| Literature DB >> 34526014 |
Min He1,2, Zhiqiang Zhong1,2, Deping Zeng1,2, Xiaobo Gong3, Zhibiao Wang4,5, Faqi Li6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acoustic cavitation plays an important role in the medical treatment using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), but unnecessarily strong cavitation also could deform the morphology and enlarge the size of lesions. It is known that the increase of ambient hydrostatic pressure (Pstat) can control the acoustic cavitation. But the question of how the decrease of Pstat and dissolved oxygen concentration (DOC) influence the strength of cavitation has not been thoroughly answered. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship among the Pstat, DOC and the strength of cavitation.Entities:
Keywords: Cavitation; Dissolved oxygen concentration; HIFU; Lesion; Sub-atmospheric pressure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34526014 PMCID: PMC8442382 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-021-00926-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Eng Online ISSN: 1475-925X Impact factor: 2.819
The comparison of DOC in degassed water and inside the tissue
| Dissolved oxygen concentration (mg/L) | Test in degassed water (mg/L) | Mean value in degassed water (mg/L) | Test in tissue (mg/L) | Mean value in tissue (mg/L) | Rate of deviation between water and tissue (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 1.07 | 1.04 | 0.95 | 1.05 | 0.77 |
| 0.99 | 1.06 | ||||
| 1.05 | 1.03 | ||||
| 0.98 | 1.10 | ||||
| 1.10 | 1.08 | ||||
| 1.5 | 1.48 | 1.52 | 1.53 | 1.54 | 1.45 |
| 1.40 | 1.57 | ||||
| 1.52 | 1.46 | ||||
| 1.60 | 1.61 | ||||
| 1.58 | 1.52 | ||||
| 2.0 | 1.98 | 2.02 | 2.10 | 2.03 | 0.40 |
| 2.06 | 2.03 | ||||
| 2.00 | 1.95 | ||||
| 1.98 | 2.09 | ||||
| 2.09 | 1.98 |
Fig. 1Broadband noise during HIFU exposure: a atmospheric pressure, b sub-atmospheric pressure. The black solid line was the baseline detected without HIFU exposure. The red, blue and purple solid lines represent the broadband noise signal at the DOC of 2.0 mg/L, 1.5 mg/L and 1.0 mg/L, respectively
Fig. 2B-mode ultrasound image before and after HIFU exposure. The white dotted circle flagged the HIFU focus zone. Hyper-echoic occurred under all conditions except at sub-atmospheric pressure with the DOC of 1.0 mg/L
Fig. 3Morphology variation of lesions in ex vivo bovine liver. The first row was experimented under the condition of atmospheric pressure, and the second row was experimented under the condition of sub-atmospheric pressure. The column represented the HIFU exposure conducted under the DOC of 2.0 mg/L, 1.5 mg/L and 1.0 mg/L. Lesion appeared under all conditions except at sub-atmospheric pressure with the DOC of 1.0 mg/L
Fig. 4Lesion volume variation in ex vivo bovine liver after HIFU exposure. At atmospheric pressure (1 bar), the volume of lesions in the 2.0 mg/L and 1.5 mg/L DOC group were 83.28 ± 14.56 mm3 and 76.84 ± 11.07 mm3, respectively. At sub-atmospheric pressure (0.1 bar), the volume of lesions in the 2.0 mg/L, 1.5 mg/L and 1.0 mg/L groups were 20.53 ± 5.54 mm3, 16.01 ± 4.22 mm3 and 0.00 ± 0.00 mm3, respectively. Lesion volume under atmospheric pressure was significantly different from that under sub-atmospheric pressure when DOC was kept the same. *Represents p < 0.05 for significance of difference between the two groups, **represents p > 0.05 for no significance of difference between the two groups
Fig. 5The flowchart of methods
Fig. 6Schematic diagram of the experimental system. The HIFU transducer was driven by the HIFU drive system. The input power was set on the PC. The PCD signal was acquired by the data acquisition card and shown on the PC. The ultrasound diagnostic scanner, which was controlled by PC, was used to scan the B-mode image of tissue