Modification of the Grood and Suntay Joint Coordinate System equations for knee joint flexion.

Authors:  Danè Dabirrahmani; Michael Hogg
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Trunk inclination estimate during the sprint start using an inertial measurement unit: a validation study.

Authors:  Elena Bergamini; Pélagie Guillon; Valentina Camomilla; Hélène Pillet; Wafa Skalli; Aurelio Cappozzo
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 1.833

8.  Application of the joint coordinate system to three-dimensional joint attitude and movement representation: a standardization proposal.

Authors:  G K Cole; B M Nigg; J L Ronsky; M R Yeadon
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee.

Authors:  E S Grood; W J Suntay
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Lumbar load in adolescent fast bowlers: A prospective injury study.

Authors:  Helen Bayne; Bruce Elliott; Amity Campbell; Jacqueline Alderson
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 4.319

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.